Vascular pediatric interventional radiology

The effect of operator's experience on mechanical thrombectomy outcomes: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has become the standard of care for stroke patients. The majority of the clinical trials and publications analyzing the outcomes related to the procedures report interventional performance by experienced practitioners. However, few of them individualize their preliminary metrics according to the operator's experience.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the literature and report safety and efficacy outcomes following MT procedures and correlate them with the operator's experience. Primary outcomes were successful recanalization, defined as modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction greater or equal to 2b or 3, duration of the procedure measured in minutes, and serious adverse event.

METHODS

This systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were utilized.

RESULTS

There were six studies comprising 9348 patients (mean age 69.8 years; 51.2% males), and 9361 MT procedures were included. Each publication used for this review used a different experience definition to report their data. Higher interventionists' experience demonstrated a positive relationship with the possibility of successful recanalization and an inverse relationship with the duration needed for the operation in almost all of the included studies. As for the complications, none of the authors reported a statistically significant risk reduction of an adverse event, except Olthuis et al. correlating increasing training with lower odds of stroke progression.

CONCLUSIONS

A higher experience level is associated with better recanalization rates and shorter procedural duration in MT operations. Further studies are warranted to define the minimum required level of experience for operational autonomy.

Pediatric Interventional Neuroradiology: Opportunities and Challenges

Pediatric interventional neuroradiology (PINR) is a relatively new field of diagnostic and therapeutic care in the pediatric population that has seen considerable advances in recent decades. However, it is still lagging behind adult interventional neuroradiology due to a variety of reasons, including the lack of evidence validating pediatric-specific procedures, the relative absence of pediatric-specific equipment, and the challenges in establishing and maintaining PINR competencies in a relatively small number of cases. Despite these challenges, the number and variety of PINR procedures are expanding for a variety of indications, including unique pediatric conditions, and are associated with reduced morbidity and psychological stigma. Continued technological advances, such as improved catheter and microwire designs and novel embolic agents, are also contributing to the growth of the field. This review aims to increase awareness of PINR and provide an overview of the current evidence base for minimally invasive neurological interventions in children. Important considerations, such as sedation, contrast agent use, and radiation protection, will also be discussed, taking into account the distinct characteristics of the pediatric population. The review highlights the usefulness and benefits of PINR and emphasizes the need for ongoing research and development to further advance this field.

Embolization in Pediatric Patients: A Comprehensive Review of Indications, Procedures, and Clinical Outcomes

Embolization in pediatric patients encompasses a large spectrum of indications, ranging from the elective treatment of congenital diseases of the cardiovascular system to the urgent management of acute hemorrhagic conditions. In particular, the endovascular treatment of central and peripheral vascular malformations and hypervascular tumors represents a wide chapter for both congenital and acquired situations. Thanks to the progressive availability of low-profile endovascular devices and new embolic materials, the mini-invasive approach has gradually overtaken surgery. In this review, the main embolization procedures will be illustrated and discussed, with a focus on clinical indications and expected outcomes. The most recent mini-invasive techniques will be described, with hints on the cutting-edge devices and embolic materials.

Current and emerging artificial intelligence applications for pediatric interventional radiology

Artificial intelligence in medicine can help improve the accuracy and efficiency of diagnostics, selection of therapies and prediction of outcomes. Machine learning describes a subset of artificial intelligence that utilizes algorithms that can learn modeling functions from datasets. More complex algorithms, or deep learning, can similarly learn modeling functions for a variety of tasks leveraging massive complex datasets. The aggregation of artificial intelligence tools has the potential to improve many facets of health care delivery, from mundane tasks such as scheduling appointments to more complex functions such as enterprise management modeling and in-suite procedural assistance. Within radiology, the roles and use cases for artificial intelligence (inclusive of machine learning and deep learning) continue to evolve. Significant resources have been devoted to diagnostic radiology tasks via national radiology societies, academic medical centers and hundreds of commercial entities. Despite the widespread interest in artificial intelligence radiology solutions, there remains a lack of applications and discussion for use cases in interventional radiology (IR). Even more relevant to this audience, specific technologies tailored to the pediatric IR space are lacking. In this review, we describe artificial intelligence technologies that have been developed within the IR suite, as well as some future work, with a focus on artificial intelligence's potential impact in pediatric interventional medicine.

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Using Propofol or Dexmedetomidine for Conscious Sedation in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Sclerotherapy

Aim:

Sodium tetradecyl sulfate (STS) sclerotherapy in pediatric patients is usually undertaken under sedation inside digital subtraction angiography (DSA) suite. These patients are day-care patients and need adequate sedation for small duration. We performed this study to compare propofol and dexmedetomidine as sedative agents in these patients.

