The impact of major trauma network triage systems on patients with major burns

Associations of urban versus rural patient residence on outcomes after burn: A national inpatient sample database study

INTRODUCTION

Burn patients in rural areas may encounter poorer outcomes associated with barriers to care; however, residence has not been studied in a large sample. The association between rural-versus-urban residence and outcomes after burn was examined using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database.

METHODS

Using the 2019 NIS database, patients over 18 years with a primary diagnosis of burn or corrosive injury were included. Level of urbanization was categorized into six groups. Outcomes after burn such as in-hospital mortality, multifactorial shock, prolonged mechanical ventilation, length of stay, and total costs were analyzed after adjusting for demographic factors and hospital characteristics.

RESULTS

We included 4671 records, which represented a weighted population of 23,085 patients. Rural residence was associated with higher percentage of prior transfer but not in-hospital mortality. Compared to the most urbanized counties, encounters from the most rural counties were associated with higher odds of shock (aOR:2.62, 99% CI: 1.04-6.56, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

Burn encounters from less urbanized counties did not experience differences in mortality, rates of skin grafting, prolonged mechanical ventilation, length of stay, or overall costs. However, odds of shock were higher among the least urbanized counties. Despite improved triage and transportation systems across the US, disparities and challenges exist for burn patients from rural residence.

Volcanic disruption: the impact of Whakaari White Island on the provision of elective surgical care in Counties Manukau

INTRODUCTION

On 9 December 2019, Whakaari White Island erupted while 47 people were on the island. Thirty-one people were subsequently hospitalized. Fourteen volcanic burn victims were managed at the National Burns Centre at Middlemore Hospital. Between December 2019 and March 2020 these patients required 124 procedures in theatre, using 23 709 operative minutes. Elective surgical lists were cancelled to fulfil this demand for acute operating theatre time and theatre staff.

OBJECTIVES

To quantify the elective surgical resource lost in the aftermath of the Whakaari White Island eruption by surgical specialty.

METHODS

A data set listing all surgical procedures undertaken within Counties Manukau District Health Board during the period 1 December 2019-1 March 2020 and the corresponding months from the preceding 3 years was analysed. Sum operating time and procedures post-Whakaari were compared with the average of the prior 3 years to quantify loss in resource.

RESULTS

In the 3 months post-Whakaari, 698 fewer elective operations were completed across all surgical specialties than the average of the previous 3 years, a decrease of 26.3%. All major surgical specialties except urology showed an absolute decrease in elective procedures completed. The most significant decrease was the 59.1% (533 procedures) loss in plastic surgery elective procedures, with no sign of recovery by March 2021.

CONCLUSIONS

The plastic surgery department was the worst affected by the Whakaari disaster. Overall elective surgical delivery within Counties Manukau was substantially impacted, and would not yet recover by the time of the national COVID-19 lockdown in March 2020.

Inappropriate Transfer of Burn Patients: A 5-Year Retrospective at a Single Center

OBJECTIVE

Burn injuries have an annual incidence exceeding 40,000. The Burn Center Referral Criteria published by the American Burn Association (ABA) serve to guide health centers in determining appropriateness of patient transfer to a specialized center. With inappropriate transfer rates reaching up to 77%, reliance on the ABA criteria is critical as the decision to transfer a patient can impose significant costs to both the patient and healthcare system. The aim of this study is to evaluate the appropriateness of all burn patient transfers to a single burn center over a 5-year period and assess the potential role of telemedicine to optimize the assessment and care of this patient population.

METHODS

A 5-year retrospective review was conducted to all burn patients transferred or consulted for transfer to our burn center between January 2013 and January 2017. After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 767 cases were analyzed, with 612 ultimately being transferred. Outcome measures included basic clinical and demographic information, as well as logistical burn and transfer data such as percent total body surface area and transfer distance. After data collection, 5-year descriptive trends were analyzed, and the ABA criteria were applied to each patient case to evaluate appropriateness of transfer. Patients transferred despite not meeting at least one of the ABA criteria were classified as inappropriately transferred.

RESULTS

A total of 25 patients (3.2%) were found to be inappropriate transfers. Statistical analysis compared appropriately transferred patients (n = 587) with those inappropriately transferred. Overall, inappropriately transferred patients were more likely to have superficial partial thickness burns (76% vs 46%, P = 0.05), were less likely to need surgery (4% vs 22%, P < 0.05), and had a higher incidence of upper extremity burns (32% vs 4%, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study increases awareness of the most commonly seen presentation of inappropriately transferred burn patients over a 5-year period at our center. Given the advent of telemedicine, the ability of institutions to pinpoint a subset of patients most vulnerable to inappropriate transfer will allow for a streamlining of resources that will serve to benefit both patients and the health system.

Does Increased Patient Load Improve Mortality in Burns?: Identifying Benchmark Parameters Defining Quality of Burn Care

INTRODUCTION

In burn care, as in other medical fields, there is a tendency to increase the required number of patients for center certifications. Does the increase in patient load automatically improve the quality of burn care? What are the benchmark parameters that have been shown to improve burn care?

METHODS

To answer these questions, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Livivo were searched from inception through January 2018 for all studies evaluating the influence of treatment parameters on outcomes in different burn care settings.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies were included in this systematic review. In adults, not a single study showed a decreased mortality due to a higher patient load. However, in children, 2 studies demonstrated a further decrease of the already low mortality due to an increase in patient load. In contrast to patient load, benchmark parameters that had a significant influence on the outcome of burn care for adults and children were: single bed isolation, residency programs, American Burn Association certifications of burn centers, speed of wound closure, and standard operating procedures for burn care.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review demonstrates that a clear correlation between patient load and mortality reduction in adult burn treatment is not supported by the existing literature, requiring future studies. In contrast, all efforts aiming to improve the quality of burn care, such as isolation of burn patients, speed of wound closure, American Burn Association verification and especially standard operating procedures for burn care improve survival and quality of burn care.