Thermo-ablation pulmonaire percutanée

Continuous positive airway pressure is unsafe for radiofrequency ablation of lung cancer under sedation: a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety of a minimum continuous positive airway pressure of 4 cmH2O (CPAP + 4) during computed tomography (CT)-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for lung malignancies under procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA).

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomised, single-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial with an open-label medical device conducted at a single tertiary university hospital in Barcelona, Spain. Forty-six patients over 18 years of age scheduled for CT-guided RFA of a malignant pulmonary tumour under PSA were randomised to receive either CPAP + 4 or a modified mask for placebo CPAP (Sham-CPAP). Exclusion criteria included contraindications for RFA, refusal to participate, inability to understand the procedure or tolerate the CPAP test, lung biopsy just prior to RFA, intercurrent diseases, or previous randomisation for additional pulmonary RFA. Primary outcomes were the percentage of patients reporting at least one serious adverse event (SAE), classification for complications from the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE), and Clavien-Dindo classifications for complications, hospital stay, and readmissions. Secondary outcomes included adverse events (AEs), respiratory parameters, airway management, and the local radiological efficacy of pulmonary ablation.

RESULTS

CPAP + 4 prolonged hospital stay (1.5 ± 1.1 vs. 1.0 ± 0 inpatient nights, p = 0.022) and increased the risk of AE post-RFA (odds ratio (95% CI): 4.250 (1.234 to 14.637), p = 0.021 with more pneumothorax cases (n = 5/22, 22.7% vs. n = 0/24, 0%, p = 0.019). Per-protocol analysis revealed more SAEs and CIRSE grade 3 complications in the CPAP + 4 group (23.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.036). No significant differences were found in the effectiveness of oxygenation, ventilation, or pulmonary ablation.

CONCLUSION

CPAP is unsafe during CT-guided RFA for lung cancer under PSA even at the lowest pressure setting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.Gov, ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT02117908, Registered 11 April 2014, https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov/study/NCT02117908 CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This study highlights the hazards of continuous positive airway pressure during radiofrequency ablation of lung cancer, even at minimal pressures, deeming it unsafe under procedural sedation and analgesia in pulmonary interventional procedures. Findings provide crucial insights to prioritise patient safety.

KEY POINTS

No prior randomised controlled trials on CPAP safety in percutaneous lung thermo-ablation. Standardised outcome measures are crucial for radiology research. CPAP during lung RFA raises hospital stay and the risk of complications. CPAP is unsafe during CT-guided RFA of lung cancer under procedural sedoanalgesia.

Cone-beam computed tomography image-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for lung nodules in a hybrid operating room: an initial experience

OBJECTIVES

The experience of thermal ablation of lung lesions is limited, especially performing the procedure under localisation by cone-beam CT in the hybrid operation room (HOR). Here, we present the experience of microwave ablation (MWA) of lung nodules in the HOR.

METHODS

We reviewed patients who underwent image-guide percutaneous MWA for lung nodules in the HOR under general anaesthesia between July 2020 and July 2022. The workflow in the HOR including the pre-procedure preparation, anaesthesia consideration, operation methods, and postoperative care was clearly described.

RESULTS

Forty lesions in 33 patients who underwent MWA under general anaesthesia (GA) in the HOR were analysed. Twenty-seven patients had a single pulmonary nodule, and the remaining six patients had multiple nodules. The median procedure time was 41.0 min, and the median ablation time per lesion was 6.75 min. The median global operation room time was 115.0 min. The median total dose area product was 14881 μGym2. The median ablation volume was 111.6 cm3. All patients were discharged from the hospital with a median postoperative stay of 1 day. Four patients had pneumothorax, two patients had pleural effusion during the first month of outpatient follow-up, and one patient reported intercostal neuralgia during the 3-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Thermal ablation of pulmonary nodules under GA in the HOR can be performed safely and efficiently if we follow the workflow provided. The procedure provides an alternative to managing pulmonary nodules in patients.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Thermal ablation of pulmonary nodules under GA in the HOR can be performed safely and efficiently if the provided workflow is followed.

KEY POINTS

• We tested the feasibility of microwave ablation of lung lesions performed in a hybrid operating room. • To this end, we provide a description of microwave ablation of the lung under cone-beam CT localisation. • We describe a workflow by which ablation of the pulmonary nodule can be performed safely under general anaesthesia.

Safety and efficacy of percutaneous microwave ablation for post-procedural haemostasis: a bi-central retrospective study focusing on safety and efficacy

OBJECTIVE

To review safety and efficacy of percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) for post-procedural haemostasis.

METHODS

Institutional databases retrospective research identified 10 cases of iatrogenic bleeding who underwent percutaneous MWA for post-procedural haemostasis. Ultrasound examination with Doppler and contrast enhancement identified a source of active bleeding prior to ablation; additionally they were used as guiding modality for antenna insertion whilst, post-ablation, assessed the lack of active extravasation. Target locations included liver intercostal space spleen and thyroid gland. Technical success was defined as positioning of the antenna on the desired location. Treatment end point was considered the disappearance of active extravasation in both Doppler imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

RESULTS

Technical success (i.e. positioning of the antenna on the desired location) was achieved in all cases. No complications were noted. All patients post MWA remained haemodynamically stable with no need for transfusion and were discharged from the hospital the next morning. Imaging and clinical follow-up in all patients before exiting the hospital did not depict any sign of active extravasation or bleeding.

CONCLUSION

Our limited experience reports preliminary data showing that MWA could be added in the armamentarium of percutaneous therapies for iatrogenic bleeding. More prospective studies with larger patient samples are necessary for verification of this technique as well as for drawing broader conclusions in order to evaluate the place of percutaneous ablation in the treatment algorithm of haemorrhage.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Percutaneous ablation might have a role in haemostasis in well-selected cases.