The Post–Myocardial Infarction Pacing Remodeling Prevention Therapy (PRomPT) Trial: Design and Rationale

Predictors of Left Ventricular Remodeling After Myocardial Infarction in Patients With a Patent Infarct Related Coronary Artery After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (from the Post-Myocardial Infarction Remodeling Prevention Therapy [PRomPT] Trial)

Left ventricular (LV) remodeling after myocardial infarction (MI) is a strong predictor of heart failure and mortality. The predictors of long-term remodeling after MI have been incompletely studied. We therefore examined the correlates of LV remodeling in patients with large ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and a patent infarct artery after percutaneous 2coronary intervention (PCI) from the randomized Post-Myocardial Infarction Remodeling Prevention Therapy trial. Peri-infarct pacing had a neutral effect on long-term remodeling in patients with large first MI. The present analysis includes 109 patients in whom an open artery was restored after PCI, and in whom LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) at baseline and 18 months was assessed by transthoracic echocardiography. Multivariable models were fit to identify the independent predictors of LVEDV at baseline and 18 months. By multivariable analysis, male sex (p = 0.004) and anterior MI location (p = 0.03) were independently associated with baseline LVEDV. The following variables were independent predictors of increased LVEDV at 18 months: younger age (p = 0.01), male sex (p = 0.03), peak creatine phosphokinase (p = 0.03), shorter time from MI to baseline transthoracic echocardiography (p = 0.04), baseline LVEDV (p < 0.0001), and lack of statin use (p = 0.03). In conclusion, patients with large MI and an open infarct artery after PCI, anterior MI location, and male sex were associated with greater baseline LVEDV, but MI location was not associated with 18-month LVEDV. In contrast, younger age, peak creatine phosphokinase, male sex, baseline LVEDV, and lack of statin use were associated with long-term LV remodeling.

Peri-infarct zone pacing to prevent adverse left ventricular remodelling in patients with large myocardial infarction

AIMS

We sought to determine whether peri-infarct pacing prevents left ventricular (LV) remodelling and improves functional and clinical outcomes in patients with large first myocardial infarction (MI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 126 patients at 27 international sites within 10 days of onset of anterior or non-anterior MI with creatine phosphokinase >3000 U/L and QRS duration ≤120 ms were randomized 1:1:1 to dual-site biventricular pacing vs. single-site LV only pacing vs. non-implanted control. The primary endpoint was the echocardiographic core laboratory-assessed change in LV end-diastolic volume (ΔLVEDV) from baseline to 18 months between the pooled pacing therapy groups and the control group. ΔLVEDV increased by 15.3 ± 28.6 mL in the control group and by 16.7 ± 30.5 mL in the pooled pacing groups during follow-up (adjusted mean difference (95% CI) = 0.6 (-12.3, 13.5) mL, P = 0.92). There were also no significant between-group differences in the change in LV end-systolic volume or ejection fraction over time. Quality of life, as assessed by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (HF) and European Quality of Life-5 Dimension questionnaires and New York Heart Association class, was also similar between groups during 18-month follow-up. Six-minute walk distance improved during follow-up to an equal degree between groups, and there were no significant differences in the 18-month rates of death or HF hospitalization between the pooled pacing therapy vs. control groups (17.4 vs. 21.7% respectively, P = 0.59).

CONCLUSIONS

In the present multicentre, randomized trial, peri-infarct pacing did not prevent LV remodelling or improve functional or clinical outcomes during 18-month follow-up in patients with large first MI.

CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER

NCT01213251.