Analgesia protocols for burns dressings: Challenges with implementation

Pain Assessment in the Outpatient Pediatric Burn Patient: An Integrative Review

BACKGROUND

There is no standardized practice in pediatric pain assessment with burn injuries in the outpatient clinic setting.

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to identify reliable, validated tools to measure pain in the pediatric burn clinic population.

METHODS

The literature search for this integrative review was conducted using the databases of PubMed, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane, and Embase from 2011 to 2023. Quality and relevance were appraised using the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model. Reporting was done according to a Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analysis checklist.

RESULTS

Fourteen articles and two clinical practice guidelines met inclusion criteria and were included in this review.

CONCLUSION

The Pain Observation Scale for Young Children and the COMFORT Behavior Scale tools have shown good reliability and construct validity and can be safely used to measure background and procedural pain in daily burn practice. Further research on reliable, validated pain assessment techniques in the pediatric burn population is needed.

Desktop Virtual Reality Offers a Novel Approach to Minimize Pain and Anxiety during Burn Wound Cleaning/Debridement in Infants and Young Children: A Randomized Crossover Pilot Study

Although most scald burn injuries involve children under six, because of the challenges of using head mounted displays with young children there is very little research exploring the use of VR in children under six. The current clinical pilot study measured the analgesic effectiveness of our new desktop VR system (with no VR helmet) in children under six during burn wound care (a within-subjects design with randomized treatment order). Between December 2021-April 2022, nine children with burn injuries (10 months to 5 years age, mean = 18 months) participated. The mean burn size was 10% Total Body Surface Area, range 2-22%. Using nurse's ratings, VR significantly reduced children's pain during burn wound care by 40% on the observational Faces, Legs, Activity, Crying, and Consolability (FLACC) pain scale. Specifically, non-parametric within-subject sign tests compared nurse's ratings of the young patients' pain during burn wound care using usual pain medications with no VR = 6.67, (SD = 2.45) vs. adjunctive Animal Rescue World VR (VR = 4.00, SD = 2.24, p < 0.01). The observational Procedure-Behavior Checklist (PBCL) nurse's scale measured a 34% reduction in anxiety with VR as compared to pharmacologic treatment alone (p < 0.005). Similarly, when using single graphic rating scales the patients' parents reported a significant 36% decrease in their child's pain during VR (p < 0.05), a 38% (p < 0.005) decrease in their child's anxiety during VR, and a significant increase in patients' joy during VR. It can be concluded that during burn wound care with no distraction (traditional pain medications), children under 6 years old experienced severe pain during a 10 min burn wound cleaning session. During burn wound care combining desktop virtual reality and traditional pain medications, the same pediatric patients experienced only mild pain during burn wound cleaning/debridement. VR significantly reduced the children's pain and anxiety during burn wound care.

Adjunctive Nonpharmacologic Interventions for the Management of Burn Pain: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The conventional way of treating burn victims with mainstream pain control modalities is costly and has many negative side effects. In this study, the authors aim to present the findings from the major clinical trials on three nonpharmacologic interventions-hypnosis, virtual/augmented reality, and yoga-as supplements to conventional pain regimens for burn management.

METHODS

A computerized literature search was conducted of the PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov databases in April of 2020. The online screening process was performed by two independent reviewers with the Covidence tool. The protocol was reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses, and it was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews of the National Institute for Health Research.

RESULTS

The search yielded 254 articles from 1955 to 2020. Fifty-eight studies met the authors' inclusion criteria. Yoga reduced cognitive and somatic anxiety in burn survivors, and improved body image. Virtual reality is effective in pain reduction in both the pediatric and the adult burn population, and in faster burn wound reepithelialization. Hypnosis has similar results regarding reducing pain quality and anxiety in burn patients undergoing burn wound care and dressing changes but was not found to significantly accelerate the healing process.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonpharmacologic interventions are not a substitute for conventional analgesics; however, they could help patients have better control over their pain, greater self-esteem, and less postburn traumatic experiences. Burn care centers should consider nonpharmacologic interventions to improve patient satisfaction and their participation in the treatment and rehabilitation process.

Intranasal dexmedetomidine and rectal ketamine for young children undergoing burn wound procedures

BACKGROUND

Safe and effective methods for sedation and analgesia in pediatric burn patients are strongly warranted. This retrospective study of electronic health care records aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine combined with rectal ketamine as procedural sedation for young children undergoing dressing changes and debridement of burn wounds.

METHODS

Documentation was analyzed from 90 procedures in 58 pediatric patients aged <5 years. Safety and efficacy of the method were assessed based on documentation for complications, adverse effects, pain level, level of sedation and preoperative and recovery time.

