1
|
Brady AP, Allen B, Chong J, Kotter E, Kottler N, Mongan J, Oakden-Rayner L, Pinto Dos Santos D, Tang A, Wald C, Slavotinek J. Developing, Purchasing, Implementing and Monitoring AI Tools in Radiology: Practical Considerations. A Multi-Society Statement From the ACR, CAR, ESR, RANZCR & RSNA. J Am Coll Radiol 2024; 21:1292-1310. [PMID: 38276923 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) carries the potential for unprecedented disruption in radiology, with possible positive and negative consequences. The integration of AI in radiology holds the potential to revolutionize healthcare practices by advancing diagnosis, quantification, and management of multiple medical conditions. Nevertheless, the ever-growing availability of AI tools in radiology highlights an increasing need to critically evaluate claims for its utility and to differentiate safe product offerings from potentially harmful, or fundamentally unhelpful ones. This multi-society paper, presenting the views of Radiology Societies in the USA, Canada, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand, defines the potential practical problems and ethical issues surrounding the incorporation of AI into radiological practice. In addition to delineating the main points of concern that developers, regulators, and purchasers of AI tools should consider prior to their introduction into clinical practice, this statement also suggests methods to monitor their stability and safety in clinical use, and their suitability for possible autonomous function. This statement is intended to serve as a useful summary of the practical issues which should be considered by all parties involved in the development of radiology AI resources, and their implementation as clinical tools. KEY POINTS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bibb Allen
- Department of Radiology, Grandview Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama; American College of Radiology Data Science Institute, Reston, Virginia
| | - Jaron Chong
- Department of Medical Imaging, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Elmar Kotter
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nina Kottler
- Radiology Partners, El Segundo, California; Stanford Center for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine & Imaging, Palo Alto, California
| | - John Mongan
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Lauren Oakden-Rayner
- Australian Institute for Machine Learning, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Daniel Pinto Dos Santos
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - An Tang
- Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology, and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Christoph Wald
- Department of Radiology, Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts; Tufts University Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Commision on Informatics, and Member, Board of Chancellors, American College of Radiology, Virginia
| | - John Slavotinek
- South Australia Medical Imaging, Flinders Medical Centre Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Warren BE, Bilbily A, Gichoya JW, Conway A, Li B, Fawzy A, Barragán C, Jaberi A, Mafeld S. An Introductory Guide to Artificial Intelligence in Interventional Radiology: Part 1 Foundational Knowledge. Can Assoc Radiol J 2024; 75:558-567. [PMID: 38445497 DOI: 10.1177/08465371241236376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly evolving and has transformative potential for interventional radiology (IR) clinical practice. However, formal training in AI may be limited for many clinicians and therefore presents a challenge for initial implementation and trust in AI. An understanding of the foundational concepts in AI may help familiarize the interventional radiologist with the field of AI, thus facilitating understanding and participation in the development and deployment of AI. A pragmatic classification system of AI based on the complexity of the model may guide clinicians in the assessment of AI. Finally, the current state of AI in IR and the patterns of implementation are explored (pre-procedural, intra-procedural, and post-procedural).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blair Edward Warren
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alexander Bilbily
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- 16 Bit Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Aaron Conway
- Prince Charles Hospital, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Ben Li
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Aly Fawzy
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Camilo Barragán
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Arash Jaberi
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sebastian Mafeld
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Arif WM. Radiologic Technology Students' Perceptions on Adoption of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Radiology. Int J Gen Med 2024; 17:3129-3136. [PMID: 39049835 PMCID: PMC11268710 DOI: 10.2147/ijgm.s465944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2024] [Accepted: 07/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Study Purpose This study aims to analyze radiologic technology student's perceptions of artificial intelligence (AI) and its applications in radiology. Methods A quantitative cross-sectional survey was conducted. A pre-validated survey questionnaire with 17 items related to students perceptions of AI and its applications was used. The sample included radiologic technology students from three universities in Saudi Arabia. The survey was conducted online for several weeks, resulting in a sample of 280 radiologic technology students. Results Of the participants, 63.9% were aware of AI and its applications. T-tests revealed a statistically significant difference (p = 0.0471) between genders with male participants reflecting slightly higher AI awareness than female participants. Regarding the choice of radiology as specialization, 35% of the participants stated that they would not choose radiology, whereas 65% preferred it. Approximately 56% of the participants expressed concerns about the potential replacement of radiology technologists with AI, and 62.1% strongly agreed on the necessity of incorporating known ethical principles into AI. Conclusion The findings reflect a positive evaluation of the applications of this technology, which is attributed to its essential support role. However, tailored education and training programs are necessary to prepare future healthcare professionals for the increasing role of AI in medical sciences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wejdan M Arif
- King Saud University, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Department of Radiological Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Contaldo MT, Pasceri G, Vignati G, Bracchi L, Triggiani S, Carrafiello G. AI in Radiology: Navigating Medical Responsibility. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:1506. [PMID: 39061643 PMCID: PMC11276428 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14141506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2024] [Revised: 07/10/2024] [Accepted: 07/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
The application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) facilitates medical activities by automating routine tasks for healthcare professionals. AI augments but does not replace human decision-making, thus complicating the process of addressing legal responsibility. This study investigates the legal challenges associated with the medical use of AI in radiology, analyzing relevant case law and literature, with a specific focus on professional liability attribution. In the case of an error, the primary responsibility remains with the physician, with possible shared liability with developers according to the framework of medical device liability. If there is disagreement with the AI's findings, the physician must not only pursue but also justify their choices according to prevailing professional standards. Regulations must balance the autonomy of AI systems with the need for responsible clinical practice. Effective use of AI-generated evaluations requires knowledge of data dynamics and metrics like sensitivity and specificity, even without a clear understanding of the underlying algorithms: the opacity (referred to as the "black box phenomenon") of certain systems raises concerns about the interpretation and actual usability of results for both physicians and patients. AI is redefining healthcare, underscoring the imperative for robust liability frameworks, meticulous updates of systems, and transparent patient communication regarding AI involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Teresa Contaldo
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy; (G.V.); (S.T.); (G.C.)
| | - Giovanni Pasceri
- Information Society Law Center, Department “Cesare Beccaria”, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Giacomo Vignati
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy; (G.V.); (S.T.); (G.C.)
| | | | - Sonia Triggiani
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy; (G.V.); (S.T.); (G.C.)
| | - Gianpaolo Carrafiello
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy; (G.V.); (S.T.); (G.C.)
- Radiology and Inverventional Radiology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda, Policlinico di Milano Ospedale Maggiore, 20122 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hwang EJ. [Clinical Application of Artificial Intelligence-Based Detection Assistance Devices for Chest X-Ray Interpretation: Current Status and Practical Considerations]. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGY 2024; 85:693-704. [PMID: 39130790 PMCID: PMC11310435 DOI: 10.3348/jksr.2024.0052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2024] [Revised: 06/14/2024] [Accepted: 07/04/2024] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) technology is actively being applied for the interpretation of medical imaging, such as chest X-rays. AI-based software medical devices, which automatically detect various types of abnormal findings in chest X-ray images to assist physicians in their interpretation, are actively being commercialized and clinically implemented in Korea. Several important issues need to be considered for AI-based detection assistant tools to be applied in clinical practice: the evaluation of performance and efficacy prior to implementation; the determination of the target application, range, and method of delivering results; and monitoring after implementation and legal liability issues. Appropriate decision making regarding these devices based on the situation in each institution is necessary. Radiologists must be engaged as medical assessment experts using the software for these devices as well as in medical image interpretation to ensure the safe and efficient implementation and operation of AI-based detection assistant tools.
