After the SERVE-HF Trial, Is There Still a Need for Treatment of Central Apnea?

Effects of Sacubitril-Valsartan on Clinical, Echocardiographic, and Polygraphic Parameters in Patients Affected by Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Sleep Apnea

Background

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a clinical condition frequently diagnosed in clinical practice. In patients affected by HFrEF, sleep apnea (SA) can be detected among the most frequent comorbidities. Sacubitril–valsartan (sac/val) association has been proven to be effective in reducing disease progression and all-cause mortality in HFrEF patients. Sac/val treatment can potentially attenuate SA development via several pathophysiologic mechanisms, including improvement of global hemodynamics, reduction of extracellular fluid overload, and decrease of sympathetic neural activity.

Methods

We recruited 132 patients affected by HFrEF and SA, already under treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), which was discontinued 24 h before the scheduled study timepoints. Physical examination, echocardiography, nocturnal cardio-respiratory monitoring, and laboratory tests were performed in each patient at baseline and after a 6-month treatment with sac/val.

Results

After 6 months, sac/val induced statistically significant changes in clinical, hemodynamic, biohumoral (NT-proBNP, serum electrolytes, creatinine, and uric acid), and echocardiographic parameters. In particular, cardiac index (CI), both atrial and ventricular volumes and global longitudinal strain (GLS) improved. Moreover, polysomnography, carried out during a temporary CPAP interruption, revealed a significant reduction in global apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) value (p < 0.0001), central AHI (p < 0.0001), obstructive AHI (p < 0.0001), oxygen desaturation index (ODI) (p < 0.0001), and percentage time of saturation below 90% (TC90) (p < 0.0001). The changes of CI, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), NT-proBNP, and tricuspid annular plane excursion (TAPSE) contributed to 23.6, 7.6, 7.3, and 4.8% of AHI variability, respectively, and the whole model accounted for a 43.3% of AHI variation.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that treatment with sac/val is able to significantly improve the cardiorespiratory performance of patients with HFrEF and SA, integrating the positive impact of CPAP. Thus, both CPAP and sac/val therapy may synergistically contribute to lower the risks of both cardiac and pulmonary complications in HFrEF patients with SA.

Sacubitril-valsartan treatment is associated with decrease in central apneas in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

BACKGROUND

To assess the impact of sacubitril-valsartan on apneic burden in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), 51 stable HFrEF patients planned for switching from an ACE-i/ARB to sacubitril-valsartan were prospectively enrolled.

METHODS AND RESULTS

At baseline and after 6 months of treatment, all patients underwent echocardiography, 24-h cardiorespiratory monitoring, neurohormonal evaluation, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing. At baseline 29% and 65% of patients presented with obstructive and central apneas, respectively. After 6 months, sacubitril-valsartan was associated with a decrease in NT-proBNP, improvement in LV function, functional capacity and ventilatory efficiency. After treatment, the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) decreased across the 24-h period (p < 0.001), as well as at daytime (p < 0.001) and at nighttime (p = 0.026), proportionally to baseline severity. When subgrouping according to the type of apneas, daytime, nighttime and 24-h AHI decreased in patients with central apneas (all p < 0.01). Conversely, in patients with obstructive apneas, the effect of drug administration was neutral at nighttime, with significant decrease only in daytime events (p = 0.007), mainly driven by reduction in hypopneas.

CONCLUSIONS

Sacubitril-valsartan on top of medical treatment is associated with a reduction in the apneic burden among a real-life cohort of HFrEF patients. The most marked reduction was observed for central apneas.

Benefit of buspirone on chemoreflex and central apnoeas in heart failure: a randomized controlled crossover trial

AIMS

Increased chemosensitivity to carbon dioxide (CO2 ) is an important trigger of central apnoeas (CA) in heart failure (HF), with negative impact on outcome. We hypothesized that buspirone, a 5HT1A receptor agonist that inhibits serotonergic chemoreceptor neuron firing in animals, can decrease CO2 chemosensitivity and CA in HF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The BREATH study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study (EudraCT-code 2015-005383-42). Outpatients with systolic HF (left ventricular ejection fraction <50%) and moderate-severe CA [nocturnal apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) ≥15 events/h] were randomly assigned to either oral buspirone (15 mg thrice daily) or placebo for 1 week, with a crossover design (1 week of wash-out). The primary effectiveness endpoint was a decrease in CO2 chemosensitivity >0.5 L/min/mmHg. The primary safety endpoint was freedom from serious adverse events. Sixteen patients (age 71.3 ± 5.8 years, all males, left ventricular ejection fraction 29.8 ± 7.8%) were enrolled. In the intention-to-treat analysis, more patients treated with buspirone (8/16, 50%) had a CO2 chemosensitivity reduction >0.5 L/min/mmHg from baseline than those treated with placebo (1/16, 6.7%) (difference between groups 43%, 95% confidence interval 14-73%, P = 0.016). Buspirone compared to baseline led to a 41% reduction in CO2 chemosensitivity (P = 0.001) and to a reduction in the AHI, central apnoea index and oxygen desaturation index of 42%, 79%, 77% at nighttime and 50%, 78%, 86% at daytime (all P < 0.01); no difference was observed after placebo administration (all P > 0.05). No patient reported buspirone-related serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Buspirone reduces CO2 chemosensitivity and improves CA and oxygen saturation across the 24 h in patients with HF.

