1
|
Mahendran S, Thiagalingam A, Hillis G, Halliwell R, Pleass HC, Chow CK. Cardiovascular risk management in the peri-operative setting. Med J Aust 2023. [PMID: 37302136 DOI: 10.5694/mja2.51988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Peri-operative cardiovascular events occur in up to 3% of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Accurate cardiovascular risk assessment is important in the peri-operative setting, as it allows informed and shared decisions regarding the appropriateness of proceeding with surgery, guides surgical and anaesthetic approaches, and may influence the use of preventive medications and post-operative cardiac monitoring. Quantitative risk assessment may also inform a reconsideration of choosing a more limited lower risk type of surgery, or conservative management. Pre-operative cardiovascular risk assessment starts with clinical assessment and should include an estimate of functional capacity. Specialised cardiac investigations are rarely indicated specifically to assess pre-operative cardiovascular risk. The decision regarding cardiac investigations is influenced by the nature, extent and urgency of surgery. The strategy of performing pre-operative revascularisation to improve post-operative outcomes is not evidence-based and recent international guidelines recommend against this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Henry Cc Pleass
- Institute of Academic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW
| | - Clara K Chow
- Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW
- University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Eptifibatide, an Older Therapeutic Peptide with New Indications: From Clinical Pharmacology to Everyday Clinical Practice. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24065446. [PMID: 36982519 PMCID: PMC10049647 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24065446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Therapeutic peptides are oligomers or short polymers of amino acids used for various medical purposes. Peptide-based treatments have evolved considerably due to new technologies, stimulating new research interests. They have been shown to be beneficial in a variety of therapeutic applications, notably in the treatment of cardiovascular disorders such as acute coronary syndrome (ACS). ACS is characterized by coronary artery wall damage and consequent formation of an intraluminal thrombus obstructing one or more coronary arteries, leading to unstable angina, non-ST elevated myocardial infarction, and ST-elevated myocardial infarction. One of the promising peptide drugs in the treatment of these pathologies is eptifibatide, a synthetic heptapeptide derived from rattlesnake venom. Eptifibatide is a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor that blocks different pathways in platelet activation and aggregation. In this narrative review, we summarized the current evidence on the mechanism of action, clinical pharmacology, and applications of eptifibatide in cardiology. Additionally, we illustrated its possible broader usage with new indications, including ischemic stroke, carotid stenting, intracranial aneurysm stenting, and septic shock. Further research is, however, required to fully evaluate the role of eptifibatide in these pathologies, independently and in comparison to other medications.
Collapse
|
3
|
Douketis JD, Spyropoulos AC, Murad MH, Arcelus JI, Dager WE, Dunn AS, Fargo RA, Levy JH, Samama CM, Shah SH, Sherwood MW, Tafur AJ, Tang LV, Moores LK. Perioperative Management of Antithrombotic Therapy: An American College of Chest Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline. Chest 2022; 162:e207-e243. [PMID: 35964704 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.07.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Revised: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The American College of Chest Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline on the Perioperative Management of Antithrombotic Therapy addresses 43 Patients-Interventions-Comparators-Outcomes (PICO) questions related to the perioperative management of patients who are receiving long-term oral anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy and require an elective surgery/procedure. This guideline is separated into four broad categories, encompassing the management of patients who are receiving: (1) a vitamin K antagonist (VKA), mainly warfarin; (2) if receiving a VKA, the use of perioperative heparin bridging, typically with a low-molecular-weight heparin; (3) a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC); and (4) an antiplatelet drug. METHODS Strong or conditional practice recommendations are generated based on high, moderate, low, and very low certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology for clinical practice guidelines. RESULTS A multidisciplinary panel generated 44 guideline recommendations for the perioperative management of VKAs, heparin bridging, DOACs, and antiplatelet drugs, of which two are strong recommendations: (1) against the use of heparin bridging in patients with atrial fibrillation; and (2) continuation of VKA therapy in patients having a pacemaker or internal cardiac defibrillator implantation. There are separate recommendations on the perioperative management of patients who are undergoing minor procedures, comprising dental, dermatologic, ophthalmologic, pacemaker/internal cardiac defibrillator implantation, and GI (endoscopic) procedures. CONCLUSIONS Substantial new evidence has emerged since the 2012 iteration of these guidelines, especially to inform best practices for the perioperative management of patients who are receiving a VKA and may require heparin bridging, for the perioperative management of patients who are receiving a DOAC, and for patients who are receiving one or more antiplatelet drugs. Despite this new knowledge, uncertainty remains as to best practices for the majority of perioperative management questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James D Douketis
