How Does Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Improve Exercise Capacity in Chronic Heart Failure?

Exercise rehabilitation in cardiac resynchronization: systematic review and a meta-analysis

The benefit of exercise training in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) recipients is not well established. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effect of exercise training on clinical outcomes in CRT recipients.A comprehensive search until 2019 was conducted of MEDLINE, Epub, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane databases as well as a bibliographic hand search to identify additional studies. We included all studies that compared aerobic exercise interventions in adults treated with CRT devices with adults treated with usual CRT care. These studies evaluated patient clinical characteristics, exercise testing measures, hemodynamic measures, echocardiography parameters, biomarkers and adverse events. Independent reviewers evaluated study eligibility, abstracted data and assessed risk of bias in duplicate. We used random-effect meta-analysis methods to estimate mean differences and odds ratios. Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system were used to quantify absolute effects and quality of evidence. I² was used to evaluate heterogeneity.We identified seven studies, six randomized control trials and one observational study, totaling 332 CRT patients in the exercise intervention and 534 patients receiving usual care. Peak VO₂ was 2.4 ml/kg/min higher in the exercise group in comparison with the control group (pooled mean difference 2.26, 95% CI 1.38-3.13, I² = 53%, high quality). AT-VO₂ improved with exercise rehabilitation, and heterogeneity was considered low (pooled mean difference 3.96, 95% CI 2.68-5.24, I² = 0.0%, moderate quality).Peak VO₂ and AT-VO₂ are increased with aerobic exercise in CRT recipients, demonstrating a significant improvement in functional capacity.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy restores muscular metaboreflex control

INTRODUCTION

The muscular metaboreflex, whose activation regulates blood flow during isometric and aerobic exercise, is blunted in patients with heart failure (HF), and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may restore this regulatory reflex.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate metaboreflex responses after CRT.

METHODS

Thirteen HF patients and 12 age-matched healthy control subjects underwent the following evaluations (pre- and post-CRT implantation in the patient group): (a) heart rate, blood pressure, and forearm blood flow measurements; (b) muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) evaluation; and (c) peak oxygen consumption (VO_2peak ). Examinations were performed at rest, during moderate isometric exercise (IE), and during forearm ischemia (metaboreflex activation). The primary outcome was the increment in MSNA during limb ischemia compared to the rest moment (ΔMSNA rest to metaboreflex activation).

RESULTS

After CRT, rest MSNA decreased in the HF participants: 50.4 ± 9.2 bursts/min pre-CRT vs 34.0 ± 14.4 bursts/min post-CRT, P = .001, accompanied by an improvement in systolic blood pressure and in rate-pressure product. MSNA during limb ischemia decreased: 56.6 ± 11.5 bursts/min pre-CRT vs 43.6 ± 12.7 bursts/min post-CRT, P = .001, and the ΔMSNA rest to metaboreflex activation increased: 0% (interquartile range [IQR)], -7 to 9) vs 13% (IQR, 5-30), P = .03. An augmentation of mean blood pressure during limb ischemia post-CRT was noticed: 94 mmHg (IQR, 81-104) vs 110 mmHg (IQR, 100-117), P = .04. CRT improved VO_2peak , and this improvement was correlated with diminution in ΔMSNA pre- to post-CRT at rest moment (r_s = -0.74, P = .006).

CONCLUSION

CRT provides metaboreflex sensitization and MSNA enhancement. The restoration of sympathetic responsiveness correlates with the improvement in functional capacity.

Effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on muscle sympathetic nerve activity

INTRODUCTION

Muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) is an independent prognostic marker in patients with heart failure (HF). Therefore, its relevance to the treatment of HF patients is unquestionable.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we investigated the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on MSNA response at rest and during exercise in patients with advanced HF.

METHODS

We assessed 11 HF patients (51 ± 3.4 years; New York Heart Association class III-IV; left ventricular ejection fraction 27.8 ± 2.2%; optimal medical therapy) submitted to CRT. Evaluations were made prior to and 3 months after CRT. MSNA was performed at rest and during moderate static exercise (handgrip). Peak oxygen consumption (VO2 ) was evaluated by means of cardiopulmonary exercise test. HF patients with advanced NYHA class without CRT and healthy individuals were also studied.

RESULTS

CRT reduced MSNA at rest (48.9 ± 11.1 bursts/min vs 33.7 ± 15.3 bursts/min, P < 0.05) and during handgrip exercise (MSNA 62.3 ± 13.1 bursts/min vs 46.9 ± 14.3 bursts/min, P < 0.05). Among HF patients submitted to CRT, the peak VO2 increased (12.9 ± 2.8 mL/kg/min vs 16.5 ± 3.9 mL/kg/min, P < 0.05) and an inverse correlation between peak VO2 and resting MSNA (r = -0.74, P = 0.01) was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with advanced HF and severe systolic dysfunction: (1) a significant reduction of MSNA (at rest and during handgrip) occurred after CRT, and this behavior was significantly superior to HF patients receiving only medical therapy; (2) MSNA reduction after CRT had an inverse correlation with O2 consumption outcomes.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy modulation of exercise left ventricular function and pulmonary O₂ uptake in heart failure

