Repenser la recherche clinique en chirurgie oncologique. De l’opéra-comique au contrôle qualité

Patient experiences of participation in a radical thoracic surgical trial: findings from the Mesothelioma and Radical Surgery Trial 2 (MARS 2)

BACKGROUND

The Mesothelioma and Radical Surgery Trial (MARS 2) aims to evaluate a surgical procedure by comparing chemotherapy and surgery against chemotherapy alone. The pilot study for MARS 2 evaluated the viability of recruitment. Challenges have been reported in conducting clinical research into thoracic surgical treatments and evidence is required to improve our understanding of patient experiences of trial procedures, trial treatments and the factors that influence participation.

METHODS

This longitudinal qualitative study was nested within the MARS 2 pilot. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 15 participants in the MARS 2 trial. Interviews were conducted post-randomisation, post-surgery (surgery arm) and at 6 and 12 months. Altogether, 41 interviews were carried out. The data were analysed using framework techniques.

RESULTS

Challenges were identified regarding the volume and complexity of information given to participants, and their understanding of clinical equipoise and randomisation. Factors influencing participation included having an opportunity to undergo surgery, a self-assessment of their ability to cope with trial treatments, maintaining a positive approach and altruism. Obstacles included the logistics of traveling for treatment in an unfamiliar setting. Negative consequences of trial participation included increased uncertainty amplified by multiple care providers and unclear transition arrangements after the trial.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants' descriptions provided insights that have implications for care for mesothelioma trial patients. The need for healthcare staff to be alert to the potential for misunderstanding, particularly when presenting treatment options, was identified. Patients perceived and derived benefits from taking part in the trial but experienced some negative consequences. These should be anticipated and managed proactively.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02040272 . Registered on 20 January 2014.

Recent advances in the laboratory detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae

Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE), mainly Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli, have been increasing rapidly on a global scale and are considered to be significant health threats. The most common carbapenemases are KPCs, NDMs, OXA-48-like, IMPs and VIMs but their distribution and prevalence differs between countries. The accurate, simple, cost effective and rapid detection of carbapenemases in clinical laboratories is an important initial step to control the spread of CPE within institutions. The diversity of carbapenemases in general, has challenged a simple approach for the detection of most types of CPE. This article summarizes the current and describes newer techniques available for the detection of carbapenemases among Enterobacteriaceae. The authors also provide a simplified approach for the accurate and rapid detection of CPEs that can easily be implemented in a clinical diagnostic laboratory.