1
|
Dreyfuss AD, Max D, Flynn J, Zhang Z, Gillespie EF, Xu A, Cuaron J, Mueller B, Khan AJ, Cahlon O, Powell SN, McCormick B, Braunstein LZ. Locoregional Control Benefit of a Tumor Bed Boost for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ. Adv Radiat Oncol 2023; 8:101254. [PMID: 37250283 PMCID: PMC10220256 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Radiation therapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) reduces invasive and in situ recurrences. Whereas landmark studies suggest that a tumor bed boost improves local control for invasive breast cancer, the benefit in DCIS remains less certain. We evaluated outcomes of patients with DCIS treated with or without a boost. Methods and Materials The study cohort comprised patients with DCIS who underwent BCS at our institution from 2004 to 2018. Clinicopathologic features, treatment parameters, and outcomes were ascertained from medical records. Patient and tumor characteristics were evaluated relative to outcomes using univariable and multivariable Cox models. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) estimates were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results We identified 1675 patients who underwent BCS for DCIS (median age, 56 years; interquartile range, 49-64 years). Boost RT was used in 1146 cases (68%) and hormone therapy in 536 (32%). At a median follow-up of 4.2 years (interquartile range, 1.4-7.0 years), we observed 61 locoregional recurrence events (56 local, 5 regional) and 21 deaths. Univariable logistic regression demonstrated that boost RT was more common among younger patients (P < .001) with positive or close margins (P < .001) and with larger tumors (P < .001) of higher grade (P = .025). The 10-year RFS rate was 88.8% among those receiving a boost and 84.3% among those without a boost (P = .3), and neither univariable nor multivariable analyses revealed an association between boost RT and locoregional recurrence. Conclusions Among patients with DCIS who underwent BCS, use of a tumor bed boost was not associated with locoregional recurrence or RFS. Despite a preponderance of adverse features among the boost cohort, outcomes were similar to those of patients not receiving a boost, suggesting that a boost may mitigate risk of recurrence among patients with high-risk features. Ongoing studies will elucidate the extent to which a tumor bed boost influences disease control rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra D. Dreyfuss
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Danielle Max
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UCLA Health, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jessica Flynn
- Department of Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Zhigang Zhang
- Department of Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Erin F. Gillespie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Amy Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - John Cuaron
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Boris Mueller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Atif J. Khan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Oren Cahlon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Simon N. Powell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Beryl McCormick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Lior Z. Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mosavi Z, Bashi Zadeh Fakhar H, Rezaei-Tavirani M, Akbari ME, Rostami F. Proteome profiling of ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast Dis 2023; 41:513-520. [PMID: 36641653 DOI: 10.3233/bd-220017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM DCIS is the most common type of non-invasive breast cancer, accounting for about 15 to 30%. Proteome profile is used to detect biomarkers in the tissues of breast cancer patients by mass spectrometry. This study aimed to obtain the expression profile of DCIS proteome, and the expression profile of invasive biomarkers, and finally to introduce a dedicated biomarker panel to facilitate the prognosis and early detection for in situ breast cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS In this study, 10 patients with breast cancer (DCIS) were studied. Benign (marginal) and cancerous tissue samples were obtained from patients for proteomics experiments. Initially, all tissue proteins were extracted using