Regulation of postburn ischemia by α- and β-adrenoceptor subtypes

Coronary Vasospasm After Burn Injury: First Described Case Series of a Lethal Lesion

Burn injuries generate multisystem physiological derangements. The authors present a case series of three patients developing acute coronary syndrome (ACS) stemming from coronary vasospasm (CVS) over a course of 5 months. This etiology of ACS is significant as it has previously not been described in burn patients and requires a different management algorithm than vaso-occlusive disease.All patients were admitted to a single accredited burn unit. Burn mechanisms were flash burn, chemical fire, and house fire. TBSA were 20%, 72%, and 31%, respectively. Ages were 67-, 41-, and 52-year-old men. All smoked tobacco, and one had diabetes and coronary artery disease. CVS presented with acute onset ST elevations, severe bradycardia, and cardiac arrest in all. Diagnosis was made via EKG and angiography. Treatment was undertaken with nitrates and calcium channel blockers. One of the patients died of refractory disease.The authors identified CVS in burn patients with an incidence of 2% of admissions and accounting for 17% of our burn mortality during this period. To date, there is no linkage between CVS and burns described in humans; however, there is a well-described animal model in rats. The risk factors for CVS are common among burn patients, particularly smoking and endothelial dysfunction. CVS may be a significant cause of ACS in burn patients, and it should be considered in the setting of ACS especially with a negative angiography. Knowledge of this disease state can change burn management to mitigate risk and accommodate specific cardiac treatments.

Up-regulation of α1-adrenoceptors in burn and keloid scars

Stimulation of α₁-adrenoceptors evokes inflammatory cytokine production, boosts neurogenic inflammation and pain, and influences cellular migration and proliferation. Hence, these receptors may play a role both in normal and abnormal wound healing. To investigate this, the distribution of α₁-adrenoceptors in skin biopsies of burn scars (N=17), keloid scars (N=12) and unscarred skin (N=17) was assessed using immunohistochemistry. Staining intensity was greater on vascular smooth muscle in burn scars than in unscarred tissue, consistent with heightened expression of α₁-adrenoceptors. In addition, expression of α₁-adrenoceptors was greater on dermal nerve fibres, blood vessels and fibroblasts in keloid scars than in either burn scars or unscarred skin. These findings suggest that increased vascular expression of α₁-adrenoceptors could alter circulatory dynamics both in burn and keloid scars. In addition, the augmented expression of α₁-adrenoceptors in keloid tissue may contribute to processes that produce or maintain keloid scars, and might be a source of the uncomfortable sensations often associated with these scars.

Stress, immunity and skin collagen integrity: evidence from animal models and clinical conditions

The skin is the largest organ of the human body and plays a major role in maintaining homeostasis and protection. As the main component of skin, collagen has a key role in providing integrity and elasticity to this organ. Several factors, including autoimmune disease, aging, and stress, can change the quantity and integrity of skin collagen. These factors impair collagen quality and consequently affect skin function. Stress seems to affect the integrity of skin collagen through glucocorticoid-mediated processes that alter its synthesis and degradation. Glucocorticoids also affect skin quality through modulation of the immune system. This review will briefly present comprehensive data from both animal and human studies delineating processes that modulate alterations in collagen in general, and will treat in more detail the consequences of stress on skin collagen.

Transforming growth factor-beta and angiotensin in fibrosis and burn injuries

This review considers the roles of transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta), the signaling Smad proteins, and angiotensin II (AT II) in conditions leading to human fibrosis. The goal is to update the burn practitioner and researcher about this important pathway and to introduce AT II as a possible synergistic signal to TGF-beta in burn scarring. Literature searches of the MEDLINE database were performed for English manuscripts combinations of TGF-beta, Smad, angiotensin, fibrosis, burn, and scar. AT II and TGF-beta both activate the Smad protein system, which leads to the expression of genes related to fibrosis. In fibrotic conditions, such as tubulointerstitial nephritis, systemic sclerosis, and myocardial infarctions, AT II acts both independently and synergistically with TGF-beta. Both AT II and TGF-beta act through a messenger system, the Smad proteins that lead to excessive extracellular matrix formation. Treatment and research implications are reviewed. The interaction between AT II and TGF-beta leading to fibrosis is well described in some human diseases. This pathway may be of importance in human burn scarring as well.

Impact of shock requiring norepinephrine on the accuracy and reliability of subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of circulatory shock requiring norepinephrine therapy on the accuracy and reliability of a subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) in critically ill patients.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A prospective, validation study of a medical intensive care unit at a university hospital was carried out.

METHODS

Continuous glucose monitoring was performed subcutaneously in 50 consecutive patients on intensive insulin therapy (IIT), who were assessed according to the a priori strata of circulatory shock requiring norepinephrine therapy or not.

RESULTS

A total of 736 pairs of sensor glucose (SG)/blood glucose (BG) values were analysed (502 without and 234 with norepinephrine therapy). For all values, repeated measures Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference of 0.08 mmol/l (limits of agreement: -1.26 and 1.43 mmol/l). Circulatory shock requiring norepinephrine therapy did not influence the relation of arterial BG with SG in a multivariable random effects linear regression analysis. The covariates norepinephrine dose, body mass index (BMI), glucose level and severity of illness also had no influence. Insulin titration grid analysis showed that 98.6% of the data points were in the acceptable treatment zone. No data were in the life-threatening zone.

CONCLUSIONS

Circulatory shock requiring norepinephrine therapy, as well as other covariates, had no influence on the accuracy and reliability of the CGMS in critically ill patients.