- Department of Medicine, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton and McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| | - Alex C Spyropoulos
- Department of Medicine, Northwell Health at Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY; Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY; Institute of Health Systems Science at The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY
| | - M Hassan Murad
- Mayo Clinic Evidence-Based Practice Center, Rochester, MN
| | - Juan I Arcelus
- Department of Surgery, Facultad de Medicina, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - William E Dager
- Department of Pharmacy, University of California-Davis, Sacramento, CA
| | - Andrew S Dunn
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mt. Sinai Health System, New York, NY
| | - Ramiz A Fargo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA; Department of Internal Medicine, Riverside University Health System Medical Center, Moreno Valley, CA
| | - Jerrold H Levy
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Surgery (Cardiothoracic), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - C Marc Samama
- Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Perioperative Medicine, GHU AP-HP, Centre-Université Paris-Cité-Cochin Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Sahrish H Shah
- Mayo Clinic Evidence-Based Practice Center, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Alfonso J Tafur
- Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL
| | - Liang V Tang
- Institute of Hematology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong, University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Lisa K Moores
- F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Salgia A, Krueger CK, Gillette MA. Perioperative Antiplatelet Bridging With Cangrelor: A Cohort Study and Narrative Review. Ann Pharmacother 2022; 57:544-552. [PMID: 36004393 DOI: 10.1177/10600280221120310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients who received a cardiac stent, practice guidelines recommend dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). However, an urgent procedure may be required necessitating interruption of DAPT. Intravenous cangrelor was previously shown to be an alternative due its short-half life and quick onset/offset. OBJECTIVE To determine the safety and effectiveness of cangrelor bridging for patients undergoing invasive procedures in a veteran population. METHODS Retrospective cohort of patients from Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center and the VA North Texas Health Care Systems who underwent perioperative cangrelor bridging. The primary outcome was the incidence of bleeding using the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria. The secondary outcome was a composite of nonfatal stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), mortality, and unplanned revascularization within 30 days. A narrative review was also performed to summarize cangrelor bridging for noncardiac invasive procedure. RESULTS There were 41 patients that met the eligibility criteria. Patients were predominantly Caucasian (57.5%) men with a median age of 70 years. The median duration on cangrelor bridging was 2.6 days with 11 and 30 patients undergoing cardiac and noncardiac invasive procedures, respectively. Nine patients (22%) had a bleeding event of which 8 were minor. One was severe due to significant iliopsoas hematoma following drain placement. All bleeding events occurred postoperatively except for 2 perioperative events that occurred during orthopedic procedures. Ischemic events up to 30 days occurred in 3 patients (7.3%) which consisted of 1 (2.4%) nonfatal MI requiring revascularization and 2 (4.9%) deaths, 1 of which was sudden cardiac. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE This study suggests that cangrelor bridging may be a reasonable alternative to holding oral P2Y12 inhibitors in patients requiring interruption of antiplatelet therapy for an urgent surgery/invasive procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alok Salgia
- Department of Pharmacy, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chelsea K Krueger
- Department of Pharmacy, VA North Texas Health Care System, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Michael A Gillette
- Department of Pharmacy, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sullivan AE, Nanna MG, Wang TY, Bhatt DL, Angiolillo DJ, Mehran R, Banerjee S, Cantrell S, Jones WS, Rymer JA, Washam JB, Rao SV, Ohman EM. Bridging Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: JACC Review Topic of the Week. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021; 78:1550-1563. [PMID: 34620413 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Revised: 08/06/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Patients undergoing early surgery after coronary stent implantation are at increased risk for mortality from ischemic and hemorrhagic complications. The optimal antiplatelet strategy in patients who cannot discontinue dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) before surgery is unclear. Current guidelines, based on surgical and clinical characteristics, provide risk stratification for bridging therapy with intravenous antiplatelet agents, but management is guided primarily by expert opinion. This review summarizes perioperative risk factors to consider before discontinuing DAPT and reviews the data for intravenous bridging therapies. Published reports have included bridging options such as small molecule glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (eptifibatide or tirofiban) and cangrelor, an intravenous P2Y12 inhibitor. However, optimal management of these complex patients remains unclear in the absence of randomized controlled data, without which an argument can be made both for and against the use of perioperative intravenous bridging therapy after discontinuing oral P2Y12 inhibitors. Multidisciplinary risk assessment remains a critical component of perioperative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander E Sullivan