standard methods, and the proteins were separated using two-dimensional electrophoresis. Then, the expression amount of the extracted proteins was determined by ITRAQ. The data were analysed by R software, and gene ontology was utilised for describing the protein in detail. RESULTS 30 spots on gel electrophoresis were found in the tumor tissue group (sample), and 15 spots in the margin group (control) with P < 0.05. Healthy and cancerous tissue gels showed that 5 spots had different expression. VWF, MMP9, ITGAM, MPO and PLG protein spots were identified using the site www.ebi.ac.uk/IPI. Finally, protein biomarkers for breast tumor tissue with margin were introduced with the names of P04406, P49915, P05323, P06733, and P02768. DISCUSSION There are 5 critical proteins in inducing cancer pathways especially complement and coagulation cascades. The hall markers of a healthy cell to be cancerous are proliferation, invasion, angiogenesis, and changes in the immune system. Hence, regulation of protein plays a key role in developing recurrence to breast cancer in margins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zeinb Mosavi
- Department of Medical Science, Islamic Azad University, Chalus Branch, Chalous, Iran
| | - Haniyeh Bashi Zadeh Fakhar
- Cancer Research Centre (CRC), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.,Department of Laboratory Science, Islamic Azad University, Chalous Branch, Chalous, Iran
| | | | - Mohamd Esmaeel Akbari
- Cancer Research Centre (CRC), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Forouzan Rostami
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Islamic Azad University, Chalous, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hypofractionation and Concomitant Boost in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS): Analysis of a Prospective Case Series with Long-Term Follow-Up. LIFE (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 12:life12060889. [PMID: 35743920 PMCID: PMC9225308 DOI: 10.3390/life12060889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2022] [Revised: 06/05/2022] [Accepted: 06/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
We previously reported on a cohort of breast cancer patients affected with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) that were treated with breast conservative surgery and hypofractionated whole-breast radiotherapy with a concomitant boost to the lumpectomy cavity. We now report on the long-term results of the oncological and toxicity outcomes, at a median follow-up of 11.2 years. We also include an analysis of the predictive factors for local recurrence (LR). Eighty-two patients with long-term observation were considered for this report. All received hypofractionated post-operative radiotherapy with a concomitant boost (45 Gy/20 fractions to the whole breast and 50 Gy/20 fractions to the lumpectomy cavity). We report on LC rates at 5 and 10 years, overall survival (OS), and breast-cancer-specific survival (BCSS), employing the Kaplan–Meier method. Cox proportional regression analysis was used to determine the role of selected clinical parameters on the risk of local recurrence, by the univariate and multivariate models. After a median follow-up of 11.2 years (range 5–15 years), 9 pts (11%) developed LR. The LR rates at 5 years and 10 years were 2.4% and 8.2%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 98.8% and 91.6%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year breast-cancer-specific survival rates were 100.0% and 99.0%. Late skin and subcutaneous toxicities were generally mild, and cosmetic results were good–excellent for most patients. For the univariate regression analysis, ER positive status (HR; 95% CI, p = 0.021), PgR positive status (HR; 95% CI, p = 0.012), and the aggregate data of positive hormonal status (HR; 95% CI, p = 0.021) were inversely correlated to LR risk. Conversely, a high tumor grade (G3) was directly correlated with the risk of LR (HR; 95% CI, p = 0.048). For the multivariate regression analysis, a high tumor grade (G3) confirmed its negative impact on LR (HR 0.40; 95% CI 0.19–0.75, p = 0.047). Our long-term data demonstrate hypofractionated whole-breast radiotherapy with a concomitant boost to be feasable, effective, and tolerable. Our experience suggests positive hormonal status to be protective with respect to LR risk. A high tumor grade is a risk factor for LR.
