Sex differences in treatment and prognosis of acute coronary syndrome with interventional management

Post-Acute Coronary Syndrome Disparities in Guideline-Directed Lipid Therapy and Insufficient Achievement of Optimal Low-Density Lipoprotein

Lipid-lowering therapies are an established cornerstone of secondary prevention. For patients with clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, guidelines provide a class I recommendation for high-intensity statins. Furthermore, patients with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) levels >70 mg/100 ml are considered at a higher risk for recurrent cardiovascular events. Previous trends in guideline-directed lipid therapy (GDLT) for secondary prevention have noted insufficiencies. In this study, we aimed to explore GDLT-prescribing patterns and assess subsequent effects on outcomes through LDL-c reduction. We used a cross-sectional study across a large, multisite university hospital system. Electronic medical records were queried for all admitted patients diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome. Data were collected for age, gender, race, and prescribed lipid medication at discharge and 1 year after discharge. Chi-square analysis was performed to assess the statistical differences in prescription rates and achieved optimal LDL-c levels. A total of 3,386 patients were studied with 2/3 of the population identified as non-Hispanic White men. Men were prescribed GDLT at a statistically significant higher rate than women, and subsequently, men were found to achieve optimal LDL-c at a statistically significant higher rate. Interestingly, Black and Hispanic patients were prescribed GDLT at the highest rates; however, these patients achieved optimal LDL-c levels at the lowest rates (significance only met for Black patients). East Indian patients achieved optimal LDL-c levels at the lowest rate among all racial groups, despite having average GDLT prescription rates. White and Asian groups achieved optimal LDL-c levels at the highest rates, with average GDLT prescription rates. Among all patients, those who achieved LDL-c levels <70 mg/100 ml were prescribed GDLT at a statistically higher rate than those who did not achieve LDL- c levels <70 mg/100 ml. We found distinct disparities in both GDLT-prescribing rates and achievement of optimal LDL-c levels for patients presenting with clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Our findings may help delineate patients who should be considered at a higher risk for recurrent major adverse cardiovascular events. We also found an interesting paradox between GDLT-prescribing patterns and achievement of optimal LDL-c levels among certain racial groups. However, among all patients who achieved LDL-c levels <70 mg/100 ml, the majority were prescribed GDLT, supporting the efficacy of statins. Prescribing GDLT does not reliably achieve optimal LDL-c levels across genders and racial groups for unclear reasons. Our study adds to the growing body of knowledge assessing the complexity in secondary cardiovascular prevention.

Sex-Related Differences in Platelet Aggregation: A Literature Review Supplemented with Local Data from a Group of Generally Healthy Individuals

The process of platelet aggregation is often influenced by several factors including sex and age. A literature review confirmed the existence of sex-related differences in platelet aggregation. Although 68 out of 78 papers found such differences, there are still some controversies regarding these differences, which can be due to multiple factors (age, trigger, concomitant disease, sample handling, etc.). These outcomes are discussed in line with novel results obtained from a local study, in which blood samples from a total of 53 overall healthy women and men with ages ranging from 20 to 66 years were collected. Aggregation was induced with seven different triggers (ristocetin, thrombin receptor activating peptide 6 [TRAP-6], arachidonic acid [AA], platelet-activating factor 16 [PAF-16], ADP, collagen, or thromboxane A₂ analog U-46619) ex vivo. In addition, three FDA-approved antiplatelet drugs (vorapaxar, ticagrelor, or acetylsalicylic acid [ASA]) were also tested. In general, women had higher aggregation responses to some agonists (ADP, TRAP), as well as lower benefit from inhibitors (ASA, vorapaxar). The aggregatory responses to AA and TRAP decreased with age in both sexes, while responses to ADP, U-46619, and PAF were affected by age only in women. In conclusion, more studies are needed to decipher the biological importance of sex-related differences in platelet aggregation in part to enable personalized antiplatelet treatment.

Sex differences in time trends in acute coronary syndrome management and in 12-month lethality: Data from the French MONICA registries

BACKGROUND

Sex differences in clinical presentation, patient care and fatal outcomes after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have been reported. However, recent improvements in the care and treatment of ACSs have not been assessed with regard to possible sex differences.

AIM

To assess sex differences in trends between 2006 and 2016 in the characteristics of ACSs, their management, and the associated mortality.

METHODS

We assessed all men and women (aged 35-74) covered by the MONICA registries in north, east and south-west France and having been hospitalized for an incident (first) ACS during a 12-month period in 2006 or a 6-month period in 2016. We analyzed the patients' clinical, biochemical, electrocardiographic and care-related data, and their vital status 28 days and 12 months after the ACS.

RESULTS

In 2006, women were older (<0.0001) and had more atypical symptoms than men (p < 0.01). These differences were no longer statistically significant in 2016. Medical care improved in both men and women. However, revascularization treatment, prescriptions of platelet aggregation inhibitors, statins, and functional rehabilitation were still more frequently provided to men than to women (p < 0.01) in 2016, independently of confounders. The 28-day or 12-month case fatality was not different between men and women in both 2006 and 2016.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study evidenced an improvement over time in the management of ACS. However, although there were no longer sex differences in the patients' age and clinical presentation, women with ACS were still less likely than men to receive revascularization and pharmacological treatments in 2016.

Sex Differences in Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Global Perspective

Despite increasing evidence and improvements in the care of acute coronary syndromes (ACS), sex disparities in presentation, comorbidities, access to care and invasive therapies remain, even in the most developed countries. Much of the currently available data are derived from more developed regions of the world, particularly Europe and the Americas. In contrast, in more resource-constrained settings, especially in Sub-Saharan Africa and some parts of Asia, more data are needed to identify the prevalence of sex disparities in ACS, as well as factors responsible for these disparities, particularly cultural, socioeconomic, educational and psychosocial. This review summarizes the available evidence of sex differences in ACS, including risk factors, pathophysiology and biases in care from a global perspective, with a focus on each of the six different World Health Organization (WHO) regions of the world. Regional trends and disparities, gaps in evidence and solutions to mitigate these disparities are also discussed.