Assessment of the impact of oxandrolone on outcomes in burn injured patients

A review of the most impactful published pharmacotherapy-pertinent literature of 2019 and 2020 for clinicians caring for patients with thermal or inhalation injury

Keeping abreast with current literature can be challenging, especially for practitioners caring for patients sustaining thermal or inhalation injury. Practitioners caring for patients with thermal injuries publish in a wide variety of journals, which further increases the complexity for those with resource limitations. Pharmacotherapy research continues to be a minority focus in primary literature. This review is a renewal of previous years' work to facilitate extraction and review of the most recent pharmacotherapy-centric studies in patients with thermal and inhalation injury. Sixteen geographically dispersed, board-certified pharmacists participated in the review. A MeSH-based, filtered search returned 1,536 manuscripts over the previous 2-year period. After manual review and exclusions, only 98 (6.4%) manuscripts were determined to have a potential impact on current pharmacotherapy practices and included in the review. A summary of the 10 articles that scored highest are included in the review. Nearly half of the reviewed manuscripts were assessed to lack a significant impact on current practice. Despite an increase in published literature over the previous 2-year review, the focus and quality remain unchanged. There remains a need for investment in well-designed, high impact, pharmacotherapy-pertinent research for patients sustaining thermal or inhalation injuries.

Oxandrolone in the Treatment of Burn Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Severe burns induce a profound hypermetabolic response, leading to a prolonged state of catabolism associated with organ dysfunction and delay of wound healing. Oxandrolone, a synthetic testosterone analog, may alleviate the hypermetabolic catabolic state thereby decreasing associated morbidity. However, current literature has reported mixed outcomes on complications following Oxandrolone use, specifically liver and lung function. We conducted an updated systematic review and meta-analysis studying the effects of Oxandrolone on mortality, length of hospital stay, progressive liver dysfunction, and nine secondary outcomes. We searched Pubmed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane Databases of Systematic Reviews and Randomized Controlled Trials. Thirty-one randomized control trials and observational studies were included. Basic science and animal studies were excluded. Only studies comparing Oxandrolone to standard of care, or placebo, were included. Oxandrolone did not affect rates of mortality (relative risk [RR]: 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.47 to 1.08; P = .11) or progressive liver dysfunction (RR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.59 to 1.85; P = .88), but did decrease length of stay in hospital. Oxandrolone significantly increased weight regain, bone mineral density, percent lean body mass, and decreased wound healing time for donor graft sites. Oxandrolone did not change the incidence of transient liver dysfunction or mechanical ventilation requirements. There is evidence to suggest that Oxandrolone is a beneficial adjunct to the acute care of burn patients; shortening hospital stays and improving several growth and wound healing parameters. It does not appear that Oxandrolone increases the risk of progressive or transient liver injury, although monitoring liver enzymes is recommended.

Oxandrolone in Patients on Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Case Series

Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) induces a systemic inflammatory response, which may progress to persistent inflammation, immunosuppression, and catabolism syndrome (PICS). The anabolic steroid oxandrolone may improve the metabolic aberrations of PICS. We report our experience with 3 patients on VV ECMO who received oxandrolone after demonstrating refractory catabolism on serial nitrogen balance (NB) studies or persistent weakness. Patients in cases 1 and 3 were started on oxandrolone on VV ECMO days 45 and 29, respectively, for negative NB despite nutrition optimization. The case 2 patient started oxandrolone for persistent weakness 68 days after cannulation. All patients demonstrated improvements in NB results. One patient developed mild transaminitis while on oxandrolone, which did not alter his medication course and resolved after the medication was discontinued. The impact of oxandrolone on functional capacity varied between patients. Oxandrolone may be beneficial in persistently catabolic VV ECMO patients to improve NB results. In some patients, this may support functional recovery. Additional research is needed to identify optimal patients for therapy and to investigate the impact of oxandrolone in this population.