1
|
Liou Y, Lan TL, Lan CC. A Meta-Analysis and Review of Radiation Dose Escalation in Definitive Radiation Therapy between Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma of Esophageal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:658. [PMID: 38339409 PMCID: PMC10854668 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16030658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Esophageal cancer, ranked as the eighth most prevalent cancer globally, is characterized by a low survival rate and poor prognosis. Concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) is the standard therapy in the non-surgical treatment of localized carcinoma of the esophagus. Nevertheless, the radiation doses employed in CCRT remain notably lower compared to the curative definite chemoradiation therapy utilized in the management of other carcinomas. In order to increase the local control rates and enhance the treatment outcomes, several clinical trials have used high-dose radiation to analyze the effect of dose escalation. Despite the integration of technically advanced RT schemes such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), the results of these trials have failed to demonstrate a significant improvement in overall survival or local progression-free survival. In this review, we investigated previous clinical trials to determine the ineffectiveness of radiation dose escalation in the context of CCRT for esophageal cancer. We aim to clarify the factors contributing to the limited efficacy of escalated radiation doses in improving patient outcomes. Furthermore, we delve into recent research endeavors, exploring prospective radiation dose modifications being altered based on the histological characteristics of the carcinoma. The exploration of these recent studies not only sheds light on potential refinements to the existing treatment protocols but also seeks to identify novel approaches that may pave the way for more efficacious and personalized therapeutic strategies for esophageal cancer management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Liou
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, No. 155, Sec. 2, Linong Street, Beitou District, Taipei City 112, Taiwan
| | - Tien-Li Lan
- Department of Heavy Particles and Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, No. 201, Sec. 2, Shipai Rd., Beitou District, Taipei City 112, Taiwan
| | - Chin-Chun Lan
- Thoracic Surgery Group, Clinical Research Center, Department of Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, 135 Nanhsiao Street, Changhua City 500, Taiwan
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Changhua Christian Hospital, 135 Nanhsiao Street, Changhua City 500, Taiwan
- Post-Baccalaureate Medical School, National Chung Hsing University, 145 Xingda Rd., South District, Taichung City 402, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Xie R, Cai Q, Chen T, Huang H, Chen C. Current and future on definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy for inoperable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1303068. [PMID: 38344202 PMCID: PMC10853813 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1303068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is an aggressive and fatal disease that is usually diagnosed when the chances for surgical intervention has been missed. Definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) is the first choice of treatment for inoperable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC). Nevertheless, the local recurrence rate for esophageal cancer patients undergoing dCRT remains high at 40-60%, with a 5-year overall survival rate of solely 10-30%. Immunotherapy in combination with dCRT is a promising treatment for inoperable LA-ESCC, for that improved long-term survival is expected. The present review provides a comprehensive overview of the evolutionary trajectory of dCRT for LA-ESCC, delineates notable relevant clinical studies, addresses unresolved concerns regarding the combination of dCRT with immunotherapy, and highlights promising directions for future research. When dCRT is combined with immunotherapy, the following aspects should be carefully explored in the future studies, including the optimal irradiation dose, segmentation scheme, radiotherapy technique, timing, sequence and duration of radiotherapy, and the selection of chemotherapeutic and immunologic drugs. In addition, further investigations on the mechanisms of how dCRT combined with immunotherapy exerts synergistic anti-tumor effects and molecular biomarkers ensuring precise screening of ESCC patients are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renxian Xie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
- Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Qingxin Cai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Tong Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
- Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Hongxin Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
- Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Chuangzhen Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chow R, Lock M, Lee SL, Lo SS, Simone CB. Esophageal Cancer Radiotherapy Dose Escalation Meta Regression Commentary: "High vs. Low Radiation Dose of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Carcinoma With Modern Radiotherapy Techniques: A Meta-Analysis". Front Oncol 2021; 11:700300. [PMID: 34336689 PMCID: PMC8317968 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.700300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ronald Chow
- New York Proton Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Michael Lock
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Sangjune Laurence Lee
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Alberta Health Services, Cummings School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Simon S Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Charles B Simone
