[Testicular tumors: A diagnostic challenge of imaging]

Radiological features characterising indeterminate testes masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis

CONTEXT

The use of scrotal ultrasonography (SUS) has increased the detection rate of indeterminate testicular masses. Defining radiological characteristics that identify malignancy may reduce the number of men undergoing unnecessary radical orchidectomy.

OBJECTIVE

To define which SUS or scrotal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics can predict benign or malignant disease in pre- or post-pubertal males with indeterminate testicular masses.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with Cochrane Collaboration guidance. Medline, Embase, Cochrane controlled trials and systematic reviews databases were searched from (1970 to 26 March 2021). Benign and malignant masses were classified using the reported reference test: i.e., histopathology, or 12 months progression-free radiological surveillance. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool (QUADAS-2).

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

A total of 32 studies were identified, including 1692 masses of which 28 studies and 1550 masses reported SUS features, four studies and 142 masses reported MRI features. Meta-analysis of different SUS (B-mode) values in post-pubertal men demonstrated that a size of ≤0.5 cm had a significantly lower odds ratio (OR) of malignancy compared to masses of >0.5 cm (P < 0.001). Comparison of masses of 0.6-1.0 cm and masses of >1.5 cm also demonstrated a significantly lower OR of malignancy (P = 0.04). There was no significant difference between masses of 0.6-1.0 and 1.1-1.5 cm. SUS in post-pubertal men also had a statistically significantly lower OR of malignancy for heterogenous masses vs homogenous masses (P = 0.04), hyperechogenic vs hypoechogenic masses (P < 0.01), normal vs increased enhancement (P < 0.01), and peripheral vs central vascularity (P < 0.01), respectively. There were limited data on pre-pubertal SUS, pre-pubertal MRI and post-pubertal MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis identifies radiological characteristics that have a lower OR of malignancy and may be of value in the management of the indeterminate testis mass.

Leydig Cell Tumors of the Testis: An Update of the Imaging Characteristics of a Not So Rare Lesion

Simple Summary

Stromal tumors of the testis are rare. However, among this group, Leydig cell tumors (LCT) are the most frequent, and recent studies suggest that LCTs account for up to 22% of small testicular nodules. It is now accepted that small LCTs can benefit from testis-sparing surgery or in some selected cases radiological surveillance. Since percutaneous testicular biopsy is still not recommended, the diagnosis of LCT rests on multimodal imaging techniques. Therefore, it is essential for the radiologist and the urologist to know the main imaging features of LCTs in ultrasound and MRI.

Abstract

Pre-operative testicular tumor characterization is a challenge for radiologists and urologists. New data concerning imaging approaches or immunochemistry markers improve the management of patients presenting with a testicular tumor, sometimes avoiding radical orchiectomy. In the past 20 years, imaging modalities, especially ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), improved, allowing for great progress in lesion characterization. Leydig cell tumors (LCT) are rare testicular tumors developing from the stromal tissue, with relatively scarce literature, as most of the studies focus on the much more frequent germ cell tumors. However, with the increase in testicular sonography numbers, the incidence of LCT appears much higher than expected, with some studies reporting up to 22% of small testicular nodules. Multimodal ultrasound using Doppler, Elastography, or injection of contrast media can provide crucial arguments to differentiate LCT from germ cell tumors. Multiparametric MRI is a second intention exam, but it allows for extraction of quantifiable data to assess the diagnosis of LCT. The aims of this article are to review the latest data regarding LCT imaging features, using multimodal ultrasound and multiparametric MRI, and to focus on the peculiar aspect of the testis of patients with Klinefelter’s syndrome. The possibility of an LCT should be raised in front of a small hypoechoic tumor with a marked corbelling hypervascularization in an otherwise normal testicular pulp. Ultrasonographic modules, such as ultrasensitive Doppler, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, or elastography, can be used to reinforce the suspicion of LCT. MRI provides objective data regarding vascularization and enhancement kinetics.

Imaging of Pediatric Testicular and Para-Testicular Tumors: A Pictural Review

Pre- and post-pubertal testicular tumors are two distinct entities in terms of epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment. Most pre-pubertal tumors are benign; the most frequent are teratomas, and the most common malignant tumors are yolk-sac tumors. Post-pubertal tumors are similar to those found in adults and are more likely to be malignant. Imaging plays a pivotal role in the diagnosis, staging and follow-up. The appearance on ultrasonography (US) is especially helpful to differentiate benign lesions that could be candidates for testis-sparing surgery from malignant ones that require radical orchidectomy. Some specific imaging patterns are described for benign lesions: epidermoid cysts, mature cystic teratomas and Leydig-cell tumors. Benign tumors tend to be well-circumscribed, with decreased Doppler flow on US, but malignancy should be suspected when US shows an inhomogeneous, not-well-described lesion with internal blood flow. Imaging features should always be interpreted in combination with clinical and biological data including serum levels of tumor markers and even intra-operative frozen sections in case of conservative surgery to raise any concerns of malignity. This review provides an overview of imaging features of the most frequent testicular and para-testicular tumor types in children and the value of imaging in disease staging and monitoring children with testicular tumors or risk factors for testicular tumors.

Magnetic Fields and Cancer: Epidemiology, Cellular Biology, and Theranostics

Humans are exposed to a complex mix of man-made electric and magnetic fields (MFs) at many different frequencies, at home and at work. Epidemiological studies indicate that there is a positive relationship between residential/domestic and occupational exposure to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields and some types of cancer, although some other studies indicate no relationship. In this review, after an introduction on the MF definition and a description of natural/anthropogenic sources, the epidemiology of residential/domestic and occupational exposure to MFs and cancer is reviewed, with reference to leukemia, brain, and breast cancer. The in vivo and in vitro effects of MFs on cancer are reviewed considering both human and animal cells, with particular reference to the involvement of reactive oxygen species (ROS). MF application on cancer diagnostic and therapy (theranostic) are also reviewed by describing the use of different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) applications for the detection of several cancers. Finally, the use of magnetic nanoparticles is described in terms of treatment of cancer by nanomedical applications for the precise delivery of anticancer drugs, nanosurgery by magnetomechanic methods, and selective killing of cancer cells by magnetic hyperthermia. The supplementary tables provide quantitative data and methodologies in epidemiological and cell biology studies. Although scientists do not generally agree that there is a cause-effect relationship between exposure to MF and cancer, MFs might not be the direct cause of cancer but may contribute to produce ROS and generate oxidative stress, which could trigger or enhance the expression of oncogenes.