[Role of functional imaging in the definition of target volumes for lung cancer radiotherapy]

Respiratory gated multistatic PET reconstructions to delineate radiotherapy target volume in patients with mobile lung tumors

BACKGROUND

PET-CT with ¹⁸F-FDG or other radiopharmaceuticals is a recommended tool to help the delineation of lung cancers candidate to radiotherapy. The motion artifacts caused by respiratory movements are reduced by 4D acquisitions. We introduced an extended reconstruction algorithm (multiple reconstruct register and average [multi-RRA]) which requires much shorter acquisition times than standard 4D PET-CT. Our aim was to evaluate the interest on multi-RRA images as an alternative of 3D and 4D PET-CT for the delineation of lung lesion.

METHODS

PET acquisitions synchronized to the respiratory signal were obtained in 18 patients with mobile lung tumors. We compared the tumor volumes delineated on Multi-RRA images to 3D and 4D PET-CT, considering the 4D CT as a reference. The tumor volumes were delineated and compared with topologic similarity indexes (Dice, Jaccard and overlap).

RESULTS

Twenty tumors were delineated. The volumes delineated with multi-RRA and 4D PET were not significantly different (mean difference of 0.2±0.7 mL). Comparison by pairs (Tukey-Kramer test) showed that 3D-PET volumes were significantly smaller than 4D-PET and multi-RRA volumes (P<0.001). Topologic similarity indexes with 4D-PET were slightly statistically higher with multi-RRA than with 3D-PET (Dice and Jaccard) or 4D-CT (Dice, Jaccard and Overlap).

CONCLUSIONS

The tumor volumes delineated on multi-RRA are similar to the volumes obtained with 4D PET, with shorter acquisition time.

GOECP/SEOR radiotherapy guidelines for small-cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 20% of all lung cancers. The main treatment is chemotherapy (Ch). However, the addition of radiotherapy significantly improves overall survival (OS) in patients with non-metastatic SCLC and in those with metastatic SCLC who respond to Ch. Prophylactic cranial irradiation reduces the risk of brain metastases and improves OS in both metastatic and non-metastatic patients. The 5-year OS rate in patients with limited-stage disease (non-metastatic) is slightly higher than 30%, but less than 5% in patients with extensive-stage disease (metastatic). The present clinical guidelines were developed by Spanish radiation oncologists on behalf of the Oncologic Group for the Study of Lung Cancer/Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology to provide a current review of the diagnosis, planning, and treatment of SCLC. These guidelines emphasise treatment fields, radiation techniques, fractionation, concomitant treatment, and the optimal timing of Ch and radiotherapy. Finally, we discuss the main indications for reirradiation in local recurrence.

[Lung cancer and elective nodal irradiation: A solved issue?]

Lung cancer treatment is a heavy workload for radiation oncologist and that field showed many evolutions over the last two decades. The issue about target volume was raised when treatment delivery became more precise with the development of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. Initially based upon surgical series, numerous retrospective and prospective studies aimed to evaluate the risk of elective nodal failure of involved-field radiotherapy compared to standard large field elective nodal irradiation. In every setting, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer, localized non-small cell lung cancer, localized small cell lung cancer, exclusive chemoradiation or postoperative radiotherapy, most of the studies showed no significant difference between involved-field radiotherapy or elective nodal irradiation with elective nodal failure rate under 5% at 2 years, provided staging had been done with modern imaging and diagnostic techniques (positron emission tomography scan, endoscopy, etc.). Moreover, if reducing irradiated volumes are safe regarding recurrences, involved-field radiotherapy allowed dose escalation while reducing acute and late oesophageal, cardiac and pulmonary toxicities. Consequently, major clinical trials involving radiotherapy initiated in the last two decades and international clinical guidelines recommended omission of elective nodal irradiation in favour of in-field radiotherapy.

Lung toxicity after radiation in childhood: Results of the International Project on Prospective Analysis of Radiotoxicity in Childhood and Adolescence

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This study presents the evaluation of acute and late toxicities of the lung in children and adolescents after irradiation in terms of dose-volume effects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Irradiated children and adolescents in Germany have prospectively been documented since 2001 in the "Registry for the Evaluation of Side-Effects after Radiotherapy in Childhood and Adolescence (RiSK)"; in Sweden since 2008 in the RADTOX registry.

RESULTS

Up to April 2012, 1,392 children were recruited from RiSK, and up to June 2013, 485 from the RADTOX-registry. Of these patients, 295 were irradiated to the lung. Information about acute toxicity was available for 228 patients. 179 patients have been documented concerning late toxicity (≥grade 1: n = 28). The acute toxicity rate was noticeably higher in children irradiated with 5-20Gy (p < 0.05). In the univariate analysis, a shorter time until late toxicity was noticeably associated with irradiation with 5-15Gy (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Acute and late toxicities appear to be correlated with higher irradiation volumes and low doses. Our data indicate that similar to the situation in adult patients, V5, V10, V15 and V20 should be kept as low as possible (e.g., at least V5 < 50%, V10 and V15 < 35% and V20 < 30%) in children and adolescents to lower the risk of toxicity.