Common hydrotherapy practices and the prevalence of burn wound bacterial colonisation at the University Teaching Hospital in Lusaka, Zambia

Handwashing basins and healthcare associated infections: Bacterial diversity in biofilms on faucets and drains

BACKGROUND

Increasingly, hospital handwashing basins have been identified as a source of healthcare-associated infections. Biofilms formed on the faucet and drains of handbasins can potentially harbour pathogenic microbes and promote the dissemination of antimicrobial resistance. However, little is known about the diversity of these biofilm communities and the routes of contamination.

AIM

The aim of this paper was to use 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing to investigate the diversity of prokaryote communities present in faucet and drain biofilm samples taken from hospital and residential handbasins.

FINDINGS

The biofilm prokaryotes communities were diverse, with high abundances of potentially corrosive, biofilm forming and pathogenic genera, including those that are not typically waterborne. The β-diversity showed statistically significant differences in the variation of bacterial communities on the basis on building type (hospital vs residential p = 0.0415). However, there was no statistically significant clustering based on sampling site (faucet vs drain p = 0.46). When examining the β-diversity between individual factors, there was a significant difference between drain biofilms of different buildings (hospital drain vs residential drain p = 0.0338).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that biofilms from hospital and residential handbasins contain complex and diverse microbial communities that differ significantly by building type. It also showed biofilms formed on the faucet and drain of a hospital's handbasins were not significantly different. Future research is needed to understand the potential mechanisms of transfer between drains and faucets of hospital handbasins. This information will inform improved infection control guidelines to control this underrecognized source of infections.

Technology and Children's health: Effect of virtual reality on pain and clinical outcomes during hydrotherapy for children with burns

BACKGROUND

Virtual Reality (VR) has been frequently used as an engaging, interactive, and effective non-pharmacological distraction technique for children during painful procedures, including burnt wound care.

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of virtual reality on pain and clinical outcomes during hydrotherapy for children with burns.

DESIGN

A randomized controlled pretest, during, and post-test research design was utilized.

METHODS

Sixty children with burns underwent hydrotherapy, divided randomly and assigned equally into two groups. Children of the control group received the standard pharmacological treatment of the unit to manage pain and stabilize their physiological parameters throughout the three days of study. Children of the virtual reality intervention group received all basic standard care as the control group plus VR intervention across different software content, and interaction immersion designs which took place using a cell phone coupled with the three-dimensional (3D) image glasses. Outcome measures were physiological parameters, wound healing, and Face, Leg, Activity, Cry and Consolability (FLACC) Behavioral Pain Assessment Scale.

SETTING

This study was carried out in the burns unit at the Plastic, Reconstructive, and Burns Surgery Center affiliated to Mansoura University, from September to November 2023.

RESULTS

Children in the study group had lower pain scores, more stable physiological parameters, and higher rates of wound healing compared to the control group with a statistically significant difference between both groups.

CONCLUSION

Using VR intervention significantly reduced pain intensity, enhanced physiological parameters and promoted the rate of wound healing in children with burns during hydrotherapy.

Surviving Sepsis After Burn Campaign

INTRODUCTION

The Surviving Sepsis Campaign was developed to improve outcomes for all patients with sepsis. Despite sepsis being the primary cause of death after thermal injury, burns have always been excluded from the Surviving Sepsis efforts. To improve sepsis outcomes in burn patients, an international group of burn experts developed the Surviving Sepsis After Burn Campaign (SSABC) as a testable guideline to improve burn sepsis outcomes.

METHODS

The International Society for Burn Injuries (ISBI) reached out to regional or national burn organizations to recommend members to participate in the program. Two members of the ISBI developed specific "patient/population, intervention, comparison and outcome" (PICO) questions that paralleled the 2021 Surviving Sepsis Campaign [1]. SSABC participants were asked to search the current literature and rate its quality for each topic. At the Congress of the ISBI, in Guadalajara, Mexico, August 28, 2022, a majority of the participants met to create "statements" based on the literature. The "summary statements" were then sent to all members for comment with the hope of developing an 80% consensus. After four reviews, a consensus statement for each topic was created or "no consensus" was reported.

