[Proton therapy for head and neck cancers]

Prospective assessment of peripapillary microvasculature using optical coherence tomography angiography in para-optic intracranial and sinonasal tumors treated with proton therapy

PURPOSE

Radiation-induced optic neuropathy (RION) is rare but may lead to blindness. The mechanisms by which this occurs include endothelial and neuronal damage, but RION has been assessed very little in the case of extraocular tumors treated with high-energy proton therapy, the use of which is expanding worldwide. We assessed peripapillary microvascular changes by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) in patients undergoing high-energy proton therapy for para-optic intracranial or head and neck tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective institutional review board approved study, patients receiving>40Gy_RBE maximal PBT dose to their optic nerve between 2018 and 2020 underwent quantitative OCT-A analyses. ImageJ software was used to assess changes in the peripapillary superficial vascular complex (SVC) using vascular area density (VAD), vessel length density (VLD) and fractal dimension (FDsk). Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Of 47 patients (78 eyes) with 29±6 months of follow-up (range 18-42), 29 patients (61.7%) had previously undergone surgery and 18 (32.1%) had microvascular abnormalities prior to proton therapy. Total radiotherapy dose was the most relevant factor in decreased peripapillary microvasculature. Duration of follow-up was associated with lower VAD (P=0.005) and mean retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFLm) thickness also decreased. There was no significant correlation between OCT-A changes and mean visual defect.

CONCLUSION

Peripapillary microvasculature changes may occur from tumor compression or surgery and proton therapy for extraocular tumors. OCT-A may provide quantitative and mechanistic insights into RION before the occurrence of clinical symptoms.

Dosimetric evaluation of dose shaping by adaptive aperture and its impact on plan quality

Mevion's single-room HYPERSCAN proton therapy system employs a proton multileaf collimator called the adaptive aperture (AA), which collimates individual spots in the proton delivery as determined by the Treatment Planning System (TPS). The purpose of this study is to assess the dosimetric benefits of the AA, specifically in the dynamic aperture (DA) mode, and evaluate its impact on proton treatment plan quality as compared to a traditional pencil beam scanning (PBS) system (Varian ProBeam). The spot dose distributions with dynamic collimation (DA), a unique AA shape for each energy layer, and with static collimation (SA), a single AA collimation shape shared by all energy layers per field, were calculated and compared with the spot dose distribution of the Varian ProBeam proton therapy system. The lateral and distal dose falloff gradients and their dependence on air gap were evaluated quantitatively. Treatment plans for ten arbitrarily selected intracranial target image sets were created, and the HYPERSCAN and ProBeam beam models were compared. The spot sizes of the HYPERSCAN system are significantly larger than ProBeam system, especially at low energy. With the help of DA, the lateral dose penumbra of the HYPERSCAN is dramatically improved at lower energy and comparable at higher to ProBeam PBS beams. While the ProBeam spot size does not change with the air gap, beam penumbra of the HYPERSCAN with DA increases with the air gap. The distal dose falloff gradient for the HYPERSCAN with or without DA remains consistently around 4.8 mm through all energies due to the beamline design, not substantially varying with energy or air gap. Treatment plans of ten randomly selected intracranial cases demonstrated favorable OAR sparing but unfavorable dose uniformity for the HYPERSCAN with DA compared to ProBeam. Dose shaping by adaptive aperture substantially improves the lateral penumbra without a significant change in the distal dose gradient. The dose gradients of the multiple beam DA plans with layer-by-layer blocking are improved compared with SA plans and are close to the ProBeam plans for the ten randomly selected brain cases. With layer-by-layer DA blocking, the HYPERSCAN plans have similar plan conformality indices as the ProBeam plans, but the overall plan quality indices are lower than ProBeam plans, largely due to the lower dose homogeneity. In some cases, DA blocking was found to be superior in sparing OAR surrounding the target.

Proton Beam Therapy for Head and Neck Carcinoma of Unknown Primary: Toxicity and Quality of Life

Purpose

Proton radiation therapy (PRT) may offer dosimetric and clinical benefit in the treatment of head and neck carcinoma of unknown primary (HNCUP). We sought to describe toxicity and quality of life (QOL) in patients with HNCUP treated with PRT.

