1
|
Al Qurashi AA, Shah Mardan QNM, Alzahrani IA, AlAlwan AQ, Bafail A, Alaa Adeen AM, Albahrani A, Aledwani BN, Halawani IR, AlBattal NZ, Mrad MA. Efficacy of Exclusive Fat Grafting for Breast Reconstruction: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2024:10.1007/s00266-024-03978-3. [PMID: 38772941 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-024-03978-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Exclusive fat grafting is an alternative method to implant- or flap- based reconstruction techniques following mastectomies or breast conservation therapies. Its efficacy has been explored before but new data has come to light, resulting in previous results becoming outdated. Concerns have also been raised about the oncological safety of this procedure which must be evaluated alongside the efficacy to gain a comprehensive understanding of the merits of this alternative technique. METHODS We queried the PubMed electronic database from its inception until August 2023 for studies evaluating the efficacy and oncological safety of exclusive fat grafting breast reconstruction following cancer-related mastectomy or breast conservation therapy. Results of the analysis were pooled and presented as means or valid proportions. Results of the analysis were pooled using a random-effects model and presented with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) where appropriate. RESULTS 41 studies were included in our analysis. Pooled results show that on average, 1.7 sessions of exclusive fat grafting were required to complete reconstruction in Breast Conservation Therapy (BCT) patients, with an average volume of 114.2 ml being injected. For mastectomy patients with irradiated breasts, 4.7 sessions were needed on average with 556.8 ml being required to complete reconstruction, compared to their non-irradiated Counterparts requiring only 2.6 sessions and 207.2 ml to complete reconstruction. Oncological recurrence events were found in 29/583 non-irradiated mastectomy patients (p = 0.014) and in 41/517 BCT patients (p = 0.301) CONCLUSION: Exclusive fat grafting is an oncologically safe and reasonably efficacious alternative to more common methods of breast reconstruction. More data is needed to fully characterize the oncological safety of this procedure in irradiated and non-irradiated mastectomy patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdullah A Al Qurashi
- College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Qutaiba N M Shah Mardan
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department, Hamad General Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | | | - Abdullah Q AlAlwan
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Security Forces Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Anas Bafail
- College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulqader Murad Alaa Adeen
- College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulaziz Albahrani
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, King Fahad Hospital, Al Hofuf, Saudi Arabia
| | - Batoul Najeeb Aledwani
- College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Nouf Z AlBattal
- College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohamed Amir Mrad
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Section, Department of Surgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, P.O. Box 3354, 11211, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Breast Reconstruction by Exclusive Lipofilling after Total Mastectomy for Breast Cancer: Description of the Technique and Evaluation of Quality of Life. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12020153. [PMID: 35207642 PMCID: PMC8876120 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12020153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Revised: 12/14/2021] [Accepted: 12/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The objective of this work was to describe the technique of exclusive lipofilling in breast reconstruction after total mastectomy, to evaluate the satisfaction and quality of life of the patients, and to explore current literature on the subject. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational multicentric study from January 2013 to April 2020. The modalities of surgery, esthetic result, and patient satisfaction were evaluated with the breast reconstruction module of BREAST-Q. Results: Complete data were available for 37 patients. The mean number of sessions was 2.2 (standard deviation 1.1), spread over an average of 6.8 months (SD 6.9). The average total volume of fat transferred was 566.4 mL. The complication rate was 18.9%. No severe complication was observed (Clavien–Dindo 3/4). Two patients were diagnosed with recurrence, in a metastatic mode (5.4%). The average satisfaction rate was 68.4% (SD 24.8) for psychosocial well-being and 64.5% (SD 24.1) for sexual well-being. The satisfaction rate was 60.2% (SD 20.9) for the image of the reconstructed breast and 82.7% (SD 21.9) for locoregional comfort. Conclusions: Breast reconstruction by exclusive lipofilling after total mastectomy provides satisfactory quality of life scores. The simplicity of the surgical technique and equipment required, and the high satisfaction rate confirm that lipofilling should be included in the panel of choice of breast reconstruction techniques.
Collapse
|
3
|
Efficacy of breast reconstruction with fat grafting: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2018; 71:1740-1750. [PMID: 30245019 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.08.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2018] [Revised: 08/10/2018] [Accepted: 08/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast reconstruction with fat grafting is a new alternative to prosthetic implants and flaps for women with breast cancer. In this study, we investigate the efficacy of fat grafting for breast reconstruction in a meta-analysis. METHODS The study followed the PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Studies were included if the patients underwent complete breast reconstruction with fat grafting as the only treatment modality. The number of fat grafting treatments needed to complete a breast reconstruction was modeled in a meta-analysis for five treatment categories: modified radical mastectomy, skin-sparing mastectomy, and breast-conserving surgery; the two mastectomy groups were subdivided into nonirradiated and irradiated. RESULTS Twenty-one studies were included in the meta-analysis. The studies comprised 1011 breast reconstructions in 834 patients. The estimated numbers of treatments to complete a reconstruction were 2.84-4.66 in the mastectomy groups and 1.72 in the breast-conserving surgery group. The number of fat grafting sessions needed to complete a breast reconstruction was significantly higher for the irradiated patients than for the nonirradiated patients (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the number of fat grafting sessions needed to complete a breast reconstruction after a modified radical mastectomy versus a skin-sparing mastectomy. CONCLUSIONS This study provides an evidence-based foundation for several practical issues related to breast reconstruction with fat grafting. The analysis showed that radiotherapy is the most important factor associated with the number of treatment sessions needed to complete a breast reconstruction and with the rate of complications.
Collapse
|