1
|
Ghodsi M, Shahmohammadi M, Modarressi MH, Karami F. Investigation of promoter methylation of MCPH1 gene in circulating cell-free DNA of brain tumor patients. Exp Brain Res 2020; 238:1903-1909. [PMID: 32556427 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-020-05848-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite advanced diagnostic and therapeutic techniques, many brain tumors are still diagnosed at high grades and, therefore finding novel molecular markers may assist in early detection and reducing brain tumors-related mortality rate. Owing to the previous reports on the importance of MCPH1 gene in tumorigenesis, the present study was aimed to study the promoter methylation of MCPH1 gene in paired circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and tumor tissues of brain tumor patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fourteen fresh paired serum and tumor tissue samples in addition to 18 isolated serum samples were collected from patients affected by different grades of brain tumor. Genomic DNA and cfDNA was isolated from tissue and serum samples using QIAamp DNA Mini Kit Norgen Bioteck Kit, respectively. Methylation DNA immunoprecipitation Real-time polymerization chain reaction (MeDIP-Real-time PCR) was performed on isolated DNA samples using EpiQuik MeDIP Ultra Kit and specific primer pairs. cfDNA quantity was determined through Real-time PCR analysis using specific primer pairs designed for GAPDH gene. RESULTS MCPH1 was methylated in 54% of cfDNA samples which was significantly associated with tumor grade, as well (P-value = 0.02). The methylation rate of MCPH1 was found as 78% in the tissue samples which was meaningfully associated with tumor grade (P-value = 0.03). Moreover, methylation of the MCPH1 gene was consistent in 57% of the same cfDNA and tissue samples. Methylation of MCPH1 gene in neither tumor tissues nor cfDNA was not correlated with age and sex of the patients. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION Due to the conformity of methylation of MCPH1 gene in cfDNA and tissue samples in more than half of the enrolled patients, especially in higher grades of tumors, it seems that MCPH1 promoter methylation could be a potential epimarker in not only detection of brain tumors but also in response to chemo- and radiotherapy which warranted further assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marjan Ghodsi
- Department of Biology, School of Basic Science, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammadreza Shahmohammadi
- Functional Neurosurgery Research Center, Shohada Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Fatemeh Karami
- Department of Medical Genetics, Applied Biophotonics Research Center, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lesueur P, Kao W, Leconte A, Geffrelot J, Lequesne J, Lacroix J, Brachet PE, Hrab I, Royer P, Clarisse B, Stefan D. Stereotactic radiotherapy on brain metastases with recent hemorrhagic signal: STEREO-HBM, a two-step phase 2 trial. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:147. [PMID: 32087691 PMCID: PMC7036220 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-6569-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2019] [Accepted: 01/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brain metastases often occur in cancer evolution. They are not only responsible for death but also for disorders affecting the quality of life and the cognitive functions. Management of brain metastases usually consists in multi-modality treatments, including neurosurgery, whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), and more recently radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT), systemic treatment (chemotherapy or targeted therapy), combined or not with corticosteroids. Almost 20% of brain metastases can present recent (within 15 days) bleeding signs on neuro-imagery. In these conditions, WBRT is the usual treatment. Yet, patients may benefit from a more aggressive strategy with SRT or FSRT. However, these options were suspected to possibly major the risk of brain haemorrhage, although no scientifically proven. Radiation oncologists therefore usually remain reluctant to deliver SRS/FSRT for bleeding brain metastases. It is therefore challenging to establish a standard of care for the treatment of bleeding brain metastases. We propose a phase II trial to simultaneously assess safety and efficacy of FSRT to manage brain metastases with hemorrhagic signal. METHODS The STEREO-HBM study is a multicenter two-step non-randomised phase II trial addressing patients with at least one bleeding brain metastasis out of a maximum of 3 brain metastases. Each brain metastasis will be treated with 30 Gy in 3 fractions for 1 week. The main endpoint is based on both safety and efficacy endpoints as proposed by Bryant and Day's design. Safety endpoint is defined as the rate of bleeding complications 4 months post-FSRT while efficacy endpoint is defined as the 6-month local control rate. Multi-modal MRI will be used to assess intra-tumoral hemorrhagic events before and after treatment. Patients' quality of life will also be assessed. DISCUSSION Management of bleeding brain metastases is still debated and poorly explored in clinical trials. There is sparse and weak data on the signification of pretreatment intra-tumour haemorrhagic signs or on the risk of brain bleeding complications after FSRT. We expect this first prospective phase 2 trial in this particular setting will allow to clarify the place of FSRT to optimally manage bleeding brain metastases. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03696680, registered October, 4, 2018. PROTOCOL VERSION Version 2.1 dated from 2018/11/09.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Lesueur
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, F-14000 Caen, France
- Normandy University, F-14000 Caen, France
| | - William Kao
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, F-14000 Caen, France
| | - Alexandra Leconte
- Clinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, F-14000 Caen, France
| | - Julien Geffrelot
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, F-14000 Caen, France
| | - Justine Lequesne
- Clinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, F-14000 Caen, France
| | - Joëlle Lacroix
- Radiology Department, Centre François Baclesse, F-14000 Caen, France
| | - Pierre-Emmanuel Brachet
- Clinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, F-14000 Caen, France
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, F-14000 Caen, France
| | - Ioana Hrab
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, F-14000 Caen, France
| | - Philippe Royer
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, F-54000 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Bénédicte Clarisse
- Clinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, F-14000 Caen, France
| | - Dinu Stefan
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, F-14000 Caen, France