Collapse
|
6
|
Costa ED, Gaêta-Araujo H, Carneiro JA, Zancan BAG, Baranauskas JA, Macedo AA, Tirapelli C. Development of a dental digital data set for research in artificial intelligence: the importance of labeling performed by radiologists. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2024; 138:205-213. [PMID: 38632036 DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2023.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2023] [Revised: 11/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to present the development of a database (dataset) of panoramic radiographs. STUDY DESIGN Three radiologists labeled an image set consisting of 936 panoramic radiographs. Labeling includes tooth numbering (including teeth present and missing) and annotation of dental conditions (e.g., caries, dental restoration, residual root, endodontic treatment, implant, fixed prosthesis, incisal wear). The annotation process was performed in a Picture Archive and Communication System software customized for the study purposes using a small bounding box to delimit the entire tooth and items for radiographic diagnosis and a large bounding box to simultaneously delimit the 2 dental arches (maxilla and mandible). A JSON file was generated for each annotation. RESULTS The database encompassed 23,619 annotations; disagreement between radiologists occurred in 0.7% of the notes. CONCLUSIONS This work aimed to inform researchers about the importance of the labeling process, in addition to providing the scientific community with a bank of labeled images to implement artificial intelligence systems in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eliana Dantas Costa
- Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
| | - Hugo Gaêta-Araujo
- Department of Stomatology, Public Health and Forensic Dentistry, Division of Oral Radiology, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - José Andery Carneiro
- Department of Computing and Mathematics, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - José Augusto Baranauskas
- Department of Computing and Mathematics, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Alessandra Alaniz Macedo
- Department of Computing and Mathematics, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Camila Tirapelli
- Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Aldhafeeri FM. Navigating the ethical landscape of artificial intelligence in radiography: a cross-sectional study of radiographers' perspectives. BMC Med Ethics 2024; 25:52. [PMID: 38734602 PMCID: PMC11088142 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-024-01052-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiography presents transformative opportunities for diagnostic imaging and introduces complex ethical considerations. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to explore radiographers' perspectives on the ethical implications of AI in their field and identify key concerns and potential strategies for addressing them. METHODS A structured questionnaire was distributed to a diverse group of radiographers in Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire included items on ethical concerns related to AI, the perceived impact on clinical practice, and suggestions for ethical AI integration in radiography. The data were analyzed using quantitative and qualitative methods to capture a broad range of perspectives. RESULTS Three hundred eighty-eight radiographers responded and had varying levels of experience and specializations. Most (44.8%) participants were unfamiliar with the integration of AI into radiography. Approximately 32.9% of radiographers expressed uncertainty regarding the importance of transparency and explanatory capabilities in the AI systems used in radiology. Many (36.9%) participants indicated that they believed that AI systems used in radiology should be transparent and provide justifications for their decision-making procedures. A significant preponderance (44%) of respondents agreed that implementing AI in radiology may increase ethical dilemmas. However, 27.8%expressed uncertainty in recognizing and understanding the potential ethical issues that could arise from integrating AI in radiology. Of the respondents, 41.5% stated that the use of AI in radiology required establishing specific ethical guidelines. However, a significant percentage (28.9%) expressed the opposite opinion, arguing that utilizing AI in radiology does not require adherence to ethical standards. In contrast to the 46.6% of respondents voicing concerns about patient privacy over AI implementation, 41.5% of respondents did not have any such apprehensions. CONCLUSIONS This study revealed a complex ethical landscape in the integration of AI in radiography, characterized by enthusiasm and apprehension among professionals. It underscores the necessity for ethical frameworks, education, and policy development to guide the implementation of AI in radiography. These findings contribute to the ongoing discourse on AI in medical imaging and provide insights that can inform policymakers, educators, and practitioners in navigating the ethical challenges of AI adoption in healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faten Mane Aldhafeeri
- Collage of Applied Medical Sciences, University of Hafr Albatin, P.O.Box 31991, Hafr Albatin, Saudi Arabia.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Brady AP, Allen B, Chong J, Kotter E, Kottler N, Mongan J, Oakden-Rayner L, Dos Santos DP, Tang A, Wald C, Slavotinek J. Developing, Purchasing, Implementing and Monitoring AI Tools in Radiology: Practical Considerations. A Multi-Society Statement From the ACR, CAR, ESR, RANZCR & RSNA. Can Assoc Radiol J 2024; 75:226-244. [PMID: 38251882 DOI: 10.1177/08465371231222229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) carries the potential for unprecedented disruption in radiology, with possible positive and negative consequences. The integration of AI in radiology holds the potential to revolutionize healthcare practices by advancing diagnosis, quantification, and management of multiple medical conditions. Nevertheless, the ever‑growing availability of AI tools in radiology highlights an increasing need to critically evaluate claims for its utility and to differentiate safe product offerings from potentially harmful, or fundamentally unhelpful ones. This multi‑society paper, presenting the views of Radiology Societies in the USA, Canada, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand, defines the potential practical problems and ethical issues surrounding the incorporation of AI into radiological practice. In addition to delineating the main points of concern that developers, regulators, and purchasers of AI tools should consider prior to their introduction into clinical practice, this statement also suggests methods to monitor their stability and safety in clinical use, and their suitability for possible autonomous function. This statement is intended to serve as a useful summary of the practical issues which should be considered by all parties involved in the development of radiology AI resources, and their implementation as clinical tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bibb Allen
- Department of Radiology, Grandview Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA
- Data Science Institute, American College of Radiology, Reston, VA, USA
| | - Jaron Chong
- Department of Medical Imaging, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Elmar Kotter
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nina Kottler
- Radiology Partners, El Segundo, CA, USA
- Stanford Center for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine & Imaging, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - John Mongan
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lauren Oakden-Rayner
- Australian Institute for Machine Learning, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Daniel Pinto Dos Santos
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - An Tang
- Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology, and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Christoph Wald
- Department of Radiology, Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA
- Tufts University Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- American College of Radiology, Reston, VA, USA
| | - John Slavotinek
- South Australia Medical Imaging, Flinders Medical Centre Adelaide, SA, Australia
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lastrucci A, Wandael Y, Ricci R, Maccioni G, Giansanti D. The Integration of Deep Learning in Radiotherapy: Exploring Challenges, Opportunities, and Future Directions through an Umbrella Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:939. [PMID: 38732351 PMCID: PMC11083654 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14090939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2024] [Revised: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
This study investigates, through a narrative review, the transformative impact of deep learning (DL) in the field of radiotherapy, particularly in light of the accelerated developments prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic. The proposed approach was based on an umbrella review following a standard narrative checklist and a qualification process. The selection process identified 19 systematic review studies. Through an analysis of current research, the study highlights the revolutionary potential of DL algorithms in optimizing treatment planning, image analysis, and patient outcome prediction in radiotherapy. It underscores the necessity of further exploration into specific research areas to unlock the full capabilities of DL technology. Moreover, the study emphasizes the intricate interplay between digital radiology and radiotherapy, revealing how advancements in one field can significantly influence the other. This interdependence is crucial for addressing complex challenges and advancing the integration of cutting-edge technologies into clinical practice. Collaborative efforts among researchers, clinicians, and regulatory bodies are deemed essential to effectively navigate the evolving landscape of DL in radiotherapy. By fostering interdisciplinary collaborations and conducting thorough investigations, stakeholders can fully leverage the transformative power of DL to enhance patient care and refine therapeutic strategies. Ultimately, this promises to usher in a new era of personalized and optimized radiotherapy treatment for improved patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Lastrucci
- Department of Allied Health Professions, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy; (A.L.); (Y.W.); (R.R.)
| | - Yannick Wandael
- Department of Allied Health Professions, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy; (A.L.); (Y.W.); (R.R.)
| | - Renzo Ricci
- Department of Allied Health Professions, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy; (A.L.); (Y.W.); (R.R.)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chen W, Lim LJR, Lim RQR, Yi Z, Huang J, He J, Yang G, Liu B. Artificial intelligence powered advancements in upper extremity joint MRI: A review. Heliyon 2024; 10:e28731. [PMID: 38596104 PMCID: PMC11002577 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Revised: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an indispensable medical imaging examination technique in musculoskeletal medicine. Modern MRI techniques achieve superior high-quality multiplanar imaging of soft tissue and skeletal pathologies without the harmful effects of ionizing radiation. Some current limitations of MRI include long acquisition times, artifacts, and noise. In addition, it is often challenging to distinguish abutting or closely applied soft tissue structures with similar signal characteristics. In the past decade, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been widely employed in musculoskeletal MRI to help reduce the image acquisition time and improve image quality. Apart from being able to reduce medical costs, AI can assist clinicians in diagnosing diseases more accurately. This will effectively help formulate appropriate treatment plans and ultimately improve patient care. This review article intends to summarize AI's current research and application in musculoskeletal MRI, particularly the advancement of DL in identifying the structure and lesions of upper extremity joints in MRI images.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Chen
- Department of Hand Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Lincoln Jian Rong Lim
- Department of Medical Imaging, Western Health, Footscray Hospital, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rebecca Qian Ru Lim
- Department of Hand & Reconstructive Microsurgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Zhe Yi
- Department of Hand Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jiaxing Huang
- Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jia He
- Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Ge Yang
- Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Bo Liu
- Department of Hand Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ciet P, Eade C, Ho ML, Laborie LB, Mahomed N, Naidoo J, Pace E, Segal B, Toso S, Tschauner S, Vamyanmane DK, Wagner MW, Shelmerdine SC. The unintended consequences of artificial intelligence in paediatric radiology. Pediatr Radiol 2024; 54:585-593. [PMID: 37665368 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-023-05746-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Revised: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
Over the past decade, there has been a dramatic rise in the interest relating to the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology. Originally only 'narrow' AI tasks were possible; however, with increasing availability of data, teamed with ease of access to powerful computer processing capabilities, we are becoming more able to generate complex and nuanced prediction models and elaborate solutions for healthcare. Nevertheless, these AI models are not without their failings, and sometimes the intended use for these solutions may not lead to predictable impacts for patients, society or those working within the healthcare profession. In this article, we provide an overview of the latest opinions regarding AI ethics, bias, limitations, challenges and considerations that we should all contemplate in this exciting and expanding field, with a special attention to how this applies to the unique aspects of a paediatric population. By embracing AI technology and fostering a multidisciplinary approach, it is hoped that we can harness the power AI brings whilst minimising harm and ensuring a beneficial impact on radiology practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierluigi Ciet
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC - Sophia's Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | | | - Mai-Lan Ho
- University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Lene Bjerke Laborie
- Department of Radiology, Section for Paediatrics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Nasreen Mahomed
- Department of Radiology, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Jaishree Naidoo
- Paediatric Diagnostic Imaging, Dr J Naidoo Inc., Johannesburg, South Africa
- Envisionit Deep AI Ltd, Coveham House, Downside Bridge Road, Cobham, UK
| | - Erika Pace
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Bradley Segal
- Department of Radiology, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Seema Toso
- Pediatric Radiology, Children's Hospital, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Sebastian Tschauner
- Division of Paediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Dhananjaya K Vamyanmane
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Child Health, Bangalore, India
| | - Matthias W Wagner
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Division of Neuroradiology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Susan C Shelmerdine
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, Great Ormond Street, London, WC1H 3JH, UK.
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
- NIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre, 30 Guilford Street, Bloomsbury, London, UK.
- Department of Clinical Radiology, St George's Hospital, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kim D, Sundling KE, Virk R, Thrall MJ, Alperstein S, Bui MM, Chen-Yost H, Donnelly AD, Lin O, Liu X, Madrigal E, Michelow P, Schmitt FC, Vielh PR, Zakowski MF, Parwani AV, Jenkins E, Siddiqui MT, Pantanowitz L, Li Z. Digital cytology part 2: artificial intelligence in cytology: a concept paper with review and recommendations from the American Society of Cytopathology Digital Cytology Task Force. J Am Soc Cytopathol 2024; 13:97-110. [PMID: 38158317 DOI: 10.1016/j.jasc.2023.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
Digital cytology and artificial intelligence (AI) are gaining greater adoption in the cytology laboratory. However, peer-reviewed real-world data and literature are lacking in regard to the current clinical landscape. The American Society of Cytopathology in conjunction with the International Academy of Cytology and the Digital Pathology Association established a special task force comprising 20 members with expertise and/or interest in digital cytology. The aim of the group was to investigate the feasibility of incorporating digital cytology, specifically cytology whole slide scanning and AI applications, into the workflow of the laboratory. In turn, the impact on cytopathologists, cytologists (cytotechnologists), and cytology departments were also assessed. The task force reviewed existing literature on digital cytology, conducted a worldwide survey, and held a virtual roundtable discussion on digital cytology and AI with multiple industry corporate representatives. This white paper, presented in 2 parts, summarizes the current state of digital cytology and AI practice in global cytology practice. Part 1 of the white paper is presented as a separate paper which details a review and best practice recommendations for incorporating digital cytology into practice. Part 2 of the white paper presented here provides a comprehensive review of AI in cytology practice along with best practice recommendations and legal considerations. Additionally, the cytology global survey results highlighting current AI practices by various laboratories, as well as current attitudes, are reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Kim
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kaitlin E Sundling
- The Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Renu Virk
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Michael J Thrall
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Susan Alperstein
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York Presbyterian-Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Marilyn M Bui
- The Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | | | - Amber D Donnelly
- Diagnostic Cytology Education, University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Allied Health Professions, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Oscar Lin
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Xiaoying Liu
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Emilio Madrigal
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Pamela Michelow
- Division of Anatomical Pathology, School of Pathology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; Department of Pathology, National Health Laboratory Services, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Fernando C Schmitt
- Department of Pathology, Medical Faculty of Porto University, Porto, Portugal
| | - Philippe R Vielh
- Department of Pathology, Medipath and American Hospital of Paris, Paris, France
| | | | - Anil V Parwani
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | | | - Momin T Siddiqui
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York Presbyterian-Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Liron Pantanowitz
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
| | - Zaibo Li
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hwang EJ, Jeong WG, David PM, Arentz M, Ruhwald M, Yoon SH. AI for Detection of Tuberculosis: Implications for Global Health. Radiol Artif Intell 2024; 6:e230327. [PMID: 38197795 PMCID: PMC10982823 DOI: 10.1148/ryai.230327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Revised: 12/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Abstract
Tuberculosis, which primarily affects developing countries, remains a significant global health concern. Since the 2010s, the role of chest radiography has expanded in tuberculosis triage and screening beyond its traditional complementary role in the diagnosis of tuberculosis. Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems for tuberculosis detection on chest radiographs have recently made substantial progress in diagnostic performance, thanks to deep learning technologies. The current performance of CAD systems for tuberculosis has approximated that of human experts, presenting a potential solution to the shortage of human readers to interpret chest radiographs in low- or middle-income, high-tuberculosis-burden countries. This article provides a critical appraisal of developmental process reporting in extant CAD software for tuberculosis, based on the Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging. It also explores several considerations to scale up CAD solutions, encompassing manufacturer-independent CAD validation, economic and political aspects, and ethical concerns, as well as the potential for broadening radiography-based diagnosis to other nontuberculosis diseases. Collectively, CAD for tuberculosis will emerge as a representative deep learning application, catalyzing advances in global health and health equity. Keywords: Computer-aided Diagnosis (CAD), Conventional Radiography, Thorax, Lung, Machine Learning Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eui Jin Hwang
- From the Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital
and Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu,
Seoul 03080, Korea (E.J.H., S.H.Y.); Department of Radiology, Chonnam National
University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Korea (W.G.J.); Faculty of Pharmacy,
University of Montréal, Montréal, Canada (P.M.D.);
OBVIA–Observatoire sur les Impacts Sociétaux de l'IA et du
Numérique, Québec, Canada (P.M.D.); and FIND–The Global
Alliance for Diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerland (M.A., M.R.)