Patients and Methods

Toxicity and QOL were prospectively tracked in patients with HNCUP from 2011 to 2019 after institutional review board approval. Patients received PRT to the mucosa of the nasopharynx, oropharynx, and bilateral cervical lymph nodes with sparing of the larynx and hypopharynx. Patient-reported outcomes were tracked with the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory–Head and Neck Module, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Head and Neck, the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory, and the Xerostomia-Related QOL Scale. Primary study endpoints were the incidence of grade ≥ 3 (G3) toxicity and QOL patterns.

Results

Fourteen patients (median follow-up, 2 years) were evaluated. Most patients presented with human papillomavirus–positive disease (n = 12, 86%). Rates of G3 oral mucositis, xerostomia, and dermatitis were 7% (n = 1), 21% (n = 3), and 36% (n = 5), respectively. None required a gastrostomy. During PRT, QOL was reduced relative to baseline and recovered shortly after PRT. At 2 years after PRT, the local regional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival were 100% (among 7 patients at risk), 79% (among 6 patients at risk), and 90% (among 7 patients at risk), respectively.

Conclusion

Therefore, PRT for HNCUP was associated with highly favorable dosimetric and clinical outcomes, including minimal oral mucositis, xerostomia, and dysphagia. Toxicity and QOL may be superior with PRT compared with conventional radiation therapy and PRT maintains equivalent oncologic control. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate late effects and cost-effectiveness.

Volumetric and dosimetric comparison of two delineation guidelines for the radiation treatment of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma

•

The delineation of target volumes for Head and Neck IMRT is complex.

•

There have been several approaches for the delineation of the primary tumor clinical target volume: the anatomical guidelines, the geometric guidelines and more recently the international guidelines.

Purpose

Three methods have been recently proposed for the delineation of the primary tumor clinical target volume (CTV-P) in Head and Neck Cancers: the anatomic method popularized in the French literature by Lapeyre et al. the geometric methods proposed by the DAHANCA group, and more recently the international guidelines promoted by Grégoire et al. integrating the latter two. The aim of this study was to perform a volumetric and dosimetric comparison of the French and the International consensus methods in laryngeal SCC.

Patients and methods

Two radiation oncologists independently delineated the high dose and low dose primary tumor CTV in four patients with T2 or T3 N0-M0 laryngeal SCC following either the so-called French guidelines or the International guidelines. For the 4 cases, the GTV was delineated by a single radiation oncologist. Nodal CTVs were delineated by one radiation oncologist for the 4 cases using International guidelines. Dose optimization was then performed with VMAT (MONACO version 5.11) using 6 MeV photons. Differences in target volumes and dose distributions in OARs and PTVs were then evaluated with various metrics such as the DICE Similarity Coefficient and the homogeneity index.

Results

Major differences were observed in the CTV delineation between the 2 delineation methods for the low dose volumes and to a lower extend for the high dose volumes. These differences translated into variations in dose distribution favoring the International guidelines for decreasing dose to various OARs. Such differences toned down when dose distribution on the primary tumors PTVs and nodal PTVs were combined.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated large differences in CTV delineation between the 2 delineation guidelines. Such differences translated into differences in dose distribution.

An update on radiation therapy in head and neck cancers

INTRODUCTION

Technological and technical improvements allowed for significant advances in the field of radiation therapy (RT) of head and neck cancer (HNC). Several organ-sparing strategies have been investigated with the objective to decrease acute and long-term adverse effects and, subsequently, to assure a better quality of life in patients affected by HNC. In this context, intensity modulated irradiation and the use of multimodality-imaging could help clinicians to obtain a rapid dose fall off towards surrounding healthy tissues and a better delineation of targets volumes and organs at risk. Areas covered: A literature review was performed with the aim to offer an update on radiation therapy in HNC. Expert commentary: During these last years, radiation oncologists have observed a continuous changing regarding radiation treatment for HNC. The adoption of intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) and the use of multimodality-imaging for tumor volume definition and organs at risk or delineation have improved the clinical outcomes of HNC patients. In the future, a better integration of functional imaging for target volume delineation as well as adaptive delivery strategies will allow to further personalize radiation oncology in HNC. Furthermore, the latest breakthrough technologies, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-linacs and heavy particles technologies have a great potential to improve treatment-related quality of life in HNC. Future studies are needed to demonstrate the clinical advantages of these new RT technologies in HNC.