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, 3 Avenue du Général Harris, F-14076 Caen Cedex 05, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Keller A, Doré M, Antoni D, Menoux I, Thillays F, Clavier JB, Delpon G, Jarnet D, Bourrier C, Lefebvre F, Chibbaro S, Darié I, Proust F, Noël G. [Risk of radionecrosis after hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy targeting the postoperative resection cavity of brain metastases]. Cancer Radiother 2017; 21:377-388. [PMID: 28551018 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2017.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2016] [Revised: 01/02/2017] [Accepted: 01/31/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the factors that potentially lead to brain radionecrosis after hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy targeting the postoperative resection cavity of brain metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS A retrospective analysis conducted in two French centres, was performed in patients treated with trifractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (3×7.7Gy prescribed to the 70% isodose line) for resected brain metastases. Patients with previous whole-brain irradiation were excluded of the analysis. Radionecrosis was diagnosed according to a combination of criteria including clinical, serial imaging or, in some cases, histology. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the predictive factors of radionecrosis including clinical and dosimetric variables such as volume of brain receiving a specific dose (V8Gy-V22Gy). RESULTS One hundred eighty-one patients, with a total of 189 cavities were treated between March 2008 and February 2015. Thirty-five patients (18.5%) developed radionecrosis after a median follow-up of 15 months (range: 3-38 months) after hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. One third of patients with radionecrosis were symptomatic. Multivariate analysis showed that infra-tentorial location was predictive of radionecrosis (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.97; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.47-6.01; P=0.0025). None V8Gy-V22Gy was associated with appearance of radionecrosis, even if V14Gy trended toward significance (P=0.059). CONCLUSION Analysis of patients and treatment variables revealed that infratentorial location of brain metastases was predictive for radionecrosis after hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for postoperative resection cavities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Keller
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Paul-Strauss, Unicancer, 3, rue de la Porte-de-l'Hôpital, 67065 Strasbourg cedex, France
| | - M Doré
- Département de radiothérapie, institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, boulevard Jacques-Monod, 44805 Saint-Herblain, France
| | - D Antoni
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Paul-Strauss, Unicancer, 3, rue de la Porte-de-l'Hôpital, 67065 Strasbourg cedex, France; Laboratoire EA 3430, fédération de médecine translationnelle de Strasbourg, université de Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - I Menoux
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Paul-Strauss, Unicancer, 3, rue de la Porte-de-l'Hôpital, 67065 Strasbourg cedex, France
| | - F Thillays
- Département de radiothérapie, institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, boulevard Jacques-Monod, 44805 Saint-Herblain, France
| | - J B Clavier
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Paul-Strauss, Unicancer, 3, rue de la Porte-de-l'Hôpital, 67065 Strasbourg cedex, France
| | - G Delpon
- Département de radiothérapie, institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, boulevard Jacques-Monod, 44805 Saint-Herblain, France
| | - D Jarnet
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Paul-Strauss, Unicancer, 3, rue de la Porte-de-l'Hôpital, 67065 Strasbourg cedex, France
| | - C Bourrier
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Paul-Strauss, Unicancer, 3, rue de la Porte-de-l'Hôpital, 67065 Strasbourg cedex, France
| | - F Lefebvre
- Laboratoire de biostatistiques, faculté de médecine, 4, rue Kirschleger, 67085 Strasbourg cedex, France
| | - S Chibbaro
- Département de neurochirurgie, hôpital de Hautepierre, avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France
| | - I Darié
- Service de neurochirurgie, centre hospitalier régional d'Orléans, 1, rue Porte-Madeleine, 45000 Orléans, France
| | - F Proust
- Département de neurochirurgie, hôpital de Hautepierre, avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France
| | - G Noël
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Paul-Strauss, Unicancer, 3, rue de la Porte-de-l'Hôpital, 67065 Strasbourg cedex, France; Laboratoire EA 3430, fédération de médecine translationnelle de Strasbourg, université de Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stereotactic fractionated radiotherapy of the resection cavity in patients with one to three brain metastases. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2016; 142:81-86. [PMID: 26816106 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2015] [Revised: 11/05/2015] [Accepted: 01/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The goal of this study is to evaluate the role of stereotactic fractionated radiotherapy (SFRT) in patients with one to three brain metastases after surgical resection. METHODS AND MATERIALS We performed a retrospective single-institutional study in patients undergoing SFRT of surgical cavity after resection of ≤3 brain metastases. 60 patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases treated with SFRT following resection were included. The total irradiation dose was 30 Gy (5 Gy/d, BED 45 Gy) after complete macroscopical resection and 35 Gy (5 Gy/d, BED 52.5 Gy) in patients with macroscopic residual tumour after surgery. Macroscopic residual tumour was defined as contrast enhancement next to the resection cavity on the postoperative T1-MRI. The gross tumour volume (GTV) encompassing the residual tumour was delineated on the T1-MRI, the clinical target volume (CTV) encompassed the surgical cavity plus 1mm and the planning target volume (PTV) the CTV plus 2mm. RESULTS Eight of 60 patients had no imaging follow-up due to morbidity/mortality. Two of 52 (3.8%) patients experienced local failures only, 25 of 52 (48.1%) patients experienced distant intracranial failures only and 4 (7.7%) patients experienced both local and distant intracranial failures. In summary, there were 6 (11.5%) local failures and 29 (55.8%) distant failures. Age was significant for local control in the Cox regression test (p=0.046). Thirty-seven of 60 (61.7%) patients died during follow-up. Median follow-up was 8 months. Median overall survival was 15 months. Cox regression for survival was significant for KPS score ≤70% and size of PTV. No severe side effects were seen. Patients undergoing whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) as salvage therapy in case of progression had no severe side effects either. CONCLUSION In the light of encouraging local control rates, SFRT could be an alternative to WBRT after surgical resection of ≤3 brain metastases. Due to the high rate of distant intracranial failure regular follow-up with MRI is mandatory.
Collapse
|