| | - Won Gi Jeong
- From the Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital
and Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu,
Seoul 03080, Korea (E.J.H., S.H.Y.); Department of Radiology, Chonnam National
University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Korea (W.G.J.); Faculty of Pharmacy,
University of Montréal, Montréal, Canada (P.M.D.);
OBVIA–Observatoire sur les Impacts Sociétaux de l'IA et du
Numérique, Québec, Canada (P.M.D.); and FIND–The Global
Alliance for Diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerland (M.A., M.R.)
| | - Pierre-Marie David
- From the Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital
and Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu,
Seoul 03080, Korea (E.J.H., S.H.Y.); Department of Radiology, Chonnam National
University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Korea (W.G.J.); Faculty of Pharmacy,
University of Montréal, Montréal, Canada (P.M.D.);
OBVIA–Observatoire sur les Impacts Sociétaux de l'IA et du
Numérique, Québec, Canada (P.M.D.); and FIND–The Global
Alliance for Diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerland (M.A., M.R.)
| | - Matthew Arentz
- From the Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital
and Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu,
Seoul 03080, Korea (E.J.H., S.H.Y.); Department of Radiology, Chonnam National
University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Korea (W.G.J.); Faculty of Pharmacy,
University of Montréal, Montréal, Canada (P.M.D.);
OBVIA–Observatoire sur les Impacts Sociétaux de l'IA et du
Numérique, Québec, Canada (P.M.D.); and FIND–The Global
Alliance for Diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerland (M.A., M.R.)
| | - Morten Ruhwald
- From the Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital
and Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu,
Seoul 03080, Korea (E.J.H., S.H.Y.); Department of Radiology, Chonnam National
University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Korea (W.G.J.); Faculty of Pharmacy,
University of Montréal, Montréal, Canada (P.M.D.);
OBVIA–Observatoire sur les Impacts Sociétaux de l'IA et du
Numérique, Québec, Canada (P.M.D.); and FIND–The Global
Alliance for Diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerland (M.A., M.R.)
| | - Soon Ho Yoon
- From the Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital
and Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu,
Seoul 03080, Korea (E.J.H., S.H.Y.); Department of Radiology, Chonnam National
University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Korea (W.G.J.); Faculty of Pharmacy,
University of Montréal, Montréal, Canada (P.M.D.);
OBVIA–Observatoire sur les Impacts Sociétaux de l'IA et du
Numérique, Québec, Canada (P.M.D.); and FIND–The Global
Alliance for Diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerland (M.A., M.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Brady AP, Allen B, Chong J, Kotter E, Kottler N, Mongan J, Oakden-Rayner L, Pinto Dos Santos D, Tang A, Wald C, Slavotinek J. Developing, purchasing, implementing and monitoring AI tools in radiology: Practical considerations. A multi-society statement from the ACR, CAR, ESR, RANZCR & RSNA. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 68:7-26. [PMID: 38259140 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) carries the potential for unprecedented disruption in radiology, with possible positive and negative consequences. The integration of AI in radiology holds the potential to revolutionize healthcare practices by advancing diagnosis, quantification, and management of multiple medical conditions. Nevertheless, the ever-growing availability of AI tools in radiology highlights an increasing need to critically evaluate claims for its utility and to differentiate safe product offerings from potentially harmful, or fundamentally unhelpful ones. This multi-society paper, presenting the views of Radiology Societies in the USA, Canada, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand, defines the potential practical problems and ethical issues surrounding the incorporation of AI into radiological practice. In addition to delineating the main points of concern that developers, regulators, and purchasers of AI tools should consider prior to their introduction into clinical practice, this statement also suggests methods to monitor their stability and safety in clinical use, and their suitability for possible autonomous function. This statement is intended to serve as a useful summary of the practical issues which should be considered by all parties involved in the development of radiology AI resources, and their implementation as clinical tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bibb Allen
- Department of Radiology, Grandview Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
- American College of Radiology Data Science Institute, Reston, Virginia, USA
| | - Jaron Chong
- Department of Medical Imaging, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Elmar Kotter
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nina Kottler
- Radiology Partners, El Segundo, California, USA
- Stanford Center for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine & Imaging, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - John Mongan
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Lauren Oakden-Rayner
- Australian Institute for Machine Learning, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Daniel Pinto Dos Santos
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - An Tang
- Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology, and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Christoph Wald
- Department of Radiology, Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA
- Tufts University Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Commision On Informatics, and Member, Board of Chancellors, American College of Radiology, Reston, Virginia, USA
| | - John Slavotinek
- South Australia Medical Imaging, Flinders Medical Centre Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Brady AP, Allen B, Chong J, Kotter E, Kottler N, Mongan J, Oakden-Rayner L, Dos Santos DP, Tang A, Wald C, Slavotinek J. Developing, purchasing, implementing and monitoring AI tools in radiology: practical considerations. A multi-society statement from the ACR, CAR, ESR, RANZCR & RSNA. Insights Imaging 2024; 15:16. [PMID: 38246898 PMCID: PMC10800328 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-023-01541-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) carries the potential for unprecedented disruption in radiology, with possible positive and negative consequences. The integration of AI in radiology holds the potential to revolutionize healthcare practices by advancing diagnosis, quantification, and management of multiple medical conditions. Nevertheless, the ever-growing availability of AI tools in radiology highlights an increasing need to critically evaluate claims for its utility and to differentiate safe product offerings from potentially harmful, or fundamentally unhelpful ones.This multi-society paper, presenting the views of Radiology Societies in the USA, Canada, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand, defines the potential practical problems and ethical issues surrounding the incorporation of AI into radiological practice. In addition to delineating the main points of concern that developers, regulators, and purchasers of AI tools should consider prior to their introduction into clinical practice, this statement also suggests methods to monitor their stability and safety in clinical use, and their suitability for possible autonomous function. This statement is intended to serve as a useful summary of the practical issues which should be considered by all parties involved in the development of radiology AI resources, and their implementation as clinical tools.Key points • The incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiological practice demands increased monitoring of its utility and safety.• Cooperation between developers, clinicians, and regulators will allow all involved to address ethical issues and monitor AI performance.• AI can fulfil its promise to advance patient well-being if all steps from development to integration in healthcare are rigorously evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bibb Allen
- Department of Radiology, Grandview Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA
- American College of Radiology Data Science Institute, Reston, VA, USA
| | - Jaron Chong
- Department of Medical Imaging, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Elmar Kotter
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nina Kottler
- Radiology Partners, El Segundo, CA, USA
- Stanford Center for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine & Imaging, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - John Mongan
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Lauren Oakden-Rayner
- Australian Institute for Machine Learning, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Daniel Pinto Dos Santos
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - An Tang
- Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology, and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Christoph Wald
- Department of Radiology, Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA
- Tufts University Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Commision On Informatics, and Member, Board of Chancellors, American College of Radiology, Virginia, USA
| | - John Slavotinek
- South Australia Medical Imaging, Flinders Medical Centre Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Brady AP, Allen B, Chong J, Kotter E, Kottler N, Mongan J, Oakden-Rayner L, dos Santos DP, Tang A, Wald C, Slavotinek J. Developing, Purchasing, Implementing and Monitoring AI Tools in Radiology: Practical Considerations. A Multi-Society Statement from the ACR, CAR, ESR, RANZCR and RSNA. Radiol Artif Intell 2024; 6:e230513. [PMID: 38251899 PMCID: PMC10831521 DOI: 10.1148/ryai.230513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) carries the potential for unprecedented disruption in radiology, with possible positive and negative consequences. The integration of AI in radiology holds the potential to revolutionize healthcare practices by advancing diagnosis, quantification, and management of multiple medical conditions. Nevertheless, the ever-growing availability of AI tools in radiology highlights an increasing need to critically evaluate claims for its utility and to differentiate safe product offerings from potentially harmful, or fundamentally unhelpful ones. This multi-society paper, presenting the views of Radiology Societies in the USA, Canada, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand, defines the potential practical problems and ethical issues surrounding the incorporation of AI into radiological practice. In addition to delineating the main points of concern that developers, regulators, and purchasers of AI tools should consider prior to their introduction into clinical practice, this statement also suggests methods to monitor their stability and safety in clinical use, and their suitability for possible autonomous function. This statement is intended to serve as a useful summary of the practical issues which should be considered by all parties involved in the development of radiology AI resources, and their implementation as clinical tools. This article is simultaneously published in Insights into Imaging (DOI 10.1186/s13244-023-01541-3), Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology (DOI 10.1111/1754-9485.13612), Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal (DOI 10.1177/08465371231222229), Journal of the American College of Radiology (DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.12.005), and Radiology: Artificial Intelligence (DOI 10.1148/ryai.230513). Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Radiology, Automation, Machine Learning Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. ©The Author(s) 2024. Editor's Note: The RSNA Board of Directors has endorsed this article. It has not undergone review or editing by this journal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bibb Allen
