Recent advances in understanding the clinical utility and underlying cause of antinucleosome (antichromatin) autoantibodies

Disease criteria of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); the potential role of non-criteria autoantibodies

Patients with SLE show a broad spectrum of more than 200 autoantibodies. They can be pathogenic, predictive, prognostic or even an epiphenomenon. Here, we discuss different autoantibodies that have not been included in EULAR/ACR 2019 classification criteria. Most of them have been addressed to monitor and detect disease activity and not specifically as classification criteria. Indeed, markers to assess disease activity fluctuate as compared with classification criteria and their validation is different. The development of new methods will probably bring new clinical associations and be evaluated as potential classification criteria.

•

Most of the autoantibodies described in SLE are of utility in monitoring disease activity.

•

The validation of activity biomarkers is different from classification criteria biomarkers.

•

The new methods coming into the clinical routine will bring new associations and potentially classification criteria.

The impact of biological treatments on the anti-dsDNA and anti-nucleosome tests

Background Anti-double stranded DNA antibodies are a very heterogeneous group of antibodies, quite specific for systemic lupus erythematosus. Newer technologies, such as addressable laser bead immunoassays (ALBIA), show great potential as a diagnostic application. The production of anti-double stranded DNA antibodies is often encountered in inflammatory arthritis; however, literature reports that the actual onset of drug induced lupus in patients treated with biological drugs is a rare event. False positive results for anti-double stranded DNA and anti-nucleosome antibodies detected in patients with inflammatory arthritis treated with different biologics prompted the investigation of full autoantibody profiles to evaluate each biomarker's diagnostic performance in systemic lupus erythematosus. The aim of the study was to compare the diagnostic performance of anti-double stranded DNA antibody and anti-nucleosome antibody methods and to evaluate the value of simultaneously measuring anti-double stranded DNA and anti-nucleosome antibodies, along with other anti-nuclear antibody analytes, as biomarkers for systemic lupus erythematosus, using a more appropriate control cohort including inflammatory arthritis patients with a non-clinical drug induced lupus. Methods Anti-double stranded DNA and anti-nucleosome antibody levels were evaluated in 247 patient samples: 70 systemic lupus erythematosus, 177 disease controls (including 97 inflammatory arthritis during treatment with different biologics) using the Bio-Rad BioPlex® 2200. Results Anti-nucleosome antibodies demonstrated greater clinical sensitivity and specificity than anti-double stranded DNA antibodies. At the manufacturers' cut-off range, considering the two markers as a single or combined test, the "anti-double stranded DNA test or anti-nucleosome antibodies" was the most sensitive combination (0.400) with the best negative likelihood ratio (0.62) and negative predictive value (0.803). Conclusion Anti-nucleosome antibodies are a more sensitive and specific biomarker of systemic lupus erythematosus than anti-double stranded DNA antibodies. Anti-nucleosome antibodies and anti-double stranded DNA antibodies are independent and complementary markers of systemic lupus erythematosus diagnosis and, therefore, are strongly suggested as combined tests (positive predictive value = 0.938). Moreover, the combined use of the two tests may help to overcome the decreased specificity percentage of the anti-double stranded DNA test, when considering an inflammatory arthritis cohort under biological therapies. The ALBIA method for anti-nuclear specificity detection allows a full autoantibody assessment, resulting in a much higher clinical specificity for systemic lupus erythematosus in the presence of ≥3 positive markers and significantly more positive likelihood ratio when ≥2 positive markers are present.

Autoantibodies in lupus nephritis patients requiring renal transplantation

The goal of this nested case-control study was to compare autoantibody profiles in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients with lupus nephritis (LN), lupus nephritis patients requiring renal transplantation (LNTP) and a SLE control group without nephritis (CON). Sera were assayed for a variety of autoantibodies by addressable laser bead immunoassay (ALBIA) and enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) and to dsDNA by Crithidia luciliae assay. The frequency of nucleosome autoantibodies was significantly greater in the LNTP group (79%) compared to the LN (18%) and CON (9%) groups ( P < 0.0005). The frequency of other autoantibodies, including anti-dsDNA, did not differ significantly between groups. Among patients with LN, the odds of progressing to renal transplantation was 16-fold higher (OR 16.5 [95% CI 2.5, 125.7], P = 0.0005) in patients testing positive for anti-nucleosome antibodies compared to those who tested negative. Furthermore, the level of anti-nucleosome antibodies was significantly ( P < 0.00005) higher in the LNTP group (3.69 ± 2.79) than the LN (0.51 ± 0.51) and CON (0.34 ± 0.44) groups. Review of 48 renal biopsies from 29 patients indicated that there was no difference in renal histological classification among patients with anti-nucleosome antibodies compared to those who tested negative. Our observations suggest that nucleosome autoantibodies are a biomarker for more severe SLE renal disease requiring transplantation. Lupus (2007) 16, 394—400.

