Phase 1 Investigation of a Ligand-Conjugated Antisense Oligonucleotide with Increased Potency for the Treatment of Transthyretin Amyloidosis

Cardiac Amyloidosis: Multimodal Imaging of Disease Activity and Response to Treatment

Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is a disease characterized by the deposition of misfolded protein deposits in the myocardial interstitium. Although advanced CA confers significant morbidity and mortality, the magnitude of deposition and ensuing clinical manifestations vary greatly. Thus, an improved understanding of disease pathogenesis at both cellular and functional levels would afford critical insights that may improve outcomes. This review will summarize contemporary therapies for the 2 major types of CA, transthyretin and light chain amyloidosis, and outline the capacity of imaging modalities to both diagnose CA, inform prognosis, and follow response to available therapies. We explore the current landscape of echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance, and bone scintigraphy in the assessment of functional and cellular parameters of dysfunction in CA throughout disease pathogenesis. Finally, we examine the impact of concurrent advances in both therapeutics and imaging on future research questions that improve our understanding of underlying disease mechanisms. Multimodal imaging in CA affords an indispensable tool to offer individualized treatment plans and improve outcomes in patients with CA.

Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy-Current and Future Therapies

OBJECTIVE

To describe the clinical presentation of transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) and discuss current treatments and investigational products and their effect on patient outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search was performed in PubMed (September 2018 to December 2020) using the following keywords: transthyretin amyloidosis, cardiomyopathy, polyneuropathy and transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy, monoclonal light-chain, tafamidis, cardiac amyloidosis, ATTR cardiomyopathy, green tea and inhibition of cardiac amyloidosis, AG10, tolcapone, tolcapone and leptomeningeal ATTR, PRX004, NI006, patisiran, inotersen, vutrisiran, AKCEA-TTR-LRx, and NTLA-2001.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Clinical trials were evaluated for evidence supporting pharmacology, safety, efficacy, and measured outcomes.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Until 2019, there were no approved treatments for ATTR-CM. Treatment consisted of symptom management and organ transplant. Nonpharmacological and pharmacological treatments focused on the symptoms of heart failure (HF) associated with ATTR-CM. However, there are several emerging therapies recently approved or in development to address the underlying pathophysiology. Treatment classes for ATTR-CM include transthyretin stabilizers, human monoclonal antibodies, gene silencers, and CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

ATTR-CM is a complex disease in which amyloidosis causes cardiomyopathy. Underdiagnosis is attributed to the clinical presentation being heterogeneous, indistinguishable from HF caused by other etiologies, and the need for invasive testing modalities, including endomyocardial biopsy. Improved diagnostic approaches along with targeted therapies can slow disease progression and enhance patient quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Diagnostic modalities along with biomarker and genetic testing could detect disease earlier and target therapy more accurately. Novel therapies demonstrate potential treatment benefits and can help shape the standard of care for these patients.

Antisense technology: A review

Antisense technology is beginning to deliver on the broad promise of the technology. Ten RNA-targeted drugs including eight single-strand antisense drugs (ASOs) and two double-strand ASOs (siRNAs) have now been approved for commercial use, and the ASOs in phase 2/3 trials are innovative, delivered by multiple routes of administration and focused on both rare and common diseases. In fact, two ASOs are used in cardiovascular outcome studies and several others in very large trials. Interest in the technology continues to grow, and the field has been subject to a significant number of reviews. In this review, we focus on the molecular events that result in the effects observed and use recent clinical results involving several different ASOs to exemplify specific molecular mechanisms and specific issues. We conclude with the prospective on the technology.

The Interaction of Phosphorothioate-Containing RNA Targeted Drugs with Proteins Is a Critical Determinant of the Therapeutic Effects of These Agents

Recent progress in understanding phosphorothioate antisense oligonucleotide (PS-ASO) interactions with proteins has revealed that proteins play deterministic roles in the absorption, distribution, cellular uptake, subcellular distribution, molecular mechanisms of action, and toxicity of PS-ASOs. Similarly, such interactions can alter the fates of many intracellular proteins. These and other advances have opened new avenues for the medicinal chemistry of PS-ASOs and research on all elements of the molecular pharmacology of these molecules. These advances have recently been reviewed. In this Perspective article, we summarize some of those learnings, the general principles that have emerged, and a few of the exciting new questions that can now be addressed.

Antisense drug discovery and development technology considered in a pharmacological context

When coined, the term "antisense" included oligonucleotides of any structure, with any chemical modification and designed to work through any post-RNA hybridization mechanism. However, in practice the term "antisense" has been used to describe single stranded oligonucleotides (ss ASOs) designed to hybridize to RNAswhile the term "siRNA" has come to mean double stranded oligonucleotides designed to activate Ago2. However, the two approaches share many common features. The medicinal chemistry developed for ASOs greatly facilitated the development of siRNA technology and remains the chemical basis for both approaches. Many of challenges faced and solutions achieved share many common features. In fact, because ss ASOs can be designed to activate Ago2, the two approaches intersect at this remarkably important protein. There are also meaningful differences. The pharmacokinetic properties are quite different and thus potential routes of delivery differ. ASOs may be designedto use a variety of post-RNA binding mechanismswhile siRNAs depend solely on the robust activity of Ago2. However, siRNAs and ASOs are both used for therapeutic purposes and both must be and can be understood in a pharmacological context. Thus, the goals of this review are to put ASOs in pharmacological context and compare their behavior as pharmacological agents to the those of siRNAs.