Addition of chromosomal microarray and next generation sequencing to FISH and classical cytogenetics enhances genomic profiling of myeloid malignancies

Optical Genome Mapping Identifies a Novel Unbalanced Translocation Between Chromosomes 4q and 6q Leading to Feeding Difficulties and Hypotonia in a Neonate: A Case Report

Optical Genome Mapping (OGM) technology has garnered growing interest for the identification of chromosomal structural variations (SVs), particularly complex ones that are implicated in genetic diseases in humans. In this study, we performed genetic diagnostics on a neonatal patient who presented with feeding difficulties, hypotonia, and an atrial septal defect. We utilized a combination of trio-whole exome sequencing and OGM for our analysis. The results revealed an unbalanced translocation between maternal chromosomes 4 and 6 in the proband, ogm[GRch38]t(4:6)(q35.2;q25.3), resulting in a 2.8 Mb deletion at the 4q35 terminal and a 10.2 Mb duplication at the 6q25 terminal. In summary, this study highlights how OGM, in conjunction with other genetic approaches, can unveil the genetic etiology of complex clinical syndromes. Neonatal patients often exhibit low specific phenotypes, underlining the significance of SV detection.

AOP report: Development of an adverse outcome pathway for deposition of energy leading to cataracts

Cataracts are one of the leading causes of blindness, with an estimated 95 million people affected worldwide. A hallmark of cataract development is lens opacification, typically associated not only with aging but also radiation exposure as encountered by interventional radiologists and astronauts during the long-term space mission. To better understand radiation-induced cataracts, the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) framework was used to structure and evaluate knowledge across biological levels of organization (e.g., macromolecular, cell, tissue, organ, organism and population). AOPs identify a sequence of key events (KEs) causally connected by key event relationships (KERs) beginning with a molecular initiating event to an adverse outcome (AO) of relevance to regulatory decision-making. To construct the cataract AO and retrieve evidence to support it, a scoping review methodology was used to filter, screen, and review studies based on the modified Bradford Hill criteria. Eight KEs were identified that were moderately supported by empirical evidence (e.g., dose-, time-, incidence-concordance) across the adjacent (directly linked) relationships using well-established endpoints. Over half of the evidence to justify the KER linkages was derived from the evidence stream of biological plausibility. Early KEs of oxidative stress and protein modifications had strong linkages to downstream KEs and could be the focus of countermeasure development. Several identified knowledge gaps and inconsistencies related to the quantitative understanding of KERs which could be the basis of future research, most notably directed to experiments in the range of low or moderate doses and dose-rates, relevant to radiation workers and other occupational exposures.

Characterisation of tumor microenvironment and prevalence of CD274/PD-L1 genetic alterations difference in colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Large-scale genomic alterations, especially CD274/PD-L1 gene amplification, have great impact on anti-PD-1 efficacy on cancers such as Hodgkin's lymphoma. However, the prevalence of PD-L1 genetic alterations in colorectal cancer (CRC) and its correlation with the tumor immune microenvironment and clinical implications remain unknown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PD-L1 genetic alterations were evaluated in 324 patients with newly diagnosed CRC including 160 mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) patients and 164 mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) patients using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) method. The correlation between PD-L1 and the expression of the common immune markers was analyzed.

RESULTS

Totally 33 (10.2%) patients were identified with aberrant PD-L1 genetic alternations including deletion (2.2%), polysomy (4.9%), and amplification (3.1%); They had more aggressive features such as advanced stage (P = 0.02), shorter overall survival (OS) (P < 0.001) than patients with disomy. The aberrations correlated with positive lymph node (PLN) (p = 0.001), PD-L1 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in tumor cells (TCs) or tumor-infiltrated immunocytes (ICs) (both p < 0.001), and pMMR (p = 0.029). When dMMR and pMMR were analyzed independently, the correlations of aberrant PD-L1 genetic alterations with PD-1 expression (p = 0.016), CD4 + T cells (p = 0.032), CD8 T + cells (p = 0.032) and CD68 + cells (p = 0.04) were only found in dMMR cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of PD-L1 genetic alterations was relatively low in CRC, but the aberrations usually correlate with aggressive nature. The correlation between PD-L1 genetic alterations and tumor immune features was only observed in dMMR CRC.

