1
|
Zambrano AK, Paz-Cruz E, Ruiz-Pozo VA, Cadena-Ullauri S, Tamayo-Trujillo R, Guevara-Ramírez P, Zambrano-Villacres R, Simancas-Racines D. Microbiota dynamics preceding bariatric surgery as obesity treatment: a comprehensive review. Front Nutr 2024; 11:1393182. [PMID: 38633602 PMCID: PMC11021787 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1393182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
The review present data on the intricate relationship between bariatric surgery, gut microbiota, and metabolic health in obesity treatment. Bariatric surgery, is recognized as an effective intervention for managing morbid obesity, including various techniques with distinct mechanisms of action, efficacy, and safety profiles including Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB), Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG), Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding (LAGB), and Biliopancreatic Diversion (BPD). RYGB and SG are the most prevalent procedures globally, inducing gut microbiota changes that influence microbial diversity and abundance. Post-surgery, alterations in bacterial communities occur, such as the increased of Escherichia coli inversely correlated with fat mass and leptin levels. During digestion, microbiota produce physiologically active compounds like bile acids (Bas) and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs). SCFAs, derived by microbial fermentation, influence appetite, energy metabolism, and obesity-related pathways. Bas, altered by surgery, modulate glucose metabolism and insulin sensitivity. Furthermore, SG and RYGB enhance incretin secretion, particularly glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1). Therefore, understanding microbiota changes after bariatric surgery could be crucial for predicting metabolic outcomes and developing targeted interventions for obesity management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Karina Zambrano
- Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud Eugenio Espejo, Centro de Investigación Genética y Genómica, Universidad UTE, Quito, Ecuador
| | - Elius Paz-Cruz
- Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud Eugenio Espejo, Centro de Investigación Genética y Genómica, Universidad UTE, Quito, Ecuador
| | - Viviana A. Ruiz-Pozo
- Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud Eugenio Espejo, Centro de Investigación Genética y Genómica, Universidad UTE, Quito, Ecuador
| | - Santiago Cadena-Ullauri
- Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud Eugenio Espejo, Centro de Investigación Genética y Genómica, Universidad UTE, Quito, Ecuador
| | - Rafael Tamayo-Trujillo
- Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud Eugenio Espejo, Centro de Investigación Genética y Genómica, Universidad UTE, Quito, Ecuador
| | - Patricia Guevara-Ramírez
- Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud Eugenio Espejo, Centro de Investigación Genética y Genómica, Universidad UTE, Quito, Ecuador
| | | | - Daniel Simancas-Racines
- Centro de Investigación de Salud Pública y Epidemiología Clínica (CISPEC), Universidad UTE, Quito, Ecuador
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Katayama RC, Herbella FAM, Patti MG, Arasaki CH, Oliveira RO, de Grande AC. Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Lacks Intrasurgeon and Intersurgeon Agreement in Technical Key Points That May Affect Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease After the Procedure. Obes Surg 2024; 34:542-548. [PMID: 38157142 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-023-07016-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) may be related to surgical technique. The fact that there is a lack of technical standardization may explain large differences in GERD incidence. The aim of this study is to evaluate auto- and hetero-agreement for SG technical key points based on recorded videos. METHODS Ten experienced (minimum of 5 years performing bariatric surgery, minimum of 30 SG per year) bariatric surgeons (9 (90%) males) were selected. Participants were invited to send an unedited video with a typical laparoscopic SG (first round of the Delphi process). Videos were cropped into small clips comprising 11 key points of the technique. All anonymized clips (including their own) were returned to all surgeons. Individuals were asked to agree or not with the technique demonstrated (second round). The percentage of agreement was presented to the entire group that was asked for a second vote (third round). RESULTS Agreement was poor/fair for all points except hiatal repair that had a very good agreement in the second round. For the third round, there was a slight increase in agreement for distance esophagogastric junction/proximal stapling and gastric mobilization for stapling and a slight decrease in agreement for gastric tube final shape. Only 1 (10%) surgeon recognized that he evaluated his own video. Five (50%) surgeons disagreed with themselves on 1 or more points. CONCLUSION SG lacks intrasurgeon and intersurgeon agreement in technical key points that may justify significant differences in GERD incidence after the procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael C Katayama
- Department of Surgery, Esophagus and Stomach Division, Federal University of São Paulo, Napoleão de Barros Street, São Paulo, 71504024-002, Brazil.
