Secondary Philadelphia chromosome and erythrophagocytosis in a relapsed acute myeloid leukemia after hematopoietic cell transplantation

A rare presentation of BCR-ABL1 and RUNX1-MECOM rearrangement in a pediatric patient with acute myeloid leukemia

Key Clinical Message

In a patient with de novo AML, co-existing BCR::ABL1 p190 isoform and RUNX1::MECOM rearrangement is accompanied by a very poor prognosis including limited response to treatment and no molecular remission. It is essential to develop a consensus on the therapeutic modalities different from the current regimen.

Abstract

Acquisition of BCR::ABL1 fusion as a primary or secondary event and RUNX1::MECOM fusion independently is reported in de novo and therapy-related MDS/AML, albeit with low frequency (<0.5%). Coexistence of BCR::ABL1 and MECOM translocation is known to cause leukemogenesis in animal models and progression towards blast crisis CML but not AML. Here we report a unique case of pediatric AML with concomitant BCR::ABL1 and RUNX1::MECOM fusion.Routine diagnostic work-up included WBC manual differential, immunophenotype, morphology, qPCR, FISH, and NGS-based CNV analyses. The patient presented with history of fever, dizziness, fatigue, gingival bleeding, and epistaxis associated with ecchymosis in right hand and heavy, prolonged menstrual period. At presentation, her hemoglobin was 5.3 g/dL, WBC 52.1(10*9/L), PLT 10(10*9/L), ESR 5 mm/h and LDH 2658 U/L. Bone marrow was hypercellular with 71% blasts, and flow cytometry showed myeloid markers including CD11c, CD33, CD34, and CD45 among others indicating AML with monocytic differentiation. FISH analyses showed variant t(9;22) (q34.1;q11.1), one additional copy each of chromosome 8 and Runx1 gene, while NGS-based CNV analyses revealed a terminal and proximal pathogenic gain within 9q34.12q34.3 and 22q11.1q11.23, respectively, and gain of entire chromosome 8 and 12 in mosaic state. qPCR confirmed the presence of p190 and also revealed RUNX1::MECOM fusion. Patient received ADE (cytarabine, daunorubicin, and etoposide) induction regimen but required multiple ICU admissions due to sepsis, cardiac shock, acute myocarditis, and thyroiditis. Coexisting BCR::ABL1 and RUNX1::MECOM fusion is suggestive of poor prognosis, and a need for consensus on the treatment modalities other than the current regimen is warranted.

Impact of high-risk cytogenetics on outcomes for children and young adults receiving CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy can induce durable remissions of relapsed/refractory B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, case reports suggested differential outcomes mediated by leukemia cytogenetics. We identified children and young adults with relapsed/refractory CD19+ ALL/lymphoblastic lymphoma treated on 5 CD19-directed CAR T-cell (CTL019 or humanized CART19) clinical trials or with commercial tisagenlecleucel from April 2012 to April 2019. Patients were hierarchically categorized according to leukemia cytogenetics: High-risk lesions were defined as KMT2A (MLL) rearrangements, Philadelphia chromosome (Ph+), Ph-like, hypodiploidy, or TCF3/HLF; favorable as hyperdiploidy or ETV6/RUNX1; and intermediate as iAMP21, IKZF1 deletion, or TCF3/PBX1. Of 231 patients aged 1 to 29, 74 (32%) were categorized as high risk, 28 (12%) as intermediate, 43 (19%) as favorable, and 86 (37%) as uninformative. Overall complete remission rate was 94%, with no difference between strata. There was no difference in relapse-free survival (RFS; P = .8112), with 2-year RFS for the high-risk group of 63% (95% confidence interval [CI], 52-77). There was similarly no difference seen in overall survival (OS) (P = .5488), with 2-year OS for the high-risk group of 70% (95% CI, 60-82). For patients with KMT2A-rearranged infant ALL (n = 13), 2-year RFS was 67% (95% CI, 45-99), and OS was 62% (95% CI, 40-95), with multivariable analysis demonstrating no increased risk of relapse (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.21-2.90; P = .7040) but a higher proportion of relapses associated with myeloid lineage switch and a 3.6-fold increased risk of all-cause death (95% CI, 1.04-12.75; P = .0434). CTL019/huCART19/tisagenlecleucel are effective at achieving durable remissions across cytogenetic categories. Relapsed/refractory patients with high-risk cytogenetics, including KMT2A-rearranged infant ALL, demonstrated high RFS and OS probabilities at 2 years.