Collapse
|
4
|
Kuntz L, Le Fèvre C, Hild C, Keller A, Gharbi M, Mathelin C, Pivot X, Noël G, Antoni D. [Overall survival and survival without local recurrence in case of radiotherapy of the tumor bed of ductal carcinomas in situ of the breast: Review of the literature]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 49:255-265. [PMID: 33401020 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2020.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Carcinomas in situ represent more than 15 to 20% of breast cancers. Radiotherapy of whole breast is part of the therapeutic standard and follows surgery. However, the indication of tumor bed irradiation is still controversial and heterogeneous according to international practice even though it is a very frequent clinical situation. The aim of this study is to define the indications of tumor bed irradiation in the context of ductal carcinomas in situ and to discuss accelerated partial irradiation of the breast. METHOD The selected papers were published between 2015 and 2020 and included as MeSH terms "ductal carcinoma in situ" and "boost" for the analysis of tumor bed irradiation, and "ductal carcinoma in situ" and "accelerated partial breast irradiation" for the analysis of accelerated partial irradiation. RESULTS Boost was more often performed when risk factors for local recurrence were present, such as age less than 40 or 50 years old, clinical mode of detection, tumor size greater than 15 to 20mm, high nuclear grade, presence of necrosis, positive or insufficient surgical margins, associated atypical hyperplastic lesions, and lobular carcinoma in situ. Accelerated partial irradiation is an option for favorable or intermediate prognosis CCIS, further studies involving more patients are required. CONCLUSION Radiotherapy of the mammary gland in the context of DCIS has shown its effectiveness in terms of local and locoregional control of the disease, thus reducing in situ and infiltrating recurrences. However, the indication of operating bed irradiation is still debated, and the practice is very heterogeneous depending on the country. Another possible alternative for patients with a favorable prognosis and a small tumor bed volume would be IPA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Kuntz
- Radiotherapy department, institut de cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17, rue Albert-Calmette, 67200 Strasbourg, France
| | - C Le Fèvre
- Radiotherapy department, institut de cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17, rue Albert-Calmette, 67200 Strasbourg, France
| | - C Hild
- Gynaecological and breast surgery department, institut de cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17, rue Albert-Calmette, 67200 Strasbourg, France
| | - A Keller
- Radiotherapy department, institut de cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17, rue Albert-Calmette, 67200 Strasbourg, France
| | - M Gharbi
- Gynaecological and breast surgery department, institut de cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17, rue Albert-Calmette, 67200 Strasbourg, France
| | - C Mathelin
- Gynaecological and breast surgery department, institut de cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17, rue Albert-Calmette, 67200 Strasbourg, France
| | - X Pivot
- Medical oncology department, institut de cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17, rue Albert-Calmette, 67200 Strasbourg, France
| | - G Noël
- Radiotherapy department, institut de cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17, rue Albert-Calmette, 67200 Strasbourg, France.
| | - D Antoni
- Radiotherapy department, institut de cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17, rue Albert-Calmette, 67200 Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Amor R, Benna M, Naimi Z, Bohli M, Kochbati L. Radiation therapy as an adjuvant treatment after breast-conserving surgery in ductal carcinoma In situ of the breast. JOURNAL OF RADIATION AND CANCER RESEARCH 2021. [DOI: 10.4103/jrcr.jrcr_24_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
6
|
Arenas M, Selek U, Kaidar-Person O, Perrucci E, Montero Luis A, Boersma L, Coles C, Offersen B, Meattini I, Bölükbaşı Y, Leonardi MC, Pfeffer R, Cutuli B, Vidali C, Franco P, Kouloulias V, Masiello V, Rivera S, Bourgier C, Ciabattoni A, Lancellotta V, Trigo L, Valentini V, Poortmans P, Aristei C. The 2018 assisi think tank meeting on breast cancer: International expert panel white paper. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2020; 151:102967. [PMID: 32450277 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.102967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Revised: 03/27/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
We report on the second Assisi Think Tank Meeting (ATTM) on breast cancer which was held under the auspices of the European Society for RadioTherapy & Oncology (ESTRO). In discussing in-depth current evidence and practice it was designed to identify grey areas in diverse forms of the disease. It aimed at addressing uncertainties and proposing future trials to improve patient care. Before the meeting, three key topics were selected: 1) primary systemic therapy, mastectomy, breast reconstruction and post-mastectomy radiation therapy, 2) therapeutic options in ductal carcinoma in situ, and 3) therapy de-escalation in early stage breast cancer. Clinical practice in these areas was investigated by means of an online questionnaire. The time lapse period between the survey and the meeting was used to review the literature and on-going clinical trials. At the ATTM both were discussed in depth and research protocols were proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ugur Selek
- Radiation Oncology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istambul, Turkey