RESULTS

The committee developed sixty statements within fourteen topics that provide guidance for the early treatment of sepsis in burn patients. These statements should be used to improve the care of sepsis in burn patients. The statements should not be considered as "static" comments but should rather be used as guidelines for future testing of the best treatments for sepsis in burn patients. They should be updated on a regular basis.

CONCLUSION

Members of the burn community from the around the world have developed the Surviving Sepsis After Burn Campaign guidelines with the goal of improving the outcome of sepsis in burn patients.

Antimicrobial resistance from a One Health perspective in Zambia: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is widely acknowledged as a global health problem, yet its extent is not well evaluated, especially in low-middle income countries. It is challenging to promote policies without focusing on healthcare systems at a local level, therefore a baseline assessment of the AMR occurrence is a priority. This study aimed to look at published papers relating to the availability of AMR data in Zambia as a means of establishing an overview of the situation, to help inform future decisions.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Libraries, Medical Journal of Zambia and African Journals Online databases were searched from inception to April 2021 for articles published in English in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Retrieval and screening of article was done using a structured search protocol with strict inclusion/exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 716 articles were retrieved, of which 25 articles met inclusion criteria for final analysis. AMR data was not available for six of the ten provinces of Zambia. Twenty-one different isolates from the human health, animal health and environmental health sectors were tested against 36 antimicrobial agents, across 13 classes of antibiotics. All the studies showed a degree of resistance to more than one class of antimicrobials. Majority of the studies focused on antibiotics, with only three studies (12%) highlighting antiretroviral resistance. Antitubercular drugs were addressed in only five studies (20%). No studies focused on antifungals. The most common organisms tested, across all three sectors, were Staphylococcus aureus, with a diverse range of resistance patterns found; followed by Escherichia coli with a high resistance rate found to cephalosporins (24-100%) and fluoroquinolones (20-100%).

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights three important findings. Firstly, AMR is understudied in Zambia. Secondly, the level of resistance to commonly prescribed antibiotics is significant across the human, animal, and environmental sectors. Thirdly, this review suggests that improved standardization of antimicrobial susceptibility testing in Zambia could help to better delineate AMR patterns, allow comparisons across different locations and tracking of AMR evolution over time.

Hospital water as the source of healthcare-associated infection and antimicrobial-resistant organisms

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Drinking water is considered one of the most overlooked and underestimated sources of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Recently, the prevention and control of opportunistic premise plumbing pathogens (OPPPs) in healthcare water systems has been receiving increasing attention in infection control guidelines. However, these fail to address colonization of pathogens that do not originate from source water. Subsequently, this review explores the role of water and premise plumbing biofilm in HAIs. The potential mechanisms of contamination and transmission of antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) pathogens originating both from supply water and human microbiota are discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

OPPPs, such as Legionella pneumophila, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Mycobacterium avium have been described as native to the plumbing environment. However, other pathogens, not found in the source water, have been found to proliferate in biofilms formed on outlets devices and cause HAI outbreaks.

SUMMARY

Biofilms formed on outlet devices, such as tap faucets, showers and drains provide an ideal niche for the dissemination of antimicrobial resistance. Thus, comprehensive surveillance guidelines are required to understand the role that drinking water and water-related devices play in the transmission of AMR HAIs and to improve infection control guidelines.