Secondary acquisition of BCR-ABL1 fusion in de novo GATA2-MECOM positive acute myeloid leukemia with subsequent emergence of a rare KMT2A-ASXL2 fusion

Secondary acquisition of t(9;22)(q34;q11.2)/BCR-ABL1 fusion in the context of de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with inv(3)(q21q26)/GATA2-MECOM rearrangement has been rarely reported. Furthermore, t(2;11)(p23;q23)/KMT2A-ASXL2 fusion has been rarely described with only a single case reported to date. We report a 45-year-old male with a diagnosis of de novo AML harboring GATA2-MECOM rearrangement in conjunction with a related subclone with concomitant inv(3) and t(9;22). The patient was treated with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) which lead to disappearance of the inv(3)/t(9;22) subclone and subsequent expansion of the inv(3) ancestral clone. The patient was started on a 7+3 induction regimen with TKI but had persistent disease. He was placed on several additional treatment protocols and only achieved morphologic remission with a combination of fludarabine, cytarabine and filgrastim with TKI. Approximately 11.5 months after diagnosis the patient relapsed with the inv(3) clone predominating initially, followed by return of the inv(3)/t(9;22) subclone and the emergence of a second subclone with concomitant inv(3) and t(2;11)(p23;q23). Mate-pair sequencing was performed and identified a KMT2A-ASXL2 in-frame fusion, which was only recently described in a single case of therapy-related AML. For BCR-ABL1 positive AML, which generally carries a poor prognosis, treatment with TKIs has been proposed in combination with standard chemotherapy. In our case, treatment with TKI alone led to initial response of the BCR-ABL1 positive clone, but the ancestral clone quickly expanded and subsequent standard AML therapy may have led to further clonal evolution and re-emergence of the BCR-ABL1 clone in the absence of therapeutic selection.

Secondary Philadelphia chromosome acquired during therapy of acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome

The Philadelphia chromosome resulting from t(9;22)(q34;q11.2) or its variants is a defining event in chronic myeloid leukemia. It is also observed in several types of de novo acute leukemia, commonly in B lymphoblastic leukemia, and rarely in acute myeloid leukemia, acute leukemia of ambiguous lineage, and T lymphoblastic leukemia. Acquisition of the Philadelphia chromosome during therapy of acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome is rare. We reported 19 patients, including 11 men and 8 women with a median age of 53 years at initial diagnosis. The diagnoses at initial presentation were acute myeloid leukemia (n = 11), myelodysplastic syndrome (n = 5), B lymphoblastic leukemia (n = 2), and T lymphoblastic leukemia (n = 1); no cases carried the Philadelphia chromosome. The Philadelphia chromosome was detected subsequently at relapse, or at refractory stage of acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. Of 14 patients evaluated for the BCR-ABL1 transcript subtype, 12 had the e1a2 transcript. In 11 of 14 patients, the diseases before and after emergence of the Philadelphia chromosome were clonally related by karyotype or shared gene mutations. Of 15 patients with treatment information available, 7 received chemotherapy alone, 5 received chemotherapy plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors, 2 received tyrosine kinase inhibitors only, and 1 patient was not treated. Twelve patients had follow-up after acquisition of the Philadelphia chromosome; all had persistent/refractory acute leukemia. Thirteen of 15 patients died a median of 3 months after the emergence of the Philadelphia chromosome. In summary, secondary Philadelphia chromosome acquired during therapy is rare, and is associated with the e1a2 transcript subtype, terminal disease stage, and poor outcome.

BCR-ABL-positive acute myeloid leukemia: a new entity? Analysis of clinical and molecular features

BCR-ABL-positive acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a rare subtype of AML that is now included as a provisional entity in the 2016 revised WHO classification of myeloid malignancies. Since a clear distinction between de novo BCR-ABL+ AML and chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) blast crisis is challenging in many cases, the existence of de novo BCR-ABL+ AML has been a matter of debate for a long time. However, there is increasing evidence suggesting that BCR-ABL+ AML is in fact a distinct subgroup of AML. In this study, we analyzed all published cases since 1975 as well as cases from our institution in order to present common clinical and molecular features of this rare disease. Our analysis shows that BCR-ABL predominantly occurs in AML-NOS, CBF leukemia, and AML with myelodysplasia-related changes. The most common BCR-ABL transcripts (p190 and p210) are nearly equally distributed. Based on the analysis of published data, we provide a clinical algorithm for the initial differential diagnosis of BCR-ABL+ AML. The prognosis of BCR-ABL+ AML seems to depend on the cytogenetic and/or molecular background rather than on BCR-ABL itself. A therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as imatinib, dasatinib, or nilotinib is reasonable, but-due to a lack of systematic clinical data-their use cannot be routinely recommended in first-line therapy. Beyond first-line treatment of AML, the use of TKI remains an individual decision, both in combination with intensive chemotherapy and/or as a bridge to allogeneic stem cell transplantation. In each single case, potential benefits have to be weighed against potential risks.