- Department of Radiology, Grandview Medical
Center, Birmingham, AL, USA
- American College of Radiology Data Science
Institute, Reston, VA, USA
| | - Jaron Chong
- Department of Medical Imaging, Schulich
School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Elmar Kotter
- Department of Diagnostic and
Interventional Radiology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of
Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nina Kottler
- Radiology Partners, El Segundo, CA,
USA
- Stanford Center for Artificial
Intelligence in Medicine & Imaging, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - John Mongan
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical
Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Lauren Oakden-Rayner
- Australian Institute for Machine Learning,
University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Daniel Pinto dos Santos
- Department of Radiology, University
Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Department of Radiology, University
Hospital of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - An Tang
- Department of Radiology, Radiation
Oncology, and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal,
Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Christoph Wald
- Department of Radiology, Lahey Hospital
& Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA
- Tufts University Medical School, Boston,
MA, USA
- Commission On Informatics, and Member,
Board of Chancellors, American College of Radiology, Virginia, USA
| | - John Slavotinek
- South Australia Medical Imaging,
Flinders Medical Centre Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- College of Medicine and Public Health,
Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
van Daal M, de Kanter AFJ, Bredenoord AL, de Graeff N. Personalized 3D printed scaffolds: The ethical aspects. N Biotechnol 2023; 78:116-122. [PMID: 37848162 DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2023.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023]
Abstract
Personalized 3D printed scaffolds are a new generation of implants for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine purposes. Scaffolds support cell growth, providing an artificial extracellular matrix for tissue repair and regeneration and can biodegrade once cells have assumed their physiological and structural roles. The ethical challenges and opportunities of these implants should be mapped in parallel with the life cycle of the scaffold to assist their development and implementation in a responsible, safe, and ethically sound manner. This article provides an overview of these relevant ethical aspects. We identified nine themes which were linked to three stages of the life cycle of the scaffold: the development process, clinical testing, and the implementation process. The described ethical issues are related to good research and clinical practices, such as privacy issues concerning digitalization, first-in-human trials, responsibility and commercialization. At the same time, this article also creates awareness for underexplored ethical issues, such as irreversibility, embodiment and the ontological status of these scaffolds. Moreover, it exemplifies how to include gender in the ethical assessment of new technologies. These issues are important for responsible development and implementation of personalized 3D printed scaffolds and in need of more attention within the additive manufacturing and tissue engineering field. Moreover, the insights of this review reveal unresolved qualitative empirical and normative questions that could further deepen the understanding and co-creation of the ethical implications of this new generation of implants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manon van Daal
- Department of Bioethics and Health Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Anne-Floor J de Kanter
- Department of Bioethics and Health Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Annelien L Bredenoord
- Erasmus School of Philosophy, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nienke de Graeff
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Law, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Herington J, McCradden MD, Creel K, Boellaard R, Jones EC, Jha AK, Rahmim A, Scott PJH, Sunderland JJ, Wahl RL, Zuehlsdorff S, Saboury B. Ethical Considerations for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging: Data Collection, Development, and Evaluation. J Nucl Med 2023; 64:1848-1854. [PMID: 37827839 PMCID: PMC10690124 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Revised: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023] Open
Abstract
The development of artificial intelligence (AI) within nuclear imaging involves several ethically fraught components at different stages of the machine learning pipeline, including during data collection, model training and validation, and clinical use. Drawing on the traditional principles of medical and research ethics, and highlighting the need to ensure health justice, the AI task force of the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging has identified 4 major ethical risks: privacy of data subjects, data quality and model efficacy, fairness toward marginalized populations, and transparency of clinical performance. We provide preliminary recommendations to developers of AI-driven medical devices for mitigating the impact of these risks on patients and populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Herington
- Department of Health Humanities and Bioethics and Department of Philosophy, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| | - Melissa D McCradden
- Department of Bioethics, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto and Dana Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kathleen Creel
- Department of Philosophy and Religion and Khoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elizabeth C Jones
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Abhinav K Jha
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Arman Rahmim
- Departments of Radiology and Physics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Peter J H Scott
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - John J Sunderland
- Departments of Radiology and Physics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Richard L Wahl
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri; and
| | | | - Babak Saboury
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland;
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Li LT, Haley LC, Boyd AK, Bernstam EV. Technical/Algorithm, Stakeholder, and Society (TASS) barriers to the application of artificial intelligence in medicine: A systematic review. J Biomed Inform 2023; 147:104531. [PMID: 37884177 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The use of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning and predictive analytics, has shown great promise in health care. Despite its strong potential, there has been limited use in health care settings. In this systematic review, we aim to determine the main barriers to successful implementation of AI in healthcare and discuss potential ways to overcome these challenges. METHODS We conducted a literature search in PubMed (1/1/2001-1/1/2023). The search was restricted to publications in the English language, and human study subjects. We excluded articles that did not discuss AI, machine learning, predictive analytics, and barriers to the use of these techniques in health care. Using grounded theory methodology, we abstracted concepts to identify major barriers to AI use in medicine. RESULTS We identified a total of 2,382 articles. After reviewing the 306 included papers, we developed 19 major themes, which we categorized into three levels: the Technical/Algorithm, Stakeholder, and Social levels (TASS). These themes included: Lack of Explainability, Need for Validation Protocols, Need for Standards for Interoperability, Need for Reporting Guidelines, Need for Standardization of Performance Metrics, Lack of Plan for Updating Algorithm, Job Loss, Skills Loss, Workflow Challenges, Loss of Patient Autonomy and Consent, Disturbing the Patient-Clinician Relationship, Lack of Trust in AI, Logistical Challenges, Lack of strategic plan, Lack of Cost-effectiveness Analysis and Proof of Efficacy, Privacy, Liability, Bias and Social Justice, and Education. CONCLUSION We identified 19 major barriers to the use of AI in healthcare and categorized them into three levels: the Technical/Algorithm, Stakeholder, and Social levels (TASS). Future studies should expand on barriers in pediatric care and focus on developing clearly defined protocols to overcome these barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda T Li
- Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Pl, New York, NY 10029, United States; McWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics at UT Health Houston, 7000 Fannin St, Suite 600, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
| | - Lauren C Haley
- McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
| | - Alexandra K Boyd
- McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
| | - Elmer V Bernstam
- McWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics at UT Health Houston, 7000 Fannin St, Suite 600, Houston, TX 77030, United States; McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Zhong NN, Wang HQ, Huang XY, Li ZZ, Cao LM, Huo FY, Liu B, Bu LL. Enhancing head and neck tumor management with artificial intelligence: Integration and perspectives. Semin Cancer Biol 2023; 95:52-74. [PMID: 37473825 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2023.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2023] [Revised: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
Head and neck tumors (HNTs) constitute a multifaceted ensemble of pathologies that primarily involve regions such as the oral cavity, pharynx, and nasal cavity. The intricate anatomical structure of these regions poses considerable challenges to efficacious treatment strategies. Despite the availability of myriad treatment modalities, the overall therapeutic efficacy for HNTs continues to remain subdued. In recent years, the deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare practices has garnered noteworthy attention. AI modalities, inclusive of machine learning (ML), neural networks (NNs), and deep learning (DL), when amalgamated into the holistic management of HNTs, promise to augment the precision, safety, and efficacy of treatment regimens. The integration of AI within HNT management is intricately intertwined with domains such as medical imaging, bioinformatics, and medical robotics. This article intends to scrutinize the cutting-edge advancements and prospective applications of AI in the realm of HNTs, elucidating AI's indispensable role in prevention, diagnosis, treatment, prognostication, research, and inter-sectoral integration. The overarching objective is to stimulate scholarly discourse and invigorate insights among medical practitioners and researchers to propel further exploration, thereby facilitating superior therapeutic alternatives for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nian-Nian Zhong
- State Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China
| | - Han-Qi Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China
| | - Xin-Yue Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China
| | - Zi-Zhan Li
- State Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China
| | - Lei-Ming Cao
- State Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China
| | - Fang-Yi Huo
- State Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China
| | - Bing Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China; Department of Oral & Maxillofacial - Head Neck Oncology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China.
