[Single center experience of (18F)-fluorocholine positron emission tomography: analysis of its impact on salvage local therapy in patients with prostate adenocarcinoma]

The impact of [68Ga]PSMA I&T PET/CT on radiotherapy planning in patients with prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the impact of Gallium-68-labled prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography/computed tomography ([⁶⁸Ga]PSMA PET/CT) on radiotherapy planning for primary disease, biochemical cancer relapse, and advanced disease of prostate cancer.

METHODS

A total of 106 patients with prostate cancer scheduled for radiation therapy underwent 120 [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA PET/CT scans prior to radiotherapy treatment. In 20 cases, patients underwent [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA PET/CT for primary therapy (PT), 75 cases were referred for biochemical relapse after surgery (RL), and 25 cases were intended for palliative treatment of localized metastases (MD). We retrospectively compared the impact of [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA PET/CT on lesion detection and treatment decision to CT alone.

RESULTS

[⁶⁸Ga]PSMA PET/CT revealed a total of 271 positive lesions, whereas CT detected 86 lesions (32%). Overall, the radiotherapy regime was changed in 55 of 120 cases (46%) based on the higher detection rate of [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA PET/CT: in 15% of cases with PT, in 43% of cases with RL, and in 44% of cases with MD.

CONCLUSION

[⁶⁸Ga]PSMA PET/CT is superior to CT alone for lesion detection in prostate cancer, thereby significantly impacting on radiotherapy planning for primary disease, biochemical cancer relapse, and advanced disease of prostate cancer.

PET/Computed Tomography for Radiation Therapy Planning of Prostate Cancer

This article is a short review of PET tracers, which have been used in clinical routine in single institutions. Preliminary anecdotal research supports the use of PET techniques in therapy planning of prostate cancer. The existing literature is discussed. For external beam radiation therapy, the biological target volume definition can only be based on PET imaging. There are not yet any prospective and randomized trials available; therefore, single-institution experiences cannot yet be recommended as clinical routine.