Cytogenetic studies in acute leukemia patients relapsing after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Cytogenetic evolution predicts a poor prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia patients who relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients relapsing after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) have a poor prognosis. Cytogenetic evolution (CGE) has been investigated and found to have an important impact on the prognosis of relapsed leukemia, but its impact on AML patients relapsing after transplantation remains controversial. In this study, we analyzed 34 AML patients relapsing after allo-HSCT, among whom 14 developed additional abnormalities in chromosomal karyotype after leukemia recurrence (CGE group) and 20 patients did not (non-CGE group). We found that the cytogenetic characteristics were much more complex at relapse in the CGE group, and the acquisition of aberrations at relapse most commonly involved chromosome 11. The 6-month post-relapse overall survival (PROS) of the CGE group was significantly lower than that of the non-CGE group (21.4% versus 50.0%, P = 0.004). The CGE group also showed a trend of worse 2-year OS (7.1% versus 28.6%, P = 0.096). In the multivariate analyses, the occurrence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (HR 0.27 [95% CI, 0.11-0.68], P = 0.006) and a reduced-intensity FBA conditioning regimen (HR 0.42 [95% CI, 0.18-0.98], P = 0.045) were found to be two independent factors for a better PROS, whereas CGE (HR 3.16 [95% CI, 1.42-7.05], P = 0.005) was associated with a worse PROS. In conclusion, CGE was associated with a poor prognosis in AML patients who relapsed after allo-HSCT, and the importance of monitoring karyotype changes after transplantation should be noted.

Prognostic impact of chromosomal changes at relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome

Chromosome analysis is a powerful prognostic tool in myeloid malignancies. Recipients who experience relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) often show chromosomal changes between diagnosis and relapse. However, the clinical impact of chromosomal changes and the efficacy of post-relapse treatment according to chromosomal changes have not been fully investigated. We retrospectively analyzed 72 recipients who had experienced relapse after allo-HCT for acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. We categorized them into two groups: with or without clonal chromosomal changes at relapse after allo-HCT. Post-relapse survival was shorter in the clonal chromosomal change group (median 117 days vs 275 days, P = 0.019). Moreover, acquisition of chromosome 7 abnormality or complex changes tended to be associated with inferior survival in a univariate analysis (median 92 days vs median 173 days, P = 0.043), and this adverse impact was confirmed in a multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 2.07, P = 0.024). The patterns of chromosomal changes from diagnosis to relapse after allo-HCT were heterogenous, and further investigations are required to clarify the effect of individual chromosomal changes.

Prognostic Impact of Cytogenetic Evolution on the Outcome of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Nonremission: A Single-Institute Analysis of 212 Recipients

Recent progress in genetic analysis technology has helped researchers understand the pathogenesis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Considering this progress, AML karyotype is still one of the most significant prognostic factors that provides risk-adapted treatment approaches. Karyotype changes during treatment have been observed at times, but their prognostic impact is sparse, especially on allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Here, we retrospectively investigated the effect of chromosomal changes between diagnosis and pretransplantation on the prognosis of allo-SCT by analyzing the outcomes of 212 consecutive patients who underwent allo-SCT for the first time at Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, between 2008 and 2018. Cytogenetic abnormalities at diagnosis and pretransplantation were categorized based on the 2017 European Leukemia Net risk stratification. Genetic abnormalities such as FLT3-ITD and NPM1 were not considered in this study due to lack of genetic information in most patients. We defined cytogenetic evolution as chromosomal changes classified from lower category to higher category. Seventeen patients (8%) had cytogenetic evolution between diagnosis and pretransplantation, and they showed a significantly worse relapse rate than those who were categorized in the intermediate group based on the karyotype at diagnosis (3-year confidence interval [CI] of relapse, 57.4% versus 24.9%; P < .01). In multivariate analysis, cytogenetic evolution before allo-SCT had a significant impact on the CI of relapse (hazard ratio [HR], 3.89; CI, 1.75 to 8.67; P < .01), as well as the high score of the hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index (HR, 0.54; CI, 0.31 to 0.94; P = .03), but had no significant impact on overall survival or nonrelapse mortality. These results indicate that cytogenetic evolution has a significant impact after allo-SCT and should be considered during AML treatment.

Immune Escape of Relapsed AML Cells after Allogeneic Transplantation

BACKGROUND

As consolidation therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation provides a benefit in part by means of an immune-mediated graft-versus-leukemia effect. We hypothesized that the immune-mediated selective pressure imposed by allogeneic transplantation may cause distinct patterns of tumor evolution in relapsed disease.

METHODS

We performed enhanced exome sequencing on paired samples obtained at initial presentation with AML and at relapse from 15 patients who had a relapse after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (with transplants from an HLA-matched sibling, HLA-matched unrelated donor, or HLA-mismatched unrelated donor) and from 20 patients who had a relapse after chemotherapy. We performed RNA sequencing and flow cytometry on a subgroup of these samples and on additional samples for validation.

