Stereotactic radiation therapy of brain metastases from colorectal cancer: A single institution cohort

Clinical features and prognostic factors of brain metastases from colorectal cancer: a single center experience

PURPOSE

The study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics, prognostic factors, survival times, and therapy outcomes of brain metastases (BM) from colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

The clinical characteristics of 25 patients with BM from CRC were retrospectively analyzed. The time of the occurrence of BM after diagnosis of CRC was recorded. Meanwhile, the time from the occurrence of lung, bone, liver, and other extracranial metastases to the occurrence of BM was also recorded. We evaluate the time factors affecting the length of the occurrence of BM and the potential prognostic factors after BM diagnosis. The influences of patients undergoing surgery-based comprehensive treatment, radiotherapy-based comprehensive treatment, and co-medication were also assessed.

RESULTS

In patients with BM from CRC, lung metastases (13/25) occurred at a higher frequency than liver metastases (8/25) and bone metastases (6/25). The median time to the development of BM was much shorter (3.7 vs. 25.3 months, p = 0.027), with the brain being the origin site for the metastasis. The median overall survival reached 9.9 months. The interval between diagnosis of BM and bone, liver, and lung metastasis remains 3, 6.5, and 11 months, respectively. The brain lesions of patients with BM alone had higher rates in supratentorial (88.9%), while those with extracranial metastasis had a 62.5% incidence of infratentorial metastasis. The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The time of occurrence of BM in patients aged 67 years and younger was 16.1 and 30.1 months, respectively. The differences between them were statistically significant (p = 0.043). The BM time for left- and right-sided colon cancer were 26.5 and 7.8 months, representing a statistically significant difference (p = 0.015). The time to onset of BM for patients with and without the resection of primary lesions was 25.4 and 4.5 months. Statistically significant differences are shown (p = 0.007). Univariate analysis demonstrated that the prognosis of patients was related to the KPS score, the number of BM, the treatment methods, and the occurrence of lung metastasis (p < 0.05). The multivariate analysis revealed that the treatment modality and lung metastasis were independent prognostic factors for CRC patients with BM. Right-sided CRC patients with BM have a poor prognosis (8.1 vs. 10.2 months, p = 0.31). Although median survival time was not significantly different between patients with and without bevacizumab combination therapy, bevacizumab therapy is associated with a better survival time (9.9 vs. 7.1 months, p = 0.27).

CONCLUSION

Patients with left-sided CRC, especially those with lung metastases, are prone to brain metastases, and patients with brain metastases as the first metastatic site have a higher rate of supratentorial metastases. Young patients with right hemicolon cancer and patients who have not undergone primary lesion resection have a shorter time for the occurrence of BM. Patients with colorectal lung metastases, especially those young with right-sided CRC, require close imaging surveillance of BM. The prognosis of CRC patients with BM and lung metastases is poor, and comprehensive treatment based on surgery could significantly prolong patients' survival time.

[Role of stereotactic radiotherapy in the treatment of oligometastatic colorectal cancer]

Stereotactic radiotherapy is used for patients with oligometastases from colorectal cancer. It results in good local tumour control, especially for hepatic and pulmonary metastases, subject to a sufficiently high biologically effective dose, and is well-tolerated. It can be associated with other local treatments such as surgery or radiofrequency as part of combined treatments, in order to increase patient survival.

Brain metastases from primary colorectal cancer: is radiosurgery an effective treatment approach? Results of a multicenter study of the radiation and clinical oncology Italian association (AIRO)

OBJECTIVES

The prognosis of brain metastatic colorectal cancer patients (BMCRC) is poor. Several local treatments have been used, but the optimal treatment choice remains an unresolved issue. We evaluated the clinical outcomes of a large series of BMCRC patients treated in several Italian centers using stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).

METHODS

185 BMCRC patients for a total of 262 lesions treated were evaluated. Treatments included surgery followed by post-operative SRS to the resection cavity, and SRS, either single-fraction, then hypofractionated SRS (HSRS). Outcomes was measured in terms of local control (LC), toxicities, brain distant failure (BDF), and overall survival (OS). Prognostic factors influencing survival were assed too.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 33 months (range 3-183 months). Surgery plus SRS have been performed in 28 (10.7%) cases, SRS in 141 (53.8%), and HSRS in 93 (35.5%). 77 (41.6%) patients received systemic therapy. The main total dose and fractionation used were 24 Gy in single fraction or 24 Gy in three daily fractions. Local recurrence occurred in 32 (17.3%) patients. Median, 6 months,1-year-LC were 86 months (95%CI 36-86), 87.2% ± 2.8, 77.8% ± 4.1. Median,6 months,1-year-BDF were 23 months (95%CI 9-44), 66.4% ± 3.9, 55.3% ± 4.5. Median,6 months,1-year-OS were 7 months (95% CI 6-9), 52.7% ± 3.6, 33% ± 3.5. No severe neurological toxicity occurred. Stage at diagnosis, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), presence and number of extracranial metastases, and disease-specific-graded-prognostic-assessment (DS-GPA) score were observed as conditioning survival.

CONCLUSION

SRS/HSRS have proven to be an effective local treatment for BMCRC. A careful evaluation of prognostic factors as well as a multidisciplinary evaluation is a valid aid to manage the optimal therapeutic strategy for CTC patients with BMs.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

The prognosis of BMCRC is poor. Several local treatments was used, but optimal treatment choice remains undefined. Radiosurgery has proven to be an effective local treatment for BMCRC. A careful evaluation of prognostic factors and a multidisciplinary evaluation needed.

