ST elevation myocardial infarction in patients with anomalous left main coronary artery: Case series and review of the literature

Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization in Patients With Single Coronary Artery

INTRODUCTION

Single coronary artery (SCA) is a rare congenital coronary anomaly. Its incidence in various angiographic series is from 0.024% to 0.066%. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of coronary artery disease (CAD) in these patients is technically challenging.

METHODS

We retrospective analyzed the cardiac catheterization procedures of last 15 years and found 12 cases of SCA (incidence 0.084%). To determine the course of anomalous coronaries, angiographic "dot and eye" method and computed tomography (CT) were used. The course of the SCA was classified as per the modified Lipton criteria. PCI was performed as per the standard protocol for a significant epicardial coronary artery stenosis.

RESULTS

Out of total 12 patients of SCA, 9 patients had PCI of significant CAD. The mean age of 9 PCI patients was 63.8 ± 8.2 years (5 males, 4 females). The origin of the SCA was from the right sinus of Valsalva in 6 cases and from left sinus of Valsalva in 3 cases. Eleven successful PCI procedures were performed, which included PCI of left main, coronary bifurcation lesion, chronic total occlusion, and multi-vessel disease. Four patients had intravascular imaging and 3 patients had rotablation of calcified lesions.

CONCLUSION

PCI of SCA is technically challenging, which requires considerable expertise and experience. An appropriate selection of hardware along with technical expertise can make the procedure simpler with optimal end results.

Trends and predictors of coronary revascularization in patients with coronary artery anomalies and acute myocardial infarction: a nationwide analysis of 8131 patients

OBJECTIVE

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is rarely associated with coronary artery anomalies (CAA). This confluence makes it difficult to identify and treat the culprit lesion with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Our objective was to evaluate trends and predictors of revascularization in patients with CAA and AMI using a large national database.

METHODS

We included adult patients with CAA presenting as ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and undergoing coronary angiography from Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2000 to 2011, using ICD-9 diagnosis code of 746.85 for CAA. Chi-square test for trend was used to compare revascularization rates over time. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of revascularization.

RESULTS

There were almost 4.7 million subjects with AMI undergoing coronary angiography from 2000 to 2011. Of these, there were 8131 patients with CAA, including 3425 STEMI and 4706 NSTEMI patients. Mean age of the CAA population was 59 years with 63.6% males. Overall PCI rate was 47.8% and coronary artery bypass grafting rate was 8.8%. In STEMI patients with CAA, PCI rate increased from 49.9% in 2000 to 77.8% in 2011 (P < 0.001). In NSTEMI patients with CAA, PCI rate remained unchanged from 33.3% in 2000 to 37.3% in 2011 (P = 0.34). Revascularization trends in AMI patients with CAA mirrored those in AMI patients without CAA.

CONCLUSION

Despite the technical challenges associated with PCI in CAA, PCI rates in STEMI patients with CAA continue to increase over time. On the contrary, PCI rates continue to remain low in CAA patients with NSTEMI, reflecting overall contemporary NSTEMI treatment trends.