- Division of Cardiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA. https://twitter.com/aesullivan37
| | - Michael G Nanna
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Tracy Y Wang
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Deepak L Bhatt
- Division of Cardiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Dominick J Angiolillo
- Division of Cardiology, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Roxana Mehran
- Division of Cardiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Subhash Banerjee
- Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Sarah Cantrell
- Duke University Medical Center Library & Archives, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - W Schuyler Jones
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jennifer A Rymer
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Sunil V Rao
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - E Magnus Ohman
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sumin AN. Actual Issues of the Cardiac Complications Risk Assessment and Correction in Non-Cardiac Surgery. RATIONAL PHARMACOTHERAPY IN CARDIOLOGY 2020. [DOI: 10.20996/1819-6446-2020-10-08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Worldwide, more than 200 million non-cardiac surgeries are performed annually, and this number is constantly increasing; cardiac complications are the leading cause of death in such surgeries. So, in a multicenter study conducted in 27 countries, cardiovascular complications were present in 68% of cases of death in the postoperative period. Registers of recent years have shown that the number of such complications remains high, for example, with a dynamic assessment of troponins, perioperative myocardial damage was detected in 13-18% of cases. This review provides a critical analysis of the step-by-step algorithm for assessing cardiac risk of non-cardiac operations considering the emergence of new publications on this topic. The review discusses new data on risk assessment scales, functional state assessment, the use of non-invasive tests, biomarkers, the role of preventive myocardial revascularization in the preoperative period, and drug therapy. The issues of non-cardiac operations after percutaneous coronary intervention, perioperative myocardial damage are considered separately. The review emphasizes the difficulties in obtaining evidence, conducting randomized clinical trials in this section of medicine, which do not allow obtaining unambiguous conclusions in most cases and lead to inconsistencies and ambiguities in the recommendations of various expert groups. This review will help practitioners navigate this issue and help to use the optimal diagnostic and treatment strategy before performing non-cardiac surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. N. Sumin
- Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rossini R, Masiero G, Fruttero C, Passamonti E, Calvaruso E, Cecconi M, Carlucci C, Mojoli M, Guido P, Talanas G, Pierini S, Canova P, De Cesare N, Luceri S, Barzaghi N, Melloni G, Baralis G, Locatelli A, Musumeci G, Angiolillo DJ. Antiplatelet Therapy with Cangrelor in Patients Undergoing Surgery after Coronary Stent Implantation: A Real-World Bridging Protocol Experience. TH OPEN 2020; 4:e437-e445. [PMID: 33376943 PMCID: PMC7758156 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1721504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2019] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective The aim of the study is to describe the real-world use of the P2Y 12 inhibitor cangrelor as a bridging strategy in patients at high thrombotic risk after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and referred to surgery requiring perioperative withdrawal of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Materials and Methods We collected data from nine Italian centers on patients with previous PCI who were still on DAPT and undergoing nondeferrable surgery requiring DAPT discontinuation. A perioperative standardized bridging protocol with cangrelor was used. Results Between December 2017 and April 2019, 24 patients (mean age 72 years; male 79%) were enrolled. All patients were at high thrombotic risk after PCI and required nondeferrable intermediate to high bleeding risk surgery requiring DAPT discontinuation (4.6 ± 1.7 days). Cangrelor infusion was started at a bridging dose (0.75 µg/kg/min) 3 days before planned surgery and was discontinued 6.6 ± 1.5 hours prior to surgical incision. In 55% of patients, cangrelor was resumed at 9 ± 6 hours following surgery for a mean of 39 ± 38 hours. One cardiac death was reported after 3 hours of cangrelor discontinuation prior to surgery. No ischemic outcomes occurred after surgery and up to 30-days follow-up. The mean hemoglobin drop was <2 g/dL; nine patients received blood transfusions consistent with the type of surgery, but no life-threatening or fatal bleeding occurred. Conclusion Perioperative bridging therapy with cangrelor is a feasible approach for stented patients at high thrombotic risk and referred to surgery requiring DAPT discontinuation. Larger studies are warranted to support the safety of this strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Enrico Passamonti
