Can systemic inflammatory response syndrome score at admission predict clinical outcome in patients with severe burns?

Effect of aerobic exercise on neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-lymphocyte ratio, and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio in burn patients: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the effects of aerobic exercises in addition to standard treatment on parameters such as neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR) in patients with burns.

METHODS

A total of 31 hospitalized patients included in the study were divided into two groups using covariate adaptive randomization method according to burn percentage and burn type (1st:standard treatment, 2nd: standard treatment + aerobic training). NLR, PLR, and LMR were evaluated for 5 weeks in all groups. Independent samples t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to examine differences between the two groups. For comparing more than two groups, Friedman's test was used for non-normally distributed variables and Bonferroni test was used as the post hoc pairwise comparison method.

RESULTS

Intragroup comparison of individuals in group 1 showed that the NLR values on days 7 and 14 were significantly higher than those on days 28 and 35 (p < 0.05). Intragroup comparison of individuals in group 2 showed that the NLR values on days 1, 7, and 14 were significantly higher than those on days 21 and 35. Additionally, the NLR values on day 14 were higher than those on day 28. Individuals in group 1 showed a significant increase in PLR values each week (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of aerobic training to standard treatment in patients with burns may be more effective in improving inflammation markers such as NLR, PLR, and LMR.

The Revised Baux Score as a Predictor of Burn Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Mortality following a severe burn is influenced by both patient- and injury-factors, and a number of predictive models have been developed or applied. As there is no consensus on the optimal formula to use, we aimed to investigate the predictive value of the revised Baux score in comparison to other models when determining mortality risk in patients with burn injuries. A systematic review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. The review yielded 21 relevant studies. The Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool quality appraisal checklist was used with many studies classified as "high" quality. All studies assessed the utility of the revised Baux score in comparison to other scoring systems such as the original Baux, Belgian Outcome in Burn Injury, Abbreviated Burn Severity Index, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, Boston Group/Ryan scores, the Fatality by Longevity, APACHE II score, Measured Extent of burn, and Sex model, and the Prognostic Burn Index. There was a range of 48 to 15975 participants per study, with a mean age range of 16 to 52 years old. The area under the curve (AUC) values of the rBaux score ranged from 0.682 to 0.99, with a summary AUC of 0.93 for all included studies (CI 0.91-0.95). This summary value demonstrates that the rBaux equation is a reliable predictor for mortality risk in heterogeneous populations. However, this study also identified that the rBaux equation has a diminished ability to predict mortality risk when applied to patients at both extremes of age, highlighting an important area for future research. Overall, the rBaux equation offers a relatively easy means to quickly assess the mortality risk from burn injury in a broad range of patient populations.

Neutrophil Count in Severe Burns Is Useful for Predicting Prognosis

Background

Burn injuries, particularly extensive severe burns, often have a fatal prognosis. However, many prognostic predictors are based on changes in the clinical course of treatment, and no prognostic predictors can be estimated in the early phases of injury. Using the Burn Index (BI) for evaluations requires familiarity with daily burn treatment, such as being able to evaluate the change from a second degree burn to a third degree burn appropriately. We sought to find a simpler and more quantitative prognostic prediction index.

Methods We hypothesized that, in addition to the current prognostic predictors, the number of neutrophils in severe burns may correlate with the prognosis, and analyzed its usefulness. The neutrophil and white blood cell counts were measured within 48 hours of injury in 35 burn patients who required inpatient treatment at our own institution. Mann-Whitney test was used to determine the significant of differences between the Survivor and Non-survivor groups.

Results

Compared to the Survivor group, neutrophil (P = 0.038) and white blood cell counts were increased significantly in the Non-survivor group (P = 0.004). Neutrophil counts and white blood cell counts correlated positively with the length of hospital stay, total body surface area, Prognostic Burn Index (PBI), and BI. The BI and PBI correlated with patient prognosis, as did neutrophil and white blood cell counts.

Conclusion

These results suggested that neutrophil and white blood cell counts in the early phases of burn injuries might be another factor in the prognosis of burn patients in addition to the current predictors.