| | - Orit Kaidar-Person
- Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
| | | | | | - Liesbeth Boersma
- Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte Coles
- Radiation Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Icro Meattini
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (AOUC), Florence, Italy
| | - Yasemin Bölükbaşı
- Radiation Oncology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istambul, Turkey
| | | | - Raphael Pfeffer
- Radiation Oncology, Assuta Medical Centres, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Bruno Cutuli
- Radiation Oncology, Institut du Cancer Courlancy, Reims, France
| | - Cristiana Vidali
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste (ASUITS), Trieste, Italy
| | - Pierfrancesco Franco
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Vassilis Kouloulias
- Radiation Oncology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Valeria Masiello
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Sofia Rivera
- Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Céline Bourgier
- Radiation Oncology, ICM-Val d'Aurelle, University Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Valentina Lancellotta
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Lurdes Trigo
- Radiation Oncology, Instituto Portugues de Oncologia Francisco Martins Porto E.P.E, Porto, Portugal
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Radiation Oncology, Iridium Kankernetwerk, Wilrijk-Antwerp - University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cutuli B, Lemanski C, De Lafontan B, Chauvet MP, De Lara CT, Mege A, Fric D, Richard-Molard M, Mazouni C, Cuvier C, Carre A, Kirova Y. Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: A French National Survey. Analysis of 2125 Patients. Clin Breast Cancer 2020; 20:e164-e172. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2019.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2019] [Revised: 08/04/2019] [Accepted: 08/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
8
|
Cutuli B. [Ductal carcinoma in situ in 2019: Diagnosis, treatment, prognosis]. Presse Med 2019; 48:1112-1122. [PMID: 31653542 DOI: 10.1016/j.lpm.2019.08.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2019] [Accepted: 08/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) currently represents up to 15% of the newly diagnosed breast cancers, and are almost always detected by microcalcifications. Global prognosis is good (3% of 15-year specific mortality) but invasive local recurrences (LR) can lead to metastasis in 12-15% of the cases. Breast conserving surgery with whole breast irradiation is the main treatment (reducing LR by 50%), but mastectomy (with or without reconstruction) is performed in about 30% of the cases due to wide lesion size and/or multicentricity. The role of tamoxifen remains unclear. Axillary dissection is needless but sentinel node biopsy is proposed in case of micro-invasion suspicion (large lesions with high grade). The main factors of LR are young age (≤40 years) incomplete excision, and high nuclear grade with comedonecrosis. Several studies on "therapeutic descalation" are still ongoing in order to identify the "low risk" DCIS (about 10% of the cases) in which radiotherapy could be safely omitted.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Age Factors
- Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use
- Biopsy
- Breast/pathology
- Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis
- Breast Neoplasms/etiology
- Breast Neoplasms/pathology
- Breast Neoplasms/therapy
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/diagnosis
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/etiology
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/pathology
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/therapy
- Combined Modality Therapy/methods
- Conservative Treatment
- Diagnostic Imaging/methods
- Female
- Humans
- Lymph Node Excision/trends
- Mastectomy
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnosis
- Prognosis
- Radiotherapy
- Risk Factors
- Tamoxifen/therapeutic use
- Time Factors
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno Cutuli
- Institut du cancer Courlancy Reims, 38, rue du Courlancy, 51100 Reims, France.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
[Decision making factors of the management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast with microinvasion]. Bull Cancer 2019; 106:1000-1007. [PMID: 31351573 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2019.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2018] [Revised: 05/02/2019] [Accepted: 05/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Microinvasive in situ ductal carcinomas of the breast are rare and of good prognosis. They are grouped with early stage invasive carcinomas in the TNM 2017 classification. This study assessed practitioners' treatment decisions and their justifications in comparison to the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS Three clinical cases were evaluated by anonymous forms regarding sentinel node decisions, tumour bed boost irradiation and hormone therapy. RESULTS Sentinel lymph node was performed by 93.1%, 100% and 44.4% of the practitioners respectively. Radiation boost was a treatment option chosen by 62.1% and 61.1% of practitioners in both clinical cases. Hormone therapy was advocated for 65.5%, 94.7% and 50.0% patients depending on the clinical case. CONCLUSION The therapeutic attitude proposed in microinvasive breast carcinomas was heterogeneous in this study, reflecting the absence of specific recommendations. In view of the existing literature, it is not currently possible to propose recommendations for these three therapeutic options. Prospective cohorts and meta-analyses of the microinvasive subgroup could provide answers.