| | - Fernando A M Herbella
- Department of Surgery, Esophagus and Stomach Division, Federal University of São Paulo, Napoleão de Barros Street, São Paulo, 71504024-002, Brazil
| | - Marco G Patti
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Carlos H Arasaki
- Department of Surgery, Esophagus and Stomach Division, Federal University of São Paulo, Napoleão de Barros Street, São Paulo, 71504024-002, Brazil
| | - Rafaella O Oliveira
- Department of Surgery, Esophagus and Stomach Division, Federal University of São Paulo, Napoleão de Barros Street, São Paulo, 71504024-002, Brazil
| | - Ana C de Grande
- Department of Surgery, Esophagus and Stomach Division, Federal University of São Paulo, Napoleão de Barros Street, São Paulo, 71504024-002, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bariatric surgeon perceptions of the safety of same-day sleeve gastrectomy in the state of Massachusetts. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2022; 19:451-457. [PMID: 36702648 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2022.10.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2022] [Revised: 09/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND During the past 2.5 years, select bariatric surgeons in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts have been implementing same-day sleeve gastrectomy (SDSG). Key reasons for this change have been to reduce risks associated with hospitalization in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and to comply with third-party payer preference to reduce costs. OBJECTIVE We aimed to evaluate bariatric surgeons' attitudes about outcomes and morbidity between patients who are hospitalized after sleeve gastrectomy and patients who undergo SDSG. SETTING Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, Massachusetts (teaching hospital of Harvard Medical School). METHODS This prospective cohort study was conducted among bariatric surgeons practicing in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. An anonymous web-based questionnaire was distributed using the Research Electronic Data Capture software. A total of 58 bariatric surgeons in Massachusetts were identified and successfully contacted based on registration with the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine, membership in the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, and internet search. RESULTS A total of 33 bariatric surgeons in Massachusetts completed the survey, yielding a response rate of 56.9%. Among the respondents, 75.76% have not performed SDSG, reporting patient safety as the major concern, and 24.24% had performed SDSG in the past. CONCLUSION Survey responses showed no significant differences in surgeon perception between SDSG and hospitalization after surgery. Optimal patient selection was an important factor influencing surgeons' decisions with regard to performing SDSG. However, bariatric surgeons in Massachusetts are reluctant to perform SDSG.
Collapse
|
4
|
Alharbi SR. Plain X-ray findings of post sleeve gastrectomy gastric leak. J Clin Imaging Sci 2022; 12:28. [PMID: 35673589 PMCID: PMC9168391 DOI: 10.25259/jcis_6_2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 04/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastric leak following sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is a rare but significant cause of morbidity and mortality. A high clinical index of suspicion is the most sensitive approach to detect gastric leaks. Computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard diagnostic technique, although it might not be performed due to unavailability, and the inability to image superobese patients due to limited CT gantry space. Early detection and management are critical for attaining a better prognosis. The following pictorial review discusses the various plain X-ray radiographic findings that indicate a gastric leak. These findings may be overlooked, however, they remain valuable in patients with clinically suspected gastric leaks. This pictorial review illustrates the spectrum of findings related to post-SG gastric leak encountered in plain X-ray radiography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sultan R Alharbi
- Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pañella C, Busto M, González A, Serra C, Goday A, Grande L, Pera M, Ramón JM. Correlation of Gastric Volume and Weight Loss 5 Years Following Sleeve Gastrectomy. Obes Surg 2021; 30:2199-2205. [PMID: 32065338 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-020-04445-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The volume of the gastric reservoir (VGR) after sleeve gastrectomy influences weight loss in the short-term, but long-term results are scarce. The aim was to analyze the correlation between the VGR and weight loss at 5 years of follow-up. METHODS It is a prospective observational study of 50 patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy (SG) from February 2009 to December 2013. An upper gastrointestinal series was performed at 1 month and at 1 and 5 years after surgery. A composite formula was used for VGR estimation. Weight loss-related data included the following: body mass index (BMI), percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL), and percentage of excess BMI loss (%EBMIL) at 1 month and at 1 and 5 years. Uni- and multivariate analyses were carried out to determine other factors that might influence long-term weight loss results. RESULTS The %EWL at 1 year was 74.5(63.8-86) vs. 55.5(47-74.3) at 5 years (p < 0.001). The VGR 1 month after surgery was 114.9 (90.5-168.3) mL. The VGR increased from 216.7 (155.1-278.6) to 367.5 (273-560.3) mL (p < 0.001) at 1 and 5 years. Although a significant inverse correlation was observed between VGR and BMI, %EWL, and %EBMIL at 1 year, it disappeared at 5 years. In the multivariate analysis, the main factor to predict worse weight results at 5 years was a pre-surgical BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2. CONCLUSION The VGR increased progressively during the study period. Although an inverse relationship between VGR and weight was found at 1 year, this correlation did not remain at 5 years. A preoperative BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2 is the main predictive factor of poor weight outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Pañella
- Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery Unit, Section of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain. .,Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Marcos Busto
- Department of Radiology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alba González
- Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery Unit, Section of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carme Serra
- Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery Unit, Section of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alberto Goday
- Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Endocrinology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,CiberOBN, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luís Grande
- Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery Unit, Section of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.,Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Surgery, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Manuel Pera
- Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery Unit, Section of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.,Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Surgery, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - José M Ramón
- Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery Unit, Section of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.,Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Alharbi SR. Computed Tomography-based Diagnosis of Post-laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Gastric Leak. J Clin Imaging Sci 2020; 10:8. [PMID: 32257584 PMCID: PMC7109466 DOI: 10.25259/jcis_5_2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2020] [Accepted: 02/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: Gastric leak post-laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy may appear as a variety of computed tomography (CT) findings. We aimed to review the various CT findings sensitivity and specificity in confirmed cases of gastric leak. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was performed for all patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy, CT, and endoscopy for suspected leak between 2011 and 2018. All patients with positive CT findings for gastric leak were included in the study. Results: A total of 152 consecutive patients underwent CT for suspected post-sleeve gastrectomy gastric leak. Out of 152 patients, 88 had positive CT findings for gastric leak and underwent endoscopy. The CT findings sensitivity and specificity of perigastric collection without oral contrast leak were 61% and 88.8%, oral contrast leak were 28% and 100%, and gas leak were 10% and 77.7%, respectively. Conclusions: Perigastric fluid collection without contrast leak and with variable wall enhancement and gas content is the most common CT findings of post-sleeve gastrectomy gastric leak. Among various CT findings, it exhibits good diagnostic accuracy with 61% sensitivity and 88.8% specificity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sultan R Alharbi
- Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Granata A, Amata M, Ligresti D, Martino A, Tarantino I, Barresi L, Traina M. Endoscopic management of post-surgical GI wall defects with the overstitch endosuturing system: a single-center experience. Surg Endosc 2019; 34:3805-3817. [PMID: 31583467 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07145-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2019] [Accepted: 09/24/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Post-GI surgical wall defects are frequent and life-threatening complications, with limited literature regarding current treatment. This case series aims to assess the safety, feasibility, and outcomes of endoluminal therapy with the overstitch endoscopic suturing system (Apollo Endosurgery Inc, Austin). MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients who underwent endoscopic suturing for post-surgical wall defect management at IRCCS-ISMETT Palermo from October 2017 until January 2019 were retrospectively enrolled. Stratification therapy was applied according to the clinical scenario, time from surgery to endoscopic intervention, and structural condition of the wall defect layers (tissue status and suture feasibility). The therapeutic endoscopic strategy was divided into three groups (A: pure endoscopic direct suture; B: combined therapy with endoscopic direct suture + FC-SEMS placement + anchoring; C: FC-SEMS placement + anchoring). Success was considered the resolution of symptoms and the presence of a regular intestinal transit after a period of 4-6 weeks. RESULTS Twenty (20) patients (male/female 7/13; mean age 54 ± 13.43 years) were included in the study (group A: 9 patients, group B: 7 patients, group C: 4 patients). The types of operative procedures were bariatric (9/20), post-tracheostomy (3/20), post-operative GI surgery (8/20). The post-surgical defects were predominantly intermediate and chronic (24-72 h: 1/20; 3-30 days: 13/20; > 30 days: 6/20). The overall clinical success was 80% (17/20 patients), with a success of 94% (16/17 patients) when excluding the three cases of tracheo-esophageal fistula. No evidence of migration was detected. The only complication was short stenosis of the distal esophagus, present in 4 patients (19%) and successfully treated with a novel lumen-apposing metal stent. CONCLUSIONS In our experience, considering the absence of clear guidelines, the endoluminal approach with the overstich endoscopic suturing system is a valid alternative to conventional therapy, offering mini-invasiveness, and presenting promising opportunities in terms of technical feasibility and clinical efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonino Granata
- Digestive Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS - ISMETT, Via Tricomi 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Michele Amata
- Digestive Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS - ISMETT, Via Tricomi 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
| | - Dario Ligresti
- Digestive Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS - ISMETT, Via Tricomi 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Alberto Martino
- Digestive Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS - ISMETT, Via Tricomi 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Ilaria Tarantino
- Digestive Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS - ISMETT, Via Tricomi 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Luca Barresi
- Digestive Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS - ISMETT, Via Tricomi 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Mario Traina
- Digestive Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS - ISMETT, Via Tricomi 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|