| | - Lin-Lin Bu
- State Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China; Department of Oral & Maxillofacial - Head Neck Oncology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Leveraging Large Language Models to Improve Triage Accuracy in Emergency Departments. J Emerg Nurs 2023; 49:651-653. [PMID: 37648366 DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2023.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2023] [Revised: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
|
22
|
Kusunose K. Revolution of echocardiographic reporting: the new era of artificial intelligence and natural language processing. J Echocardiogr 2023; 21:99-104. [PMID: 37312003 DOI: 10.1007/s12574-023-00611-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Revised: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has been making a significant impact on cardiovascular imaging, transforming everything from data capture to report generation. In the field of echocardiography, AI offers the potential to enhance accuracy, speed up reporting, and reduce the workload of physicians. This is an advantage because, compared to computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, echocardiograms tend to exhibit higher observer variability in interpretation. This review takes a comprehensive viewpoint at AI-based reporting systems and their application in echocardiography, emphasizing the need for automated diagnoses. The integration of natural language processing (NLP) technologies, including ChatGPT, could provide revolutionary advancements. One of the exciting prospects of AI integration is its potential to accelerate reporting, thereby improving patient outcomes and access to treatment, while also mitigating physician burnout. However, AI introduces new challenges like ensuring data quality, managing potential over-reliance on AI, addressing legal and ethical concerns, and balancing significant costs against benefits. As we navigate these complexities, it's important for cardiologists to stay updated with AI advancements and learn to utilize them effectively. AI has the potential to be integrated into daily clinical practice, becoming a valuable tool for healthcare professionals dealing with heart diseases, provided it's approached with careful consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenya Kusunose
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nephrology, and Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, 207 Uehara, Nishihara Town, Okinawa, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Akinci D’Antonoli T, Todea RA, Leu N, Datta AN, Stieltjes B, Pruefer F, Wasserthal J. Development and Evaluation of Deep Learning Models for Automated Estimation of Myelin Maturation Using Pediatric Brain MRI Scans. Radiol Artif Intell 2023; 5:e220292. [PMID: 37795138 PMCID: PMC10546368 DOI: 10.1148/ryai.220292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Revised: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
Purpose To predict the corresponding age of myelin maturation from brain MRI scans in infants and young children by using a deep learning algorithm and to build upon previously published models. Materials and Methods Brain MRI scans acquired between January 1, 2011, and March 17, 2021, in our institution in patients aged 0-3 years were retrospectively retrieved from the archive. An ensemble of two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) convolutional neural network models was trained and internally validated in 710 patients to predict myelin maturation age on the basis of radiologist-generated labels. The model ensemble was tested on an internal dataset of 123 patients and two external datasets of 226 (0-25 months of age) and 383 (0-2 months of age) healthy children and infants, respectively. Mean absolute error (MAE) and Pearson correlation coefficients were used to assess model performance. Results The 2D, 3D, and 2D-plus-3D ensemble models showed MAE values of 1.43, 2.55, and 1.77 months, respectively, on the internal test set, values of 2.26, 2.27, and 1.22 months on the first external test set, and values of 0.44, 0.27, and 0.31 months on the second external test set. The ensemble model outperformed the previous state-of-the-art model on the same external test set (MAE = 1.22 vs 2.09 months). Conclusion The proposed deep learning model accurately predicted myelin maturation age using pediatric brain MRI scans and may help reduce the time needed to complete this task, as well as interobserver variability in radiologist predictions.Keywords: Pediatrics, MR Imaging, CNS, Brain/Brain Stem, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Artificial Intelligence, Pediatric Imaging, Myelin Maturation, Brain MRI, Neuroradiology Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tugba Akinci D’Antonoli
- From the Department of Pediatric Radiology (T.A.D., N.L., F.P.) and
Department of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine (A.N.D.),
University Children’s Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 33, 4056 Basel,
Switzerland; Institute of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cantonal Hospital
Basel, Basel, Switzerland (T.A.D.); and Department of Neuroradiology, Clinic of
Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (R.A.T.) and Department of Research and Analysis,
Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (B.S., J.W.), University Hospital
Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Ramona-Alexandra Todea
- From the Department of Pediatric Radiology (T.A.D., N.L., F.P.) and
Department of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine (A.N.D.),
University Children’s Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 33, 4056 Basel,
Switzerland; Institute of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cantonal Hospital
Basel, Basel, Switzerland (T.A.D.); and Department of Neuroradiology, Clinic of
Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (R.A.T.) and Department of Research and Analysis,
Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (B.S., J.W.), University Hospital
Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Nora Leu
- From the Department of Pediatric Radiology (T.A.D., N.L., F.P.) and
Department of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine (A.N.D.),
University Children’s Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 33, 4056 Basel,
Switzerland; Institute of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cantonal Hospital
Basel, Basel, Switzerland (T.A.D.); and Department of Neuroradiology, Clinic of
Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (R.A.T.) and Department of Research and Analysis,
Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (B.S., J.W.), University Hospital
Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Alexandre N. Datta
- From the Department of Pediatric Radiology (T.A.D., N.L., F.P.) and
Department of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine (A.N.D.),
University Children’s Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 33, 4056 Basel,
Switzerland; Institute of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cantonal Hospital
Basel, Basel, Switzerland (T.A.D.); and Department of Neuroradiology, Clinic of
Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (R.A.T.) and Department of Research and Analysis,
Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (B.S., J.W.), University Hospital
Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Bram Stieltjes
- From the Department of Pediatric Radiology (T.A.D., N.L., F.P.) and
Department of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine (A.N.D.),
University Children’s Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 33, 4056 Basel,
Switzerland; Institute of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cantonal Hospital
Basel, Basel, Switzerland (T.A.D.); and Department of Neuroradiology, Clinic of
Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (R.A.T.) and Department of Research and Analysis,
Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (B.S., J.W.), University Hospital
Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Friederike Pruefer
- From the Department of Pediatric Radiology (T.A.D., N.L., F.P.) and
Department of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine (A.N.D.),
University Children’s Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 33, 4056 Basel,
Switzerland; Institute of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cantonal Hospital
Basel, Basel, Switzerland (T.A.D.); and Department of Neuroradiology, Clinic of
Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (R.A.T.) and Department of Research and Analysis,
Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (B.S., J.W.), University Hospital
Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jakob Wasserthal
- From the Department of Pediatric Radiology (T.A.D., N.L., F.P.) and
Department of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine (A.N.D.),
University Children’s Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 33, 4056 Basel,
Switzerland; Institute of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cantonal Hospital
Basel, Basel, Switzerland (T.A.D.); and Department of Neuroradiology, Clinic of
Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (R.A.T.) and Department of Research and Analysis,
Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (B.S., J.W.), University Hospital
Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Farasati Far B. Artificial intelligence ethics in precision oncology: balancing advancements in technology with patient privacy and autonomy. EXPLORATION OF TARGETED ANTI-TUMOR THERAPY 2023; 4:685-689. [PMID: 37720345 PMCID: PMC10501889 DOI: 10.37349/etat.2023.00160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Precision oncology is a rapidly evolving field that uses advanced technologies to deliver personalized cancer care based on a patient's unique genetic and clinical profile. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in precision oncology has shown great potential to improve diagnosis, treatment planning, and treatment outcomes. However, the integration of AI in precision oncology also raises important ethical considerations related to patient privacy, autonomy, and protection from bias. In this opinion paper, an overview is provided of previous studies that have explored the use of AI in precision oncology and the ethical considerations associated with this technology. The conclusions of these studies are compared, and the importance of approaching the use of AI in precision oncology with caution is emphasized. It is stressed that patient privacy, autonomy, and protection from bias should be made central to the development and use of AI in precision oncology. Clear guidelines and regulations must be established to ensure that AI is used ethically and for the benefit of patients. The use of AI in precision oncology has the potential to revolutionize cancer care, but it should be ensured that it striked a balance between advancements in technology and ethical considerations. In conclusion, the use of AI in precision oncology is a promising development that has the potential to improve cancer outcomes. However, ethical considerations related to patient privacy, autonomy, and protection from bias must be central to the development and use of AI in precision oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bahareh Farasati Far
- Department of Chemistry, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran 16846-13114, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Sammer MBK, Akbari YS, Barth RA, Blumer SL, Dillman JR, Farmakis SG, Frush DP, Gokli A, Halabi SS, Iyer R, Joshi A, Kwon JK, Otero HJ, Sher AC, Sotardi ST, Taragin BH, Towbin AJ, Wald C. Use of Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: Impact on Pediatric Patients, a White Paper From the ACR Pediatric AI Workgroup. J Am Coll Radiol 2023; 20:730-737. [PMID: 37498259 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Revised: 05/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
In this white paper, the ACR Pediatric AI Workgroup of the Commission on Informatics educates the radiology community about the health equity issue of the lack of pediatric artificial intelligence (AI), improves the understanding of relevant pediatric AI issues, and offers solutions to address the inadequacies in pediatric AI development. In short, the design, training, validation, and safe implementation of AI in children require careful and specific approaches that can be distinct from those used for adults. On the eve of widespread use of AI in imaging practice, the group invites the radiology community to align and join Image IntelliGently (www.imageintelligently.org) to ensure that the use of AI is safe, reliable, and effective for children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marla B K Sammer
- Singleton Department of Radiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas; Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; and Chair, Pediatric AI Workgroup, Commission on Informatics, American College of Radiology.
| | | | - Richard A Barth
- Department of Radiology, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Steven L Blumer
- Chair, Pediatrics Panel of the American College of Radiology Data Science Institute; Associate Medical Director of Radiology Informatics, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Health System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jonathan R Dillman
- Associate Chief, Research, William S. Ball Chair of Radiology Research, and Medical Director, Imaging Research Center, Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Shannon G Farmakis
- Department of Radiology, Mercy Children's Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri; and West County Radiological Group, St. Louis, Missouri
| | | | - Ami Gokli
- Division Chief of Pediatric Radiology, Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, New York; and Associate Program Director, Department of Radiology Residency Program, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Uniondale, New York
| | - Safwan S Halabi
- University of Chicago, Lurie Children's Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ramesh Iyer
- University of Washington, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington
| | - Aparna Joshi
- Section of Pediatric Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Jeannie K Kwon
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Chief Radiology Officer, Children's Health System of Texas, Dallas, Texas; and Chair, Informatics Committee, Society for Pediatric Radiology
| | - Hansel J Otero
- University of Pennsylvania, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Andrew C Sher
- Singleton Department of Radiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas; and Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Susan T Sotardi
- University of Pennsylvania, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Benjamin H Taragin
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Samson Assuta Ashdod University Hospital, Ashdod, Israel; Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Medical School for International Health, Ben Gurion University, Be'er Sheva, Israel
| | - Alexander J Towbin
- Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio; and Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Christoph Wald
- Chair, Department of Radiology, Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts; Tufts University Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; and Chair, Commission on Informatics
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Perchik JD, Smith AD, Elkassem AA, Park JM, Rothenberg SA, Tanwar M, Yi PH, Sturdivant A, Tridandapani S, Sotoudeh H. Artificial Intelligence Literacy: Developing a Multi-institutional Infrastructure for AI Education. Acad Radiol 2023; 30:1472-1480. [PMID: 36323613 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2022.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2022] [Revised: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effectiveness of an artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology literacy course on participants from nine radiology residency programs in the Southeast and Mid-Atlantic United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS A week-long AI in radiology course was developed and included participants from nine radiology residency programs in the Southeast and Mid-Atlantic United States. Ten 30 minutes lectures utilizing a remote learning format covered basic AI terms and methods, clinical applications of AI in radiology by four different subspecialties, and special topics lectures on the economics of AI, ethics of AI, algorithm bias, and medicolegal implications of AI in medicine. A proctored hands-on clinical AI session allowed participants to directly use an FDA cleared AI-assisted viewer and reporting system for advanced cancer. Pre- and post-course electronic surveys were distributed to assess participants' knowledge of AI terminology and applications and interest in AI education. RESULTS There were an average of 75 participants each day of the course (range: 50-120). Nearly all participants reported a lack of sufficient exposure to AI in their radiology training (96.7%, 90/93). Mean participant score on the pre-course AI knowledge evaluation was 8.3/15, with a statistically significant increase to 10.1/15 on the post-course evaluation (p= 0.04). A majority of participants reported an interest in continued AI in radiology education in the future (78.6%, 22/28). CONCLUSION A multi-institutional AI in radiology literacy course successfully improved AI education of participants, with the majority of participants reporting a continued interest in AI in radiology education in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J D Perchik
