[Systematic review of stereotactic radiotherapy for high-grade gliomas]

Radiation guidelines for gliomas

Gliomas are the most frequent primary brain tumour. The proximity of organs at risk, the infiltrating nature, and the radioresistance of gliomas have to be taken into account in the choice of prescribed dose and technique of radiotherapy. The management of glioma patients is based on clinical factors (age, KPS) and tumour characteristics (histology, molecular biology, tumour location), and strongly depends on available and associated treatments, such as surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. The knowledge of molecular biomarkers is currently essential, they are increasingly evolving as additional factors that facilitate diagnostics and therapeutic decision-making. We present the update of the recommendations of the French society for radiation oncology on the indications and the technical procedures for performing radiation therapy in patients with gliomas.

Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy as a Salvage Therapy for Recurrent High-Grade Gliomas: Single-Center Experience

Background and Purpose:

The aim of this study was to investigate the survival outcomes and safety of hypofractioned stereotactic radiotherapy as a salvage treatment for recurrent high-grade glioma.

Patients and Methods:

Between March 2012 and March 2017, 32 consecutive patients (12 women, 20 men) treated in a single center were retrospectively included in this study. Grade III gliomas were diagnosed in 14 patients and grade IV in 18 patients. Thirty-four lesions were treated with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy on a linear accelerator. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy delivered a median dose of 30 Gy (27-30) in 6 fractions (3-6) of 5 Gy (5-9). The treatment plans were normalized to 100% at the isocenter and prescribed to the 80% isodose line. Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors were analyzed.

Results:

Median follow-up was 20.9 months. Median overall survival following hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy was 15.6 months (median overall survival for patients with glioblastoma and grade III glioma was 8.2 and 19.5 months, respectively; P = .0496) and progression-free survival was 3.7 months (median progression-free survival for patients with glioblastoma and grade III glioma was 3.6 and 4.5 months, respectively; P = .2424). In multivariate analysis, tumor grade III (P = .0027), an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status <2 at the time of reirradiation (P = .0023), and a mean dose >35 Gy (P = .0055) significantly improved overall survival. A maximum reirradiation dose above 38 Gy (P = .0179) was significantly associated with longer progression-free survival.

Conclusion:

Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy is well tolerated and offers an effective salvage option for the treatment of recurrent high-grade gliomas with encouraging overall survival. Our results suggest that the dose distribution had an impact on survival.

[Neurocognition: Impact of radiotherapy]

The cognitive evaluation is essential to arrest the impact of brain tumours on brain functions. Radiation therapy on the brain has side effects, which can impact on the cognitive functioning. The cognitive disorders constitute a predictive factor of the quality of life of the patients impacting on their autonomy, as well as on their social and professional life. This problem thus takes a more and more important place in the reflection on the cancer care. A better detection of these cognitive disorders requires a better cognitive evaluation from the diagnosis. What would allow the implementation of preventive actions upstream. This prospect of improvement of the coverage of the cognitive consequences of the irradiation should allow a better social reinstatement after the treatment, as well as a facilitation for the preservation of autonomy and functional independence. However, a complete cognitive evaluation is expensive in time and asks for a qualified personnel, which often slows down the exploration and the follow-up of the disorders.

Reirradiation of gliomas under stereotactic conditions: Prognostic factors for survival without relapse or side effects, a retrospective study at Tours regional university hospital (France)

PURPOSE

To search for factors correlated with relapse-free survival following stereotactic reirradiation in patients with recurrent glioma following radiochemotherapy and evaluate tolerance to this treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Initial radiotherapy was given according to the protocol of Stupp and al. Reirradiation was performed using the CyberKnife^® system. Patients could have had surgical resection initially and at the time of recurrence. We analysed 13 patients treated between July 2010 and September 2014. The median age was 55 years. The doses delivered ranged from 20 to 36Gy, in one to ten fractions.

RESULTS

Median survival after stereotactic radiotherapy was 14 months. Survival without relapse was 3.7 months. Factors significantly influencing duration of relapse-free survival were: age (P=0.04), total dose (P=0.02), dose per fraction (P=0.04) and number of fractions (P=0.01). We found no correlation between gross tumour volume, clinical target volume, grade of tumour or prescription isodose and relapse-free survival following radiochemotherapy. Three patients developed radionecrosis.

CONCLUSION

Reirradiation under stereotactic conditions is well tolerated. A dose of more than 30Gy delivered in 5 or more fractions seems to prolong relapse-free survival.

[Guidelines for the radiotherapy of gliomas]

Gliomas are the most frequent primary brain tumours. Treating these tumours is difficult because of the proximity of organs at risk, infiltrating nature, and radioresistance. Clinical prognostic factors such as age, Karnofsky performance status, tumour location, and treatments such as surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy have long been recognized in the management of patients with gliomas. Molecular biomarkers are increasingly evolving as additional factors that facilitate diagnosis and therapeutic decision-making. These practice guidelines aim at helping in choosing the best treatment, in particular radiation therapy.

[Evolution of the management of pediatric and adult medulloblastoma]

Medulloblastoma are cerebellar tumours belonging to the group of primitive neuroectodermal tumours (PNET) and are the most common malignant brain tumours of childhood. These tumours are rare and heterogeneous, requiring some multicentric prospective studies and multidisciplinary care. The classical therapeutic approaches are based on clinical, radiological and surgical data. They involve surgery, radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Some histological features were added to characterize risk. More recently, molecular knowledge has allowed to devise risk-adapted strategies and helped to define groups with good outcome and reduce long-term sequelae, improve the prognostic of high-risk medulloblastoma and develop new therapeutic tools.