Collapse
|
10
|
Cambra MJ, Moreno F, Sanz X, Anglada L, Mollà M, Reyes V, Arenas M, Pedro A, Ballester R, García V, Casals J, Cusidó M, Jimenez C, Escribà JM, Macià M, Solé JM, Arcusa A, Seguí MA, Gonzalez S, Farrús B, Biete A. Role of boost radiotherapy for local control of pure ductal carcinoma in situ after breast-conserving surgery: a multicenter, retrospective study of 622 patients. Clin Transl Oncol 2019; 22:670-680. [PMID: 31264148 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-019-02168-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2018] [Accepted: 06/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the effect of boost radiotherapy on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) after breast-conserving surgery and whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT) with or without boost. METHODS AND MATERIALS Retrospective, multicentre study of 622 patients (624 tumors) diagnosed with pure DCIS from 1993-2011. RESULTS Most tumors (377/624; 60.4%) received a boost. At a median follow-up of 8.8 years, IBTR occurred in 64 cases (10.3%). A higher percentage of patients with risk factors for IBTR received a boost (p < 0.05). Boost was not associated with lower rates of IBTR than WBRT alone (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.42-1.35). On the univariate analyses, IBTR was significantly associated with tumor size (11-20 mm, HR 2.32, 95% CI 1.27-4.24; and > 20 mm, HR 2.10, 95% CI 1.14-3.88), re-excision (HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.04-2.96), and tamoxifen (HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.12-3.70). Boost dose > 16 Gy had a protective effect (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.187-0.824). Multivariate analyses confirmed the independent associations between IBTR and 11-20 mm (p = 0.02) and > 20 mm (p = 0.009) tumours, and re-excision (p = 0.006). On the margin-stratified multivariate analysis, tamoxifen was a poor prognostic factor in the close/positive margin subgroup (HR 4.28 95% CI 1.23-14.88), while the highest boost dose ( > 16 Gy) had a significant positive effect (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.13-0.86) in the negative margin subgroup. CONCLUSIONS Radiotherapy boost did not improve the risk of IBTR. Boost radiotherapy was more common in patients with high-risk disease. Tumor size and re-excision were significant independent prognostic factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J Cambra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitari General de Catalunya-Grupo Quirónsalud (IOV-HGC-Quironsalud), Carrer Pedro i Pons 1, 08195, Sant Cugat del Vallés, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - F Moreno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Català d'Oncologia L'Hospitalet, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Avda de la Granvia, 199, 08908, Barcelona, Spain
| | - X Sanz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Parc de Salut MAR, Passeig Marítim 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain
| | - L Anglada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ICO Girona, Avda de França, s/n, 17007, Girona, Spain
| | - M Mollà
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Vall d'Hebrón, Pg Vall d'Hebron 119, 129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clìnic, Universitat de Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - V Reyes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Vall d'Hebrón, Pg Vall d'Hebron 119, 129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Arenas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitari Sant Joan Reus, Avda del Dr. Josep Laporte, 2, 43204, Reus, Tarragona, Spain
| | - A Pedro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Plató, c/Plató, 21, 08006, Barcelona, Spain
| | - R Ballester
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Català D'Oncologia-Badalona, Carretera del Canyet, s/n, 08916, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - V García
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Avda Alcalde Rovira Roure, 80, 25198, Lleida, Spain
| | - J Casals
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Quirón, Plaça Alfonso Comín, 5, 08023, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Cusidó
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Universitari Dexeus-Grupo Quirónsalud, c/Sabino Arana, 5-19, 08028, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C Jimenez
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatic Expert, Olesa de Montserrat, c/Urgell 55 A, 08640, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J M Escribà
- Catalan Cancer Registry, Cancer Planning Directorate, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Avda de La Granvia, s/n, 08908, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Macià
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Català d'Oncologia L'Hospitalet, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Avda de la Granvia, 199, 08908, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J M Solé
