System biological investigations of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin targets and their implications in QT interval prolongation

Hydroxychloroquine and the associated risk of arrhythmias

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), which was initially used as an antimalarial drug, is now being used to treat other illnesses, especially rheumatic autoimmune disorders  such as systemic lupus erythematosus, primary Sjögren's syndrome, and rheumatoid arthritis, because it is safe, effective, and cost efficient. This drug has shown high efficacy and has become the first-line treatment for many of these diseases. Although HCQ has many therapeutic effects, it has unfortunately shown some complications, especially with its long-term use. One of these side effects is arrhythmia through prolongation of the QT interval. This narrative literature review focuses on the effects of HCQ on the QT interval in patients with rheumatologic diseases who have been prescribed this drug. In particular, we will focus on the increased risk of arrhythmia when HCQ is administered with other drugs, such as azithromycin and many others, along with drug-drug interactions. In addition, we investigated the safety of this drug in pregnant women.

Structural analysis of hERG channel blockers and the implications for drug design

The repolarizing current (I_kr) produced by the hERG potassium channel forms a major component of the cardiac action potential and blocking this current by small molecule drugs can lead to life-threatening cardiotoxicity. Understanding the mechanisms of drug-mediated hERG inhibition is essential to develop a second generation of safe drugs, with minimal cardiotoxic effects. Although various computational tools and drug design guidelines have been developed to avoid binding of drugs to the hERG pore domain, there are many other aspects that are still open for investigation. This includes the use computational modelling to study the implications of hERG mutations on hERG structure and trafficking, the interactions of hERG with hERG chaperone proteins and with membrane-soluble molecules, the mechanisms of drugs that inhibit hERG trafficking and drugs that rescue hERG mutations. The plethora of available experimental data regarding all these aspects can guide the construction of much needed robust computational structural models to study these mechanisms for the rational design of safe drugs.

Meta-Data Analysis to Explore the Hub of the Hub-Genes That Influence SARS-CoV-2 Infections Highlighting Their Pathogenetic Processes and Drugs Repurposing

The pandemic of SARS-CoV-2 infections is a severe threat to human life and the world economic condition. Although vaccination has reduced the outspread, but still the situation is not under control because of the instability of RNA sequence patterns of SARS-CoV-2, which requires effective drugs. Several studies have suggested that the SARS-CoV-2 infection causing hub differentially expressed genes (Hub-DEGs). However, we observed that there was not any common hub gene (Hub-DEGs) in our analyses. Therefore, it may be difficult to take a common treatment plan against SARS-CoV-2 infections globally. The goal of this study was to examine if more representative Hub-DEGs from published studies by means of hub of Hub-DEGs (hHub-DEGs) and associated potential candidate drugs. In this study, we reviewed 41 articles on transcriptomic data analysis of SARS-CoV-2 and found 370 unique hub genes or studied genes in total. Then, we selected 14 more representative Hub-DEGs (AKT1, APP, CXCL8, EGFR, IL6, INS, JUN, MAPK1, STAT3, TNF, TP53, UBA52, UBC, VEGFA) as hHub-DEGs by their protein-protein interaction analysis. Their associated biological functional processes, transcriptional, and post-transcriptional regulatory factors. Then we detected hHub-DEGs guided top-ranked nine candidate drug agents (Digoxin, Avermectin, Simeprevir, Nelfinavir Mesylate, Proscillaridin, Linifanib, Withaferin, Amuvatinib, Atazanavir) by molecular docking and cross-validation for treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infections. Therefore, the findings of this study could be useful in formulating a common treatment plan against SARS-CoV-2 infections globally.

Microbiota, probiotics and respiratory infections: the three musketeers can tip off potential management of COVID-19

Rapid infectivity of SARS-CoV2 with recent viral variants is posing a challenge in the development of robust therapeutic strategies. On the other hand, microbiota is debated for its involvement in SARS-CoV2 infection with varied opinions. Although ample data about the role of microbiota and probiotics in respiratory viral infections are available, their role in COVID-19 is limited albeit emerging rapidly. The utilization of probiotics for the management of COVID-19 is still under investigation in many clinical trials. Existing information coupled with recent COVID-19 related studies can suggest various ways to use microbiota modulation and probiotics for managing this pandemic. Present article indicates the role of microbiota modulation and probiotics in respiratory infections. In addition, scattered evidence was gathered to understand the potential of microbiota and probiotics in the management of SARS-CoV2. Gut-airway microbiota connection is already apparent in respiratory tract viral infections, including SARS-CoV2. Though few clinical trials are evaluating microbiota and probiotics for COVID-19 management, the safety evaluation must be given more serious consideration because of the possibility of opportunistic infections among COVID-19 patients. Nevertheless, the information about microbiota modulation using probiotics and prebiotics can be helpful to manage this outbreak and this review presents different aspects of this idea.