RESULTS

On exome sequencing, the spectrum of gained and lost mutations observed with relapse after transplantation was similar to the spectrum observed with relapse after chemotherapy. Specifically, relapse after transplantation was not associated with the acquisition of previously unknown AML-specific mutations or structural variations in immune-related genes. In contrast, RNA sequencing of samples obtained at relapse after transplantation revealed dysregulation of pathways involved in adaptive and innate immunity, including down-regulation of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II genes ( HLA-DPA1, HLA-DPB1, HLA-DQB1, and HLA-DRB1) to levels that were 3 to 12 times lower than the levels seen in paired samples obtained at presentation. Flow cytometry and immunohistochemical analysis confirmed decreased expression of MHC class II at relapse in 17 of 34 patients who had a relapse after transplantation. Evidence suggested that interferon-γ treatment could rapidly reverse this phenotype in AML blasts in vitro.

CONCLUSIONS

AML relapse after transplantation was not associated with the acquisition of relapse-specific mutations in immune-related genes. However, it was associated with dysregulation of pathways that may influence immune function, including down-regulation of MHC class II genes, which are involved in antigen presentation. These epigenetic changes may be reversible with appropriate therapy. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others.).

Selected biological issues affecting relapse after stem cell transplantation: role of T-cell impairment, NK cells and intrinsic tumor resistance

The graft vs. leukemia (GvL) effect as a method of preventing relapse is well described after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), but the mechanisms to this effect and how tumor sometimes develops resistance to GvL are just beginning to be understood. This article reviews and expands upon data presented at the Third International Workshop on Biology, Prevention and Treatment of Relapse after Stem Cell Transplantation held in Hamburg, Germany, in November 2016. We first discuss in detail the role that T-cell impairment early after HCT plays in relapse by looking at data from T cell-depleted approaches as well as the clear role that early T-cell recovery has shown in improving outcomes. We then review key findings regarding the role of specific KIR donor/recipient pairings that contribute to relapse prevention after HCT for several tumor types. Finally, we discuss a unique mouse model following the development of tumor resistance to GvL. Detailed molecular characterization of events marking the development of tumor resistance to the immunotherapy of GvL may help in developing future strategies to overcome immune escape.

Mutational analysis of disease relapse in patients allografted for acute myeloid leukemia

Disease relapse is the major cause of treatment failure after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). To identify AML-associated genes prognostic of AML relapse post-allo-SCT, we resequenced 35 genes in 113 adults at diagnosis, 49 of whom relapsed. Two hundred sixty-two mutations were detected in 102/113 (90%) patients. An increased risk of relapse was observed in patients with mutations in WT1 (P = .018), DNMT3A (P = .045), FLT3 ITD (P = .071), and TP53 (P = .06), whereas mutations in IDH1 were associated with a reduced risk of disease relapse (P = .018). In 29 patients, we additionally compared mutational profiles in bone marrow at diagnosis and relapse to study changes in clonal structure at relapse. In 13/29 patients, mutational profiles altered at relapse. In 9 patients, mutations present at relapse were not detected at diagnosis. In 15 patients, additional available pre-allo-SCT samples demonstrated that mutations identified posttransplant but not at diagnosis were detectable immediately prior to transplant in 2 of 15 patients. Taken together, these observations, if confirmed in larger studies, have the potential to inform the design of novel strategies to reduce posttransplant relapse highlighting the potential importance of post-allo-SCT interventions with a broad antitumor specificity in contrast to targeted therapies based on mutational profile at diagnosis.

Role of chromosomal aberrations in clonal diversity and progression of acute myeloid leukemia

Genetic abnormalities are a hallmark of cancer. Hereby, cytogenetic aberrations and small-scale abnormalities, such as single-nucleotide variations and insertion/deletion mutations, have emerged as two alternative modes of genetic diversification. Both mechanisms are at work in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), in which conventional karyotyping and molecular studies demonstrate that gene mutations occur predominantly in cytogenetically normal AML, whereas chromosomal changes are a driving force of development and progression of disease in aberrant karyotype AML. All steps of disease evolution in AML, ranging from the transformation of preleukemic clones into overt leukemia to the expansion and recurrence of malignant clones, are paralleled by clonal evolution at either the gene mutation or chromosome aberration level. Preleukemic conditions, such as Fanconi anemia and Bloom syndrome, demonstrate that the acquisition of chromosomal aberrations can contribute to leukemic transformation. Similar to what has been shown at the mutational level, expansion and recurrence of AML clones goes along with increasing genetic diversification. Hereby, cytogenetically more evolved subclones are at a proliferative advantage and outgrow ancestor clones or have evolved toward a more aggressive behavior with additional newly acquired aberrations as compared with the initial leukemic clone, respectively.

