[Localized Ewing sarcoma of the spine: a preliminary dose-escalation study comparing innovative radiation techniques in a single patient]

The Role of Neuroaxis Irradiation in the Treatment of Intraspinal Ewing Sarcoma: A Review and Meta-Analysis

The role of cranio-spinal irradiation (CSI) for primary extraosseous intraspinal Ewing sarcoma (EwS) remains unclear. Here, we evaluate clinical and survival outcomes in patients with primary intraspinal EwS treated with CSI as part of multimodal primary therapy regimens. We abstracted patient information, including details on treatment application, efficacy, and tolerance from the literature and our hospital database for a cohort of 24 primary intraspinal EwS patients treated with CSI. Median age was 25.5 years, median CSI dose was 36 Gy and mean boost dose was 12.8 Gy. Sixteen patients (66.7%) achieved complete radiological remission, another 5 patients demonstrated partial response and 1 patient showed no response to treatment. Compared to a cohort of patients treated with focal radiotherapy, CSI patients were more likely to have multifocal disease at time of diagnosis (p = 0.001) and intradural tumor location (p < 0.001). Despite over-representation of these unfavorable characteristics, there was no survival difference between groups (p = 0.58). While CSI shows promising results in the treatment of primary intraspinal EwS, treatment should be considered individually based on tumor and patient characteristics in the absence of prospective trials.

[Rare cancers and new radiotherapy techniques]

Rare cancers represent about a quarter of all cancers diagnosed in Europe, and their incidence is increasing. Meanwhile, scientific advances provide techniques, which become more and more sophisticated in the domain of radiotherapy. Treatment options for radiotherapy rare cancers are increasing, but are not yet evaluated. The question of the appropriateness of treatment by modern radiotherapy techniques in rare cancers remains. There are a lot of cases reported in the literature for treating rare cancers by modern technology. These techniques are often used when anatomical and dosimetric constraints do not achieve optimal treatment by surgery or standard radiotherapy. In contrast, standard radiotherapy techniques also provide good results in terms of overall survival and tolerance. They are also less expensive and less complex in terms of dosimetry. The establishment of specialized centers in rare cancers seems essential to evaluate the appropriateness of the use of modern techniques in these cases. Currently, data from the literature does not provide an answer to this question.