A new potential oncogenic mutation in the FERM domain of JAK2 in BCR/ABL1-negative and V617F-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms revealed by a comprehensive screening of 17 tyrosine kinase coding genes

Systematization of analytical studies of polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia and primary myelofibrosis, and a meta-analysis of the frequency of JAK2, CALR and MPL mutations: 2000-2018

BACKGROUND

Research into Philadelphia-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms is heterogeneous. In addition, no systematization of studies of polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET) or primary myelofibrosis (PMF) have been carried out. The objective of this review is to characterize studies on BCR-ABL1-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms and to compare the frequency of JAK2, MPL and CALR mutations in PV, ET and PMF.

METHOD

A systematic review of the scientific literature was conducted, as was meta-analysis with an ex-ante selection of protocol, according to phases of the PRISMA guide in three interdisciplinary databases. To guarantee reproducibility in the pursuit and retrieval of information, the reproducibility and methodological quality of the studies were evaluated by two researchers.

RESULTS

Fifty-two studies were included, the majority having been carried out in the United States, China, Brazil and Europe. The frequency of the JAK2V617F mutation ranged from 46.7 to 100% in patients with PV, from 31.3 to 72.1% in patients with ET, and from 25.0 to 85.7% in those with PMF. The frequency of the MPL mutation was 0% in PV, from 0.9 to 12.5% in ET, and from 0 to 17.1% in PMF. The CALR mutation occurred at a frequency of 0.0% in PV, whereas in ET, it ranged from 12.6 to 50%, and in PMF, it ranged from 10 to 100%. The risk of this mutation presenting in PV is 3.0 times that found for ET and 4.0 times that found for PMF.

CONCLUSION

Given the specificity and reported high frequencies of the JAK2V617F, MPL and CALR mutations in this group of neoplasms, the diagnosis of these diseases should not be made on clinical and hematological characteristics alone but should include genetic screening of patients.

GOG 8020/210: Risk stratification of lymph node metastasis, disease progression and survival using single nucleotide polymorphisms in endometrial cancer: An NRG oncology/gynecologic oncology group study

OBJECTIVES

The ability to stratify a patient's risk of metastasis and survival permits more refined care. A proof of principle study was undertaken to investigate the relationship between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in literature based candidate cancer genes and the risk of nodal metastasis and clinical outcome in endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) patients.

METHODS

Surgically-staged EEC patients from the Gynecologic Oncology Group or Washington University School of Medicine with germline DNA available were eligible. Fifty-four genes represented by 384 SNPs, were evaluated by Illumina Custom GoldenGate array. Association with lymph node metastases was the primary outcome. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was also evaluated.

RESULTS

361 SNPs with high quality genotype data were evaluated in 337 patients with outcome data. Five SNPs in CXCR2 had an odds ratio (OR) between 0.68 and 0.70 (p-value ≤ 0.025). The A allele rs946486 in ABL had an OR of 1.5 (p-value = 0.01) for metastasis. The G allele in rs7795743 in EGFR had an OR for metastasis of 0.68 (p-value = 0.02) and hazard ratio (HR) for progression of 0.66 (p-value = 0.004). Importantly, no SNP met genome wide significance after adjusting for multiple test correcting and clinical covariates. The A allele in rs2159359 SNP in NME1 and the G allele in rs13222385 in EGFR were associated with worse OS. Both exhibited genome wide significance; rs13222385 remained significant after adjusting for prognostic clinical variables.

CONCLUSION

SNPs in cancer genes including rs2159359 SNP in NME1 and rs13222385 in EGFR may stratify risk in EEC and are prioritized for further investigation.

Next-generation sequencing for JAK2 mutation testing: advantages and pitfalls

The JAK2^V617F mutation is part of the major criteria for diagnosis of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). Allele-specific quantitative PCR (qPCR) is the most prevalent method used in laboratories but with the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques, we felt necessary to evaluate this approach for JAK2 mutations testing. Among DNA samples from 427 patients analyzed by qPCR and NGS, we found an excellent concordance between both methods when allelic burden was superior to 2% (the detection limit of our NGS assay). Only one sample among 298 was found negative by NGS while allelic burden by qPCR was 3%. Because NGS detection limit is higher, sensitivity was lower as exemplified by 21 samples found negative whereas qPCR measured allelic burdens between 0.1 and 1%. Importantly, quantitative data of samples found positive by both techniques were highly correlated (R² = 0.9477). We also evaluated 40 samples tested for JAK2 exon 12 mutations by HRM. The concordance with NGS was of 100%. Using NGS, the full coding region of JAK2 was analyzed leading to identification of several variants outside of exon 12 and 14 which were previously described or not. Interestingly, we found one somatic mutation (c.1034A>T p.H345L) which induced constitutive activation of the JAK/STAT pathway leading to an increased proliferation of BaF/3 cells with low-dose EPO. This study showed that NGS is a robust method highly correlated to qPCR, although less sensitive, but providing the opportunity to identify other JAK2 variants with potential impact on disease initiation or evolution.