An Increase in Admission RDW Value Is Associated with Excess Short-Term Mortality Rates in Patients with Severe Burns

The predictive value of red blood cell distribution width (RDW) in severely burned patients remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the potential association between admission RDW and outcomes in patients with severe burns. Data of severely burned patients in the burn center of Changhai Hospital were retrospectively evaluated. The relationship between admission RDW and mortality was analyzed and displayed using the receiver operating characteristic curve, Kaplan-Meier curve, Cox proportional hazards regression, and the nomogram method. A total of 342 patients were identified according to the filter criteria. The 30-day mortality was 12.9%, and the mortality rates in 7 days and 90 days were 2.9% and 16.7%, respectively. Patients with high admission RDW value were more likely to die than those with low RDW value. Multivariate analysis revealed that higher admission RDW, age, full-thickness burned area, and inhalation injury were independent risk factors with 30-day mortality. The nomogram based on these risk factors was established to predict survival probability in severe burn patients. The C-index of different follow-up times was computed between 0.867 and 0.904, and the nomogram model list fits the data well. Admission RDW played a valuable role in predicting short-term mortality in patients with severe burns. The nomogram containing admission RDW was established to predict mortality, which helps burn care providers identify the patients at higher risk of short-term mortality after severe burns. More attention should be paid to the application of these easy and inexpensive biochemical indicators in the early prediction of disease progression.

Burn-injured skin is marked by a prolonged local acute inflammatory response of innate immune cells and pro-inflammatory cytokines

The systemic and local immune response in burn patients is often extreme and derailed. As excessive inflammation can damage healthy tissues and slow down the healing process, modulation of inflammatory responses could limit complications and improve recovery. Due to its complexity, more detailed information on the immune effects of thermal injury is needed to improve patient outcomes. We therefore characterized and quantified subsets of immune cells and mediators present in human burn wound tissue (eschar), sampled at various time points. This study shows that after burn injury, the number of immune cells were persistently increased, unlike the normal wound healing process. There was an immediate, strong increase in neutrophils and a moderate increase in monocytes/macrophages and lymphocytes, especially in the second and third week post burn. The percentage of classical (CD14highCD16-) monocytes/macrophages demonstrated a steady decrease over time, whereas the proportion of intermediate (CD14highCD16+) monocytes/macrophages slowly increased. The absolute numbers of T cells, NK cells and B cells increased up to week 3, while the fraction of γδ T cells was increased only in week 1. Secretome profiling revealed high levels of chemokines and an overall pro-inflammatory cytokine milieu in burn tissue. The local burn immune response shows similarities to the systemic immune reaction, but differs in neutrophil maturity and lymphocyte composition. Altogether, the neutrophil surges, high levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and limited immunosuppression might be key factors that prolong the inflammation phase and delay the wound healing process in burns.

The Predictive Capacity of American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA PS) Score in Burn Patients

Advances in burn care continues to improve survival rates and patient outcomes. There are several burn prognostic tools used to predict mortality and outcomes; however, none include patient comorbidities. We used the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score as a surrogate measure for comorbidities, and evaluated its role in predicting mortality and outcomes in adult burn patients undergoing surgery. A retrospective analysis was performed on data collected from a single burn center in the United States, which was comprised of 183 patients. We evaluated the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score as an independent predictor of mortality and outcomes, including intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, mechanical ventilator (MV) days, and complications. We compared the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score to other prognostic models which included the revised Baux score, Belgian Outcome in Burn Injury, and the Abbreviated Burn Severity Index. Our results demonstrated that the revised Baux and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status scores could be used to determine the mortality risk in adult burn patients. The revised Baux was the best predictor of mortality, ICU LOS, and MV days, while the Abbreviated Burn Severity Index was the best predictor of total LOS.