- New York Proton Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhang W, Zhao J, Han W, Zhang H, Wang X, Li C, Chen J, Wang X, Zhao Y, Qiao X, Zhou Z, Han C, Zhu S, Shen W, Wang L, Ge X, Sun X, Zhang K, Hu M, Li L, Hao C, Li G, Xu Y, Wang Y, Lu N, Liu M, Qian S, Xiao Z, Wang P, Pang Q. Dose escalation of 3D radiotherapy is effective for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective analysis (3JECROG R-03). ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2020; 8:1140. [PMID: 33240989 PMCID: PMC7576038 DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-4672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Background To evaluate the impact of radiation dose escalation on overall survival (OS) in patients with non-metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with radical radiotherapy. Methods The clinical data of ESCC patients treated with three-dimensional (3D) radiotherapy alone or chemoradiotherapy were collected from multiple institutes and retrospectively analyzed. Patients who received radiation dose ≥40 Gy were included. Radiation dose as a continuous variable was entered into the Cox regression model by using penalized spline regression to allow for a nonlinear relationship between radiation dose and OS to be identified. Patients were stratified into five groups according to EQD2. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess the OS in different dose groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the factors associated with OS. Results A total of 2,469 patients were included from 10 institutes across China. The median follow-up time was 58.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 56.4–60.2 months]. The median OS and PFS time were 24.3 months (95% CI: 22.5–26.2 months) and 18.0 months (95% CI: 16.4–19.6 months), respectively. The risk of death decreased sharply with a dose up to 60 to 62 Gy, before increasing slightly after the dose was elevated beyond 62 Gy. Multivariate analysis indicated that the chance of death was significantly decreased in patients who received radiotherapy doses of 60–62 Gy [P=0.028, hazard ratio (HR) 0.85, 95% CI: 0.73–0.98)], compared with those who received radiotherapy doses of 40–60 Gy. Conclusions Our results reveal radiation dose is a significant prognostic factor of survival for ESCC patients. Higher radiation dose contributes to much more favorable survival outcomes for ESCC patients receiving radical radiotherapy by modern techniques, and 60 Gy or above might be the most optimal radiation dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wencheng Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Jingjing Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Weiming Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hualei Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Chen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Junqiang Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital/Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Xiaomin Wang
- Department 4th of Radiation Oncology, Anyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang, China
| | - Yidian Zhao
- Department 4th of Radiation Oncology, Anyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang, China
| | - Xueying Qiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Zhiguo Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Chun Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Shuchai Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Wenbin Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Lan Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Xiaolin Ge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xinchen Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Kaixian Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Tengzhou Central People's Hospital, Tengzhou, China
| | - Miaomiao Hu
- Department of Oncology, Tengzhou Central People's Hospital, Tengzhou, China
| | - Ling Li
- Department of Oncology, Tengzhou Central People's Hospital, Tengzhou, China
| | - Chongli Hao
- Department of Oncology, Tengzhou Central People's Hospital, Tengzhou, China
| | - Gaofeng Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China
| | - Yonggang Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China
| | - Yadi Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Na Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Miaoling Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, China
| | - Shuai Qian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, China
| | - Zefen Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ping Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Qingsong Pang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sun X, Wang L, Wang Y, Kang J, Jiang W, Men Y, Hui Z. High vs. Low Radiation Dose of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Carcinoma With Modern Radiotherapy Techniques: A Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol 2020; 10:1222. [PMID: 32850362 PMCID: PMC7418493 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefit of different radiation doses in concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for esophageal carcinoma using modern radiotherapy techniques. Methods: A systematic review was conducted by screening PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, SCOPUS, Wanfang, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases with prespecified searching strategy. Studies which compared high radiation dose group with low-dose radiation group using modern radiotherapy techniques for esophageal cancer patients in CCRT were identified. The hazard ratios (HR) for overall survival (OS) and the odds ratios (OR) for local-regional failure (LRF), distant metastasis (DM), and toxicities were considered as the outcomes of interest. R 3.6.2 software was used for statistical analysis. Results: Twelve studies involving 10,896 patients were included for analyses. The results showed that the high-dose group had better OS (HR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.70-0.90, P = 0.0004) and the local-regional control (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.46-0.76, P < 0.0001), especially for patients who were diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The subgroup analyses further indicated that ≥ circa 60 Gy can significantly improve the OS (HR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.68-0.80, P < 0.0001) as well as the local-regional control (OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.40-0.74, P < 0.0001) as compared with < circa 60 Gy. Another subgroup analysis comparing ≤ 50.4 Gy with > 50.4 Gy showed no substantial difference in OS (HR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.93-1.03, P = 0.43). In addition, there are no significant differences between the two groups in grade 3-5 radiation pneumonitis (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.54-2.05, P = 0.89), grade 3-5 radiation esophagitis (OR = 1.40, 95% CI = 0.93-2.11, P = 0.11), treatment-related death (OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 0.70-3.66, P = 0.27), and DM (OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 0.92-1.59, P = 0.17). Conclusions: For esophageal carcinoma receiving CCRT with modern radiation techniques, evidence suggested that high-dose radiotherapy, especially ≥circa 60 Gy, had potentials to improve the OS and local-regional control without increase in severe toxicities when compared with low-dose radiotherapy. The result needs to be confirmed by randomized clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Lei Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of VIP Region, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jingjing Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital and Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yu Men