To better understand the mechanisms contributing to improved exercise capacity with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), we studied the effects of 6 mo of CRT on pulmonary O(2) uptake (Vo(2)) kinetics, exercise left ventricular (LV) function, and peak Vo(2) in 12 subjects (age: 56 ± 15 yr, peak Vo(2): 12.9 ± 3.2 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1), ejection fraction: 18 ± 3%) with heart failure. We hypothesized that CRT would speed Vo(2) kinetics due to an increase in stroke volume secondary to a reduction in LV end-systolic volume (ESV) and that the increase in peak Vo(2) would be related to an increase in cardiac output reserve. We found that Vo(2) kinetics were faster during the transition to moderate-intensity exercise after CRT (pre-CRT: 69 ± 21 s vs. post-CRT: 54 ± 17 s, P < 0.05). During moderate-intensity exercise, LV ESV reserve (exercise - resting) increased 9 ± 7 ml (vs. a 3 ± 9-ml decrease pre-CRT, P < 0.05), and steady-state stroke volume increased (pre-CRT: 42 ± 8 ml vs. post-CRT: 61 ± 12 ml, P < 0.05). LV end-diastolic volume did not change from rest to steady-state exercise post-CRT (P > 0.05). CRT improved heart rate, measured as a lower resting and steady-state exercise heart rate and as faster heart rate kinetics after CRT (pre-CRT: 89 ± 12 s vs. post-CRT: 69 ± 21 s, P < 0.05). For peak exercise, cardiac output reserve increased significantly post-CRT and was 22% higher at peak exercise post-CRT (both P < 0.05). The increase in cardiac output was due to both a significant increase in peak and reserve stroke volume and to a nonsignificant increase in heart rate reserve. Similar patterns in LV volumes as moderate-intensity exercise were observed at peak exercise. Cardiac output reserve was related to peak Vo(2) (r = 0.48, P < 0.05). These findings demonstrate the chronic CRT-mediated cardiac factors that contribute, in part, to the speeding in Vo(2) kinetics and increase in peak Vo(2) in clinically stable heart failure patients.

Chronic heart failure and exercise intolerance: the hemodynamic paradox

Heart failure represents a major source of morbidity and mortality in industrialized nations. As the leading hospital discharge diagnosis in the United States in patients over the age of 65, it is also associated with substantial economic costs. While the acute symptoms of volume overload frequently precipitate inpatient admission, it is the symptoms of chronic heart failure, including fatigue, exercise intolerance and exertional dyspnea, that impact quality of life. Over the last two decades, research into the enzymatic, histologic and neurohumoral alterations seen with heart failure have revealed that hemodynamic derangements do not necessarily correlate with symptoms. This “hemodynamic paradox” is explained by alterations in the skeletal musculature that occur in response to hemodynamic derangements. Importantly, gender specific effects appear to modify both disease pathophysiology and response to therapy. The following review will discuss our current understanding of the systemic effects of heart failure before examining how exercise training and cardiac resynchronization therapy may impact disease course.

Impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy on exercise performance, functional capacity, and quality of life in systolic heart failure with QRS prolongation: COMPANION trial sub-study

BACKGROUND

A total of 405 participants in the Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing, and Defibrillation in Heart Failure trial were prospectively enrolled in an exercise sub-study designed to study the influence of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on measures of exercise capacity, functional capacity, and quality of life (QOL).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Substudy eligibility included New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional Class III or IV heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction < or =0.35, QRS interval of > or =120 ms, normal sinus rhythm, a heart failure hospitalization (or equivalent) within 1 year, a peak VO2 < or =22 mL x kg x min, the ability to walk 150 to 425 meters in 6 minutes, forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity > or =50%, and no clinical indication for a pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Patients were randomized in a 1:4 ratio to optimal medical therapy (OPT) or to OPT plus CRT. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (peak VO2 and 6-minute walk distance [6MWD]) and assessment of NYHA functional class and QOL were assessed at baseline and at 3 and 6 months of assigned therapy. There was no significant improvement in peak VO2 at 6 months in the CRT group compared with the OPT group (+0.63 mL x kg x min) by unadjusted analysis (P = .05) or by analyses adjusted for missing data. Thus the primary end point of the study was not met. There was significantly greater improvement in the 6MWD in the CRT group compared with the OPT group at both 3 and 6 months by both statistical methods (P < or = .045). Likewise, a greater proportion of CRT patients improved by 1 or more NYHA functional classes (P < .01) at 3 months and had better QOL scores (P < .01) at 3 and 6 months compared with the OPT patients. Baseline peak VO2 predicted clinical events (time to death, time to death or first hospitalization, or time to death and first heart failure hospitalization: P < .05) in CRT participants.

CONCLUSION

CRT patients with moderate to advanced symptoms of systolic heart failure and prolonged QRS intervals benefit from the addition of CRT to OPT in terms of exercise capacity, functional status, and QOL. CRT should be considered standard therapy in this select group of heart failure patients.