Materials and Methods:

Seventy American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I patients scheduled to undergo sclerotherapy for low-flow venous malformations under sedation were randomized to be administered either dexmedetomidine (Group D) or propofol (Group P). In Group D, initially 2 µg/kg of dexmedetomidine was administered over 10min (or till attainment of a Ramsay sedation score [RSS] of 5), followed by an infusion at the rate of 0.3 µg/kg/h. In Group P, propofol 1mg/kg bolus followed by an infusion at 100 µg/kg/min was administered, titrated to an RSS of 5. We measured intraoperative heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, duration of procedure, and incidence of arterial desaturation, bradycardia, and respiratory depression in the two groups.

Results:

All the patients in both groups completed the procedure. The mean anesthesia time was significantly longer in Group D. Intraoperative heart rates remained comparable in the two groups, whereas systolic and diastolic BP were significantly higher in Group D throughout the procedure. No patient in Group D experienced arterial desaturation, whereas five patients in Group P reported a SpO₂ of <90%.

Conclusion:

Both propofol and dexmedetomidine can be used for administering sedation in pediatric patients undergoing sclerotherapy for superficial venous malformations in DSA suite. Although propofol provides a rapid onset and reduced duration of action, dexmedetomidine provides reduced episodes of arterial desaturation and respiratory depression.

Feasibility and mid- to long-term results of endovascular treatment for portal vein thrombosis after living-donor liver transplantation

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate mid- to long-term results of endovascular treatment for portal vein thrombosis (PVT) after living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

METHODS

Thirty cases (14 males, 16 females; age range, 0.67-65 years) who underwent endovascular treatment including thrombolysis, angioplasty, stent placement, and/or collateral embolization for PVT after LDLT from 2001 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical and procedural data were collected and analyzed regarding the patency of the PVT site at the last follow-up date (PVT-free persistency) using Log-rank test. Results were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 120 months. The technical success rate was 80% (n=24). Patency rates at 1 week and 1, 3, 6, 12, 36, and 60 months were 73%, 59%, 55%, 51%, 51%, 51%, and 51% for primary patency and 80%, 70%, 66%, 66%, 66%, 61%, and 61% for assisted patency after secondary endovascular treatment. PVT-free persistency rates regarding the subgroups were as follows: children under 12 years vs. adults, 50% vs. 68% (P = 0.42); acute vs. nonacute, 76% vs. 46% (P = 0.10); localized vs. extensive, 90% vs. 50% (P = 0.035); transileocolic approach vs. percutaneous-transhepatic approach, 71% vs. 54% (P = 0.39); and thrombolysis-based treatment vs. non-thrombolysis-based treatment, 71% vs. 44% (P = 0.12), respectively. Among technically successful cases, PVT-free persistency rate was 94% for those with hepatopetal flow in the peripheral portal vein vs. 17% for those without hepatopetal flow (P < 0.001). The only major complication occurring was pleural hemorrhage (n=1). Minor complications (i.e., fever) occurred in 18 patients (60%).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, mid- to long-term portal patency following endovascular treatment was approximately 50%-60% in PVT patients after LDLT. PVT site patency over three months after the first endovascular treatment, localized PVT, and hepatopetal flow in the peripheral portal vein were identified as key prognostic factors for mid- to long-term portal patency.

Pediatric Anesthesia Considerations for Interventional Radiology

Anesthesiologists are increasingly called on to care for pediatric patients undergoing diagnostic imaging and invasive procedures in interventional radiology. These procedures are typically classified as either nonvascular or vascular, and can range from short diagnostic imaging studies or biopsies to significantly longer and more invasive intravascular procedures. Anesthesia providers must consider each child's ability to cooperate reliably during the procedure, their age, and any cognitive impairment to define the best anesthetic plan. Several unique pediatric patient populations with specific procedural implications and anesthetic considerations who will benefit from additional periprocedural planning are discussed.

Unresectable hepatoblastoma: current perspectives

Although rare, hepatoblastoma is the most common pediatric liver tumor. Complete resection is a critical component for cure; however, most patients will have tumors that are not resected at diagnosis. For these patients, administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy renders tumors resectable in most patients. For patients whose tumors remain unresectable after chemotherapy, liver transplantation is indicated (in the absence of active unresectable metastatic disease). In patients whose tumors remain unresectable after conventional chemotherapy, interventional techniques may serve as a promising option to reduce tumor size, decrease systemic toxicity, decrease need for liver transplantation, and increase feasibility of tumor resection.