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Ctra. Torrebonica s/n, 08227, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Arcusa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ctra. Torrebonica s/n, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, 08227, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M A Seguí
- Department of Medical Oncology, Corporació Sanitaria Parc Taulí, Parc Taulí 1, 08208, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S Gonzalez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitari Mútua de Terrassa, Plaça del Doctor Robert, 5, 08221, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
| | - B Farrús
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clìnic, Universitat de Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Biete
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clìnic, Universitat de Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Valli M, Cima S, Gaudino D, Cartolari R, Deantonio L, Frapolli M, Daniele D, Pesce GA, Martucci F, Azinwi NC, Bosetti D, Presilla S, Richetti A. Skin and lung toxicity in synchronous bilateral breast cancer treated with volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy: a mono-institutional experience. Clin Transl Oncol 2019; 21:1492-1498. [DOI: 10.1007/s12094-019-02077-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2018] [Accepted: 02/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
12
|
A national multicenter study on 1072 DCIS patients treated with breast-conserving surgery and whole breast radiotherapy (COBCG-01 study). Radiother Oncol 2018; 131:208-214. [PMID: 30075864 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2018] [Revised: 07/17/2018] [Accepted: 07/18/2018] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and whole breast radiation (RT) with or without endocrine therapy (ET) represent the standard of care for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The use of adjuvant treatments after surgery is still controversial in this setting. We performed a retrospective multicenter analysis on a series of DCIS patients treated with BCS and adjuvant RT. MATERIALS AND METHODS We collected clinical data from nine Italian centers on 1072 women having a diagnosis of DCIS and treated between 1997 and 2012. We reported on the 5- and 10-year local recurrence (LR) rates, overall survival, and breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) employing the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 8.4 years, 67 LR (6.3%) and 47 deaths (4.4%) were observed. LR rates at 5 and 10 years were 3.4% and 7.6%, respectively. BCSS rates at 5 and 10 years were 99.7% and 99.1%, respectively. At univariate regression analysis, postmenopausal state (p = 0.009), estrogen receptor (ER) (p = 0.0001) and progesterone receptor (p = 0.018) positivity and ET (p = 0.006) were inversely correlated with LR. Final surgical margins (FSM) status <1 mm was significantly correlated with higher LR (p = 0.003). At multivariate regression analysis postmenopausal state (p = 0.03), and ER positive (p = 0.045) maintained the significant favorable feature, while FSM <1 mm (p = 0.024) confirmed its negative impact on LR. CONCLUSIONS Our real-life study pointed out the significant favorable prognostic role of postmenopausal state and ER positive status on LR occurrence. FSM <1 mm was significantly correlated to a higher chance to experience LR.
Collapse
|
13
|
Breast-conserving therapy for primary Ductal Carcinoma in Situ in The Netherlands: A multi-center study and population-based analysis. Breast 2018; 42:3-9. [PMID: 30118902 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2018] [Revised: 06/24/2018] [Accepted: 07/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to analyse the efficacy of breast-conserving therapy (BCT) for women with primary DCIS in a population-based setting. METHODS Data were used from five Radiotherapy centres in The Netherlands from 2000 to 2010, all treated with BCT. Of all the cases, 59.2% received a boost of radiotherapy after their whole breast irradiation (WBI), irrespective of margin status. RESULTS A total of 1248 cases with primary DCIS were analysed. The 10-years LRFS was 92.9%. Age ≤50 years and a positive margin were significantly related to local relapse free survival (LRFS). Having a boost had no impact on LRFS, showing a nearly equal recurrence pattern in patients with and without a boost. Separate analyses were done on patients who had received and not received a boost of radiotherapy after WBI. We noted 9.1% contra-lateral breast tumours. The 10-years disease specific survival (DSS) rate was 99.0%. CONCLUSIONS DCIS of the breast and treated with BCT results in excellent LRFS and DSS. Primary surgical lumpectomy with negative margins followed by WBI seems to be the treatment of choice in DCIS treated with BCS with respect to IBTR.
