In-Hospital Weight Loss and Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure

Protocolized Natriuresis-Guided Decongestion Improves Diuretic Response: The Multicenter ENACT-HF Study

BACKGROUND

The use of urinary sodium to guide diuretics in acute heart failure is recommended by experts and the most recent European Society of Cardiology guidelines. However, there are limited data to support this recommendation. The ENACT-HF study (Efficacy of a Standardized Diuretic Protocol in Acute Heart Failure) investigated the feasibility and efficacy of a standardized natriuresis-guided diuretic protocol in patients with acute heart failure and signs of volume overload.

METHODS

ENACT-HF was an international, multicenter, open-label, pragmatic, 2-phase study, comparing the current standard of care of each center with a standardized diuretic protocol, including urinary sodium to guide therapy. The primary end point was natriuresis after 1 day. Secondary end points included cumulative natriuresis and diuresis after 2 days of treatment, length of stay, and in-hospital mortality. All end points were adjusted for baseline differences between both treatment arms.

RESULTS

Four hundred one patients from 29 centers in 18 countries worldwide were included in the study. The natriuresis after 1 day was significantly higher in the protocol arm compared with the standard of care arm (282 versus 174 mmol; adjusted mean ratio, 1.64; P<0.001). After 2 days, the natriuresis remained higher in the protocol arm (538 versus 365 mmol; adjusted mean ratio, 1.52; P<0.001), with a significantly higher diuresis (5776 versus 4381 mL; adjusted mean ratio, 1.33; P<0.001). The protocol arm had a shorter length of stay (5.8 versus 7.0 days; adjusted mean ratio, 0.87; P=0.036). In-hospital mortality was low and did not significantly differ between the 2 arms (1.4% versus 2.0%; P=0.852).

CONCLUSIONS

A standardized natriuresis-guided diuretic protocol to guide decongestion in acute heart failure was feasible, safe, and resulted in higher natriuresis and diuresis, as well as a shorter length of stay.

The Impact of Weight Loss Prior to Hospital Readmission

Hospital readmissions place a burden on hospitals. Reducing the readmission number and duration will help reduce the burden. Weight loss might affect readmission risk, especially the risk of an early (<30 days) readmission. This study sought to identify the predictors and the impact of weight loss prior to a delayed readmission (>30 days). Body mass index (BMI) was measured during the index admission and first readmission. Patients, after their readmission, were assessed retrospectively to identify the characteristics of those who had lost >5% weight prior to that readmission. Length of stay (LOS), time spent in the intensive care unit (ICU) and the one-year mortality of those patients who lost weight were compared to the outcomes of those who remained weight-stable using multilevel mixed-effects regression adjusting for BMI, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), ICU hours and relative stay index (RSI). Those who were at risk of weight loss prior to readmission were identifiable based upon their age, BMI, CCI and LOS. Of 1297 patients, 671 (51.7%) remained weight-stable and 386 (29.7%) lost weight between admissions. During their readmission, those who had lost weight had a significantly higher LOS (IRR 1.17; 95% CI 1.12, 1.22: p < 0.001), RSI (IRR 2.37; 95% CI 2.27, 2.47: p < 0.001) and an increased ICU LOS (IRR 2.80; 95% CI 2.65, 2.96: p < 0.001). This study indicates that weight loss prior to a delayed readmission is predictable and leads to worse outcomes during that readmission.