Acute Appendicitis or Lymphoid Hyperplasia: How to Distinguish More Safely?

Appendectomy in endometriosis: an update on surgical indications and management of uncommon diseases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Abnormal appendiceal disease is commonly encountered following an appendectomy when performed in patients with endometriosis. Appendiceal endometriosis is the most notable finding and can affect up to 39% of patients with endometriosis. Despite this knowledge, guidelines for performing an appendectomy have not been formally established. In this article, we review the surgical indications for an appendectomy at the time of endometriosis surgery and discuss the management of other diseases that may be encountered following the histopathologic evaluation of an excised appendix.

RECENT FINDINGS

Removal of the appendix in patients with endometriosis contributes to optimal surgical management. Relying on abnormal appendiceal appearance for removal may leave endometriosis-affected appendices. For this reason, utilizing risk factors to guide surgical management is essential. Common appendiceal diseases are sufficiently managed with appendectomy. Uncommon diseases may require further surveillance.

SUMMARY

Emerging data in our field support the performance of an appendectomy at the time of endometriosis surgery. Guidelines for performing a concurrent appendectomy should be formalized to encourage preoperative counselling and management for patients with risk factors for appendiceal endometriosis. Abnormal diseases is frequently encountered after appendectomy in the setting of endometriosis surgery and further management is based on the histopathology of the specimen.

Imaging of acute appendicitis: Advances

We read with interest the review by Teng et al, who summarized the current approach to the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis (AA). Also, the article summarizes the clinical scoring systems very effectively. In one of the previous studies conducted by our research group, we showed that the use of the Alvarado score, ultrasound and C-reactive protein values in combination provides a safe confirmation or exclusion of the diagnosis of AA. Computed tomography is particularly sensitive in detecting periappendiceal abscess, peritonitis and gangrenous changes. Computed tomography is not a good diagnostic tool in pediatric patients because of the ionizing radiation it produces. Ultrasound is a valuable diagnostic tool to differentiate AA from lymphoid hyperplasia. Presence of fluid collection in the periappendiceal and lamina propria thickness less than 1 mm are the most effective parameters in differentiating appendicitis from lymphoid hyperplasia. Although AA is the most common cause of surgical acute abdomen, it remains an important diagnostic and clinical challenge. By combining clinical scoring systems, laboratory data and appropriate imaging methods, diagnostic accuracy and adherence to treatment can be increased. Lymphoid hyperplasia and perforated appendicitis present significant diagnostic challenges in children. Additional ultrasound findings are increasingly defined to differentiate AA from these conditions.

It's time to deconstruct treatment-failure: A randomized controlled trial of nonoperative management of uncomplicated pediatric appendicitis with antibiotics alone

BACKGROUND

Published data demonstrate that management of uncomplicated pediatric appendicitis with antibiotics-alone is safe and frequently successful. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing antibiotics-alone to appendectomy are lacking, alongside insight into drivers of failure. We sought to validate the antibiotics-alone approach and identify barriers to success using an RCT design.

METHODS

Patients aged 6-17 years with uncomplicated appendicitis were randomized to appendectomy or intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam for 24-48 h followed by 10 days of oral ciprofloxacin/metronidazole. Enrollment required symptoms <48 h, WBC<18, appendiceal diameter <11 mm, and radiographic absence of perforation. Lack of clinical improvement or persistently elevated WBC resulted in appendectomy. Primary outcomes were 1-year success rate of antibiotics-alone and quality-of-life measures.

RESULTS

Among 39 children enrolled over 31 months, 20 were randomized to antibiotics-alone and 19 to surgery. At 1 year, 6 nonoperative patients underwent appendectomy (70% success). Four cases were not true antibiotic failures but instead reflected "pragmatic" challenges to executing nonoperative algorithms. Only 2 cases represented recurrent/refractory appendicitis, suggesting a 90% adjusted 1-year success rate. Parental PedsQL™ scores were similar between treatment cohorts (91.3 vs 90.2, P = 0.32). Children treated with antibiotics-alone had faster return to activity (2.0 vs 12 days, P = 0.001) and fewer parental missed work days (0.0 vs 2.5, P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

These data corroborate findings from non-randomized studies suggesting 70-90% of uncomplicated pediatric appendicitis can be treated with antibiotics-alone, with fewer disability days. Failures appear multifactorial, often reflecting practical hurdles and not antibiotic limitations. As surgeons consider nonoperative protocols for uncomplicated appendicitis, these data further inform the variability of treatment success.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1; randomized controlled trial.

Clinical, Morphological, and Immunohistochemical Justification of Surgery for Chronic Appendicitis in Children

Objective: Chronic appendicitis (CA) is a diagnosis characterized by long-standing right lower quadrant pain. We analyzed clinical, morphological, and immunohistochemical studies of the appendix to confirm the adequacy of surgery for CA in children with chronic right lower quadrant pain. Patients and Methods: We carried out comparative studies of clinical presentations and results of morphological and immunohistochemical studies of remote appendicitis in 55 children with chronic recurrent lower quadrant pain (CRLQP). Results: Morphological and immunohistochemical studies revealed three types of changes in the appendix. Type 1 (n = 21)-chronic inflammation. Inflammatory leukocyte infiltration was localized within the mucous membrane of the appendix. An immunohistochemical study revealed a significant (P < .01) increase in the expression of CD106 (vascular cell adhesion molecule 1) and in the number of matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) positive cells. Type 2 (n = 20)-lymphoid hyperplasia. Morphological changes were characterized by lymphoid infiltration of the mucosa and submucosa of the appendix. Immunological changes were characterized by an increase (P < .01) in the expression and number of MMP-9, expression of CD106 positive cells, an increase in the expression of collagen IIIα in combination with a decrease in the expression and number of positive vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and vasoactive intestinal peptide cells. Type 3 (n = 12)-catarrhal inflammation. Morphological changes were characterized by impaired blood circulation only in the mucous membrane, without destructive or inflammatory changes. Immunological changes were characterized by an increase (P < .01) in the expression and number of VEGF-positive cells, which may indicate a response to local hypoxia of the appendix and explain neovascularization in a chronic condition. The abdominal syndrome after appendectomy was noted to disappear in 89% of patients. The established changes in remote appendicitis, other than acute inflammation, make it possible to consider reasonable appendectomy a way of treating CRLQP in children. Conclusions: We have identified immunohistochemical and morphological changes pointing to autoimmune and vascular mechanisms of appendix damage in children with CRLQP. Laparoscopic appendectomy helps to eliminate abdominal pain in most CA patients.