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
| | - A D Smith
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - A A Elkassem
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - J M Park
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - S A Rothenberg
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - M Tanwar
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - P H Yi
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland Medical Intelligent Imaging Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - A Sturdivant
- University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine
| | - S Tridandapani
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - H Sotoudeh
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Khosravi P, Schweitzer M. Artificial intelligence in neuroradiology: a scoping review of some ethical challenges. FRONTIERS IN RADIOLOGY 2023; 3:1149461. [PMID: 37492387 PMCID: PMC10365008 DOI: 10.3389/fradi.2023.1149461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has great potential to increase accuracy and efficiency in many aspects of neuroradiology. It provides substantial opportunities for insights into brain pathophysiology, developing models to determine treatment decisions, and improving current prognostication as well as diagnostic algorithms. Concurrently, the autonomous use of AI models introduces ethical challenges regarding the scope of informed consent, risks associated with data privacy and protection, potential database biases, as well as responsibility and liability that might potentially arise. In this manuscript, we will first provide a brief overview of AI methods used in neuroradiology and segue into key methodological and ethical challenges. Specifically, we discuss the ethical principles affected by AI approaches to human neuroscience and provisions that might be imposed in this domain to ensure that the benefits of AI frameworks remain in alignment with ethics in research and healthcare in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pegah Khosravi
- Department of Biological Sciences, New York City College of Technology, CUNY, New York City, NY, United States
| | - Mark Schweitzer
- Office of the Vice President for Health Affairs Office of the Vice President, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Wasti S, Lee IH, Kim S, Lee JH, Kim H. Ethical and legal challenges in nanomedical innovations: a scoping review. Front Genet 2023; 14:1163392. [PMID: 37252668 PMCID: PMC10213273 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1163392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Rapid advancements in research and development related to nanomedical technology raise various ethical and legal challenges in areas relevant to disease detection, diagnosis, and treatment. This study aims to outline the existing literature, covering issues associated with emerging nanomedicine and related clinical research, and identify implications for the responsible advancement and integration of nanomedicine and nanomedical technology throughout medical networks in the future. Methods: A scoping review, designed to cover scientific, ethical, and legal literature associated with nanomedical technology, was conducted, generating and analyzing 27 peer-reviewed articles published between 2007-2020. Results: Results indicate that articles referencing ethical and legal issues related to nanomedical technology were concerned with six key areas: 1) harm exposure and potential risks to health, 2) consent to nano-research, 3) privacy, 4) access to nanomedical technology and potential nanomedical therapies, 5) classification of nanomedical products in relation to the research and development of nanomedical technology, and 6) the precautionary principle as it relates to the research and development of nanomedical technology. Conclusion: This review of the literature suggests that few practical solutions are comprehensive enough to allay the ethical and legal concerns surrounding research and development in fields related to nanomedical technology, especially as it continues to evolve and contribute to future innovations in medicine. It is also clearly apparent that a more coordinated approach is required to ensure global standards of practice governing the study and development of nanomedical technology, especially as discussions surrounding the regulation of nanomedical research throughout the literature are mainly confined to systems of governance in the United States.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Wasti
- Asian Institute of Bioethics and Health Law, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Il Ho Lee
- Institute for Legal Studies, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sumin Kim
- Korea National Institute for Bioethics Policy, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae-Hyun Lee
- Advanced Science Institute, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Institute for Basic Science (IBS) Center for Nanomedicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hannah Kim
- Asian Institute of Bioethics and Health Law, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- College of Medicine, Division of Medical Humanities and Social Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Iqbal S, N. Qureshi A, Li J, Mahmood T. On the Analyses of Medical Images Using Traditional Machine Learning Techniques and Convolutional Neural Networks. ARCHIVES OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING : STATE OF THE ART REVIEWS 2023; 30:3173-3233. [PMID: 37260910 PMCID: PMC10071480 DOI: 10.1007/s11831-023-09899-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
Convolutional neural network (CNN) has shown dissuasive accomplishment on different areas especially Object Detection, Segmentation, Reconstruction (2D and 3D), Information Retrieval, Medical Image Registration, Multi-lingual translation, Local language Processing, Anomaly Detection on video and Speech Recognition. CNN is a special type of Neural Network, which has compelling and effective learning ability to learn features at several steps during augmentation of the data. Recently, different interesting and inspiring ideas of Deep Learning (DL) such as different activation functions, hyperparameter optimization, regularization, momentum and loss functions has improved the performance, operation and execution of CNN Different internal architecture innovation of CNN and different representational style of CNN has significantly improved the performance. This survey focuses on internal taxonomy of deep learning, different models of vonvolutional neural network, especially depth and width of models and in addition CNN components, applications and current challenges of deep learning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saeed Iqbal
- Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Information Technology & Computer Science, University of Central Punjab, Lahore, Punjab 54000 Pakistan
- Faculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124 Beijing China
| | - Adnan N. Qureshi
- Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Information Technology & Computer Science, University of Central Punjab, Lahore, Punjab 54000 Pakistan
| | - Jianqiang Li
- Faculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124 Beijing China
- Beijing Engineering Research Center for IoT Software and Systems, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124 Beijing China
| | - Tariq Mahmood
- Artificial Intelligence and Data Analytics (AIDA) Lab, College of Computer & Information Sciences (CCIS), Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, 11586 Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ursin F, Lindner F, Ropinski T, Salloch S, Timmermann C. Ebenen der Explizierbarkeit für medizinische künstliche Intelligenz: Was brauchen wir normativ und was können wir technisch erreichen? Ethik Med 2023. [DOI: 10.1007/s00481-023-00761-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/05/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Definition of the problem
The umbrella term “explicability” refers to the reduction of opacity of artificial intelligence (AI) systems. These efforts are challenging for medical AI applications because higher accuracy often comes at the cost of increased opacity. This entails ethical tensions because physicians and patients desire to trace how results are produced without compromising the performance of AI systems. The centrality of explicability within the informed consent process for medical AI systems compels an ethical reflection on the trade-offs. Which levels of explicability are needed to obtain informed consent when utilizing medical AI?
Arguments
We proceed in five steps: First, we map the terms commonly associated with explicability as described in the ethics and computer science literature, i.e., disclosure, intelligibility, interpretability, and explainability. Second, we conduct a conceptual analysis of the ethical requirements for explicability when it comes to informed consent. Third, we distinguish hurdles for explicability in terms of epistemic and explanatory opacity. Fourth, this then allows to conclude the level of explicability physicians must reach and what patients can expect. In a final step, we show how the identified levels of explicability can technically be met from the perspective of computer science. Throughout our work, we take diagnostic AI systems in radiology as an example.
Conclusion
We determined four levels of explicability that need to be distinguished for ethically defensible informed consent processes and showed how developers of medical AI can technically meet these requirements.
Collapse
|
31
|
Al-Naser YA. The impact of artificial intelligence on radiography as a profession: A narrative review. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2023; 54:162-166. [PMID: 36376210 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2022.10.196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Revised: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, particularly deep learning, have made significant strides in image recognition and classification, providing remarkable diagnostic accuracy to various diseases. This domain of AI has been the focus of many research papers as it directly relates to the roles and responsibilities of a radiologist. However, discussions on the impact of such technology on the radiography profession are often overlooked. To address this gap in the literature, this paper aims to address the application of AI in radiography and how AI's rapid emergence into healthcare is impacting not only standard radiographic protocols but the role of the radiographic technologist as well. METHODS A review of the literature on AI and radiography was performed, using databases within PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect. Video presentations from YouTube were also utilized to weigh the varying opinions of world leaders at the fore of artificial intelligence. RESULTS AI can augment routine standard radiographic protocols. It can automatically ensure optimal patient positioning within the gantry as well as automate image processing. As AI technologies continue to emerge in diagnostic imaging, practicing radiologic technologists are urged to achieve threshold computational and technical literacy to operate AI-driven imaging technology. CONCLUSION There are many applications of AI in radiography including acquisition and image processing. In the near future, it will be important to supply the demand for radiographers skilled in AI-driven technologies.
Collapse
|
32
|
Caffery LJ, Janda M, Miller R, Abbott LM, Arnold C, Caccetta T, Guitera P, Shumack S, Fernández-Peñas P, Mar V, Soyer HP. Informing a position statement on the use of artificial intelligence in dermatology in Australia. Australas J Dermatol 2023; 64:e11-e20. [PMID: 36380357 DOI: 10.1111/ajd.13946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Revised: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is the ability for computers to simulate human intelligence. In dermatology, there is substantial interest in using AI to identify skin lesions from images. Due to increasing research and interest in the use of AI, the Australasian College of Dermatologists has developed a position statement to inform its members of appropriate use of AI. This article presents the ACD Position Statement on the use of AI in dermatology, and provides explanatory information that was used to inform the development of this statement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liam J Caffery
- Centre for Online Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Dermatology Research Centre, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Monika Janda
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Robert Miller
- The Australasian College of Dermatologists, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lisa M Abbott
- The Australasian College of Dermatologists, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chris Arnold
- The Australasian College of Dermatologists, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Australasian Society of Cosmetic Dermatologists, South Yarra, Victoria, Australia.,BioGrid Australia, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Tony Caccetta
- The Australasian College of Dermatologists, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Pascale Guitera
- The Australasian College of Dermatologists, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stephen Shumack
- The Australasian College of Dermatologists, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Pablo Fernández-Peñas
- The Australasian College of Dermatologists, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Victoria Mar
- The Australasian College of Dermatologists, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Victorian Melanoma Service, Alfred Health, Victoria, Australia.,School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - H Peter Soyer
- The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Dermatology Research Centre, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Cohen EB, Gordon IK. First, do no harm. Ethical and legal issues of artificial intelligence and machine learning in veterinary radiology and radiation oncology. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2022; 63 Suppl 1:840-850. [PMID: 36514231 PMCID: PMC10107688 DOI: 10.1111/vru.13171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2022] [Revised: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence and machine learning are novel technologies that will change the way veterinary medicine is practiced. Exactly how this change will occur is yet to be determined, and, as is the nature with disruptive technologies, will be difficult to predict. Ushering in this new tool in a conscientious way will require knowledge of the terminology and types of AI as well as forward thinking regarding the ethical and legal implications within the profession. Developers as well as end users will need to consider the ethical and legal components alongside functional creation of algorithms in order to foster acceptance and adoption, and most importantly to prevent patient harm. There are key differences in deployment of these technologies in veterinary medicine relative to human healthcare, namely our ability to perform euthanasia, and the lack of regulatory validation to bring these technologies to market. These differences along with others create a much different landscape than AI use in human medicine, and necessitate proactive planning in order to prevent catastrophic outcomes, encourage development and adoption, and protect the profession from unnecessary liability. The authors offer that deploying these technologies prior to considering the larger ethical and legal implications and without stringent validation is putting the AI cart before the horse, and risks putting patients and the profession in harm's way.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eli B Cohen
- Department of Molecular and Biomedical Sciences, North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Cary, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ira K Gordon
