Examining Information Needs of Heart Failure Patients and Family Companions Using a Previsit Question Prompt List and Audiotaped Data: Findings From a Pilot Study

Inpatient vs. Outpatient: A Systematic Review of Information Needs throughout the Heart Failure Patient Journey

The objective of this systematic review was to identify and describe information needs for individuals with heart failure (HF) throughout their patient journey. Six databases were searched (APA PsycINFO, CINAHL Ultimate, Embase, Emcare Nursing, Medline ALL, and Web of Science Core Collection) from inception to February 2023. Search strategies were developed utilizing the PICO framework. Potential studies of any methodological design were considered for inclusion through a snowball hand search. Data from the included articles were extracted by a reviewer, and the extraction accuracy was independently cross-checked by another author. Quality appraisal was assessed using the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool. A narrative synthesis was used to analyze all the outcomes according to the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis reporting guidelines. Twenty-five studies (15 quantitative and 10 qualitative) were included. Socioeconomic, cultural, and demographic factors influencing information needs were considered. The top three information needs for outpatients included general HF information, signs and symptoms and disease management strategies. For inpatients, medications, risk factors, and general HF were reported as the top needs. These divergent needs emphasize the importance of tailored education at different stages. Additionally, the review identified gaps in global representation, with limited studies from Africa and South America, underscoring the need for inclusive research. The findings caution against overgeneralization due to varied reporting methods. Practical implications call for culturally sensitive interventions to address nuanced HF patients' needs, while future research must prioritize standardized reporting, consider diverse patient journey timepoints, and minimize biases for enhanced reliability and applicability.

Use of provider-sponsored patient portals among older adults and their family caregivers

BACKGROUND

Millions of older adults co-manage or delegate health responsibilities to one or more family caregivers. Patient portals facilitate health care management tasks, but little is known about portal use arrangements (i.e., individual or joint use) among older adults and their caregivers.

METHODS

We sought to characterize individual and joint use of the patient portal and to identify how using arrangements varies by individual-, interpersonal-, and community-level factors. We used linked 2017 National Health and Aging Trends Study, National Study on Caregiving, and American Community Survey data for a nationally representative sample of older adults (n = 1417; weighted n = 7.4 million) and their caregivers (n = 2232; weighted n = 20.6 million). Patient portals used by older adults and caregiver(s) were assessed via self-reports. We described portal use arrangements and tested for between-group differences using weighted Wald tests. Caregiver's likelihood of accessing the portal was modeled using weighted, multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

One in ten (10%) community-living older adults were sole portal users, 3% were joint users with one or more caregivers, 14% solely relied on one or more caregivers as portal users, and 74% reported no portal use. Older adults whose portal was only used by caregiver(s) were more likely to be Medicaid-enrolled (20% vs. 1%; p < 0.001), have dementia (43% vs. 5%; p < 0.001), and be homebound (65% vs. 27%; p < 0.001). Caregivers were more likely to use the portal if they were college-educated adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.68; p < 0.01) and reported caregiving-related emotional difficulty (aOR: 1.92; p < 0.001) and doing more than their "fair share" (aOR: 1.48; p = 0.03), and were less likely if Black (versus White) (aOR: 0.61; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient portals could be a valuable platform for identifying and supporting caregivers of high-need older adults, but existing disparities in portal access must be closed to ensure equitable support.

Communication about Prognosis and End-of-Life in Heart Failure Care and Experiences Using a Heart Failure Question Prompt List

BACKGROUND

To further advance the use of a heart-failure-specific question prompt list (HF-QPL) for communication about prognosis and end-of-life care, knowledge about such communication and the perceptions and experiences of professionals is needed.

OBJECTIVES

1. to describe health care professionals' perceptions of communication about prognosis and end-of-life in heart failure (HF) care, and 2. to describe their experiences of using a HF-QPL.

DESIGN

A qualitative design that analyzed material from written assignments of nurses and physicians who were using a HF-QPL while participating in a communication course.

METHODS

Fifteen health care professionals from different regions in the south of Sweden were included. The data were collected from course assignments on 1. their reflection on the suitable timepoint for talking about prognosis for the first time, 2. their reflection on the HF-QPL, and 3. their experiences of using the HF-QPL in clinical practice. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Five overarching themes were identified. The first theme was awareness of professional role responsibilities that described the recognition of different responsibilities in these conversations within the HF team. The second theme described the importance of being optimally prepared, and the third that confidence and skills are required to use the HF-QPL. The fourth theme described the HF-QPL as a bridge in the communication between professionals, patients, and family members. The fifth theme identified challenges using the HF-QPL in HF care.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a HF-QPL in HF care has the potential to start conversation and facilitate discussion about the HF trajectory.