[Management of gliomas]

Gliomas are the most frequent primary brain tumors. Their care is difficult because of the proximity of organs at risk. The treatment of glioblastoma includes surgery followed by chemoradiation with the protocol of Stupp et al. The addition of bevacizumab allows an increase in progression-free survival by 4 months but it does not improve overall survival. This treatment is reserved for clinical trials. Intensity modulation radiotherapy may be useful to reduce the neurocognitive late effects in different types of gliomas. In elderly patients an accelerated radiotherapy 40 Gy in 15 fractions allows a similar survival to standard radiotherapy. O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) status may help to choose between chemotherapy and radiotherapy. There is no standard for the treatment of recurrent gliomas. Re-irradiation in stereotactic conditions allows a median survival of 8 to 12.4 months. Anaplastic gliomas with 1p19q mutation have a greater sensibility to chemotherapy by procarbazine, lomustine and vincristine. Chemoradiotherapy in these patients has become the standard treatment. Many studies are underway testing targeted therapies, their place in the therapeutic management and new radiotherapy techniques.

[Irradiation in stereotactic conditions: prerequisites]

Indications of treatment by stereotactic body radiotherapy are dramatically increasing due to new potential indications. The conditions associated with the treatment delivery are multiple. The first step of the process is crucial. It is related to the validation of the indication proposed during the multidisciplinary meeting as regard the evidence-based proof of the concept. These emerging techniques mainly extracranial stereotactic body irradiation do not benefit from long-term evaluation in terms of efficiency as well as normal tissue late toxicities. Priority should be given to prospective independent clinical trials, validated by an independent scientific committee, performed under a relevant and well dedicated multicentric quality assurance program aiming to improve knowledge and selection of indications. The SFRO is still working with others professionals on the definition of the conditions for the implementation of such treatments and actively collaborates with the authorities to define the appropriate conditions to preserve the quality of the treatment delivery under these specific conditions.

Increased survival using delayed gamma knife radiosurgery for recurrent high-grade glioma: a feasibility study

OBJECTIVE

The current study retrospectively assessed delayed gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) in the management of high-grade glioma recurrences.

METHODS

A total of 55 consecutive patients with high-grade glioma comprising 68 World Health Organization (WHO) III and WHO IV were treated with GKRS for local recurrences between 2001 and 2007. All patients had undergone microsurgery and radiochemotherapy, considered as standard therapy for high-grade glioma. Complete follow-up was available in all patients; median follow-up was 17.2 months (2.5-114.2 months). Median tumor volume was 5.2 mL, prescription dose was 20 Gy (14-22 Gy), and median max dose was 45 Gy (30-77.3 Gy).

RESULTS

The patients with WHO III tumors showed a median survival of 49.6 months with and a 2-year survival of 90%. After GKRS of the recurrences, these patients showed a median survival of 24.2 months and a 2-year survival of 50%. The patients with WHO IV tumors had a median survival of 24.5 months with a 2-year survival of 51.4%. After the recurrence was treated with GKRS, the median survival was 11.3 months and a 2-year survival: 22.9% for the WHO IV patients.

CONCLUSION

The current study shows a survival benefit for high-grade glioma recurrences when GKRS was administered after standard therapy. This is a relevant improvement compared with earlier studies that had had not been able to provide a beneficial effect timing radiosurgery in close vicinity to EBRT.

Salvage radiosurgery for selected patients with recurrent malignant gliomas

Purpose. To analyse the survival after salvage radiosurgery and to identify prognostic factors. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 87 consecutive patients, with recurrent high-grade glioma, that underwent stereotactic radiosurgery between 1997 and 2010. We evaluated the survival after initial diagnosis and after reirradiation. The prognostic factors were analysed by bivariate and multivariate Cox regression model. Results. The median age was 48 years old. The primary histology included anaplastic astrocytoma (47%) and glioblastoma (53%). A margin dose of 18 Gy was administered in the majority of cases (74%). The median survival after initial diagnosis was 21 months (39 months for anaplastic astrocytoma and 18.5 months for glioblastoma) and after reirradiation it was 10 months (17 months for anaplastic astrocytoma and 7.5 months for glioblastoma). In the bivariate analyses, the prognostic factors significantly associated with survival after reirradiation were age, tumour and treatment volume at recurrence, recursive partitioning analyses classification, Karnofsky performance score, histology, and margin to the planning target volume. Only the last four showed significant association in the multivariate analyses. Conclusion. stereotactic radiosurgery is a safe and may be an effective treatment option for selected patients diagnosed with recurrent high-grade glioma. The identified prognostic factors could help individualise the treatment.

[Stereotactic radiotherapy in pediatric indications]

Stereotactic radiotherapy is a very high precision procedure, which has been limited to radiosurgery for a long time. Technological improvements allowed the development of radiotherapy in stereotactic conditions, leading to a lot of innovations. Previously indicated for cerebral pathologies, this procedure is now developed for extracerebral locations. In paediatrics, stereotactic radiotherapy is still limited, delivered precociously, due to the possibility of long-term late effects that needs to be addressed. This review reports the different useful conditions, technical evolutions, and the current validated paediatric indications, with differences from adults, and future directions.