Predictors of Change in Left-Ventricular Structure and Function in a Trial of Extended Hours Hemodialysis

Impact of volume indices in bioelectrical impedance measurement on the assessment of cardiac function indices by echocardiography in hemodialysis patients

INTRODUCTION

Cardiovascular events resulting from volume overload are a primary cause of mortality in hemodialysis patients. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is significantly valuable for assessing the volume status of hemodialysis (HD) patients. In this article, we explore the correlation between the volume index measured by BIA and the cardiac function index assessed by echocardiography (ECG) in HD patients.

METHODS

Between April and November 2018, we conducted a cross-sectional study involving randomly selected 126 maintenance HD patients. Comprehensive data on medical history and laboratory test results were collected. Subsequently, we investigated the correlation between volume indices measured by BIA and cardiac function parameters by ECG.

RESULTS

We discovered a significant correlation between the volume indices measured by BIA and various parameter of cardiac function. The Left Ventricular Hypertrophy (LVH) group exhibited higher levels of the percentage of Extracellular Water (ECW%) and the percentage of Total Body Water (TBW%) compared to the Non-LVH group. Extracellular Water (ECW) and Third Interstitial Fluid Volume (TSFV) were identified as independent risk factors for Left Ventricular Mass (LVM), and both demonstrated a high predictive value for LVM. ECW% emerged as an independent risk factor for the Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI), with a high predictive value for LVMI.

CONCLUSION

ECW and TSFV were found to be positively associated with cardiac function parameters in HD patients.

Association of vascular endothelial growth factor-C, plasma angiotensinogen and left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with hemodialysis

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to examine the relationship between fluid overload, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor C (VEGF-C), plasma Angiotensinogen (pAGT), and echocardiography findings in hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

This was a single-center, cross-sectional study. Patients were divided into two groups according to mid-week inter-dialytic weight gain (mIDWG): (1) mIDWG ≤3% and (2) mIDW >3%.

RESULTS

A total of 55 patients were enrolled in this study. While the mean pAGT and left ventricular mass index were significantly higher in patients with mIDWG >3% compared to patients with mIDWG ≤3%, VEGF-C was similar between groups. pAGT ≥76.8 mcg/L, VEGF-C ≤175.5 pg/ML, and pAGT /VEGF-C ≥0.45 were significant cut-offs for the prediction of left ventricular hypertrophy(LVH). Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that these cut-off values were significantly associated with LVH.

CONCLUSION

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activation may persist in hemodialysis patients with excessive IDWG. Additionally, pAGT and VEGF-C could be risk factors for the development of LVH.

Survival on four compared with three times per week haemodialysis in high ultrafiltration patients: an observational study

Background

The harm caused by the long interdialytic interval in three-times-per-week haemodialysis regimens (3×WHD) may relate to fluid accumulation and associated high ultrafiltration rate (UFR). Four-times-per-week haemodialysis (4×WHD) may offer a solution, but its impact on mortality, hospitalization and vascular access complications is unknown.

Methods

From the AROii cohort of incident in-centre haemodialysis patients, 3×WHD patients with a UFR >10 mL/kg/h were identified. The hazard for the outcomes of mortality, hospitalization and vascular access complications in those who switched to 4×WHD compared with staying on 3×WHD was estimated using a marginal structural Cox proportional hazards model. Adjustment included baseline patient and treatment characteristics with inverse probability weighting used to adjust for time-varying UFR and cardiovascular comorbidities.

Results

From 10 637 European 3×WHD patients, 3842 (36%) exceeded a UFR >10 mL/kg/h. Of these, 288 (7.5%) started 4×WHD and at baseline were more comorbid. Event rates while receiving 4×WHD compared with 3×WHD were 12.6 compared with 10.8 per 100 patient years for mortality, 0.96 compared with 0.65 per year for hospitalization and 14.7 compared with 8.0 per 100 patient years for vascular access complications. Compared with 3×WHD, the unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) for mortality on 4×WHD was 1.05 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78–1.42]. Following adjustment for baseline demographics, time-varying treatment probability and censoring risks, this HR was 0.73 (95% CI 0.50–1.05; P = 0.095). Despite these adjustments on 4×WHD, the HR for hospitalization remained elevated and vascular access complications were similar to 3×WHD.

Conclusions

This observational study was not able to demonstrate a mortality benefit in patients switched to 4×WHD. To demonstrate the true benefits of 4×WHD requires a large, well-designed clinical trial. Our data may help in the design of such a study.