Pancreatic and Extrapancreatic Features in Autoimmune Pancreatitis

Distinct metabolic biomarkers to distinguish IgG4-related disease from Sjogren's syndrome and pancreatic cancer and predict disease prognosis

BACKGROUND

The pathogenesis of immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) remains unclear. IgG4-RD often mimics other diseases, including pancreatic cancer (PC) and Sjogren's syndrome (SS), which may easily lead to misdiagnosis. This study was performed to explore the metabolite changes and potential biomarkers of IgG4-RD and other misdiagnosed diseases.

METHODS

Untargeted liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry metabolomics profiling of plasma samples from a cohort comprising healthy controls (HCs) and patients with IgG4-RD (n = 87), PC (n = 33), and SS (n = 31) was performed. A random forest machine learning model was used to verify the relevance of the identified metabolites in the diagnosis of different diseases and the prediction of disease prognosis.

RESULTS

The ATP-binding cassette transporter pathway was found to be most closely related to IgG4-RD, which was significantly up-regulated in the IgG4-RD group than in all the matched groups. Five metabolites were proved to be valuable biomarkers for IgG4-RD. Caftaric acid, maltotetraose, D-glutamic acid, 1-stearoyl-2-arachidonoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoserine, and hydroxyproline were useful in distinguishing between IgG4-RD, PC, SS, and HC [area under the curve (AUC) = 1]. A combination of phenylalanine betaine, 1-(1z-hexadecenyl)-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine, Pi 40:8, uracil, and N1-methyl-2-pyridone-5-carboxamide showed a moderate value in predicting relapse in patients with IgG4-RD (AUC = 0.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings revealed the metabolite changes of IgG4-RD and provide new insights for deepening our understanding of IgG4-RD despite the lack of validation in external cohorts. Metabolomic biomarkers have significance in the clinical diagnosis and disease prognosis of IgG4-RD.

Prevalence and clinical features of patients with autoimmune pancreatitis and inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are categorized into immune-mediated inflammatory disorders (IMIDs). While AIP is a pancreato-biliary IMID with an increased incidence and prevalence among patients with IBD, its features are still unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the prevalence and clinical characteristics of AIP-IBD patients.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched to identify observational studies assessing AIP and IBD. The primary outcome was the prevalence of IBD among AIP patients, and vice versa. Secondary outcomes included clinical findings and outcomes of each IMID in AIP-IBD patients. The pooled rate of each outcome was determined using a random effects model.

RESULTS

For primary outcomes, 40 observational studies with 4031 AIP patients were included and the pooled prevalence of IBD was 10.5% (95% CI 7.2-15.0%). Meanwhile, five studies with 10,551 IBD patients were included and the pooled prevalence of AIP was 0.6% (95% CI 0.2-1.9%). For secondary outcomes, 53 observational studies with 469 AIP-IBD patients were assessed. The rates of type 2 AIP and ulcerative colitis were 79.2% (95% CI 69.1-86.6%) and 74.8% (95% CI 68.2-80.4%), respectively. We also demonstrated AIP-IBD patients were at a significant increased risk of AIP recurrence and colectomy compared with patients with either AIP or IBD (RR = 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.1 and P = 0.014 and RR = 3.7, 95% CI 1.9-6.9, P < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis reported the prevalence of AIP-IBD patients and demonstrated patients with both IMIDs had a high risk of poor outcomes.

Imaging of inflammatory disease of the pancreas

Increasingly acute and chronic pancreatitis (AP and CP) are considered a continuum of a single entity. Nonetheless, if, after flare-up, the pancreas shows no residual inflammation, it is classified as AP. CP is characterised by a long cycle of worsening and waning glandular inflammation without the pancreas ever returning to its baseline structure or function. According to the International Consensus Guidelines on Early Chronic Pancreatitis, pancreatic inflammation must last at least 6 months before it can be labelled CP. The distinction is important because, unlike AP, CP can destroy endocrine and exocrine pancreatic function, emphasising the importance of early diagnosis. As typical AP can be diagnosed by clinical symptoms plus laboratory tests, imaging is usually reserved for those with recurrent, complicated or CP. Imaging typically starts with ultrasound and more frequently with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT). MRI and/or MR cholangiopancreatography can be used as a problem-solving tool to confirm indirect signs of pancreatic mass, differentiate between solid and cystic lesions, and to exclude pancreatic duct anomalies, as may occur with recurrent AP, or to visualise early signs of CP. MR cholangiopancreatography has replaced diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). However, ERCP, and/or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) remain necessary for transpapillary biliary or pancreatic duct stenting and transgastric cystic fluid drainage or pancreatic tissue sampling, respectively. Finally, positron emission tomography-MRI or positron emission tomography-CT are usually reserved for complicated cases and/or to search for extra pancreatic systemic manifestations. In this article, we discuss a broad spectrum of inflammatory pancreatic disorders and the utility of various modalities in diagnosing acute and chronic pancreatitis.