The Presence of Opportunistic Premise Plumbing Pathogens in Residential Buildings: A Literature Review

Opportunistic premise plumbing pathogens (OPPP) are microorganisms that are native to the plumbing environment and that present an emerging infectious disease problem. They share characteristics, such as disinfectant resistance, thermal tolerance, and biofilm formation. The colonisation of domestic water systems presents an elevated health risk for immune-compromised individuals who receive healthcare at home. The literature that has identified the previously described OPPPs (Aeromonas spp., Acinetobacter spp., Helicobacter spp., Legionella spp., Methylobacterium spp., Mycobacteria spp., Pseudomonas spp., and Stenotrophomonas spp.) in residential drinking water systems were systematically reviewed. By applying the Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines, 214 studies were identified from the Scopus and Web of Science databases, which included 30 clinical case investigations. Tap components and showerheads were the most frequently identified sources of OPPPs. Sixty-four of these studies detected additional clinically relevant pathogens that are not classified as OPPPs in these reservoirs. There was considerable variation in the detection methods, which included traditional culturing and molecular approaches. These identified studies demonstrate that the current drinking water treatment methods are ineffective against many waterborne pathogens. It is critical that, as at-home healthcare services continue to be promoted, we understand the emergent risks that are posed by OPPPs in residential drinking water. Future research is needed in order to provide consistent data on the prevalence of OPPPs in residential water, and on the incidence of waterborne homecare-associated infections. This will enable the identification of the contributing risk factors, and the development of effective controls.

Effect of Combining Immersion Therapy with Shengji Ointment on Wound Healing Rate and Adverse Reaction Rate in Patients with Second-Degree Burn

Objective

To explore the effect of combining immersion therapy with Shengji ointment on wound healing rate and adverse reaction rate (ARR) in patients with second-degree burn.

Methods

The data of 80 patients with second-degree burn treated in our hospital from February 2019 to February 2020 were retrospectively analyzed by the means of retrospective study, and the patients were equally divided into the treatment group and the control group according to their admission order, with 40 cases each. Immersion therapy was performed to all patients (7 d); after that, patients in the control group received routine medication (7 d), and those in the treatment group were treated with Shengji ointment until the wounds were healed, so as to compare their wound healing condition, ARRs, levels of inflammatory factors, and infection incidence.

Results

Compared with the control group after treatment, the treatment group presented significantly shorter wound healing time (12.14 ± 1.26 vs. 15.98 ± 1.20, P < 0.001), better wound healing rate and quality (P < 0.05), and lower levels of inflammatory factors (P < 0.001); no significant between-group difference in ARRs was shown (P > 0.05); 34 patients in the treatment group (85.0%) and 26 patients in the control group (65.0%) had no infections, so the incidence rate of infections was significantly lower in the treatment group than in the control group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Combining immersion therapy with Shengji ointment can reduce the levels of inflammatory factors in patients with second-degree burn, lower the incidence rate of infections, provide the conditions for wound healing, and increase the wound healing rate, which shall be promoted and applied in practice.

Antibiogram Development in the Setting of a High Frequency of Multi-Drug Resistant Organisms at University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia

Antimicrobial resistance is a global challenge requiring reliable surveillance data collection and use. Prior studies on resistance in Zambia depended on laboratory methods with limited standardization. Since 2015, the University Teaching Hospital (UTH) microbiology laboratory has used the Vitek 2 Compact (bioMerieux, Inc., Marcy-l’Étoile, France) for standardized identification and susceptibility testing. We conducted a cross-sectional study of 2019 bacterial isolates collected from July 2015 to April 2017 to identify bacterial causes of infections, their susceptibility to commonly used antibiotics at UTH, and develop hospital antibiograms with a multidisciplinary team using World Health Organization guidance. We found high levels of antibiotic resistance among Gram negative bacteria. Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were highly resistant to all antibiotics except amikacin and carbapenems. E. coli had susceptibilities of 42.4% to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, 41.4% to ceftriaxone, 40.2% to ciprofloxacin, and 10.4% to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX). K. pneumoniae had susceptibilities of 20.7% to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, 15.6% to ceftriaxone, 48.5% to ciprofloxacin, and 12.3% to TMP/SMX. The high resistance to 3rd generation cephalosporins indicates high rates of beta-lactamase production. This is information that clinicians need to inform clinical decision making and choice of empiric antibiotics and that UTH requires to inform antimicrobial stewardship such as improvements in antibiotic use.