- The Oncology Service by United Veterinary Care, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Santer M, Kloppenburg M, Gottfried TM, Runge A, Schmutzhard J, Vorbach SM, Mangesius J, Riedl D, Mangesius S, Widmann G, Riechelmann H, Dejaco D, Freysinger W. Current Applications of Artificial Intelligence to Classify Cervical Lymph Nodes in Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma-A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:5397. [PMID: 36358815 PMCID: PMC9654953 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14215397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Revised: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/29/2022] [Indexed: 07/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Locally-advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is mainly defined by the presence of pathologic cervical lymph nodes (LNs) with or without extracapsular spread (ECS). Current radiologic criteria to classify LNs as non-pathologic, pathologic, or pathologic with ECS are primarily shape-based. However, significantly more quantitative information is contained within imaging modalities. This quantitative information could be exploited for classification of LNs in patients with locally-advanced HNSCC by means of artificial intelligence (AI). Currently, various reviews exploring the role of AI in HNSCC are available. However, reviews specifically addressing the current role of AI to classify LN in HNSCC-patients are sparse. The present work systematically reviews original articles that specifically explore the role of AI to classify LNs in locally-advanced HNSCC applying Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines and the Study Quality Assessment Tool of National Institute of Health (NIH). Between 2001 and 2022, out of 69 studies a total of 13 retrospective, mainly monocentric, studies were identified. The majority of the studies included patients with oropharyngeal and oral cavity (9 and 7 of 13 studies, respectively) HNSCC. Histopathologic findings were defined as reference in 9 of 13 studies. Machine learning was applied in 13 studies, 9 of them applying deep learning. The mean number of included patients was 75 (SD ± 72; range 10-258) and of LNs was 340 (SD ± 268; range 21-791). The mean diagnostic accuracy for the training sets was 86% (SD ± 14%; range: 43-99%) and for testing sets 86% (SD ± 5%; range 76-92%). Consequently, all of the identified studies concluded AI to be a potentially promising diagnostic support tool for LN-classification in HNSCC. However, adequately powered, prospective, and randomized control trials are urgently required to further assess AI's role in LN-classification in locally-advanced HNSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Santer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Marcel Kloppenburg
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Timo Maria Gottfried
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Annette Runge
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Joachim Schmutzhard
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Samuel Moritz Vorbach
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Julian Mangesius
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - David Riedl
- University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
- Ludwig-Boltzmann Institute for Rehabilitation Research, 1100 Vienna, Austria
| | - Stephanie Mangesius
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Gerlig Widmann
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Herbert Riechelmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Daniel Dejaco
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Wolfgang Freysinger
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Fasterholdt I, Naghavi-Behzad M, Rasmussen BSB, Kjølhede T, Skjøth MM, Hildebrandt MG, Kidholm K. Value assessment of artificial intelligence in medical imaging: a scoping review. BMC Med Imaging 2022; 22:187. [PMID: 36316665 PMCID: PMC9620604 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-022-00918-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Artificial intelligence (AI) is seen as one of the major disrupting forces in the future healthcare system. However, the assessment of the value of these new technologies is still unclear, and no agreed international health technology assessment-based guideline exists. This study provides an overview of the available literature in the value assessment of AI in the field of medical imaging. METHODS We performed a systematic scoping review of published studies between January 2016 and September 2020 using 10 databases (Medline, Scopus, ProQuest, Google Scholar, and six related databases of grey literature). Information about the context (country, clinical area, and type of study) and mentioned domains with specific outcomes and items were extracted. An existing domain classification, from a European assessment framework, was used as a point of departure, and extracted data were grouped into domains and content analysis of data was performed covering predetermined themes. RESULTS Seventy-nine studies were included out of 5890 identified articles. An additional seven studies were identified by searching reference lists, and the analysis was performed on 86 included studies. Eleven domains were identified: (1) health problem and current use of technology, (2) technology aspects, (3) safety assessment, (4) clinical effectiveness, (5) economics, (6) ethical analysis, (7) organisational aspects, (8) patients and social aspects, (9) legal aspects, (10) development of AI algorithm, performance metrics and validation, and (11) other aspects. The frequency of mentioning a domain varied from 20 to 78% within the included papers. Only 15/86 studies were actual assessments of AI technologies. The majority of data were statements from reviews or papers voicing future needs or challenges of AI research, i.e. not actual outcomes of evaluations. CONCLUSIONS This review regarding value assessment of AI in medical imaging yielded 86 studies including 11 identified domains. The domain classification based on European assessment framework proved useful and current analysis added one new domain. Included studies had a broad range of essential domains about addressing AI technologies highlighting the importance of domains related to legal and ethical aspects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iben Fasterholdt
- CIMT – Centre for Innovative Medical Technology, Odense University Hospital, Sdr. Boulevard 29, Entrance 102, 4rd Floor, 5000 Odense C, Denmark
| | - Mohammad Naghavi-Behzad
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Benjamin S. B. Rasmussen
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- CAI-X – Centre for Clinical Artificial Intelligence, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Tue Kjølhede
- CIMT – Centre for Innovative Medical Technology, Odense University Hospital, Sdr. Boulevard 29, Entrance 102, 4rd Floor, 5000 Odense C, Denmark
| | - Mette Maria Skjøth
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Malene Grubbe Hildebrandt
- CIMT – Centre for Innovative Medical Technology, Odense University Hospital, Sdr. Boulevard 29, Entrance 102, 4rd Floor, 5000 Odense C, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Kristian Kidholm
- CIMT – Centre for Innovative Medical Technology, Odense University Hospital, Sdr. Boulevard 29, Entrance 102, 4rd Floor, 5000 Odense C, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Artificial intelligence and machine learning in cancer imaging. COMMUNICATIONS MEDICINE 2022; 2:133. [PMID: 36310650 PMCID: PMC9613681 DOI: 10.1038/s43856-022-00199-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
An increasing array of tools is being developed using artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) for cancer imaging. The development of an optimal tool requires multidisciplinary engagement to ensure that the appropriate use case is met, as well as to undertake robust development and testing prior to its adoption into healthcare systems. This multidisciplinary review highlights key developments in the field. We discuss the challenges and opportunities of AI and ML in cancer imaging; considerations for the development of algorithms into tools that can be widely used and disseminated; and the development of the ecosystem needed to promote growth of AI and ML in cancer imaging.
Collapse
|
37
|
Giansanti D. The Regulation of Artificial Intelligence in Digital Radiology in the Scientific Literature: A Narrative Review of Reviews. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:1824. [PMID: 36292270 PMCID: PMC9601605 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10101824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Revised: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Today, there is growing interest in artificial intelligence (AI) in the field of digital radiology (DR). This is also due to the push that has been applied in this sector due to the pandemic. Many studies are devoted to the challenges of integration in the health domain. One of the most important challenges is that of regulations. This study conducted a narrative review of reviews on the international approach to the regulation of AI in DR. The design of the study was based on: (I) An overview on Scopus and Pubmed (II) A qualification and eligibility process based on a standardized checklist and a scoring system. The results have highlighted an international approach to the regulation of these systems classified as "software as medical devices (SaMD)" arranged into: ethical issues, international regulatory framework, and bottlenecks of the legal issues. Several recommendations emerge from the analysis. They are all based on fundamental pillars: (a) The need to overcome a differentiated approach between countries. (b) The need for greater transparency and publicity of information both for SaMDs as a whole and for the algorithms and test patterns. (c) The need for an interdisciplinary approach that avoids bias (including demographic) in algorithms and test data. (d) The need to reduce some limits/gaps of the scientific literature production that do not cover the international approach.
Collapse
|
38
|
Park SH. [Ethics for Artificial Intelligence: Focus on the Use of Radiology Images]. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGY 2022; 83:759-770. [PMID: 36238915 PMCID: PMC9514581 DOI: 10.3348/jksr.2022.0036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2021] [Revised: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
The importance of ethics in research and the use of artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly recognized not only in the field of healthcare but throughout society. This article intends to provide domestic readers with practical points regarding the ethical issues of using radiological images for AI research, focusing on data security and privacy protection and the right to data. Therefore, this article refers to related domestic laws and government policies. Data security and privacy protection is a key ethical principle for AI, in which proper de-identification of data is crucial. Sharing healthcare data to develop AI in a way that minimizes business interests is another ethical point to be highlighted. The need for data sharing makes the data security and privacy protection even more important as data sharing increases the risk of data breach.
Collapse
|
39
|
Wang Y, Cai H, Pu Y, Li J, Yang F, Yang C, Chen L, Hu Z. The value of AI in the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis of Malignant Lung Cancer. FRONTIERS IN RADIOLOGY 2022; 2:810731. [PMID: 37492685 PMCID: PMC10365105 DOI: 10.3389/fradi.2022.810731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
Malignant tumors is a serious public health threat. Among them, lung cancer, which has the highest fatality rate globally, has significantly endangered human health. With the development of artificial intelligence (AI) and its integration with medicine, AI research in malignant lung tumors has become critical. This article reviews the value of CAD, computer neural network deep learning, radiomics, molecular biomarkers, and digital pathology for the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of malignant lung tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Wang
- Department of PET/CT Center, Cancer Center of Yunnan Province, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
| | - Haihua Cai
- Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yongzhu Pu
- Department of PET/CT Center, Cancer Center of Yunnan Province, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
| | - Jindan Li
- Department of PET/CT Center, Cancer Center of Yunnan Province, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
| | - Fake Yang
- Department of PET/CT Center, Cancer Center of Yunnan Province, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
| | - Conghui Yang
- Department of PET/CT Center, Cancer Center of Yunnan Province, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
| | - Long Chen
- Department of PET/CT Center, Cancer Center of Yunnan Province, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
| | - Zhanli Hu
- Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Tian L, Zhang Z, Long Y, Tang A, Deng M, Long X, Fang N, Yu X, Ruan X, Qiu J, Wang X, Deng H. Endoscopists' Acceptance on the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Development and Case Analysis of a Scale. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:760634. [PMID: 35492311 PMCID: PMC9040450 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.760634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The purpose of this paper is to develop and validate a standardized endoscopist acceptance scale for the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Methods After investigating endoscopists who have previously used AI and consulting with AI experts, we developed a provisional scale to measure the acceptance of AI as used in gastrointestinal endoscopy that was then distributed to a sample of endoscopists who have used AI. After analyzing the feedback data collected on the provisional scale, we developed a new formal scale with four factors. Cronbach's alpha, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), content validity, and related validity were conducted to test the reliability and validity of the formal scale. We also constructed a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve in order to determine the scale's ability to distinguish higher acceptance and satisfaction. Results A total of 210 valid formal scale data points were collected. The overall Cronbach's alpha was 0.904. All the factor loadings were >0.50, of which the highest factor loading was 0.86 and the lowest was 0.54 (AVE = 0.580, CR = 0.953). The correlation coefficient between the total score of the scale and the satisfaction score was 0.876, and the area under the ROC curve was 0.949 ± 0.031. Endoscopists with a score higher than 50 tend to be accepting and satisfied with AI. Conclusion This study yielded a viable questionnaire to measure the acceptance among endoscopists of the implementation of AI in gastroenterology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Tian
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Zinan Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Yu Long
- Health Management Center, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Anliu Tang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Minzi Deng
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xiuyan Long
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Ning Fang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xiaoyu Yu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xixian Ruan
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Jianing Qiu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xiaoyan Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Haijun Deng
- Department of Public Health, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Stidham RW, Takenaka K. Artificial Intelligence for Disease Assessment in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: How Will it Change Our Practice? Gastroenterology 2022; 162:1493-1506. [PMID: 34995537 PMCID: PMC8997186 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.12.238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2021] [Revised: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has arrived and it will directly impact how we assess, monitor, and manage inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Advances in the machine learning methodologies that power AI have produced astounding results for replicating expert judgment and predicting clinical outcomes, particularly in the analysis of imaging. This review will cover general concepts for AI in IBD, with descriptions of common machine learning methods, including decision trees and neural networks. Applications of AI in IBD will cover recent achievements in endoscopic image interpretation and scoring, new capabilities for cross-sectional image analysis, natural language processing for automated understanding of clinical text, and progress in AI-powered clinical decision support tools. In addition to detailing current evidence supporting the capabilities of AI for replicating expert clinical judgment, speculative commentary on how AI may advance concepts of disease activity assessment, care pathways, and pathophysiologic mechanisms of IBD will be addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan W. Stidham
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA,Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Kento Takenaka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Pham N, Ju C, Kong T, Mukherji SK. Artificial Intelligence in Head and Neck Imaging. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2022; 43:170-175. [PMID: 35339257 DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2022.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) can be applied to head and neck imaging to augment image quality and various clinical tasks including segmentation of tumor volumes, tumor characterization, tumor prognostication and treatment response, and prediction of metastatic lymph node disease. Head and neck oncology care is well positioned for the application of AI since treatment is guided by a wealth of information derived from CT, MRI, and PET imaging data. AI-based methods can integrate complex imaging, histologic, molecular, and clinical data to model tumor biology and behavior, and potentially identify associations, far beyond what conventional qualitative imaging can provide alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy Pham
- Neuroradiology, Radiology Department, University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA; Neuroradiology, Radiology Department, University of Illinois.