Collapse
|
14
|
Moran MS, Zhao Y, Ma S, Kirova Y, Fourquet A, Chen P, Hoffman K, Hunt K, Wong J, Halasz LM, Freedman G, Prosnitz R, Yassa M, Nguyen DHA, Hijal T, Haffty BG, Wai ES, Truong PT. Association of Radiotherapy Boost for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ With Local Control After Whole-Breast Radiotherapy. JAMA Oncol 2017; 3:1060-1068. [PMID: 28358936 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.6948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Importance The use of a radiotherapy (RT) boost to the tumor bed after whole-breast RT (WBRT) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is largely extrapolated from invasive cancer data, but robust evidence specific to DCIS is lacking. Objective To compare ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) in women with DCIS treated with vs without the RT boost after breast-conserving surgery and WBRT. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective analysis pooled deidentified patient-level data from 10 academic institutions in the United States, Canada, and France from January 1, 1980, through December 31, 2010. All patients had newly diagnosed pure DCIS (no microinvasion), underwent breast-conserving surgery, and received WBRT with or without the boost with a minimum of 5 years of follow-up required for inclusion in the analysis. Given the limited events after WBRT, an a priori power analysis was conducted to estimate the DCIS sample size needed to detect the anticipated benefit of the boost. Data were uniformly recoded at the host institution and underwent primary and secondary reviews before analysis. Sample size calculations (ratio of patients who received the boost dose to those who did not, 2:1; α = .05; power = 80%) estimated that 2982 cases were needed to detect a difference of at least 3%. The final analysis included 4131 patients (2661 in the boost group and 1470 in the no-boost group) with a median follow-up of 9 years and media boost dose of 14 Gy. Data were collected from July 2011 through February 2014 and analyzed from March 2014 through August 2015. Interventions Radiotherapy boost vs no boost. Main Outcomes and Measures Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. Results The analysis included 4131 patients (median [SD] age, 56.1 [10.9] years; range, 24-88 years). Patients with positive margins, unknown estrogen receptor status, and comedo necrosis were more likely to have received an RT boost. For the entire cohort, the boost was significantly associated with lower IBTR (hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; 95% CI, 0.57-0.94; P = .01) and with IBTR-free survival (boost vs no-boost groups) of 97.1% (95% CI, 0.96-0.98) vs 96.3% (95% CI, 0.95-0.97) at 5 years, 94.1% (95% CI, 0.93-0.95) vs 92.5% (95% CI, 0.91-0.94) at 10 years, and 91.6% (95% CI, 0.90-0.93) vs 88.0% (95% CI, 0.85-0.91) at 15 years. On multivariable analysis accounting for confounding factors, the boost remained significantly associated with reduced IBTR (HR compared with no boost, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.50-0.91; P = .01) independent of age and tamoxifen citrate use. Conclusions and Relevance This patient-level analysis suggests that the RT boost confers a statistically significant benefit in decreasing IBTR across all DCIS age groups, similar to that seen in patients with invasive breast cancer. These findings suggest that a DCIS RT boost to the tumor bed could be considered to provide an added incremental benefit in decreasing IBTR after a shared discussion between the patient and her radiation oncologist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meena S Moran
- Smilow Cancer Center, Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Yinjun Zhao
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Shuangge Ma
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Youlia Kirova
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Alain Fourquet
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Peter Chen
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Karen Hoffman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Kelly Hunt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Julia Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lia M Halasz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Gary Freedman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Robert Prosnitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Michael Yassa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Montreal, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - David H A Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Montreal, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Tarek Hijal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Bruce G Haffty
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Elaine S Wai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Pauline T Truong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|