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Department of VIP Medical Services, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zhouguang Hui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Department of VIP Medical Services, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Xiao L, Czito BG, Pang Q, Hui Z, Jing S, Shan B, Wang J. Do Higher Radiation Doses with Concurrent Chemotherapy in the Definitive Treatment of Esophageal Cancer Improve Outcomes? A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. J Cancer 2020; 11:4605-4613. [PMID: 32489478 PMCID: PMC7255355 DOI: 10.7150/jca.44447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 04/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: To investigate the effects and safety profile of radiation dose escalation utilizing computerized tomography (CT) based radiotherapy techniques (including 3-Dimensional conformal radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy and proton therapy) in the definitive treatment of patients with esophageal carcinoma (EC) with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (dCCRT). Methods: All relevant studies utilizing CT-based radiation planning, comparing high-dose (≥ 60 Gy) versus standard-dose (50.4 Gy) radiation for patients with EC were analyzed for this meta-analysis. Results: Eleven studies including 4946 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 96.5% of patients diagnosed with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The high-dose group demonstrated a significant improvement in local-regional failure (LRF) (OR 2.199, 95% CI 1.487-3.253; P<0.001), two-year local-regional control (LRC) (OR 0.478, 95% CI 0.309-0.740; P=0.001), two-year overall survival (OS) (HR 0.744, 95% CI 0.657-0.843; P<0.001) and five-year OS (HR 0.683, 95% CI 0.561-0.831; P<0.001) rates relative to the standard-dose group. In addition, there was no difference in grade ≥ 3 radiation-related toxicities and treatment-related deaths between the groups. Conclusion: Under the premise of controlling the rate of toxicities, doses of ≥ 60 Gy in CT-based dCCRT of ESCC patients might improve locoregional control and ultimate survival compared to the standard-dose dCCRT. While our review supports a dose-escalation approach in these patients, multiple ongoing randomized trial initial and final reports are awaited to evaluate the effectiveness of this strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linlin Xiao
- Department of Radiotherapy, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
| | - Brian G Czito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Qingsong Pang
- Department of Radiotherapy, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Zhouguang Hui
- Department of Radiotherapy, Cancer Institute & Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Shaowu Jing
- Department of Radiotherapy, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
| | - Baoen Shan
- Department of Radiotherapy, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
| | - Jun Wang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Luo HS, Huang HC, Lin LX. Effect of modern high-dose versus standard-dose radiation in definitive concurrent chemo-radiotherapy on outcome of esophageal squamous cell cancer: a meta-analysis. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:178. [PMID: 31623639 PMCID: PMC6798457 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1386-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2019] [Accepted: 09/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and objectives Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 94–05 has demonstrated that higher dose radiation didn’t improve outcome of patients with esophageal cancer (EC). However, several retrospective studies showed that a higher dose radiation based on modern radiotherapy techniques could improve overall survival (OS) and local control rate (LCR) of patients with EC, especially esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC). As trials have provided updated and controversial data, we performed this updated meta-analysis to investigate whether high-dose (> = 60 Gy) radiotherapy in definitive concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) could yield benefit compared to standard dose radiotherapy. Methods A systematic literature search was carried out in the database of MEDLINE, PubMed and Embase. All studies published between 1 January 1990 and 31 December 2018 on the association between radiation dose and curative efficiency in EC were included in this meta-analysis. The hazard ratio (HR) was used to evaluate the time-to-event data employing RevMan version 5.3. Results Eight articles with a total of 3736 patients were finally included. Results indicated that there was a significant benefit in favor of high dose radiotherapy (HD-RT) regarding OS (HR = 0.78, 95%CI: 0.72–0.84, p < 0.001; 2-year OS risk ratio (RR) = 1.25, 95%CI: 1.14–1.37, p < 0.001), progression-free survival (PFS) (P = 0.001, HR = 0.7, 95%CI: 0.57–0.87) and LRFS (P < 0.001, HR = 0.52, 95%CI: 0.36–0.74) . Conclusions HD-RT (> = 60 Gy) based on modern radiotherapy techniques in definitive CCRT appears to improve OS, PFS amd LRFS compared to the SD-RT in patients with ESCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- He-San Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shantou Central Hospital, Affiliated Shantou Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, NO. 114 Waima Road, Shantou, Guangdong, China.