[Chronic pancreatitis : Characterization and differentiation from pancreatic cancer]

Klinisches/methodisches Problem

Bei der chronischen Pankreatitis (CP) handelt es sich um eine langanhaltende Entzündung der Bauchspeicheldrüse, welche die normale Struktur und Funktion des Organs schädigt. Das breite Spektrum an entzündlichen Pankreaserkrankungen umfasst einzelne Entitäten, wie die fokale Pankreatitis (FP) oder den Pseudotumor („mass-forming pancreatitis“), welche radiomorphologisch ein Adenokarzinom der Bauchspeicheldrüse (PDAC) nachahmen können. In weiterer Folge kann eine Fehldiagnose zu einem vermeidbaren und unnötigen operativen Eingriff oder zu einer Therapieverzögerung führen.

Radiologische Standardverfahren

Der Ultraschall (US) ist das primäre bildgebende Verfahren zur Abklärung von Pankreaserkrankungen, gefolgt von kontrastmittelverstärkter Computertomographie (KM-CT), die als meistverwendete Methode bei der diagnostischen Abklärung von Bauchspeicheldrüsenerkrankungen gilt. Die Magnetresonanztomographie (MRT) und/oder die MR-Cholangiopankreatographie (MRCP) können als Problemlöser eingesetzt werden, um zwischen soliden und zystischen Läsionen zu unterscheiden sowie auch Anomalien der Pankreasgänge auszuschließen, welche bei rezidivierender akuter Pankreatitis (AP) vorhanden sein können, oder um frühe Anzeichen einer CP zu visualisieren. Die MRCP hat dabei die diagnostische endoskopische retrograde Cholangiopankreatographie (ERCP) in der Abklärung von therapeutischen Interventionen im Wesentlichen ersetzt.

Empfehlung für die Praxis

Folgender Übersichtsartikel fasst die relevanten Merkmale in der Computertomographie (CT) und MRT zusammen, um eine akkurate, frühzeitige Diagnose einer CP zu stellen und eine Differenzierung zwischen FP und Pankreaskarzinom zu ermöglichen, um somit – auch in schwierigen Fällen – ein adäquates Therapiemanagement zu gewährleisten.

Differentiation of focal autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is an inflammatory process of the pancreas that occurs most commonly in elderly males and clinically can mimic pancreatic adenocarcinoma and present with jaundice, weight loss, and abdominal pain. Mass-forming lesions in the pancreas are seen in the focal form of AIP and both clinical and imaging findings can overlap those of pancreatic cancer. The accurate distinction of AIP from pancreatic cancer is of utmost importance as it means avoiding unnecessary surgery in AIP cases or inaccurate steroid treatment in patients with pancreatic cancer. Imaging concomitantly with serological examinations (IgG4 and Ca 19-9) plays an important role in the distinction between these entities. Characteristic extra-pancreatic manifestations as well as favorable good response to treatment with steroids are characteristic of AIP. This paper will review current diagnostic parameters useful in differentiating between focal AIP and pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Imaging in Autoimmune Pancreatitis and Immunoglobulin G4-Related Disease of the Abdomen

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is steroid-responsive fibroinflammatory disorder of the pancreas. There are 2 distinct subtypes of AIP, types 1 and 2. Type 1 is associated with systemic immunoglobulin (Ig)G4 disease and may affect multiple organs in the body. Type 2 is confined to the pancreas and shows an association with ulcerative colitis. This article describes the imaging findings of AIP and IgG4 disease in the liver, bile ducts, kidneys, and the retroperitoneal regions. The imaging differentiation of AIP from pancreas cancer is discussed.