Étude du chimérisme après allogreffe de cellules hématopoïétiques : recommandations de la Société francophone de greffe de moelle et de thérapie cellulaire (SFGM-TC)

Can novel methods replace the gold standard chimerism method after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation?

After hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, chimerism assay is a useful approach to monitor the success of the transplant and to select the appropriate treatment strategy, such as donor leukocyte infusion or immunosuppressive drug dosage. Short tandem repeat PCR is the method that has been accepted as the gold standard for chimerism. However, it has not yet been sufficient to detect mixed chimerism in patients with minimal residual disease. Simultaneously, recent years have been marked by developing sensitive, high-throughput, and accurate molecular genetic assays. These novel methods have subsequently been adapted for the analysis of post-transplant chimerism. In this review, we discuss the technical features of both novel and conventional gold standard chimerism assays. We also discuss their advantages and disadvantages.

A one-step assay for sorted CD3+ cell purity and chimerism after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

A hematopoietic chimerism assay is the laboratory test for monitoring engraftment and quantifying the proportions of donor and recipient cells after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients. Flow cytometry is the reference method for determining the purity of CD3⁺ cells on the chimerism of selected CD3⁺ cells. In the present study, we developed a single-step procedure that combines the CD3⁺ purity assay (using the PCR-based Non-T Genomic Detection Kit from Accumol, Calgary, Canada) and the qPCR chimerism monitoring assay (the QTRACE qPCR assay from Jeta Molecular, Utrecht, the Netherlands). First, for the CD3⁺ purity assay, we used a PCR-friendly protocol by changing the composition of the ready-to-use reaction tubes (buffer and taq polymerase) and obtained a satisfactory calibration plot (R² = 0.8924) with a DNA reference scale of 2 ng/μl. Next, 29 samples (before and after CD3 positive selection) were analyzed, the mean cell purity was, respectively, 19.6% ± 6.45 and 98.9% ± 1.07 in the flow cytometry assay; 26.8% ± 7.63 and 98.5% ± 1.79 in the PCR-based non-T genomic detection assay. Our results showed that the CD3⁺ purity assay using a qPCR kit is a robust alternative to the flow cytometry assay and is associated with time savings when combined with a qPCR chimerism assay.