Tumor heterogeneity makes AML a "moving target" for detection of residual disease

Detection of minimal residual disease is recognized as an important post-therapy risk factor in acute myeloid leukemia patients. Two most commonly used methods for residual disease monitoring are real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction and multiparameter flow cytometry. The results so far are very promising, whereby it is likely that minimal residual disease results will enable to guide future post-remission treatment strategies. However, the leukemic clone may change between diagnosis and relapse due to the instability of the tumor cells. This instability may already be evident at diagnosis if different subpopulations of tumor cells coexist. Such tumor heterogeneity, which may be reflected by immunophenotypic, molecular, and/or cytogenetic changes, can have important consequences for minimal residual disease detection, since false-negative results can be expected to be the result of losses of aberrancies used as minimal residual disease markers. In this review the role of such changes in minimal residual disease monitoring is explored. Furthermore, possible causes of tumor instability are discussed, whereby the concept of clonal selection and expansion of a chemotherapy-resistant subpopulation is highlighted. Accordingly, detailed knowledge of the process of clonal evolution is required to improve both minimal residual disease risk stratification and patient outcome.

Karyotypic change between diagnosis and relapse as a predictor of salvage therapy outcome in AML patients

Background

Only a few patients who experience AML relapse derive lasting benefit from re-induction therapy. The utility of reassessing the disease karyotype at relapse is unclear. The main goals of this study were to identify prognostic factors for AML relapse and to determine the prognostic utility of karyotypic change between diagnosis and relapse as a variable for predicting response to salvage therapy for relapsed AML.

Methods

This retrospective study included 58 patients with relapsed AML treated at the Yonsei University College of Medicine between 2005 and 2010. Karyotypes at both diagnosis and relapse were available for 45 patients (77%). A change in karyotype at relapse was observed in 17 of 45 cases (37%), and no change was noted in 28 of 45 cases (62%).

Results

Karyotypic changes between diagnosis and relapse were associated with the response rate (RR) to salvage therapy (P=0.016). Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) in the group with karyotypic changes between diagnosis and relapse were significantly different from those with no karyotypic changes (P=0.004 and P=0.010, respectively). We applied multiple multivariate Cox regression analyses to identify independent prognostic factors for overall response (OR), OS, and EFS. A change in karyotype between diagnosis and relapse was significantly associated with OS (P=0.023; RR=2.655) and EFS (P=0.033; RR=2.831).

Conclusion

Karyotypic changes between the diagnosis and relapse of AML could be used to predict outcomes and tailor clinical and biological therapeutic strategies for relapsed AML patients.

Genome-wide profiling in AML patients relapsing after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Molecular pathogenesis of relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is poorly understood. Data regarding relapse mechanisms after transplantation is scarcely available. We investigated genomic aberrations (GAs) in 21 patients undergoing related and unrelated HLA-matched transplantation in leukemic blasts before transplant and at relapse after transplantation. We found a higher number of GAs after transplantation, suggesting increased genomic instability during relapse. Two of 21 patients showed a large homozygous region spanning the whole HLA-locus on chromosome 6p in the relapse sample. In both patients sequence-based HLA typing of the blasts revealed a loss of the patient-specific allele at the mismatched locus leading to homozygosity for the HLA haplotype shared by the patient and the donor. In addition, GAs were found in critical regions such as 12p13, 13q12.2, and 17p13. Our results suggest that escape from immunologic surveillance may be a relevant mechanism of relapse after transplantation in patients with GAs on chromosome 6p. A combination of continuous immunologic pressure mediated by donor T cells and clonal evolution of myeloid leukemia may result in acquired GAs after transplantation.

Comparison of cytogenetic clonal evolution patterns following allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation versus conventional treatment in patients at relapse of AML

Relapse of acute myelogenous leukemia has been associated with clonal cytogenetic evolution, but no study focused specifically on relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We compared karyotypes in 160 patients at both diagnosis and relapse either after allo-HSCT (n = 26) or standard chemotherapy (n = 134) using chromosome banding analysis combined with fluorescein in situ hybridization. There were 71 females and 89 males (19.7-80.6 years). At diagnosis, aberrant karyotypes were more frequent in the HSCT than in the chemotherapy cohort (16 of 26; 61.5% versus 63 of 134; 47.0%). This was most obvious in patients with unfavorable cytogenetics (8 of 26; 30.8% versus 19 of 134; 14.2%; P = .032). Differences in the karyotypes between diagnosis and relapse were more frequent in the allo-cohort (14 of 26; 53.8% versus 49 of 134; 36.6%) than in the conventional cohort (n.s.), mainly because of newly emerging cytogenetic alterations. Appearance of ≥ 3 new clonal alterations was more frequent in the allo-cohort (6 of 12; 50.0% with clonal evolution versus 5 of 41; 12.2%, P = .005). The mean number of cytogenetic alterations per patient was increasing from 2.0 at diagnosis to 4.0 at relapse in the allo-cohort, in the conventionally treated patients from 0.9 to 1.3 (both P < .001). Thus, higher frequencies of clonal evolution and increasing cytogenetic complexity were observed in the stem cell recipients probably related to the more unfavorable cytogenetic profiles already depicted at diagnosis.