RESULTS

All 90 sedations were completed without significant adverse events with acute airway management or medical intervention. The combination of dexmedetomidine-ketamine produced acceptable analgesia during the procedure and effectively relieved postoperative pain. However, the approach was insufficient for 7/58 patients (7.8%); these patients were converted from the dexmedetomidine-ketamine combination to intravenous anesthesia. In 23% of the cases an extra dose of either ketamine of dexmedetomidine was administered. Moreover, there were two cases of delayed awakening with recovery time >120 min.

CONCLUSION

The drug combination intranasal dexmedetomidine and rectal ketamine is a safe and reliable approach for procedural sedation and analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing burn wound procedures, producing a clinically stable sedative condition requiring only basic monitoring.

Reaching consensus on an analgesia protocol for paediatric burn patients in a resource-scarce South African community

BACKGROUND

Despite the exceptional burden of burns in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) and the importance of adequate analgesia in burn care, there is a lack of analgesia protocol developed in resource-scarce settings. This necessitates the development of an analgesia protocol applicable to the resource-scarce setting. This study presents the findings of a modified Delphi study aimed at achieving consensus by a panel of experts in the management of burn injuries from low- and middle-income settings across Africa.

METHODS

A two-round Delphi survey was conducted to achieve consensus on an analgesia protocol for paediatric burn patients for a resource-limited setting. The Delphi panel consisted of nine experts with experience in management of burn injuries in low-income settings.

RESULTS

Consensus was determined by an a priori threshold of 80% of agreement for a drug to be included in the analgesia protocol. There was a largely overarching agreement with regard to the background analgesia protocol and strong agreement regarding the use of an initial dose of ketamine and midazolam for procedural sedation.

CONCLUSION

A modified Delphi method was used to obtain expert consensus for a recently adopted analgesia protocol for burn-injured children in a resource-limited setting, with experts in the management of burn injuries in low- and middle-income settings. The expert consensus leads to the rigour and robustness of the protocol. Delphi methods are exceptionally valuable in healthcare research and the aim of such studies is to find converging expert opinions.

The Management of Burn Pain in a Pediatric Burns-Specialist Hospital

Appropriate pain management for children who have experienced an acute burn injury is critical to improve patient outcomes and reduce potential morbidities. With 60% of our patients being under the age of 4 years, pain management is crucial in reducing pain and anxiety in both patients and parents. It is imperative that appropriate pain relief is commenced from initial contact with healthcare workers as this will affect the success or failure of future wound procedures. Uncontrolled pain can negatively affect a patient, both short and long term. It may cause anticipatory anxiety for future medical procedures, increased pain and anxiety can decrease wound re-epithelialization which can lead to long-term consequences for growth and mobility, and increased pain can also influence the possibility of patients and families displaying signs of post-traumatic stress disorder. Pain management in the form of pharmaceuticals is imperative during burn wound treatment and should incorporate pain relief targeted at both background and procedural pain. It also requires a multimodal, individualized, and targeted approach combining both pharmaceutical and nonpharmaceutical techniques, including cold running water, multimodal distraction devices, hypnotherapy, and bubbles. We discuss the research and knowledge that our center has gained through treating pediatric patients with burns over the last 20 years.

A comparison of analgesia requirements in children with burns: Do delayed referrals require higher procedural analgesia doses?

Background:

Our clinical impression is that delayed referrals require more analgesia than children referred to our service acutely. Previous work demonstrated poor uptake of analgesia protocols at district hospitals with probable inadequate background and procedural analgesia, which may account for this. The purpose of this study was to compare analgesia requirements for dressing changes of paediatric patients referred to us acutely versus those children with delayed referral (i.e. more than 21 days post injury). Our hypothesis is that paediatric patients with delayed referral require higher doses of ketamine when taking length of stay and total body surface area (TBSA) of the burn into account.

Methods:

Data for children under 12 years, admitted to the Pietermaritzburg Burn Service (PBS) from the 1 July 2017 until 30 June 2018 was reviewed. Total ketamine dose during admission, weight, days admitted and TBSA were analysed. The total ketamine use in milligram per kilogram per days admitted per TBSA (mg/kg/days admitted/TBSA) was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the total ketamine dose between the acute and delayed referral groups.

Results:

One-hundred-and-ninety-seven patients were included. Patients were divided into two groups, the acute group including those referred to the PBS early (prior to 21 days post-burn) and the delayed referral group (those referred 21 days or more post burn). The acute group consisted of 167 patients and the chronic group 30 patients. There is a statistically significant difference between the total ketamine dose (mg/kg/days admitted/TBSA) for the acute referral and delayed referral groups (p = 0.01). The median total ketamine dose (mg/kg/days admitted/TBSA) of the acute referral group was 0.27 (Range: 0–7.05) and the median total Ketamine dose (mg/kg/days admitted/TBSA) for the delayed referral group was 0.41 (range: 0.1–3.89).

Conclusion:

Patients with delayed referrals require more ketamine to achieve adequate procedural analgesia than patients referred acutely. Inadequate analgesia in the acute phase of the burn may influence this, underpinning the importance of adequate analgesia right from the time of the injury.