Analyses of (1-chloroethenyl)oxirane headspace and hemoglobin N-valine adducts in erythrocytes indicate selective detoxification of (1-chloroethenyl)oxirane enantiomers

Weighted gene co-expression network analysis of pneumocytes under exposure to a carcinogenic dose of chloroprene

AIMS

Occupational exposure to chloroprene via inhalation may lead to acute toxicity and chronic pulmonary diseases, including lung cancer. Currently, most research is focused on epidemiological studies of chloroprene production workers. The specific molecular mechanism of carcinogenesis by chloroprene in lung tissues still remains obscure, and specific candidate therapeutic targets for lung cancer are lacking. The present study identifies specific gene modules and valuable hubs associated with lung cancer.

MAIN METHODS

We downloaded the dataset GSE40795 from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and divided the dataset into the non-carcinogenic dose chloroprene exposed mice group and the carcinogenic dose chloroprene exposed mice group. With a systemic biological view, we discovered significantly altered gene modules between the two groups and identified hub genes in the carcinogenic dose exposed group using weighted co-expression network analysis (WGCNA).

KEY FINDINGS

A total of 2434 differentially expressed genes were identified. Twelve gene modules with multiple biological activities were related to the carcinogenesis of chloroprene in lung tissue. Seven hub genes that were critical for the carcinogenesis of chloroprene in lung tissue were ultimately identified, including Cftr, Hip1, Tbl1x, Ephx1, Cbr3, Antxr2 and Ccnd2. They were implicated in inflammatory response, cell transformation, gene transcription regulation, phase II detoxification, angiogenesis, cell adhesion, motility and the cell cycle.

SIGNIFICANCE

The seven hub genes may become valuable candidates for risk assessment biomarkers and therapeutic targets in lung cancer.

Micronuclei in bone marrow and liver in relation to hepatic metabolism and antioxidant response due to coexposure to chloroform, dichloromethane, and toluene in the rat model

Genotoxicity in cells may occur in different ways, direct interaction, production of electrophilic metabolites, and secondary genotoxicity via oxidative stress. Chloroform, dichloromethane, and toluene are primarily metabolized in liver by CYP2E1, producing reactive electrophilic metabolites, and may also produce oxidative stress via the uncoupled CYP2E1 catalytic cycle. Additionally, GSTT1 also participates in dichloromethane activation. Despite the oxidative metabolism of these compounds and the production of oxidative adducts, their genotoxicity in the bone marrow micronucleus test is unclear. The objective of this work was to analyze whether the oxidative metabolism induced by the coexposure to these compounds would account for increased micronucleus frequency. We used an approach including the analysis of phase I, phase II, and antioxidant enzymes, oxidative stress biomarkers, and micronuclei in bone marrow (MNPCE) and hepatocytes (MNHEP). Rats were administered different doses of an artificial mixture of CLF/DCM/TOL, under two regimes. After one administration MNPCE frequency increased in correlation with induced GSTT1 activity and no oxidative stress occurred. Conversely, after three-day treatments oxidative stress was observed, without genotoxicity. The effects observed indicate that MNPCE by the coexposure to these VOCs could be increased via inducing the activity of metabolism enzymes.

Toward an "omic" physiopathology of reactive chemicals: thirty years of mass spectrometric study of the protein adducts with endogenous and xenobiotic compounds

Cancer and degenerative diseases are major causes of morbidity and death, derived from the permanent modification of key biopolymers such as DNA and regulatory proteins by usually smaller, reactive molecules, present in the environment or generated from endogenous and xenobiotic components by the body's own biochemical mechanisms (molecular adducts). In particular, protein adducts with organic electrophiles have been studied for more than 30 [see, e.g., Calleman et al., 1978] years essentially for three purposes: (a) as passive monitors of the mean level of individual exposure to specific chemicals, either endogenously present in the human body or to which the subject is exposed through food or environmental contamination; (b) as quantitative indicators of the mean extent of the individual metabolic processing which converts a non-reactive chemical substance into its toxic products able to damage DNA (en route to cancer induction through genotoxic mechanisms) or key proteins (as in the case of several drugs, pesticides or otherwise biologically active substances); (c) to relate the extent of protein modification to that of biological function impairment (such as enzyme inhibition) finally causing the specific health damage. This review describes the role that contemporary mass spectrometry-based approaches employed in the qualitative and quantitative study of protein-electrophile adducts play in the discovery of the (bio)chemical mechanisms of toxic substances and highlights the future directions of research in this field. A particular emphasis is given to the measurement of often high levels of the protein adducts of several industrial and environmental pollutants in unexposed human populations, a phenomenon which highlights the possibility that a number of small organic molecules are generated in the human organism through minor metabolic processes, the imbalance of which may be the cause of "spontaneous" cases of cancer and of other degenerative diseases of still uncharacterized etiology. With all this in mind, it is foreseen that a holistic description of cellular functions will take advantage of new analytical methods based on time-integrated metabolomic measurements of a new biological compartment, the "adductome," aimed at better understanding integrated organism response to environmental and endogenous stressors.

