Intravascular Lithotripsy Facilitated Percutaneous Endovascular Intervention of the Aortic Arch: A Single-Center Experience

Interaction of a self-expandable stent with the arterial wall in the presence of hypocellular and calcified plaques

Self-expandable stents manufactured from nitinol alloys are commonly utilized alongside traditional balloon-expandable stents to provide scaffolding to stenosed arteries. However, a significant limitation hampering stent efficacy is restenosis, triggered by neointimal hyperplasia and resulting in the loss of gain in lumen size, post-intervention. In this study, a nonlinear finite element model was developed to simulate stent crimping and expansion and its interaction with the surrounding vessel in the presence of a plaque. The main aim was to determine contact pressures and forces induced at the interface between an artery wall with hypocellular and calcified plaques and an expanded stent. The results demonstrated the drawbacks of plaque calcification, which triggered a sharp contact pressure and radial force surge at the interface as well as a significant rise in von Mises stress within the vessel, potentially leading to rupture and restenosis. A regression line was then established to relate hypocellular and calcified plaques. The adjusted coefficient of determination indicated a good correlation between contact pressures for calcified and hypocellular plaque models. Regarding the directionality of wall properties, contact pressure and force observations were not significantly different between isotropic and anisotropic arteries. Moreover, variations in friction coefficients did not substantially affect the interfacial contact pressures.

Use of intravascular lithotripsy in non-coronary artery lesions

BACKGROUND

Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a novel technique increasingly used for plaque modification and endovascular revascularization in patients with severe calcification and peripheral artery disease. However, much of the available literature on IVL is focused on its use in coronary arteries, with relatively limited data on non-coronary artery use.

AIM

To analyze the safety and efficacy of current IVL use in non-coronary artery lesions, as reported in case reports and case series.

METHODS

We searched EMBASE, PubMed, and Reference Citation Analysis databases for case reports and case series on IVL use in peripheral artery disease. We then extracted variables of interest and calculated the mean and proportions of these variables.

RESULTS

We included 60 patients from 33 case reports/case series. Ninety-eight percent of the cases had IVL usage in only one blood vessel, while four had the IVL used in two vessels (2.0%), resulting in 64 Lesions treated with IVL. The mean age of the patients was 73.7 (SD 10.9). IVL was successfully used in severe iliofemoral artery stenosis (51.6%), severe innominate, subclavian, and carotid artery stenosis (26.7% combined), and severe mesenteric vessel stenosis (9.4%). Additionally, IVL was successfully used in severe renal (7.8%) and aortic artery (4.7%) stenosis. There were complications in 12% of the cases, with dissection being the commonest.

CONCLUSION

IVL has successfully used in plaque modification and endovascular revascularization in severely calcified and challenging lesions in the iliofemoral, carotid, subclavian, aorta, renal, and mesenteric vessels. The most severe but transient complications were with IVL use in the aortic arch and neck arteries.

Intravascular lithotripsy in calcified subclavian and innominate peripheral artery disease: A single centre experience

BACKGROUND

Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a novel tool for the treatment of calcified vascular stenosis. Recently, IVL has been successfully used for modification of calcified plaque in coronary and lower extremity peripheral arteries with promising results. However, experience in subclavian and innominate peripheral arterial disease is limited. This study aims to report our initial experience of IVL use in calcified subclavian and innominate vasculature.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of all the cases of IVL performed in subclavian and innominate arteries at the Miriam Hospital, Providence, between January 2019 and May 2020. Data on the baseline and procedural characteristics were collected. The primary endpoint was procedural success defined as residual stenosis of <20% after stenting. Other endpoints of interest were; 1) procedural complications, including dissections, perforations, abrupt closure, slow or no-reflow, thrombosis, and distal embolization; 2) in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke/transient ischemic attack.

RESULTS

A total of 7 patients with 13 lesions undergoing IVL were included. Of these, 5 (71%) were women, the mean age was 74.6 ± 12.9, and the mean BMI was 25.1 ± 6.7. IVL was successfully delivered to all the target lesions with a mean 252.9 ± 54.4 pulses delivered per patient. Procedural success was achieved in 100% of the treated lesions. No procedure-related complications or in-hospital MACE occurred in any of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In this single-center retrospective analysis, IVL facilitated acute procedural success without any procedural complications in severely calcified stenoses of the subclavian and innominate vasculature. Larger studies with an active comparator and longer follow-up are needed to establish the relative efficacy and safety of IVL use in this vascular bed.

Study on the Correlation Factors of Tumour Prognosis after Intravascular Interventional Therapy

Noninvasive or minimally invasive interventional surgery was selected, and the complications were less and had no significant impact on the quality of life of patients. Tumour patients are often accompanied by cerebrovascular diseases, metabolic diseases, and other basic diseases, which more or less adversely affect the surgical efficacy of tumour. In this paper, endovascular remobilization was used to treat tumour; the basic condition of patients before operation and the interventional operation plan were introduced. Through the analysis of clinical data and prognosis evaluation results of tumour patients receiving intravascular interventional therapy, the patients were divided into good prognosis group and poor prognosis group according to the modified Rankin scale score at discharge. The relationship between gender, age, history of hypertension, tumour width, tumour size, preoperative Hunt-Hess grade, interventional surgery method, and prognosis related to intravascular interventional therapy was explored. The results showed that intravascular interventional therapy for tumour patients can obtain a good prognosis, which provides a reference for the future preoperative assessment of treatment risk and possible prognosis and provides a theoretical basis for the formulation of treatment plan to improve prognosis.