Determining transfusion use in major burn patients: A retrospective review and analysis from 2009 to 2019

Impact of red blood cell transfusion in massive burn: a multicenter cohort study

Blood transfusions were frequently in massive burn patients, current studies focus on the trigger threshold of red blood cell transfusion, and few studies focus on the impact of red blood cell transfusion volume on patient outcomes. We initiated a multicenter cohort study to explore the impact of red blood cell transfusions volume on patient mortality. 379 patients in three centers were enrolled to the cohort. The extroperative and overall RBC transfusion in the death group were significantly higher than those in the survival group (p < 0.001), and this difference became insignificant within the operation (p = 0.312). RBC transfusion volume and mortality risk of patients was obviously not linear (p < 0.0001) and would be L-shaped, and the threshold would be 6U. 1:1propensity matching was used to adjust the burn area, full thickness burned area and inhalation injury. There was no significant difference in the outcome and bloodstream infection between the two groups, but the length of stay, length of stay in burn ICU and mechanical ventilation time of the low red blood cell group were significantly lower than those of the high red blood cell group. Our findings therefore support the approach of a restrictive transfusion strategy in severely burned patients. This also confirms the scientificity of restrictive transfusion strategy and suggests that unnecessary red blood cell transfusion should be avoided in clinic.

A 10-year mono-center study on patients with burns ≥70% TBSA: prediction model construction and multicenter validation - retrospective cohort

BACKGROUND

Burn injuries with ≥70% total body surface area (TBSA) are especially acute and life-threatening, leading to severe complications and terrible prognosis, while a powerful model for the prediction of overall survival (OS) is lacking. The objective of this study is to identify prognostic factors for the OS of patients with burn injury ≥70% TBSA and construct and validate a feasible predictive model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients diagnosed with burns ≥70% TBSA admitted and treated between 2010 and 2020 in our hospital were included. A cohort of the patients from the Kunshan explosion were assigned as the validation set. The χ2 test and K-M survival analysis were conducted to identify potential predictors for OS. Then, multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to identify the independent factors. Afterward, we constructed a nomogram to predict OS probability. Finally, the Kunshan cohort was applied as an external validation set.

RESULTS

Sex, the percentage of third-degree and fourth-degree burns as well as organ dysfunction were identified as significant independent factors. A nomogram only based on the factors of the individuals was built and evidenced to have promising predictive accuracy, accordance, and discrimination by both internal and external validation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study recognized significant influencing factors for the OS of patients with burns ≥70% TBSA. Furthermore, our nomogram proved to be an effective tool for doctors to quickly evaluate patients' outcomes and make appropriate clinical decisions at an early stage of treatment.

Ultra-restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategies in extensively burned patients

In recent years, due to the shortage of blood products, some extensive burn patients were forced to adopt an "ultra-restrictive" transfusion strategy, in which the hemoglobin levels of RBC transfusion thresholds were < 7 g/dl or even < 6 g/dl. This study investigated the prognostic impacts of ultra-restrictive RBC transfusion in extensive burn patients. This retrospective multicenter cohort study recruited extensive burns (total body surface area ≥ 50%) from three hospitals in Eastern China between 1 January 2016 and 30 June 2022. Patients were divided into an ultra-restrictive transfusion group and a restrictive transfusion group depending on whether they received timely RBC transfusion at a hemoglobin level < 7 g/dl. 1:1 ratio propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance selection bias. Modified Poisson regression and linear regression were conducted for sensitive analysis. Subsequently, according to whether they received timely RBC transfusion at a hemoglobin level < 6 g/dl, patients in the ultra-restrictive transfusion group were divided into < 6 g/dl group and 6-7 g/dl group to further compare the prognostic outcomes. 271 eligible patients with extensive burns were included, of whom 107 patients were in the ultra-restrictive transfusion group and 164 patients were in the restrictive transfusion group. The ultra-restrictive transfusion group had a significantly lower RBC transfusion volume than the restrictive transfusion group (11.5 [5.5, 21.5] vs 17.3 [9.0, 32.5] units, p = 0.004). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of in-hospital mortality, risk of infection, hospital length of stay, and wound healing time after PSM or multivariate adjustment (p > 0.05). Among the ultra-restrictive transfusion group, patients with RBC transfusion threshold < 6 g/dl had a significantly higher hospital mortality than 6-7 g/dl (53.1% vs 21.3%, p = 0.001). For extensive burn patients, no significant adverse effects of ultra-restrictive RBC transfusion were found in this study. When the blood supply is tight, it is acceptable to adopt an RBC transfusion threshold of < 7 g/dL but not < 6 g/dL.