Impact of thrombus aspiration use and direct stenting on final myocardial blush score in patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Manual Aspiration Thrombectomy in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Clinical Experience

Multiple clinical studies have failed to establish the role of routine use of thrombectomy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. There is a paucity of data on the impact of thrombectomy in unselected STEMI patients outside clinical trials. We sought to evaluate the clinical variables and outcomes associated with the performance of thrombectomy in STEMI patients. We retrospectively examined the clinical outcomes in all STEMI patients who underwent successful percutaneous intervention (PCI) at our center. Patients were divided into two groups, one with patients who underwent conventional PCI and another with patients who had thrombus aspiration in addition to conventional PCI. We compared the baseline clinical characteristics, laboratory investigations, re-infarction rates, and all-cause mortality. Total 477 consecutive STEMI patients were identified. Overall, 29% (139) of the patients underwent conventional PCI and 71% (338) of the patients were treated with aspiration thrombectomy and PCI. In addition to the presence of thrombus, patients with nonanterior infarction, and patients with hemodynamic instability requiring intra-aortic balloon pump support were more likely to undergo thrombectomy. Thrombectomy was associated with higher enzymatic infarction (creatine kinase: 2,796 [2,575] vs. 1,716 [1,662]; p < 0.0001; CK-MB: 210.6 [156.0] vs. 142.0 [121.9], p < 0.0001). However, thrombectomy was not associated with any difference in 30 day reinfarction rate (3.3 vs. 2.9%, p = 0.83), mortality (5.0 vs. 7.2%, p = 0.35), or composite of death and 30 day reinfarction (7.7 vs. 9.4%, p = 0.55). We observed that STEMI patients with anterior infarction and hemodynamic instability were more likely to undergo thrombectomy during primary PCI.

Immediate vs. delayed stenting in acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

To conduct a meta-analysis of studies comparing immediate versus delayed stenting in populations where primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or early invasive revascularisation was the initial mode of reperfusion.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We identified five non-randomised studies and one randomised trial for a total of 590 patients in studies comparing immediate to delayed stenting in populations where primary PCI or early invasive revascularisation was the initial mode of reperfusion. In non-randomised studies, delayed stenting was associated with a reduction of procedure-related angiographic events (OR=0.13, 95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.03- 0.36). No differences were observed in the rates of major bleeding (OR=0.81, 95% CrI: 0.01-13.42) and major adverse cardiac events (OR=0.40, 95% CrI: 0.09-1.91), between delayed and immediate stenting. In one randomised trial, delayed stenting was associated with a reduction in myocardial infarction during hospitalisation (39% vs. 60%; relative risk [RR]=0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.39-0.80). None of the patients assigned to delayed stenting experienced a major adverse cardiac event in the interval between the initial angiogram and the stenting.

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed stent implantation is associated with better angiographic outcomes. Randomised trials are required to assess whether delayed stenting translates into better long-term cardiac outcomes.