Addition of admission lactate levels to Baux score improves mortality prediction in severe burns

Risk adjustment and mortality prediction models are central in optimising care and for benchmarking purposes. In the burn setting, the Baux score and its derivatives have been the mainstay for predictions of mortality from burns. Other well-known measures to predict mortality stem from the ICU setting, where, for example, the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS 3) models have been found to be instrumental. Other attempts to further improve the prediction of outcome have been based on the following variables at admission: Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (_aSOFA) score, determinations of _aLactate or Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio (_aNLR). The aim of the present study was to examine if estimated mortality rate (EMR, SAPS 3), _aSOFA, _aLactate, and _aNLR can, either alone or in conjunction with the others, improve the mortality prediction beyond that of the effects of age and percentage total body surface area (TBSA%) burned among patients with severe burns who need critical care. This is a retrospective, explorative, single centre, registry study based on prospectively gathered data. The study included 222 patients with median (25th–75th centiles) age of 55.0 (38.0 to 69.0) years, TBSA% burned was 24.5 (13.0 to 37.2) and crude mortality was 17%. As anticipated highest predicting power was obtained with age and TBSA% with an AUC at 0.906 (95% CI 0.857 to 0.955) as compared with EMR, _aSOFA, _aLactate and _aNLR. The largest effect was seen thereafter by adding _aLactate to the model, increasing AUC to 0.938 (0.898 to 0.979) (p < 0.001). Whereafter, adding EMR, _aSOFA, and _aNLR, separately or in combinations, only marginally improved the prediction power. This study shows that the prediction model with age and TBSA% may be improved by adding _aLactate, despite the fact that _aLactate levels were only moderately increased. Thereafter, adding EMR, _aSOFA or _aNLR only marginally affected the mortality prediction.

Validation of the modified NUTrition Risk Score (mNUTRIC) in mechanically ventilated, severe burn patients: A prospective multinational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Whether nutrition therapy benefits all burn victims equally is unknown. To identify patients who will benefit the most from optimal nutrition, the modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) Score has been validated in the Intensive Care Unit. However, the utility of mNUTRIC in severe burn victims is unknown. We hypothesized that a higher mNUTRIC (≥5) will be associated with worse clinical outcomes, but that greater nutritional adequacy will be associated with better clinical outcomes in patients with higher mNUTRIC score.

METHODS

This prospective study included data from mechanically ventilated, severe burn patients (n = 359) from 51 Burn Units worldwide included in a randomized trial. Our primary and secondary outcomes were hospital mortality and the time to discharge alive (TTDA) from hospital. We described the association between nutrition performance and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Compared to low mNUTRIC (n = 313), the high mNUTRIC group (n = 46) had higher mortality (61% vs. 19%, p = 0.001), and longer TTDA (>90 [87->90] vs. 64 [38-90] days, p = <0.0001). Only in the high mNUTRIC group, increased calorie intake (per 20% increase) was associated with lower mortality and a faster TTDA.

CONCLUSIONS

The mNUTRIC score identifies those with poor clinical outcomes and may identifies those mechanically ventilated, severe burn patients in whom optimal nutrition therapy may be more advantageous.

Serum albumin concentration on admission as a predictor of morbidity and mortality in patients with burn injuries

Efforts have been made to determine new predictors of morbidity and mortality in patients with severe burn injuries. This prospective cohort study aimed to determine the association of serum albumin concentration on admission and renal failure, pulmonary infection, sepsis, and death in patients with burn injuries. We included 141 patients, aged >18 years, who were admitted to our institution between April and August 2018. Among them, 59.1% were male and 83.8% had burns covering <20% of the body surface area. Scalds were the most common cause of burns (34.8%). Twelve patients died, of whom eight (66.6%) had an Abbreviated Burn Severity Index (ABSI) ≥8. Patients with serum albumin ≤2.2 g/dL had a higher mortality rate than those with >2.2 g/dL (odds ratios [OR]: 18.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.9-70.8). Serum albumin ≤2.2 g/dL was also significantly associated with pulmonary infection (OR: 13.1, 95%CI: 3.8-45.7), renal failure (OR: 30.2, 95% CI: 7.4-122.3), and sepsis (OR: 16.9, 95% CI: 4.9-58.3). Serum albumin concentration cut-points and ABSIs were determined to be death predictors using areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs). The AUCs with albumin or ABSI alone were 0.89 (95% CI: 0.79-0.98) and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.87-0.96), respectively. The AUC including both albumin and ABSI was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.90-0.98), indicating that the combination is a better death predictor than either measure alone. We confirmed that burn patients with a serum albumin concentration ≤2.2 g/dL on admission have substantially increased morbidity and mortality.