The Prognostic Role of Cytogenetics Analysis in Philadelphia Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are clonal stem cell disorders characterized collectively by clonal proliferation of myeloid cells with variable morphologic maturity and hematopoietic efficiency. Although the natural history of these neoplasms can be measured sometimes in decades more than years, the cytogenetics analysis can offer useful information regarding the prognosis. Cytogenetics has a well-established prognostic role in acute leukemias and in myelodysplastic syndromes, where it drives the clinical decisions. NGS techniques can find adverse mutations with clear prognostic value and are currently included in the prognostic evaluation of MPNs in scores such as MIPSS, GIPSS, MIPSS-PV, and MIPSS-ET. We suggest that cytogenetics (considering its availability and relative cost) has a role regarding prognostic and therapeutic decisions.

Delineation of Molecular Lesions in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients at Diagnosis: Integrated Next Generation Sequencing and Cytogenomic Studies

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disorder characterized by a wide range of genetic defects. Cytogenetics, molecular and genomic technologies have proved to be helpful for deciphering the mutational landscape of AML and impacted clinical practice. Forty-eight new AML patients were investigated with an integrated approach, including classical and molecular cytogenetics, array-based comparative genomic hybridization and targeted next generation sequencing (NGS). Various genetic defects were identified in all the patients using our strategy. Targeted NGS revealed known pathogenic mutations as well as rare or unreported variants with deleterious predictions. The mutational screening of the normal karyotype (NK) group identified clinically relevant variants in 86.2% of the patients; in the abnormal cytogenetics group, the mutation detection rate was 87.5%. Overall, the highest mutation prevalence was observed for the NPM1 gene, followed by DNMT3A, FLT3 and NRAS. An unexpected co-occurrence of KMT2A translocation and DNMT3A-R882 was identified; alterations of these genes, which are involved in epigenetic regulation, are considered to be mutually exclusive. A microarray analysis detected CNVs in 25% of the NK AML patients. In patients with complex karyotypes, the microarray analysis made a significant contribution toward the accurate characterization of chromosomal defects. In summary, our results show that the integration of multiple investigative strategies increases the detection yield of genetic defects with potential clinical relevance.

Clinical Utility of Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Assay to Detect Copy Number Variants Associated with Myelodysplastic Syndrome in Myeloid Malignancies

Copy number variants (CNVs) and gene mutations are important for diagnosis and treatment of myeloid malignancies. In a routine clinical setting, somatic gene mutations are detected by targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay, but CNVs are commonly detected by conventional chromosome analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The aim of this proof-of-principle study was to investigate the feasibility of using targeted NGS to simultaneously detect both somatic mutations and CNVs. Herein, we sequenced 406 consecutive patients with myeloid malignancies by targeted NGS and performed a head-to-head comparison with the results from a myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) FISH and conventional chromosome analysis to detect CNVs. Among 91 patients with abnormal MDS FISH results, the targeted NGS revealed all 120 CNVs detected by MDS FISH (including -5/5q-, -7/7q-, +8, and 20q-) and 193 extra CNVs detected by conventional chromosome analysis. The targeted NGS achieved 100% concordance with the MDS FISH. The lower limit of detection of MDS CNVs by the targeted NGS was generally 5% variant allele fraction for DNA, based on the lowest percentages of abnormal cells detected by MDS FISH in this study. This proof-of-principle study demonstrated that the targeted NGS assay can simultaneously detect both MDS CNVs and somatic mutations, which can provide a more comprehensive genetic profiling for patients with myeloid malignancies using a single assay in a clinical setting.

Clinical Applications of Chromosomal Microarray Testing in Myeloid Malignancies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Knowledge of both somatic mutations and copy number aberrations are important for the understanding of cancer pathogenesis and management of myeloid neoplasms. The currently available standard of care technologies for copy number assessment such as conventional karyotype and FISH are either limited by low resolution or restriction to targeted assessment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Chromosomal microarray (CMA) is effective in characterization of chromosomal and gene aberrations of diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic significance at a higher resolution than conventional karyotyping. These results are complementary to NGS mutation studies. Copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity (CN-LOH), which is prognostic in AML, is currently only identified by CMA. Yet, despite the widespread availability, CMA testing is not routinely performed in diagnostic laboratories due to lack of knowledge on best-testing practices for clinical work-up of myeloid neoplasms. In this review, we provide an overview of the clinical significance of CMA in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN). We will also elaborate the specific clinical scenarios where CMA can provide additional information essential for management and could potentially alter treatment. Chromosomal microarray (CMA) is an effective technology for characterizing chromosomal copy number changes and copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity of diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic significance at a high resolution in myeloid malignancies.