Local control and toxicity outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery for spinal metastases of gastrointestinal origin

OBJECTIVE

Colorectal cancer (CRC) and other gastrointestinal (GI) cancers are believed to have greater radioresistance than other histologies. The authors report local control and toxicity outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to spinal metastases from GI primary cancers.

METHODS

A retrospective single-center review was conducted of patients with spinal metastases from GI primary cancers treated with SRS from 2004 to 2017. Patient demographics and lesion characteristics were summarized using medians, interquartile ranges (IQRs), and proportions. Local failure (LF) was estimated using the cumulative incidence function adjusted for the competing risk of death and compared using Gray's test for equality. Multivariable analyses were conducted using Cox proportional hazard models, adjusting for death as a competing risk, on a per-lesion basis. Patients were stratified in the Cox model to account for repeated measures for clustered outcomes. Median survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

A total of 74 patients with 114 spine lesions were included in our analysis. The median age of the cohort was 62 years (IQR 53-70 years). Histologies included CRC (46%), hepatocellular carcinoma (19%), neuroendocrine carcinoma (13%), pancreatic carcinoma (12%), and other (10%). The 1- and 2-year cumulative incidence rates of LF were 24% (95% confidence interval [CI] 16%-33%) and 32% (95% CI 23%-42%), respectively. Univariable analysis revealed that older age (p = 0.015), right-sided primary CRCs (p = 0.038), and single fraction equivalent dose (SFED; α/β = 10) < 20 Gy (p = 0.004) were associated with higher rates of LF. The 1-year cumulative incidence rates of LF for SFED < 20 Gy10 versus SFED ≥ 20 Gy10 were 35% and 7%, respectively. After controlling for gross tumor volume and prior radiation therapy to the lesion, SFED < 20 Gy10 remained independently associated with worse LF (hazard ratio 2.92, 95% CI 1.24-6.89, p = 0.014). Toxicities were minimal, with pain flare observed in 6 patients (8%) and 15 vertebral compression fractures (13%).

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal metastases from GI primary cancers have high rates of LF with SRS at a lower dose. This study found that SRS dose is a significant predictor of failure and that prescribed SFED ≥ 20 Gy10 (biological equivalent dose ≥ 60 Gy10) is associated with superior local control.

Monte Carlo study on the secondary cancer risk estimations for patients undergoing prostate radiotherapy: A humanoid phantom study

AIM

The aim of this study was to estimate the secondary malignancy risk from the radiation in FFB prostate linac-based radiotherapy for different organs of the patient.

BACKGROUND

Radiation therapy is one of the main procedures of cancer treatment. However, the application the radiation may impose dose to organs of the patient which can be the cause of some malignancies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Monte Carlo (MC) simulation was used to calculate radiation doses to patient organs in 18 MV linear accelerator (linac) based radiotherapy. A humanoid MC phantom was used to calculate the equivalent dose s for different organs and probability of secondary cancer, fatal and nonfatal risk, and other risks and parameters related to megavoltage radiation therapy. In out-of-field radiation calculation, it could be seen that neutrons imparted a higher dose to distant organs, and the dose to surrounding organs was mainly due to absorbed scattered photons and electron contamination.

RESULTS

Our results showed that the bladder and skin with 54.89 × 10-3 mSv/Gy and 46.09 × 10-3 mSv/Gy, respectively, absorbed the highest equivalent dose s from photoneutrons, while a lower dose was absorbed by the lung at 3.42 × 10-3 mSv/Gy. The large intestine and bladder absorbed 55.00 × 10-3 mSv/Gy and 49.08 × 10-3, respectively, which were the highest equivalent dose s due to photons. The brain absorbed the lowest out-of-field dose, at 1.87 × 10-3 mSv/Gy.

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that secondary neutron portion was higher than other radiation. Then, we recommended more attention to neutrons in the radiation protection in linac based high energy radiotherapy.

Bone metastasis predicts poor prognosis of patients with brain metastases from colorectal carcinoma post aggressive treatment

Purpose

The presence of brain metastasis (BM) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) is usually associated with terminal-stage illness; however, a subgroup of patients receiving aggressive treatment can have a satisfactory prognosis. This study was designed to investigate the profile of prognostic factors in CRC patients with BM treated aggressively.

Patients and methods

CRC patients with BM were retrospectively reviewed. Survival analysis was performed to identify potential prognostic factors in the entire cohort of patients and a subgroup of patients treated aggressively. Aggressive treatments included surgical resection, radiotherapy, and/or chemotherapy. Overall survival was defined as the time between the diagnosis of BM and death or until the date of the last follow-up visit.

Results

A total of 78 CRC patients were confirmed as having BM. Sixty-eight of them had extracranial metastases at the time of their BM diagnosis. The most common sites of extracranial metastases were lung (n=51, 65.4%), followed by liver (n=25, 32.1%) and bone (n=12, 15.4%). Fifty-one patients who were treated aggressively had significantly longer overall survival than those who accepted palliative care (14.1 months vs 2.0 months, P<0.0001). Multivariate analysis was applied, and the results showed that aggressive treatment (n=51), recursive partitioning analysis class I/II (hazard ratio [HR]=0.27, 95% CI: 0.12–0.6, P=0.001), and fewer BM (HR=0.4, 95% CI: 0.21–0.78, P=0.07) predicted longer survival. In contrast, the presence of bone metastasis, rather than lung or liver metastasis, at the time of diagnosis of BM (HR=2.38, 95% CI: 1.08–5.28, P=0.032) predicted a poor prognosis.

Conclusions

Although the prognosis of CRC patients having BM is frequently very poor, those with good performance status and few brain lesions responded to aggressive treatment, while those with bone metastasis at the time of diagnosis of BM had relatively dismal survival rates, even when treated aggressively.