Characterization strategies for the functional assessment of the cutaneous lesion

A systematic review of objective burn scar measurements

BACKGROUND

Problematic scarring remains a challenging aspect to address in the treatment of burns and can significantly affect the quality of life of the burn survivor. At present, there are few treatments available in the clinic to control adverse scarring, but experimental pharmacological anti-scarring strategies are now beginning to emerge. Their comparative success must be based on objective measurements of scarring, yet currently the clinical assessment of scars is not carried out systematically and is mostly based on subjective review of patients. However, several techniques and devices are being introduced that allow objective analysis of the burn scar. The aim of this article is to evaluate various objective measurement tools currently available and recommend a useful panel that is suitable for use in clinical trials of anti-scarring therapies.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was done using the Web of Science, PubMed and Cochrane databases. The identified devices were then classified and grouped according to the parameters they measured. The tools were then compared and assessed in terms of inter- and intra-rater reproducibility, ease of use and cost.

RESULTS

After duplicates were removed, 5062 articles were obtained in the search. After further screening, 157 articles which utilised objective burn scar measurement systems or tools were obtained. The scar measurement devices can be broadly classified into those measuring colour, metric variables, texture, biomechanical properties and pathophysiological disturbances.

CONCLUSIONS

Objective scar measurement tools allow the accurate and reproducible evaluation of scars, which is important for both clinical and scientific use. However, studies to evaluate their relative performance and merits of these tools are scarce, and there remain factors, such as itch and pain, which cannot be measured objectively. On reviewing the available evidence, a panel of devices for objective scar measurement is recommended consisting of the 3D cameras (Eykona/Lifeviz/Vectra H1) for surface area and volume, DSM II colorimeter for colour, Dermascan high-frequency ultrasound for scar thickness and Cutometer for skin elasticity and pliability.

Burn scar assessment: A systematic review of objective scar assessment tools

PURPOSE

All deep second and third degree burns are at risk to develop hypertrophic scars which can severely undermine the quality of survival. To assess the severity of scarring, several technical devices or tools have been introduced to evaluate one or more aspects of the scar, enabling comparison of different treatment protocols and allowing an objective follow-up. The objective of this study was to review which tools can be used in objective burn scar assessment.

BASIC PROCEDURES

The Systematic literature search involving PubMed, the Web of Science (incl. Science Citation Index).

MAIN FINDINGS

51 articles with burn scar assessment as main topic were found. Several characteristics of the scar can be assessed, such as color, metric features and elasticity, but none of the available tools covers the whole aspect of the scar. Especially subjective factors such as pain and itching cannot be assessed with those tools, in spite of their great impact on the patient's quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Scar tools enable objective and reproducible evaluation of scars, which is essential for scientific studies and medico-legal purposes, and in selected cases for the clinical follow-up of an individual patient. Further studies to evaluate these tools on scars are nevertheless required.

A minimally invasive human in vivo cutaneous wound model for the evaluation of innate skin reactivity and healing status

Individual variability in skin reactivity and healing capacity after trauma are important clinical issues. The aims were to develop an in vivo, human wound model based on a standardised minimal skin injury and to demonstrate therapeutic effect of simple wound therapies in terms of morphological wound outcome with changes in skin blood perfusion as a quantified indicator of wound healing. In a series of experiments, wounds were induced on the normal forearm skin of volunteers using a blood collection lancet. This was well tolerated. Wounds were assessed by naked eye examination or laser Doppler perfusion imaging (LDPI) at baseline and at up to 6 further time points up to 96 h in control wounds and wounds treated by commonly used occlusive dressing options. Assessment by clinical observation with 10x magnification showed over 96 h a progression of erythema, surface crust, a new keratinisation layer and finally healed areas. LDPI quantifying wound erythema showed a peak at 24 h and near normal levels at 96 h. Inter-individual variability was evident but intra-individual variability was much less pronounced. Wounds treated with occlusion showed a statistically significant more rapid return to baseline blood perfusion as measured by LDPI compared to controls supported by favourable healing parameters in the clinical assessment. The paper exemplifies use of non-invasive, bioengineering technique for quantification of individual innate variability in skin reactivity, wound healing capacity and therapeutic effect in a well-tolerated in vivo, human, minimal skin trauma model.

Medicolegal evaluation of aesthetic impairment: particularities of post-burn scars

Burns are serious injuries with incidence decreasing with the increasing efficacy of prevention campaigns. Their cause may be non-intentional or criminal. Thanks to advances in burn management, mortality has declined; however, the sequelae are more severe. The medical expert must be familiar with this field in order to carry out precise clinical evaluation so that individual compensation may be determined by the judge. Aesthetic damage, which is purely a non-economic loss, is difficult to assess, as it is dependent on the subjective opinion of the medical expert. The principle of financial compensation for aesthetic impairment is an imperfect one, but it gives victims a satisfactory compensation to which they attach importance. Without detailing the various national compensation systems, we review the burn patient's examination by the medical expert with particular attention to the specific characteristics of burn scars, their course and aesthetic impact.