- Ospedale di Cremona, Struttura Complessa di Cardiologia, Cremona, Italy
| | - Elba Calvaruso
- Ospedale di Cremona, Struttura Complessa di Cardiologia, Cremona, Italy
| | | | | | - Marco Mojoli
- Ospedale Santa Maria degli Angeli, Pordenone, Pordenone, Italy
| | - Parodi Guido
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Sassari, Struttura Complessa di Cardiologia Clinica ed Interventistica, Sassari, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Talanas
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Sassari, Struttura Complessa di Cardiologia Clinica ed Interventistica, Sassari, Italy
| | - Simona Pierini
- P.O. BASSINI—ASST Nord Milano, U.O.C. Cardiologia, Milano, Italy
| | - Paolo Canova
- ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Unità di Cardiologia 2, Bergamo, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cao D, Chandiramani R, Capodanno D, Berger JS, Levin MA, Hawn MT, Angiolillo DJ, Mehran R. Non-cardiac surgery in patients with coronary artery disease: risk evaluation and periprocedural management. Nat Rev Cardiol 2020; 18:37-57. [PMID: 32759962 DOI: 10.1038/s41569-020-0410-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Perioperative cardiovascular complications are important causes of morbidity and mortality associated with non-cardiac surgery, particularly in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Although preoperative cardiac risk assessment can facilitate the identification of vulnerable patients and implementation of adequate preventive measures, excessive evaluation might lead to undue resource utilization and surgical delay. Owing to conflicting data, there remains some uncertainty regarding the most beneficial perioperative strategy for patients with CAD. Antithrombotic agents are the cornerstone of secondary prevention of ischaemic events but substantially increase the risk of bleeding. Given that 5-25% of patients undergoing coronary stent implantation require non-cardiac surgery within 2 years, surgery is the most common reason for premature cessation of dual antiplatelet therapy. Perioperative management of antiplatelet therapy, which necessitates concomitant evaluation of the individual thrombotic and bleeding risks related to both clinical and procedural factors, poses a recurring dilemma in clinical practice. Current guidelines do not provide detailed recommendations on this topic, and the optimal approach in these patients is yet to be determined. This Review summarizes the current data guiding preoperative risk stratification as well as periprocedural management of patients with CAD undergoing non-cardiac surgery, including those treated with stents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Cao
- The Zena and Michael A. Weiner Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rishi Chandiramani
- The Zena and Michael A. Weiner Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Davide Capodanno
- Division of Cardiology, C.A.S.T., P.O. "G. Rodolico", Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Jeffrey S Berger
- Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthew A Levin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mary T Hawn
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Dominick J Angiolillo
- Division of Cardiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Roxana Mehran
- The Zena and Michael A. Weiner Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Choxi R, Pillai A, Ahmed S, Jovin IS. Use of Intravenous Cangrelor as Antiplatelet Bridge Therapy in a Patient Undergoing Esophageal Dilation Procedure. CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE 2020; 21:94-95. [PMID: 31932170 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.12.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2019] [Revised: 12/30/2019] [Accepted: 12/31/2019] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Peri-procedural management of dual antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention for esophagogastroduodenoscopy and intervention is not clearly defined. We describe a case of a patient with a drug-eluting stent implanted in the setting of an acute myocardial infarction six weeks earlier who was bridged with cangrelor after interruption of ticagrelor for esophageal balloon dilatation because of dysphagia. The patient tolerated the procedure well and was transitioned back to ticagrelor without any complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ravi Choxi
- Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, VA, United States of America; McGuire Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Richmond, VA, United States of America
| | - Ajay Pillai
- Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, VA, United States of America; McGuire Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Richmond, VA, United States of America
| | - Shafeeq Ahmed
- Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, VA, United States of America; McGuire Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Richmond, VA, United States of America
| | - Ion S Jovin
- Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, VA, United States of America; McGuire Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Richmond, VA, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lipinski MJ. Bridging to Surgery With Intravenous Platelet Inhibitors: Are We Treating the Patient or Ourselves? CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE 2019; 20:733-734. [DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.07.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|