International Symposium on the Evaluation of Butadiene and Chloroprene Health Risks

These proceedings represent nearly all the platform and poster presentations given during the International Symposium on Evaluation of Butadiene and Chloroprene Health Risks, held in Charleston, South Carolina, USA, on September 20-22, 2005. The Symposium was attended by 78 participants representing private industry (37), academia (21), government (11), not-for-profit organizations (5), and consulting (4). The program followed the format of previous symposia on butadiene, chloroprene, and isoprene in London UK (2000) and butadiene and isoprene in Blaine, Washington USA (1995). This format enabled the exchange of significant new scientific results and discussion of future research needs. Isoprene was not evaluated during the 2005 Symposium because of lack of new data. For background information, the reader is referred to the proceedings of the London 2000 meeting for a thorough historical perspective and overview of scientific and regulatory issues concerning butadiene, chloroprene, and isoprene [Chem.-Biol. Interact. (2001) 135-136:1-7]. The Symposium consisted of seven sessions: (1) Introduction and Opening Remarks, (2) Butadiene/styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR)--Process Overview, Exposure and Health Effects/Human Studies; (3) Chloroprene--Process Overview, Exposure and Health Effects/Human Studies; (4) Mode of Action/Key Events; (5) Risk Assessment; (6) Poster Presentations; and (7) Panel Discussion and Future Directions. The Symposium concluded with a discussion by all participants of issues that arose throughout the course of the Symposium. The Proceedings of the Symposium published in this Special Issue are organized according to the Sessions outlined above. The purpose of this foreword is to summarize the presentations and their key findings and recommend future research directions for each chemical.

Toxicology of 1,3-butadiene, chloroprene, and isoprene

The diene monomers, 1,3-butadiene, chloroprene, and isoprene, respectively, differ only in substitution of a hydrogen, a chlorine, or a methyl group at the second of the four unsaturated carbon atoms in these linear molecules. Literature reviewed in the preceding sections indicates that these chemicals have important uses in synthesis of polymers, which offer significant benefits within modern society. Additionally, studies document that these monomers can increase the tumor formation rate in various organs of rats and mice during chronic cancer bioassays. The extent of tumor formation versus animal exposure to these monomers varies significantly across species, as well among strains within species. These studies approach, but do not resolve, important questions of human risk from inhalation exposure. Each of these diene monomers can be activated to electrophilic epoxide metabolites through microsomal oxidation reactions in mammals. These epoxide metabolites are genotoxic through reactions with nucleic acids. Some of these reactions cause mutations and subsequent cancers, as noted in animal experiments. Significant differences exist among the compounds, particularly in the extent of formation of highly mutagenic diepoxide metabolites, when animals are exposed. These metabolites are detoxified through hydrolysis by epoxide hydrolase enzymes and through conjugation with glutathione with the aid of glutathione S-transferase. Different strains and species perform these reactions with varying efficacy. Mice produce these electrophilic epoxides more rapidly and appear to have less adequate detoxification mechanisms than rats or humans. The weight of evidence from many studies suggests that the balance of activation versus detoxification offers explanation of differing sensitivities of animals to these carcinogenic actions. Other aspects, including molecular biology of the many processes that lead through specific mutations to cancer, are yet to be understood. Melnick and Sills (2001) compared the carcinogenic potentials of these three dienes, along with that of ethylene oxide, which also acts through an epoxide intermediate. From the number of tissue sites where experimental animal tumors were detected, butadiene offers greatest potential for carcinogenicity of these dienes. Chloroprene and then isoprene appear to follow in this order. Comparisons among these chemicals based on responses to external exposures are complicated by differences among studies and of species and tissue susceptibilities. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic models offer promise to overcome these impediments to interpretation. Mechanistic studies at the molecular level offer promise for understanding the relationships among electrophilic metabolites and vital genetic components. Significant improvements in minimization of industrial worker exposures to carcinogenic chemicals have been accomplished after realization that vinyl chloride caused hepatic angiosarcoma in polymer production workers (Creech and Johnson 1974; Falk et al. 1974). Efforts continue to minimize disease, particularly cancer, from exposures to chemicals such as these dienes. Industry has responded to significant challenges that affect the health of workers through efforts that minimize plant exposures and by sponsorship of research, including animal and epidemiological studies. Governmental agencies provide oversight and have developed facilities that accomplish studies of continuing scientific excellence. These entities grapple with differences in perspective, objectives, and interpretation as synthesis of knowledge develops through mutual work. A major challenge remains, however, in assessment of significance of environmental human exposures to these dienes. Such exposure levels are orders of magnitude less than exposures studied in experimental or epidemiological settings, but exposures may persist much longer and may involve unknown but potentially significant sensitivities in the general population. New paradigms likely will be needed for toxicological evaluation of these human exposures, which are ongoing but as yet are not interpreted.

Chloroprene: overview of studies under consideration for the development of an IRIS assessment

Beta-chloroprene (C(4)H(5)Cl, chloroprene, 2-chloro-1,3-butadiene, CASRN 126-99-8) is a volatile, flammable liquid monomer utilized primarily in the manufacture of neoprene (polychloroprene) elastomer used in belts, hoses, gloves, wire coatings, and tubing. Absorption into the body occurs primarily via the respiratory system and may occur via the gastrointestinal tract or the skin. Once absorbed, chloroprene is widely distributed as evidenced by effects in several target organs including nose and lung, liver, and skin. Chloroprene metabolism is believed to include cytochrome P450 oxidation to a monoepoxide, hydrolysis by epoxide hydrolases, and glutathione conjugation. Similar to 1,3-butadiene, the epoxide is considered to be the toxic moiety, and species differences in metabolic capacity may influence the severity of effects as well as what tissues are affected. EPA has not previously developed an assessment of chloroprene's potential for human health effects. Existing human epidemiological studies offer little data on noncancer effects, and the associations of exposure with increased cancer (liver and lung) mortality reported are inconclusive. Recent epidemiological studies (submitted for publication) could offer information that may impact chloroprene's health assessment. Multiple-site tumors have been reported in rats and mice exposed to chloroprene by inhalation; nevertheless, there are marked differences in strain sensitivities (i.e., tumors in F344 rats versus no tumors in Wistar rats). Recently developed physiologically based toxicokinetic models may allow for the resolution of species and tissue differences and sensitivities as well as exposure-dose-response relationships relevant to humans. (This presentation does not necessarily reflect EPA policy.).