Beasley's 1981 paper: The power of a well-designed cohort study to drive liver cancer research and prevention

Risk Factors for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Historical Perspective

Content available: Author Audio Recording.

Hepatitis C virus and hepatitis B virus in patients with schizophrenia

This study evaluated the severe hepatic outcome (SHO) in patients with schizophrenia and viral hepatitis who received antipsychotics.Using the nationwide Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, patients first diagnosed with schizophrenia between 2002 and 2013 were identified. Patients diagnosed with schizophrenia who had viral hepatitis, including hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV), were designated as the viral hepatitis group. A control group without viral hepatitis was matched for age, sex, and index year in a 2:1 ratio. Patients with severe hepatic outcomes before enrollment were excluded. The 2 cohorts were observed until December 31, 2013. The primary endpoint was occurrence of a SHO, including liver cancer, liver failure, liver decompensation, or transplantation.Among the 16,365 patients newly diagnosed with schizophrenia between January 2002 and December 2013, we identified 614 patients with viral hepatitis and 1228 matched patients without viral hepatitis. Of these 1842 patients, 41 (2.22%) developed SHOs, including 26 (4.23%) in the viral hepatitis group and 15 (1.22%) in the control group, during the mean follow-up period of 3.71 ± 2.49 years. Cox proportional hazard analysis indicated that the SHO risk increased by 3.58 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.859-6.754; P < .001) in patients with schizophrenia and viral hepatitis. Moreover, patients with schizophrenia having HCV had a higher SHO risk than those without viral hepatitis (hazard ratio: 5.07, 95% CI: 1.612-15.956; P < .0001). Patients having both schizophrenia and viral hepatitis, especially HCV, had a higher risk of SHOs.

Effect of Hepatitis Viruses on the Nrf2/Keap1-Signaling Pathway and Its Impact on Viral Replication and Pathogenesis

With respect to their genome and their structure, the human hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) are complete different viruses. However, both viruses can cause an acute and chronic infection of the liver that is associated with liver inflammation (hepatitis). For both viruses chronic infection can lead to fibrosis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) play a central role in a variety of chronic inflammatory diseases. In light of this, this review summarizes the impact of both viruses on ROS-generating and ROS-inactivating mechanisms. The focus is on the effect of both viruses on the transcription factor Nrf2 (nuclear factor erythroid 2 (NF-E2)-related factor 2). By binding to its target sequence, the antioxidant response element (ARE), Nrf2 triggers the expression of a variety of cytoprotective genes including ROS-detoxifying enzymes. The review summarizes the literature about the pathways for the modulation of Nrf2 that are deregulated by HBV and HCV and describes the impact of Nrf2 deregulation on the viral life cycle of the respective viruses and the virus-associated pathogenesis.

Proposed model for the prediction of intrahepatic covalently closed circular DNA level in patients with chronic hepatitis B

AIM

We sought to create a prediction model for intrahepatic covalently closed circular DNA (IH-cccDNA) level in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients and to validate the model's predictive accuracy.

METHODS

Patients who did not receive previous nucleoside analogue (NA) therapy were assigned to the training cohort (n = 57), and those who received previous NA therapy were assigned to the validation cohort (n = 69). Factors linked to IH-cccDNA levels in the training cohort were analyzed and a formula to predict IH-cccDNA levels was constructed. Next, the reproducibility of that formula was assessed.

RESULTS

In the multivariate analysis for the prediction of IH-cccDNA level in the training cohort, fasting blood sugar (FBS) (P = 0.0227), hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) (P = 0.0067) and log₁₀ (HB surface antigen [HBsAg]) (P = 0.0497) were significant, whereas HB core-related antigen (HBcrAg) tended to be significant (P = 0.0562). The formula was constructed and named the FBS-cres score based on the variables used (FBS, HBcrAg, HBeAg, and HBsAg). The FBS-cres score was calculated as: 3.1686 - (0.0148 × FBS) + (0.1982 × HBcrAg) + (0.0008168 × HBeAg) + (0.1761 × log₁₀ (HBsAg)). In the training cohort, a significant correlation was noted between HBcrAg and IH-cccDNA levels (P < 0.0001, r = 0.67), whereas the FBS-cres score was more closely correlated to IH-cccDNA level (P < 0.0001, r = 0.81). In the validation cohort, significant correlation was found between HBcrAg and IH-cccDNA levels (P = 0.0012, r = 0.38), whereas the FBS-cres score was more closely linked to IH-cccDNA levels (P < 0.0001, r = 0.51). Similar tendencies were observed in all subgroup analyses.

CONCLUSION

Our proposed model for the prediction of IH-cccDNA level could be helpful in CHB patients.