Interplay between ESKAPE Pathogens and Immunity in Skin Infections: An Overview of the Major Determinants of Virulence and Antibiotic Resistance

The skin is the largest organ in the human body, acting as a physical and immunological barrier against pathogenic microorganisms. The cutaneous lesions constitute a gateway for microbial contamination that can lead to chronic wounds and other invasive infections. Chronic wounds are considered as serious public health problems due the related social, psychological and economic consequences. The group of bacteria known as ESKAPE (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacter sp.) are among the most prevalent bacteria in cutaneous infections. These pathogens have a high level of incidence in hospital environments and several strains present phenotypes of multidrug resistance. In this review, we discuss some important aspects of skin immunology and the involvement of ESKAPE in wound infections. First, we introduce some fundamental aspects of skin physiology and immunology related to cutaneous infections. Following this, the major virulence factors involved in colonization and tissue damage are highlighted, as well as the most frequently detected antimicrobial resistance genes. ESKAPE pathogens express several virulence determinants that overcome the skin's physical and immunological barriers, enabling them to cause severe wound infections. The high ability these bacteria to acquire resistance is alarming, particularly in the hospital settings where immunocompromised individuals are exposed to these pathogens. Knowledge about the virulence and resistance markers of these species is important in order to develop new strategies to detect and treat their associated infections.

Water as a Source of Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare-Associated Infections

Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are one of the most common patient complications, affecting 7% of patients in developed countries each year. The rise of antimicrobial resistant (AMR) bacteria has been identified as one of the biggest global health challenges, resulting in an estimated 23,000 deaths in the US annually. Environmental reservoirs for AMR bacteria such as bed rails, light switches and doorknobs have been identified in the past and addressed with infection prevention guidelines. However, water and water-related devices are often overlooked as potential sources of HAI outbreaks. This systematic review examines the role of water and water-related devices in the transmission of AMR bacteria responsible for HAIs, discussing common waterborne devices, pathogens, and surveillance strategies. AMR strains of previously described waterborne pathogens including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Mycobacterium spp., and Legionella spp. were commonly isolated. However, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae that are not typically associated with water were also isolated. Biofilms were identified as a hot spot for the dissemination of genes responsible for survival functions. A limitation identified was a lack of consistency between environmental screening scope, isolation methodology, and antimicrobial resistance characterization. Broad universal environmental surveillance guidelines must be developed and adopted to monitor AMR pathogens, allowing prediction of future threats before waterborne infection outbreaks occur.

Does the timing of postoperative showering impact infection rates? A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Optimum timing of postoperative showering varies. Earlier showering improves patient satisfaction, but the impact of the timing of showering on postoperative infection is unclear. We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to investigate the outcomes of various postoperative showering practices.

METHODS

We searched PubMed to identify relevant human clinical studies in English, and searched these for additional references. Articles were reviewed for patient demographics, surgical specialty and procedure, wound closure method, placement of drains, showering protocol, and rates of infection and complications. Only randomized controlled trials were analyzed. A random-effects meta-analysis model was used to determine overall infection and complication rates between patients allowed to shower within the first 48 h postoperatively or later.

RESULTS

Out of 357 studies, seven and five were included in the infection and complications rate meta-analyses, respectively. A total of 1,881 and 958 patients were included in each analysis; 605 and 477 patients in each analysis were allowed to shower on or before postoperative day 2 ("early"), while the remainder were prohibited from showering until postoperative day 3 to beyond one week ("delayed") postoperatively. There was no difference in infection (p = 0.45, [-0.0052, 2 × 0.007 95% CI]) or complication rate (p = 0.36, [-0.0046, 2 × 0.005 95% CI]) with earlier vs. delayed showering protocols.

CONCLUSION

Published literature demonstrates no increase in the overall rate of wound infections or complications when patients showered earlier in the postoperative period. Additional randomized studies are needed to determine the ideal time for postoperative showering. These data should be considered by surgeons while determining when to permit patients to shower after surgery.