A structure-function perspective of Jak2 mutations and implications for alternate drug design strategies: the road not taken

Jak2 is a non-receptor tyrosine kinase that is involved in the control of cellular growth and proliferation. Due to its significant role in hematopoiesis, Jak2 is a frequent target for mutations in cancer, especially myeloid leukemia, lymphoid leukemia and the myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). These mutations are common amongst different populations all over the world and there is a great deal of effort to develop therapeutic drugs for the affected patients. Jak2 mutations, whether they are point, deletion, or gene fusion, most commonly result in constitutive kinase activation. Here, we explore the structure-function relation of various Jak2 mutations identified in cancer and understand how they disrupt Jak2 regulation. Current Jak2 inhibitors target the highly conserved active site in the kinase domain and therefore, these inhibitors may lack specificity. Based on our knowledge regarding structure-function correlations as they pertain to regulation of Jak2 kinase activity, an alternative approach for specific Jak2 targeting could be via allosteric inhibitor design. Successful reports of allosteric inhibitors developed against other kinases provide precedent for the development of Jak2 allosteric inhibitors. Here, we suggest plausible target sites in the Jak2 structure for allosteric inhibition. Such targets include the type II inhibitor pocket and substrate binding site in the kinase domain, the kinase-pseudokinase domain interface, SH2-JH2 linker region and the FERM domain. Thus, future Jak2 inhibitors that target these sites via allosteric mechanisms may provide alternative therapeutic strategies to existing ATP competitive inhibitors.

CBL mutations in myeloproliferative neoplasms are also found in the gene's proline-rich domain and in patients with the V617FJAK2

BACKGROUND

Despite the discovery of the p.V617F in JAK2, the molecular pathogenesis of some chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms remains unclear. Although very rare, different studies have identified CBL (Cas-Br-Murine ecotropic retroviral transforming sequence) mutations in V617FJAK2-negative patients, mainly located in the RING finger domain. In order to determine the frequency of CBL mutations in these diseases, we studied different regions of all CBL family genes (CBL, CBLB and CBLC) in a selected group of patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms. We also included V617FJAK2-positive patients to check whether mutations in CBL and JAK2 are mutually exclusive events.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Using denaturing high performance liquid chromatography, we screened for mutations in CBL, CBLB and CBLC in a group of 172 V617FJAK2-negative and 232 V617FJAK2-positive patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms not selected for loss of heterozygosity. The effect on cell proliferation of the mutations detected was analyzed on a 32D(FLT3) cell model.

RESULTS

An initial screening of all coding exons of CBL, CBLB and CBLC in 44 V617FJAK2-negative samples revealed two new CBL mutations (p.C416W in the RING finger domain and p.A678V in the proline-rich domain). Analyses performed on 128 additional V617FJAK2-negative and 232 V617FJAK2-positive samples detected three CBL changes (p.T402HfsX29, p.P417R and p.S675C in two cases) in four V617FJAK2-positive patients. None of these mutations was found in 200 control samples. Cell proliferation assays showed that all of the mutations promoted hypersensitivity to interleukin-3 in 32D(FLT3) cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Although mutations described to date have been found in the RING finger domain and in the linker region of CBL, we found a similar frequency of mutations in the proline-rich domain. In addition, we found CBL mutations in both V617FJAK2-positive (4/232; 1.7%) and negative (2/172; 1.2%) patients and all of them promoted hypersensitivity to interleukin-3.

Quantification of PDGFRA alternative transcripts improves the screening for X-PDGFRA fusions by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction

Hematological malignancies with eosinophilia are often associated with fusions in PDGFRA, PDGFRB, or FGFR1 genes. RT-PCR has proved to be useful for finding new PDGFRA gene fusions, but some studies have shown overexpression of the TK domain which cannot be explained by the existence of such aberrations. This fact could be related to the expression of alternative PDGFRA transcripts. We show that quantification of the expression of three different PDGFRA fragments discriminates between PDGFRA alternative transcripts and fusion genes, and we have tested this novel methodological approach in a group of eosinophilia cases. Our data show that alternative PDGFRA transcripts should be taken into account when screening for PDGFRA aberrations, such as gene fusions, by RT-PCR. Expression from an internal PDGFRA promoter seems to be a frequent event, in both normal and leukemic samples, and is probably related to physiological conditions, but it could have a role in other tumors. Even so, we show that our RQ-PCR methodology can discriminate expression of alternative transcripts from the presence of X-PDGFRA fusion genes.