Clinical use of SNP-microarrays for the detection of genome-wide changes in haematological malignancies

Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarrays are commonly used for the clinical investigation of constitutional genomic disorders; however, their adoption for investigating somatic changes is being recognised. With increasing importance being placed on defining the cancer genome, a shift in technology is imperative at a clinical level. Microarray platforms have the potential to become frontline testing, replacing or complementing standard investigations such as FISH or karyotype. This 'molecular karyotype approach' exemplified by SNP-microarrays has distinct advantages in the investigation of several haematological malignancies. A growing body of literature, including guidelines, has shown support for the use of SNP-microarrays in the clinical laboratory to aid in a more accurate definition of the cancer genome. Understanding the benefits of this technology along with discussing the barriers to its implementation is necessary for the development and incorporation of SNP-microarrays in a clinical laboratory for the investigation of haematological malignancies.

Cytogenomic array detects a subset of myelodysplastic syndrome with increased risk that is invisible to conventional karyotype

Conventional karyotyping is essential standard practice in the initial evaluation of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and is the most impactful single component of the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R). While single nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP-A) has demonstrated the ability to detect chromosomal defects with greater sensitivity than conventional karyotype, widespread adoption is limited by the unknown additional prognostic impact of SNP-A analysis. Here, we investigate the significance of additional SNP-A abnormalities in the setting of MDS and demonstrate differences in survival of patients with additional abnormalities, even those initially characterized as relatively lower risk either by cytogenetic score or IPSS-R. Our findings identify specific abnormalities, particularly KMT2A partial tandem duplication, that are invisible to conventional karyotype and potentially contribute to the poor prognosis of MDS patients. Furthermore, these results demonstrate the added value of SNP-A analysis in identifying patients who may benefit from more aggressive therapy, particularly those who would otherwise be classified into lower risk categories.

Assessing copy number aberrations and copy neutral loss of heterozygosity across the genome as best practice: An evidence based review of clinical utility from the cancer genomics consortium (CGC) working group for myelodysplastic syndrome, myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative and myeloproliferative neoplasms

Multiple studies have demonstrated the utility of chromosomal microarray (CMA) testing to identify clinically significant copy number alterations (CNAs) and copy-neutral loss-of-heterozygosity (CN-LOH) in myeloid malignancies. However, guidelines for integrating CMA as a standard practice for diagnostic evaluation, assessment of prognosis and predicting treatment response are still lacking. CMA has not been recommended for clinical work-up of myeloid malignancies by the WHO 2016 or the NCCN 2017 guidelines but is a suggested test by the European LeukaemiaNet 2013 for the diagnosis of primary myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). The Cancer Genomics Consortium (CGC) Working Group for Myeloid Neoplasms systematically reviewed peer-reviewed literature to determine the power of CMA in (1) improving diagnostic yield, (2) refining risk stratification, and (3) providing additional genomic information to guide therapy. In this manuscript, we summarize the evidence base for the clinical utility of array testing in the workup of MDS, myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). This review provides a list of recurrent CNAs and CN-LOH noted in this disease spectrum and describes the clinical significance of the aberrations and how they complement gene mutation findings by sequencing. Furthermore, for new or suspected diagnosis of MDS or MPN, we present suggestions for integrating genomic testing methods (CMA and mutation testing by next generation sequencing) into the current standard-of-care clinical laboratory testing (karyotype, FISH, morphology, and flow).

Is fluorescence in-situ hybridization sufficient in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and insufficient cytogenetic testing?

Chromosome banding analysis (CBA) in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) remains the 'gold standard' for identification of chromosomal abnormalities, while interphase fluorescence in-situ hybridization (I-FISH) is mainly used to complement CBA. This study, retrospectively, evaluated CBA and I-FISH results in 600 patients with suspected MDS and determined the effect of CBA/FISH reallocation on IPSS-R. Our result demonstrated that in 7/586 (1.2%) patients with satisfactory karyotype, I-FISH provided additional information. In 25/453 (5.5%) of the patients with normal I-FISH, CBA detected chromosomal abnormalities, and in 68/147 (46%) of the patients with abnormal I-FISH, CBA detected additional chromosomal aberrations. When 5q- aberration was alone or accompanied by additional abnormalities by I-FISH, CBA revealed a complex karyotype (16/25;64%, 35/43;81%, respectively). Our results suggest that in cases of karyotype failure, if I-FISH is used alone, patients are at risk of being misclassified into the wrong cytogenetic risk groups and a repeat sample for CBA should be attempted.