Adaptive servo-ventilation therapy does not favourably alter sympatho-vagal balance in sleeping patients with systolic heart failure and central apnoeas: Preliminary data

BACKGROUND

In contrast to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), the use of adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) for treatment of central sleep apnoea (CSA) was associated with increased mortality in patients with chronic systolic heart failure (CHF). In order to characterize the interplay between sleep-disordered breathing, CHF and sympathovagal balance (SVB) this study investigated the effect of nocturnal CPAP and ASV on SVB in CSA patients with or without CHF.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients with ongoing positive airway pressure therapy (CPAP or ASV) for CSA (17 patients with systolic CHF - left ventricular ejection fraction <50% - and 20 patients with CSA but no CHF) underwent evaluation of SVB (spectral analysis of heart rate -HRV- and diastolic blood pressure variability) during full nocturnal polysomnography. The night was randomly split into equal parts including no treatment (NT), automatic CPAP and ASV. Data analysis was restricted to stable N2 sleep.

RESULTS

In patients with CSA and systolic CHF, neither automatic CPAP nor ASV showed favourable effects on parameters reflecting SVB during N2 sleep (all p > 0.05). In contrast, in subjects with CSA without CHF automatic CPAP, but not ASV, favourably altered SVB by decreasing the low frequency and increasing the high frequency component of HRV (both p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Effects of various modes of positive airway pressure therapy of CSA on SVB during sleep depend on the mode of pressure support and underlying cardiac function. Automatic CPAP but not ASV favourably influences SVB in subjects without CHF, whereas both interventions leave SVB unchanged in patients with CHF.

Arrhythmogenic mechanisms of obstructive sleep apnea in heart failure patients

Heart failure (HF) affects 23 million people worldwide and results in 300000 annual deaths. It is associated with many comorbidities, such as obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and risk factors for both conditions overlap. Eleven percent of HF patients have OSA and 7.7% of OSA patients have left ventricular ejection fraction <50% with arrhythmias being a significant comorbidity in HF and OSA patients. Forty percent of HF patients develop atrial fibrillation (AF) and 30%-50% of deaths from cardiac causes in HF patients are from sudden cardiac death. OSA is prevalent in 32%-49% of patients with AF and there is a dose-dependent relationship between OSA severity and resistance to anti-arrhythmic therapies. HF and OSA lead to various downstream arrhythmogenic mechanisms, including metabolic derangement, remodeling, inflammation, and autonomic imbalance. (1) Metabolic derangement and production of reactive oxidative species increase late Na+ currents, decrease outward K+ currents and downregulate connexin-43 and cell-cell coupling. (2) remodeling also features downregulated K+ currents in addition to decreased Na+/K+ ATPase currents, altered Ca2+ homeostasis, and increased density of If current. (3) Chronic inflammation leads to downregulation of both Nav1.5 channels and K+ channels, altered Ca2+ homeostasis and reduced cellular coupling from alterations of connexin expression. (4) Autonomic imbalance causes arrhythmias by evoking triggered activity through increased Ca2+ transients and reduction of excitation wavefront wavelength. Thus, consideration of these multiple pathophysiological pathways (1-4) will enable the development of novel therapeutic strategies that can be targeted against arrhythmias in the context of complex disease, such as the comorbidities of HF and OSA.

Prognostic Significance of Central Apneas Throughout a 24-Hour Period in Patients With Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Large trials using noninvasive mechanical ventilation to treat central apnea (CA) occurring at night ("sleep apnea") in patients with systolic heart failure (HF) have failed to improve prognosis. The prevalence and prognostic value of CA during daytime and over an entire 24-h period are not well described.

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the occurrence and prognostic significance of nighttime, daytime, and 24-h CA episodes in a large cohort of patients with systolic HF.

METHODS

Consecutive patients receiving guideline-recommended treatment for HF (n = 525; left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] of 33 ± 9%; 66 ± 12 years of age; 77% males) underwent prospective evaluation, including 24-h respiratory recording, and were followed-up using cardiac mortality as an endpoint.