| | - Connie Ju
- Neuroradiology, Radiology Department, University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Tracie Kong
- Neuroradiology, Radiology Department, University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Suresh K Mukherji
- Neuroradiology, Radiology Department, University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Jassar S, Adams SJ, Zarzeczny A, Burbridge BE. The future of artificial intelligence in medicine: Medical-legal considerations for health leaders. Healthc Manage Forum 2022; 35:185-189. [PMID: 35354409 PMCID: PMC9047088 DOI: 10.1177/08404704221082069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly common in healthcare and has potential to improve the efficiency and quality of healthcare services. As the utility of AI expands, medical-legal questions arise regarding the possible legal implications of incorporating AI into clinical practice. Particularly, the unique black box nature of AI brings distinct challenges. There is limited guidance addressing liability when AI is used in clinical practice, and traditional legal principles present limitations when applied to novel uses of AI. Comprehensive solutions to address the challenges of AI have not been well established in North America. As AI continues to evolve in healthcare, appropriate guidance from professional regulatory bodies may help the medical field realize AI’s utility and encourage its safe use. As the options for AI in medicine evolve, physicians and health leaders would be prudent to consider the evolving medical-legal context regarding use of AI in clinical practices and facilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunam Jassar
- College of Medicine, 12371University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Scott J Adams
- Department of Medical Imaging, 6846University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Amy Zarzeczny
- Johnson Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Brent E Burbridge
- Department of Medical Imaging, 6846University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Dhombres F, Bonnard J, Bailly K, Maurice P, Papageorghiou A, Jouannic JM. Contributions of artificial intelligence reported in Obstetrics and Gynecology journals: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24:e35465. [PMID: 35297766 PMCID: PMC9069308 DOI: 10.2196/35465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2021] [Revised: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The applications of artificial intelligence (AI) processes have grown significantly in all medical disciplines during the last decades. Two main types of AI have been applied in medicine: symbolic AI (eg, knowledge base and ontologies) and nonsymbolic AI (eg, machine learning and artificial neural networks). Consequently, AI has also been applied across most obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) domains, including general obstetrics, gynecology surgery, fetal ultrasound, and assisted reproductive medicine, among others. Objective The aim of this study was to provide a systematic review to establish the actual contributions of AI reported in OB/GYN discipline journals. Methods The PubMed database was searched for citations indexed with “artificial intelligence” and at least one of the following medical subject heading (MeSH) terms between January 1, 2000, and April 30, 2020: “obstetrics”; “gynecology”; “reproductive techniques, assisted”; or “pregnancy.” All publications in OB/GYN core disciplines journals were considered. The selection of journals was based on disciplines defined in Web of Science. The publications were excluded if no AI process was used in the study. Review, editorial, and commentary articles were also excluded. The study analysis comprised (1) classification of publications into OB/GYN domains, (2) description of AI methods, (3) description of AI algorithms, (4) description of data sets, (5) description of AI contributions, and (6) description of the validation of the AI process. Results The PubMed search retrieved 579 citations and 66 publications met the selection criteria. All OB/GYN subdomains were covered: obstetrics (41%, 27/66), gynecology (3%, 2/66), assisted reproductive medicine (33%, 22/66), early pregnancy (2%, 1/66), and fetal medicine (21%, 14/66). Both machine learning methods (39/66) and knowledge base methods (25/66) were represented. Machine learning used imaging, numerical, and clinical data sets. Knowledge base methods used mostly omics data sets. The actual contributions of AI were method/algorithm development (53%, 35/66), hypothesis generation (42%, 28/66), or software development (3%, 2/66). Validation was performed on one data set (86%, 57/66) and no external validation was reported. We observed a general rising trend in publications related to AI in OB/GYN over the last two decades. Most of these publications (82%, 54/66) remain out of the scope of the usual OB/GYN journals. Conclusions In OB/GYN discipline journals, mostly preliminary work (eg, proof-of-concept algorithm or method) in AI applied to this discipline is reported and clinical validation remains an unmet prerequisite. Improvement driven by new AI research guidelines is expected. However, these guidelines are covering only a part of AI approaches (nonsymbolic) reported in this review; hence, updates need to be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ferdinand Dhombres
- Sorbonne University, Armand Trousseau University hospital, Fetal Medicine department, APHP, Armand Trousseau University hospital, Fetal Medicine department, APHP26 AV du Dr Arnold Netter, Paris, FR.,INSERM, Laboratory in Medical Informatics and Knowledge Engineering in e-Health (LIMICS), Paris, FR
| | - Jules Bonnard
- Sorbonne University, Institute for Intelligent Systems and Robotics (ISIR), Paris, FR
| | - Kévin Bailly
- Sorbonne University, Institute for Intelligent Systems and Robotics (ISIR), Paris, FR
| | - Paul Maurice
- Sorbonne University, Armand Trousseau University hospital, Fetal Medicine department, APHP, Paris, FR
| | - Aris Papageorghiou
- Oxford Maternal & Perinatal Health Institute, Green Templeton College, Oxford, GB
| | - Jean-Marie Jouannic
- Sorbonne University, Armand Trousseau University hospital, Fetal Medicine department, APHP, Paris, FR.,INSERM, Laboratory in Medical Informatics and Knowledge Engineering in e-Health (LIMICS), Paris, FR
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Gong B, Salehi F, Hurrell C, Patlas MN. 2021 Year in Review. Can Assoc Radiol J 2022; 73:443-445. [PMID: 35272532 DOI: 10.1177/08465371221083860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Gong
- Department of Radiology, 8166University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Fateme Salehi
- Department of Radiology, McMaster University, Juravinski Hospital, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Casey Hurrell
- Canadian Association of Radiologists, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Michael N Patlas
- Department of Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Bonekamp D, Schlemmer HP. [Artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology? : Do we need as many radiologists in the future?]. Urologe A 2022; 61:392-399. [PMID: 35277758 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-022-01768-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
We are in the middle of a digital revolution in medicine. This raises the question of whether subjects such as radiology, which is superficially concerned with the interpretation of images, will be particularly changed by this revolution. In particular, it should be discussed whether in the future the completion of initially simpler, then more complex image analysis tasks by computer systems may lead to a reduced need for radiologists. What distinguishes radiology in particular is its key position between advanced technology and medical care. This article discusses that not only radiology but every medical discipline will be affected by innovations due to the digital revolution, and that a redefinition of medical specialties focusing on imaging and visual interpretation makes sense and that the arrival of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology is to be welcomed in the context of ever larger amounts of image data-to at all be able to handle the increasing amount of image data in the future at the current number of radiologists. In this respect, the balance between research and teaching in comparison to patient care is more difficult to maintain in the academic environment. AI can help improve efficiency and balance in the areas mentioned. With regard to specialist training, information technology topics are expected to be integrated into the radiological curriculum. Radiology acts as a pioneer designing the entry of AI into medicine. It is to be expected that by the time radiologists can be substantially replaced by AI, the replacement of human contributions in other medical and non-medical fields will also be well advanced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Bonekamp
- Abteilung für Radiologie (E010), Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
| | - H-P Schlemmer
- Abteilung für Radiologie (E010), Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Giansanti D, Di Basilio F. The Artificial Intelligence in Digital Radiology: Part 1: The Challenges, Acceptance and Consensus. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:509. [PMID: 35326987 PMCID: PMC8949694 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10030509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Revised: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence is having important developments in the world of digital radiology also thanks to the boost given to the research sector by the COVID-19 pandemic. In the last two years, there was an important development of studies focused on both challenges and acceptance and consensus in the field of Artificial Intelligence. The challenges and acceptance and consensus are two strategic aspects in the development and integration of technologies in the health domain. The study conducted two narrative reviews by means of two parallel points of view to take stock both on the ongoing challenges and on initiatives conducted to face the acceptance and consensus in this area. The methodology of the review was based on: (I) search of PubMed and Scopus and (II) an eligibility assessment, using parameters with 5 levels of score. The results have: (a) highlighted and categorized the important challenges in place. (b) Illustrated the different types of studies conducted through original questionnaires. The study suggests for future research based on questionnaires a better calibration and inclusion of the challenges in place together with validation and administration paths at an international level.
Collapse
|
48
|
Challenges of Radiology education in the era of artificial intelligence. RADIOLOGIA 2022; 64:54-59. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rxeng.2020.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Accepted: 10/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
49
|
Huber FA, Guggenberger R. AI MSK clinical applications: spine imaging. Skeletal Radiol 2022; 51:279-291. [PMID: 34263344 PMCID: PMC8692301 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-021-03862-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Revised: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Recent investigations have focused on the clinical application of artificial intelligence (AI) for tasks specifically addressing the musculoskeletal imaging routine. Several AI applications have been dedicated to optimizing the radiology value chain in spine imaging, independent from modality or specific application. This review aims to summarize the status quo and future perspective regarding utilization of AI for spine imaging. First, the basics of AI concepts are clarified. Second, the different tasks and use cases for AI applications in spine imaging are discussed and illustrated by examples. Finally, the authors of this review present their personal perception of AI in daily imaging and discuss future chances and challenges that come along with AI-based solutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian A. Huber
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Roman Guggenberger
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Murdoch B, Jandura A, Caulfield T. Privacy Considerations in the Canadian Regulation of Commercially-Operated Healthcare Artificial Intelligence. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS 2022. [DOI: 10.7202/1094696ar] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
|