The spectrum of anti-chromatin/nucleosome autoantibodies: independent and interdependent biomarkers of disease

Autoantibodies directed to chromatin components date back to the discovery of the LE cell and the LE cell phenomenon circa 1950, and subsequent evidence that major components of that reaction were chromatin components and histones in particular. Over time, immunoassays ranging from ELISA and line immunoassays to more modern bead-based assays incorporated histone and DNA mixtures, purified histones, and purified nucleosomes leading to a more thorough understanding of the genesis and pathogenetic relationships of antibodies to chromatin components in systemic lupus erythematosus and other autoimmune conditions. More recently, interest has focussed on other components of chromatin such as high mobility group (HMG) proteins both as targets of B cell responses and pro-inflammatory mediators. This review will focus on immunoassays that utilize chromatin components, their clinical relationships, and newer evidence implicating HMG proteins and DNA neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) as important players in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases.

Lupus nephritis: role of antinucleosome autoantibodies

The discovery of autoantigen clustering in blebs at the surface of apoptotic cells boosted research on the role of apoptosis in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and led to the discovery of autoantigen modification during apoptosis. Normally, apoptotic cells are cleared efficiently and swiftly. However, it became clear that in SLE insufficient removal of apoptotic material leads to the release of these modified autoantigens. This creates the danger that these modified autoantigens are recognized by the immune system. Indeed, dendritic cells, the professional antigen-presenting cells, phagocytose these modified autoantigens, which leads to maturation and induction of a proinflammatory state of these dendritic cells. As a consequence, they present these modified autoantigens to T cells in an immunogenic way, which become activated and stimulate autoreactive B cells to secrete autoantibodies. In this review the currently available evidence for the sequential steps in the pathogenesis of SLE is discussed. Furthermore, the mechanisms responsible for the nephritogenicity of antinucleosome antibodies are reviewed. This will reveal that nucleosomes are not only a major driving force in the formation of antinuclear antibodies, but also play a pivotal role in the development of tissue lesions by mediating binding of autoantibodies to basement membranes as exemplified for the kidney.

Anti-C1q antibodies have higher correlation with flares of lupus nephritis than other serum markers

OBJECTIVE

Autoantibodies are important in the diagnosis and classification of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but whether they correlate with changes in disease activity within individual patients is controversial. We assessed the association between changes in SLE global and renal activity and changes in several autoantibodies and cell adhesion molecules in patients with SLE.

METHODS

Stored sera collected at two or three clinic visits from each of 49 SLE patients (91% female, 59% African-American, 31% Caucasian, 10% other ethnicity, 38% under 30 years, 41% between 30-44 years, and 21% 45-63 years) were analyzed. The visits were chosen to include one visit with proteinuria, and one or two without, for each patient. Global disease activity was measured by the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA), SELENA-SLEDAI (SLE Disease Activity Index modified to exclude anti-dsDNA and complement) and renal activity assessed by urine protein (by urine dipstick) and Renal Activity Score. Sera were assayed for anti-C1q, anti-chromatin, anti-dsDNA, anti-ribosomal P, monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM) intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM) and complement. The associations between changes in disease activity and changes in biomarker levels were assessed.

RESULTS

In terms of global disease activity, anti-C1q had the highest association with the PGA (p = 0.09) and was strongly associated with modified SELENA-SLEDAI (p = 0.009). In terms of renal activity, anti-C1q had the highest association with proteinuria (p = 0.079), and was strongly associated with Renal Activity Score (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Anti-C1q performed the best of the potential biomarkers, being significantly associated with the modified SELENA-SLEDAI and with the Renal Activity Score. This study indicates the potential superior utility of anti-C1q over anti-dsDNA and other measures to track renal activity.

Acquired infantile abducens palsy associated with anti-GM2 antibodies

Anti-ganglioside antibodies have been associated with acquired neuropathies, including Guillain-Barré syndrome. We describe a case of acute abducens nerve palsy acquired 2 weeks after symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection and rash in a 6-month-old. Elevated anti-GM2 ganglioside immunoglobulin M antibodies were detected in the serum. The palsy slowly improved over time, although eventually surgical intervention was required. Elevated anti-GM2 immunoglobulin M antibodies have previously been reported in Guillain-Barré syndrome variants involving sensory and cranial neuropathies, but never in isolated unilateral cranial nerve VI mononeuropathy. Anti-ganglioside antibodies may play a role in the pathogenesis of postinfectious isolated abducens palsy in young children.

Nucleic acid-associated autoantigens: pathogenic involvement and therapeutic potential

Autoimmunity to ubiquitously expressed macromolecular nucleic acid-protein complexes such as the nucleosome or the spliceosome is a characteristic feature of systemic autoimmune diseases. Disease-specificity and/or association with clinical features of some of these autoimmune responses suggest pathogenic involvement which, however, has been proven in only a few cases so far. Although the mechanisms leading to autoimmunity against nucleic acid-containing complexes are still far from being fully understood, there is increasing experimental evidence that the nucleic acid component may act as a co-stimulator or adjuvans via activation of nucleic acid-binding receptor systems such as Toll-like receptors in antigen-presenting cells. Dysregulated apoptosis and inappropriate stimulation of nucleic acid-sensing receptors may lead to loss of tolerance against the protein components of such complexes, activation of autoreactive T cells and formation of autoantibodies. This has been demonstrated to occur in systemic lupus erythematosus and seems to represent a general mechanism that may be crucial for the development of systemic autoimmune diseases. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the most thoroughly-characterized nucleic acid-associated autoantigens, describing their structure and biological function, as well as the nature and pathogenic importance of the reactivities directed against them. Furthermore, recent advances in immunotherapy such as antigen-specific approaches targeted at nucleic acid-binding antigens are discussed.

