[Image-guided radiotherapy: Overview of devices and practice in France in 2015]

Visual analysis of image-guided radiation therapy based on bibliometrics: A review

Radiation therapy plays an important role in tumor treatment. The development of image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) technology provides a strong guarantee for precise radiation therapy of tumors. However, bibliometric studies on IGRT research have rarely been reported. This study uses literature collected from the Web of Science during 1987 to 2021 as a sample and uses the bibliometric method to reveal the current research status, hotspots, and development trends in IGRT. Based on 6407 papers published from the Web of Science during 1987 to 2021, we utilized Microsoft Excel 2007 and cite space software to perform statistical analysis and visualization of IGRT. A total of 6407 articles were included, this area of IGRT has gone through 4 stages: budding period, growth period, outbreak period, and stationary period. The research category is mainly distributed in Radiology Nuclear Medicine Medical Imaging, which intersects with the research categories of Materials, Physics, and Mathematics. Yin FF, Tanderup K, and Sonke JJ are highly productive scholars who are active in IGRT research, while Jaffray DA, van Herk M and Guckenberger M are authors with high impact in this field. The team of scholars has close cooperation within the team and weak cooperation among teams. The League of European Research Universities, University of Texas System, University of Toronto, and Princess Margaret Cancer are the main research institutions in this field. The United States has the most research literature, followed by China and Germany. Six thousand four hundred seven articles are distributed in 712 journals, and the top 3 journals are Med Phys, Int J Radiat Oncol, and Radiather Oncol. Precise registration, intelligence, magnetic resonance guidance, and deep learning are current research hotspots. These results demonstrate that the research in this field is relatively mature and fruitful in the past 35 years, providing a solid theoretical basis and practical experience for precision radiotherapy.

[Image-guided radiotherapy contribution and patient setup for anorectal cancer treatment]

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy is recommended in anal squamous cell carcinoma treatment and is increasingly used in rectal cancer. It adapts the dose to target volumes, with a high doses gradient. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy allows to reduce toxicity to critical normal structures and to consider dose-escalation studies or systemic treatment intensification. Image-guided radiation therapy is a warrant of quality for intensity-modulated radiation therapy, especially for successful delivery of the dose as planned. There is no recommended international or national anorectal cancer image-guided radiation therapy protocol currently available. Dose-escalation trials or expert opinions about intensity-modulated/image-guided radiation therapy good practice guidelines recommend daily volumetric imaging throughout the treatment or during the five first fractions and weekly thereafter as a minimum. Image-guided radiation therapy allows to reduce margins related to patient setup errors. Internal margin, related to the internal organ motion, needs to be adapted according to short- or long-course radiotherapy, gender, rectal location; it can be higher than current recommended planning target volume margins, particularly in the upper and anterior part of mesorectum, which has the most significant movement. Image-guided radiation therapy based on volumetric imaging allows to take target volume shrinkage into account and to develop adaptive strategies, in particular for mesorectum shrinkage during rectal cancer treatment. Lastly, the emergence of new image-guided radiation therapy technologies including MRI (which plays a major role in pelvic tumours assessment and diagnosis) opens up interesting perspectives for adaptive radiotherapy, taking into account both organs' movements and tumour shrinkage.

[Interest of positioning control in onboard imaging and its delegation to the therapists]

The delegation of the on board imaging position control, from the radiation oncologist to the therapist, is justified by the generalization of the image-guided radiotherapy techniques which are particularly time consuming. This delegation is however partial. Indeed, the validation of the position by the therapist can be clearly performed when the registration is based on bony landmark or fiducial. The radiation oncologist needs however to make the validation in case of large target displacement, in more complex soft tissue-based registration, and in case of stereotactic body radiation therapy. Moreover, this delegation implies at least three conditions which are first the training of the staff, then the formalization of the procedures, responsibilities and delegations and finally, the evaluation of the practices of IGRT.