RESULTS

The 24-h prevalence of predominant CAs (apnea/hypopnea index [AHI] ≥5 events/h, with CA of >50%) was 64.8% (nighttime: 69.1%; daytime: 57.0%), whereas the prevalence of predominant obstructive apneas (OA) was 12.8% (AHI ≥5 events/h with OAs >50%; nighttime: 14.7%; daytime: 5.9%). Episodes of CA were associated with neurohormonal activation, ventricular arrhythmic burden, and systolic/diastolic dysfunction (all p < 0.05). During a median 34-month follow-up (interquartile range [IQR]: 17 to 36 months), 50 cardiac deaths occurred. Nighttime, daytime, and 24-h moderate-to-severe CAs were associated with increased cardiac mortality (AHI of </≥15 events/h; log-rank: 6.6, 8.7, and 5.3, respectively; all p < 0.05; central apnea index [CAI] of </≥10 events/h; log-rank 8.9, 11.2, and 10.9, respectively; all p < 0.001). Age, B-type natriuretic peptide level, renal dysfunction, 24-h AHI, CAI, and time with oxygen saturation of <90% were independent predictors of outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

In systolic HF patients, CAs occurred throughout a 24-h period and were associated with a neurohormonal activation, ventricular arrhythmic burden, and worse prognosis.

How to take arms against central apneas in heart failure

Introduction Despite being a risk mediator in several observational studies, central apneas are currently orphan of treatment in heart failure. After the neutral effects on survival of two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) based on the use of positive airway pressure (the CANPAP and SERVE-HF trials), two alternative hypotheses have been formulated: 1) Periodic breathing/Cheyne-Stokes respiration (PB/CSR) in HF is protective. Indeed, the Naughton's hypothesis assumes that hyperventilation leads to increased cardiac output, lung volume, oxygen storage and reduced muscle sympathetic nerve activity, while central apnea to respiratory muscle rest and hypoxia-induced erythropoiesis. 2) The use of positive airway pressure is just a wrong treatment for PB/CSR. If this is the case, the search for novel potential alternative treatment approaches is mandatory in HF. Areas covered This review will focus on the crucial issue of whether PB/CSR should be treated or not in HF, first by outlining the ideal design of pathophysiological studies to test the Naughton's hypothesis and second by summarizing the treatment strategies so far proposed for PB/CSR in HF and identifying the most promising options to be tested in future RCTs. Expert commentary It is likely that PB/CSR may be compensatory in some cases, but after a certain threshold (to be defined) it becomes maladaptive with negative prognostic meaning in HF. The development of a pathophysiologically based treatment targeting feedback resetting and neurohormonal activation underlying PB/CSR is likely to be the best option to obtain survival benefits in HF.

Patients with Cheyne-Stokes respiration and heart failure: patient tolerance after three-month discontinuation of treatment with adaptive servo-ventilation

The recent SERVE HF study concluded that patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and Cheyne-Stokes respiration (CSR) have increased mortality when treated with adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV). We, therefore, wanted to explore if these patients tolerated discontinuation of ASV treatment. The study was a prospective post-ASV treatment observational design with a 3-month follow-up period. 14 patients from our outpatient clinic, all male, were originally diagnosed with CHF and Cheyne-Stokes respiration, which is a clinical form of central sleep apnea. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was ≤45% when ASV treatment was initiated. Median machine use was 68 (42-78) months when the patients were instructed to terminate ASV treatment. The patients were then followed during conventional CHF treatment for 3 months. Study baseline was set the last ASV treatment day. Sleep data were collected from the machine the last day of use. Apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), LVEF, 6-min walk test and 24-h ambulatory electrocardiogram recordings were performed at baseline and at study end. Life quality data were obtained using The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionaire (MLHFQ). New York Heart Association Functional Classification (NYHA) was registered. An ambulatory sleep screening was performed at study end. AHI increased significantly after 3 months without ASV treatment [from 1.6 (0.8-3.2) to 39.2 (24.3-44.1, p = 0.001)]. Quality of life (QOL) decreased significantly: 30 (13-54) at discontinuation of ASV vs. 46 (24-67) (MLHFQ) at study end, p = 0.04. Though there was no significant change in NYHA functional class, patients especially reported increased shortness of breath, reduced concentration and reduced memory after discontinuation of ASV treatment. There were no significant differences in LVEF, heart rhythm data and physical capacity. Left ventricular function was preserved indicating that discontinuation of ASV in heart failure patients does not affect cardiac capacity. There was a significant decrement in QOL that must be considered in further treatment of these patients.