Three-Dimensional Echocardiography for Diagnosis of Transcatheter Prosthetic Aortic Valve Endocarditis

Novel 3D versus traditional transesophageal echocardiography techniques: Defining differences in the diagnosis of infective endocarditis

BACKGROUND

Despite the availability of current antibiotic and surgical treatment options, infective endocarditis (IE) remains associated with a high mortality rate. Even though two-dimensional (2D) transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) is a major criteria in the diagnosis of IE, it is constrained by the single-plane orientation. Since three-dimensional (3D) TOE provides a comprehensive understanding of the cardiac architecture by allowing for a realistic visualization of the underlying structures in 3D space, it has attracted considerable interest in recent years.

AIM

The purpose of this narrative review is to discuss the advantages and pitfalls of 3D TOE in patients with IE, as well as to address emerging photo-realistic 3D techniques that have the potential to enhance the visualization of cardiac structures in this setting.

RESULTS

According to recent research, 3D TOE acquisitions outperform 2D acquisitions in terms of vegetation identification accuracy and embolism risk assessment. By reporting a variety of findings that are missed with 2D TOE, but which are validated by surgical examination, 3D TOE further improves the ability to identify endocarditis complications on both native and prosthetic valves. In addition to conventional 3D TOE, future developments in 3D technology led to the development of transillumination and tissue-transparency rendering, which may improve anatomical understanding and depth perception. Due to the use of both conventional and novel 3D techniques, there are more patients who require surgical intervention, indicating that 3D TOE may have a clinical relevance on the surgical management.

CONCLUSION

3D TOE might fill the gaps left by 2D TOE in the diagnosis of IE.

Diagnostic performance of contemporary transesophageal echocardiography with modern imaging for infective endocarditis

Background

Infective endocarditis (IE) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Following an initial negative transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE), high clinical suspicion warrants repeat examination. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of contemporary TEE imaging for IE.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included patients ≥18 years old undergoing ≥2 TEEs within 6 months, with confirmed diagnosis of IE based on Duke criteria, 70 in 2011 and 172 in 2019, were included. We compared the diagnostic performance of TEE for IE in 2019 versus 2011. The primary endpoint was the sensitivity of initial TEE to detect IE.

Results

Sensitivity of the initial TEE to detect endocarditis was 85.7% versus 95.3%, in 2011 and 2019, respectively (P=0.01). On multivariable analysis, initial TEE more frequently detected IE in 2019, compared to 2011 [odds ratio (OR): 4.06, 95% confidence intervals (CIs): 1.41-11.71, P=0.01]. Improved diagnostic performance was driven by improved detection of prosthetic valve infective endocarditis (PVIE), sensitivity 70.8% in 2011 versus 93.7% (P=0.009) in 2019. In 2019, TEEs more frequently utilized probes with higher frame rates/resolution, than 2011 (P<0.001). Three dimensional (3D) technology was utilized in 97.2% of initial TEEs in 2019, compared to 70.5% in 2011 (P<0.001).

Conclusions

Contemporary TEE was associated with improved diagnostic performance for endocarditis, driven by improved sensitivity for PVIE.