Peri-stent contrast staining, major evaginations and severe malapposition after biolimus-eluting stent implantation: a case report based on coronary optical frequency domain imaging

Comparison of Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Lesions Exhibiting Focal and Segmental Peri-Stent Contrast Staining

Background

Peri‐stent contrast staining (PSS) after metallic drug‐eluting stent deployment is associated with target lesion revascularization and very late stent thrombosis. However, the type of PSS that influences the clinical outcomes is unknown. Therefore, we aimed to reveal which PSS type was influencing clinical outcomes.

Methods and Results

This study included 5580 de novo lesions of 4405 patients who were implanted with a first‐ or second‐generation drug‐eluting stent and who were evaluated using follow‐up angiography within 12 months after stent implantation. We compared the clinical outcomes of patients divided into focal PSS and segmental PSS groups for 6 years after stent implantation. Total PSS was observed in 97 lesions (2.2%), of which 42 and 55 lesions were focal and segmental PSS, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except for intraoperative chronic total occlusion (segmental PSS=47.3% versus focal PSS=11.9%, P=0.0001). The incidence of segmental PSS tended to be higher in patients with a first‐generation drug‐eluting stent (83.6% versus 16.4%, P=0.05). The cumulative incidence of stent thrombosis in the 6 years of segmental PSS group was significantly higher than that of the focal PSS group (13.9% versus 0%, P=0.04). The cumulative incidence of overall target lesion revascularization for restenosis, excluding target lesion revascularization procedures for stent thrombosis, was significantly higher in the segmental PSS group (38.0% versus 0%, P=0.01).

Conclusions

The incidence of segmental PSS tended to be higher in patients with a first‐generation drug‐eluting stent and appeared to be significantly associated with target lesion revascularization and stent thrombosis.

Risk Factors and Clinical Impacts of Peri-Stent Contrast Staining After Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation

BACKGROUND

Peri-stent contrast staining (PSS) after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation is associated with target lesion revascularization (TLR) and very late stent thrombosis. However, the risk factors and clinical sequelae of PSS after second-generation DES implantation remain unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study comprised 2,090 patients with 2,883 lesions treated with second-generation DES from April 2009 to February 2013. Angiographic findings and clinical outcomes were compared between PSS and non-PSS groups. Follow-up angiography was available for 2,411 lesions. PSS was observed in 23 lesions: 4 in biolimus-eluting stents, 4 in zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES), and 15 in everolimus-eluting stents (EES). Right coronary artery lesions, chronic total occlusion (CTO), and lesions with severe angulation (>90°) were more frequent in the PSS group compared with the non-PSS group. Lesions were longer and the cumulative TLR incidence at 3 years was higher in the PSS group than those in the non-PSS group (27.9 mm vs. 19.4 mm, P < 0.0001; 27.4% vs. 8.6%, P = 0.0002). There was no significant difference in stent thrombosis between the two groups. Multivariable analysis identified CTO [odds ratio (OR) 3.75, 95%CI 1.52-8.88, P = 0.005] as an independent predictor of PSS.

CONCLUSIONS

PSS after second-generation DES implantation was associated with an increased risk of subsequent TLR. CTO was the independent predictor of PSS.