| | - He-Cheng Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shantou Central Hospital, Affiliated Shantou Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, NO. 114 Waima Road, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| | - Lian-Xing Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shantou Central Hospital, Affiliated Shantou Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, NO. 114 Waima Road, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chen Y, Zhu HP, Wang T, Sun CJ, Ge XL, Min LF, Zhang XW, Jia QQ, Yu J, Yang JQ, Allgayer H, Abba ML, Zhang XZ, Sun XC. What is the optimal radiation dose for non-operable esophageal cancer? Dissecting the evidence in a meta-analysis. Oncotarget 2017; 8:89095-89107. [PMID: 29179502 PMCID: PMC5687672 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.18760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2017] [Accepted: 06/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The standard radiation dose 50.4 Gy with concurrent chemotherapy for localized inoperable esophageal cancer as supported by INT-0123 trail is now being challenged since a radiation dose above 50 Gy has been successfully administered with an observable dose-response relationship and insignificant untoward effects. Therefore, to ascertain the treatment benefits of different radiation doses, we performed a meta-analysis with 18 relative publications. According to our findings, a dose between 50 and 70 Gy appears optimal and patients who received ≥ 60 Gy radiation had a significantly better prognosis (pooled HR = 0.78, P = 0.004) as compared with < 60 Gy, especially in Asian countries (pooled HR = 0.75, P = 0.003). However, contradictory results of treatment benefit for ≥ 60 Gy were observed in two studies from Western countries, and the pooled treatment benefit of ≥ 60 Gy radiation was inconclusive (pooled HR = 0.86, P = 0.64). There was a marginal benefit in locoregional control in those treated with high dose (> 50.4/51 Gy) radiation when compared with those treated with low dose (≤ 50.4/51 Gy) radiation (pooled OR = 0.71, P = 0.06). Patients that received ≥ 60 Gy radiation had better locoregional control (OR = 0.29, P = 0.001), and for distant metastasis control, neither the > 50.4 Gy nor the ≥ 60 Gy treated group had any treatment benefit as compared to the groups that received ≤ 50.4 Gy and < 60 Gy group respectively. Taken together, a dose range of 50 to 70 Gy radiation with CCRT is recommended for non-operable EC patients. A dose of ≥ 60 Gy appears to be better in improving overall survival and locoregional control, especially in Asian countries, while the benefit of ≥ 60 Gy radiation in Western countries still remains controversial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Hui-Ping Zhu
- Department of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zhangjiagang First People's Hospital, Zhangjiagang, Jiangsu, China
| | - Tao Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Chang-Jiang Sun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Xiao-Lin Ge
- Department of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Ling-Feng Min
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Xian-Wen Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Qing-Qing Jia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jie Yu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jian-Qi Yang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Heike Allgayer
- Department of Experimental Surgery-Cancer Metastasis, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany and Centre for Biomedicine and Medical Technology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mohammed L. Abba
- Department of Experimental Surgery-Cancer Metastasis, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany and Centre for Biomedicine and Medical Technology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Xi-Zhi Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Xin-Chen Sun
- Department of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| |
Collapse
|