Pathogenic anti-nucleosome antibodies

There is increasing evidence that in systemic lupus erythematosus, nucleosomes, the basic chromatin component, represent both a driving immunogen and a major in vivo target for antibodies. Either a disturbed apoptosis or a reduced clearance of apoptotic cells by phagocytes may lead to an increased exposure of apoptotic nucleosomes to the immune system. These nucleosomes, which have been cleaved and modified during the process of apoptosis, escape normal clearance and encompass epitopes that normally are not encountered by the immune system. This may then lead to tolerance breaking and autoimmunity by the activation of nucleosome-specific autoreactive T cells (that help B cells) and subsequently to the production of anti-nucleosome, anti-histone and anti-DNA autoantibodies. Some anti-nucleosome antibody subsets are pathogenic and are involved in the nephritogenic process in systemic lupus erythematosus. Accordingly, several studies reported: (i) increased plasma circulating nucleosomes that positively correlated with an active disease, (ii) nucleosomes in typical glomerular deposits as well as in the basement membrane of non-lesional skin of systemic lupus erythematosus patients and (iii) a close correlation between nephritis and the presence of anti-nucleosome antibodies. Recent studies reported anti-nucleosome antibodies also in primary anti-phospholipid syndrome and particularly in patients with associated lupus-like disease.

Antinucleosome antibodies in primary antiphospholipid syndrome: a hint at systemic autoimmunity?

BACKGROUND

Antinucleosome antibodies (anti-NCS) are reported to be highly sensitive and specific for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and to correlate with disease activity. They may appear in early stages of the disease, in particular before anti-dsDNA antibodies, being a potential marker for identifying patients susceptible to SLE. Patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS) may develop full-blown SLE but there is no evidence for markers predictive for that.

AIM

To evaluate whether anti-NCS may be predictors for full-blown or lupus like disease (LL) in a cohort of PAPS patients.

METHODS

A multicentric cohort of 105 PAPS patients was tested for IgG/IgM anti-NCS by using a home made assay with H1-stripped chromatin as antigen.

RESULTS

Eighty-one out of 105 (77%) of the patients were positive for anti-NCS; medium-high titre results were present only in 49/105 (46%). Anti-NCS were more frequently detected in PAPS+LL, but no relationship with clinical/serological features was found, except for a weak correlation with anti-dsDNA antibodies. Two PAPS patients evolved into full-blown SLE during the follow-up and displayed high titre anti-NCS many years before.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that anti-NCS might be added to the mosaic of autoimmune phenomena characterizing PAPS patients and in particular those with more chance to evolve to SLE.

Anti-chromatin (anti-nucleosome) antibodies

Chromatin is the native complex of histones and DNA found in the cell nucleus of eukaryotes. The fundamental subunit of chromatin is the nucleosome, which is composed of a core particle in which 146 bp of helical DNA are wrapped around an octamer made up of two H2A-H2B dimers that surround an H3-H4 tetramer. The prevalence of anti-chromatin (nucleosome) antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) varies from 50% to 90%, being similar to that of the classical positive LE cell. The presence of these antibodies can be used, in conjunction with clinical findings and other laboratory tests, to help in the diagnosis of SLE and drug induced lupus. The presence of anti-chromatin antibodies has also been linked to glomerulonephritis in SLE patients.

Present and future of the autoimmunity laboratory

At present, autoimmunity laboratories are very dynamic owing to the constant and increasing availability of new tests, mainly due to the detection of new autoantibodies. The main characteristic of the autoimmunity laboratory and the one that differentiates it from other laboratories that use immunoassays as basic techniques is that it determines antibodies (autoantibodies) and not antigens. For this reason, immunoassay techniques must employ antigens as reagents. Indirect immunofluorescence has and continues to be a basic technique in autoimmunity studies. However, over the last few years, a significant trend at autoimmunity laboratories has been the gradual replacement of immunofluorescence microscopy by immunoassay. Of the several different forms of immunoassay, the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) format is the one most used in autoimmunity laboratories. Recombinant DNA technology has allowed the production of large quantities of antigens for autoantibody analysis. Flow cytometry for the analysis of microsphere-based immunoassays allows the simultaneous measurement of several autoantibodies. Likewise, autoantigen microarrays provide a practical means to analyse biological fluids in the search for a high number of autoantibodies. We are now at the beginning of an era of multiplexed analysis, with a high capacity of autoantibody specificities. Future trends in this field include immunoassays with greater analytical sensitivity, simultaneous multiplexed capability, the use of protein microarrays, and the use of other technologies such as microfluidics.